Adper Prompt L-Pop Research Articles

Effect of EDTA and Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment on the Bonding Effectiveness of Self-Etch Adhesives to Ground Enamel

This in vitro study determined the effect of enamel pretreatment with phosphoric acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on the bond strength of strong, intermediary strong, and mild self-etching adhesive systems. Ninety sound human premolars were used. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to flat ground enamel surfaces using three self-etching adhesive systems: strong Adper Prompt L-Pop (pH=0.9-1.0), intermediary strong AdheSE (pH=1.6-1.7), and mild Frog (pH=2). Adhesive systems were applied either according to manufacturer instructions (control) or after pretreatment with either phosphoric acid or EDTA (n=10). After 24 hours, shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Ultra-morphological characterization of the surface topography and resin/enamel interfaces as well as representative fractured enamel specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Neither surface pretreatment statistically increased the mean shear bond strength values of either the strong or the intermediary strong self-etching adhesive systems. However, phosphoric acid pretreatment significantly increased the mean shear bond strength values of the mild self-etching adhesive system. SEM examination of enamel surface topography showed that phosphoric acid pretreatment deepened the same etching pattern of the strong and intermediary strong adhesive systems but converted the irregular etching pattern of the mild self-etching adhesive system to a regular etching pattern. SEM examination of the resin/enamel interface revealed that deepening of the etching pattern was consistent with increase in the length of resin tags. EDTA pretreatment had a negligible effect on ultra-morphological features. Use of phosphoric acid pretreatment can be beneficial with mild self-etching adhesive systems for bonding to enamel.

Efficacy of microtensile versus microshear bond testing for evaluation of bond strength of dental adhesive systems to enamel

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the microtensile bond test (μTBS) and the microshear bond test (μSBS) in ranking four dental adhesives according to bond strength to enamel and identify the modes of failure involved. Materials and methods Forty-four caries-free human molars were randomly assigned to one of two bond strength testing methods: 20 teeth were used for μTBS test and 24 teeth for μSBS test. Flat enamel surfaces were created by wet grinding. Four adhesive systems were applied to the ground enamel surfaces; a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond, SEB), two all-in-one self-etch (Adper Prompt L-Pop, APL; Hybrid Bond, HB) and a two-step etch-and-rinse (Adper Single Bond, ASB). Resin composite (Z100) was applied over the adhesive. The μTBS and μSBS were determined after 24 h of storage in water at 37 °C. The mode of failure was determined by light microscope and SEM. Data was analyzed with ANOVA, Tukey's and Chi-square tests. Results μTBS test ranked the adhesives as follows: SEB = ASB = APL > HB, while μSBS test ranked the adhesives as follows: ASB > SEB = APL > HB. The highest percentage failure mode with μTBS testing was cohesive in enamel or at the DEJ: SEB (95%), APL (65%) and ASB (65%). As for HB, adhesive failure (95%) was the common finding. The predominant failure mode in case of the μSBS was adhesive (APL 50%, SEB 58.3%, ASB 75% and HB 91.7%). Significance Ranking appears to be test-dependant and μSBS test appears to be more accurate in differentiating among the stronger adhesives.

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Etch Adhesive System in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions

All-in one adhesive systems reduce the number of steps and thus possible soures of error that may occur in clinical wage of adhesives, it is hoped that they also have good clinical performance. To evaluate the clinical performance of a self-etch adhesive system--Adper's Prompt L-Pop in non-carious cervical lesions over a six months period. One hundred and eighty-one (181) restorations were placed by one operator for 35 patients. The self-etch adhesive was applied to the cavity and composite was used to restore the teeth. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 3 months and 6 months according to the modified Ryge's criteria. Restorations were monitored for postoperative sensitivity, retention rates and marginal adaptation. At six months, 160 restorations were available for evaluation in 32 patients. The retention rate was 96.3%, postoperative sensitivity was scored Alpha for all restorations (no sensitivity), and 3.7% restorations had marginal adaptation failure at six months. The adhesive system tested exhibited very good clinical performance at the end of six months.

The effects of three different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of composite resin bonding agents

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of three desensitizing agents on the shear bond strengths of four different bonding agents used to bond composite resin to dentin. A total of 160 extracted human molars were sectioned parallel to the occlusal plane under water cooling, polished and randomly divided into 4 groups of 40. Each group was treated with a different desensitizing agent (Tooth Mousse, Ultra-EZ, Cervitec Plus), except for an untreated control group. Each group was then randomly subdivided into 4 groups of 10, and a different dentin bonding agent (XP Bond, AdheSE, Adper Prompt L-pop, GBond) was applied to each group in order to bond the specimens to a resin composite (Gradia Direct) built up using a plastic apparatus. A Universal Testing Machine was used to measure the shear bond strength of each specimen. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. With the exception of the Control/AdheSE and Ultra-EZ/XP Bond groups, no statistically significant differences were found in the shear bond strength values of the groups tested. These findings suggest that the use of different desensitizing agents does not affect the shear bond strength of various adhesive systems used to bond resin composite to dentin.

An All-in-One Adhesive Does Not Etch beyond Hybrid Layers

Continuous etching of aggressive all-in-one adhesives occurs in wet dentin tubules after polymerization of the adhesives. This study challenged the hypothesis that unpolymerized acidic monomers from an aggressive all-in-one self-etching adhesive continue to etch beyond dentin hybrid layers. Dentin surfaces bonded with Adper Prompt L-Pop were sectioned into 0.3-mm-thick slabs. Some of the slabs were stored in water (pH 6.8) or glycine buffer (pH 11.1) for six weeks and then examined by CLSM, SEM, and TEM. The rest were immersed in a biomimetic remineralizing medium for up to 4 months. Morphologic analysis indicated no difference in demineralization thickness between the two 6-week storage groups. However, increased permeability and loss of integrity occurred along the base of the hybrid layers in the glycine buffer group, but not in the water storage group. These findings were also confirmed by the results of biomimetic remineralization along the bases of those hybrid layers.

Degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity of etch-and-rinse versus self-etching adhesives.

This study was designed to compare the self-etching with the etch-and-rinse adhesives regarding the degree of conversion and antimicrobial activity against cariogenic bacteria. The materials used were AdheSE (two-step self-etching), Adper Prompt L-Pop (self-etching, single-step) and Excite (etch-and-rinse) adhesives. The degree of conversion was measured using Fourier Transformation Infrared Spectroscopy. The absorbance peaks of infrared rays by the aliphatic C=C was detected at 1632 to 1637cm-1 and the aromatic C=C peak at 1610 to 1500 cm-1.The antimicrobial activity was evaluated using the microorganisms Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus salivarius, and Actinomyces odontolyticus, with a disk diffusion method. Chlorhexidine digluconate solution 0.2% was used as a positive control. Zones of inhibited bacterial growth were observed and measured. AdheSE showed the highest degree of conversion, followed by Excite, while Adper Prompt L-Pop had the lowest values. A significant difference in the degree of conversion was found between Excite and Adper Prompt L-Pop as well as AdheSE and Adper Prompt L-Pop. On the other hand, there was no significant difference between Excite and AdheSE. Adper Prompt L-Pop showed an antimicrobial effect against Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces odontolyticus while it was unable to inhibit the growth of Lactobacillus salivarius. AdheSE could inhibit the growth of Streptococcus mutans only. Excite did not produce inhibition zones to the tested microorganisms. Adper Prompt L-Pop showed the worst degree of conversion. AdheSE and Excite had the highest degree of conversion. Appreciable antimicrobial activity was noted with self-etching adhesives, while the etch-and-rinse demonstrated no antimicrobial action.

Bond strength of adhesives to dentin contaminated with smoker’s saliva

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of contamination with smoker's and non-smoker's saliva on the bond strength of resin composite to superficial dentin using different adhesive systems. The interfacial structure between the resin and dentin was evaluated for each treatment using environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Freshly extracted human molars were ground with 600-grit SiC paper to expose the superficial dentin. Adhesives [One-Up-Bond-F-Plus (OUFP) and Adper-Prompt-L-Pop (APLP)] and resin composite (TPHSpectrum) were bonded to the dentin (n = 8/group, 180 total specimens) under five surface conditions: control (adhesive applied following manufacturers' instructions); saliva, then 5-s air dry, then adhesive; adhesive, saliva, 5-s air dry; adhesive, saliva, 5-s water rinse, 5-s air dry (ASW group); and adhesive, saliva, 5-s water rinse, 5-s air dry, reapply adhesive (ASWA group). After storage in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, the specimens were debonded under tension at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. ESEM photomicrographs of the dentin/adhesive interfaces were taken. Mean bond strength ranged from 8.1 to 24.1 MPa. Fisher's protected least significant difference (P = 0.05) intervals for critical adhesive, saliva, and surface condition differences were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.1 MPa, respectively. There were no significant differences in bond strength to dentin between contamination by smoker's and nonsmoker's saliva, but bond strengths were significantly different between adhesive systems, with OUFP twice as strong as APLP under almost all conditions. After adhesive application and contamination with either smoker's or nonsmoker's saliva followed by washing and reapplication of the adhesive (ASWA group), the bond strength of both adhesive systems was the same as that of the control group.

Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self‐etching adhesives

This in vitro study was performed to compare the microtensile bond strengths (MTBS) of current self-etching adhesives to dentin and to evaluate the effects of artificial aging [(thermocycling (TC) and/or mechanic loading (ML)] on MTBS and on nanoleakage of self-etching adhesives. Two-step (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, Clearfil SE Bond, Optibond Self-Etch) and one-step (Hybrid Bond, G-bond, Clearfil Tri-S Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop) self-etching adhesives were tested. Resin composite build-ups were created, and the specimens were subjected to 10(4) TC, 10(5) ML, and 10(4)/10(5) TC/ML. Non-aged specimens served as controls. In the control group, no significant differences were found among the MTBS of the one-step self-etching adhesives and among those of three two-step self-etching adhesives (AdheSE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, and Clearfil SE Bond) (p > 0.05). The MTBS of AdheSE Bond and Clearfil Protect Bond were higher than were those of all one-step self-etching adhesives and than those of Optibond Self-Etch. The MTBS of Clearfil SE Bond was higher than were those of two one-step self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, G-bond) (p < 0.05). Compared with the non-aged controls, TC did not decrease (p > 0.05), but ML and TC/ML significantly decreased the MTBS of the adhesives tested (p < 0.05). Two-step self-etching adhesives tended to fail more cohesively in dentin. Transmission electron microscopy revealed different nanoleakage patterns in the adhesive and hybrid layers of all adhesives examined, and signs of additional silver-filled water channels were more readily detectable after TC/ML.

Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the bond strengths of experimentally fractured human tooth fragments reattached with different adhesive materials and retentive techniques in vitro. Uncomplicated crown fractures were obtained on intact human mandibular permanent incisors by applying perpendicular load to the buccal aspect of tooth crowns. Fractured teeth were randomly assigned into one of three reattachment protocols: (i) Simple reattachment, (ii) Overcontour preparation, and (iii) Internal dentin groove. The first and second groups were divided into 10 subgroups, and the third group into five subgroups (n = 10 per group) with respect to five different adhesive systems (Prime&Bond NT, Adper Single Bond II, Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S(3) Bond, G Bond) used with or without a hybrid resin composite (Z250). Restored teeth were subjected to thermal cycling, and subsequently to the same loading protocol used for fracturing intact teeth. Fracture strength after reattachment procedures was recorded as a percentage of the original fracture strength. Both type of adhesive material and placement of an intermediate layer of resin composite affected the fracture resistance (P < 0.05). The highest fracture strength recovery was obtained using the internal dentin groove technique (54 +/- 0.58%, P < 0.05), followed by the overcontour and simple reattachment protocols (49 +/- 0.58% and 32 +/- 0.82%, respectively, P < 0.05). Ultramorphological evaluation of bonded specimens revealed voids and microcracks along the adhesive interface, which might contribute to postadhesive failure.

Comparison of the shear bond strength of RMGIC to a resin composite using different adhesive systems: An in vitro study

Aim:This study evaluated and compared the role of newer dental adhesives to bond composite resin to the resin modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) liner.Materials and Methods:Thirty-six specimens were prepared on acrylic blocks, with wells prepared in it by drilling holes, to retain the RMGIC. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 12 specimens each. In group I, a thin layer of an adhesive, which was a Total-etch type (Adper Single bond-2), was applied between RMGIC and the composite resin. Ingroup II, a Self-Etch adhesive (Adper prompt-L pop) was applied, and in group III there was no application of any adhesive between RMGIC and the composite resin. After curing all the specimens, the shear bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine.Results:The results were drawn and tabulated using ANOVA-fishers and Tukey’s statistical tests. The maximum shear bond strength values were recorded in group II specimens with the self-etch adhesive (Adper prompt-L pop), showing a mean value of 5.826 when compared to the group I adhesive-Total-etch type with a mean shear bond strength of 4.6380, while group III specimens, where no adhesive was used, showed a minimum mean shear bond strength of 2.8385. There was a great and significant difference between group I and group II (P value 0.003), whereas, both group I and group II showed a vast and significant difference from group III (P value 0 – 001).Conclusion:Hence, this present study concludes that application of Self-Etch adhesive (Adper prompt-L pop) in between RMGIC and composite resin increases the shear bond strength between RMGIC and the resin composites, as compared to the Total-etch type adhesives (Adper Single Bond 2), as well as, without application of the adhesive agent.

Imperfect hybrid layers created by an aggressive one‐step self‐etch adhesive in primary dentin are amendable to biomimetic remineralization in vitro

Degradation of hybrid layers created in primary dentin occurs as early as 6 months in vivo. Biomimetic remineralization utilizes "bottom-up" nanotechnology principles for interfibrillar and intrafibrillar remineralization of collagen matrices. This study examined whether imperfect hybrid layers created in primary dentin can be remineralized. Coronal dentin surfaces were prepared from extracted primary molars and bonded using Adper Prompt L-Pop and a composite. One-millimeter-thick specimen slabs of the resin-dentin interface were immersed in a Portland cement-based remineralization medium that contained two biomimetic analogs to mimic the sequestration and templating functions of dentin noncollagenous proteins. Specimens were retrieved after 1-6 months. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used for evaluating the permeability of hybrid layers to Rhodamine B. Transmission electron microscopy was used to examine the status of remineralization within hybrid layers. Remineralization at different locations of the hybrid layers corresponded with quenching of fluorescence within similar locations of those hybrid layers. Remineralization was predominantly intrafibrillar in nature as interfibrillar spaces were filled with adhesive resin. Biomimetic remineralization of imperfect hybrid layers in primary human dentin is a potential means for preserving bond integrity. The success of the current proof-of-concept, laterally diffusing remineralization protocol warrants development of a clinically applicable biomimetic remineralization delivery system.

Reactions of connective tissue to self-etching/priming dentin bonding systems: oxidative stress, tumor necrosis factor α expression, and tissue reactions

Background/Purpose Few data have been published concerning tissue and systemic responses to resinous dental materials. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the biocompatibility of four kinds of dental self-etching/priming adhesives by measuring tissue responses, local and systemic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) a expression, and oxidative stress parameters. Materials and methods Eighty rats were equally divided into 10 groups. Four dental adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond, iBond, Clearfil Protect Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop) were applied to connective tissue of the rats. In the control group, rats were operated on with no material being applied. Biocompatibilities of the bonding agents were evaluated according to tissue responses, histopathologic and biochemical TNF-a expressions, and levels of malondialdehyde, glutathione, superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activities 1 week and 1 month after initiation of treatment. Results All neutrophil levels and edema formation between the iBond group and the other groups were statistically significant after 1 week. Fibroblast levels in the Clearfil SE Bond group were higher than all other groups. Vascularization levels statistically differed between the Clearfil SE Bond and iBond groups, and between the Adper Prompt L-Pop and control groups. Tissue TNF-a levels statistically differed in all groups other than the control group. At the end of 1 month, the neutrophil level in the iBond group was higher than that in the control group. The differences in fibroblast levels after 1 month were statistically significant between the Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil Protect Bond groups, and between the control and iBond groups. Tissue TNF-a levels were higher in the iBond, Clearfil Protect Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop groups than in the Clearfil SE Bond and control groups. Conclusion There were no statistical differences in levels of serum TNF-a and oxidative stress parameters in any groups during the course of the study. The four different adhesive systems exhibited different degrees of local toxicity to the subsurface of the skin of rats, but no systemic toxicity was detected.

Degree of conversion and interfacial nanoleakage expression of three one‐step self‐etch adhesives

Suboptimally polymerized monomers may be responsible for the reduced material properties of simplified adhesives and their inherent bonded interface instability. This study was performed to determine the degree of cure within the hybrid layers produced by three one-step self-etch adhesives in situ using Raman microspectroscopy and to investigate nanoleakage expression. Dentin disks were bonded with AdheSE One, Adper Prompt L-Pop, or iBond. Composite layers of 2-mm thickness were built up in bulk on the polymerized adhesive surfaces and then the adhesive-dentin interfaces were exposed to a micro-Raman beam. Adhesive penetration was calculated using the relative intensities of bands associated with mineral and adhesive, and the degree of conversion (DC) was evaluated. Interfacial nanoleakage expression was evaluated on the same specimens. The DC values for the tested adhesives were found to increase in the following order: AdheSE One (48 +/- 16%) < Adper Prompt L-Pop (83 +/- 2%) = iBond (90 +/- 6%; P < 0.05). AdheSE One showed greater nanoleakage expression than iBond or Adper Prompt L-Pop. Increased nanoleakage expression was associated with AdheSE One that showed the lowest DC. This suggests that a low DC may affect the quality and the long-term stability of the adhesive interface owing to the elution of unreacted monomers forming a porous and highly permeable hybrid layer.

The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives

Sealing ability and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing have not been assessed and established. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of immediate dentin sealing (IDS) using total-etch or self-etch dentin adhesives on microleakage and microtensile bond strength. Twenty recently extracted molars were selected, and standard MOD inlay preparations were made with the gingival margins located below the cemento-enamel junction. The teeth were assigned to 4 experimental groups (n=5) according to the indirect composite restoration cementation technique used: (1) immediate dentin sealing with Adper Single Bond (TEBI); (2) conventional adhesive cementation technique using Adper Single Bond (TEAI); (3) immediate dentin sealing using Adper Prompt L-Pop (SEBI); or (4) conventional adhesive cementation technique using Adper Prompt L-Pop (SEAI). The restored teeth were thermal cycled 1,000 times between 5 degrees and 55 degrees C and then immersed in 50% ammoniacal silver nitrate. Three specimens per restoration were evaluated for microleakage, according to predefined scores, and submitted to Friedman's test (alpha=.05). The specimens were then sectioned to obtain 0.8 +/-0.2-mm-thick sticks (with n ranging from 32 to 57 specimens) and submitted to microtensile bond strength (muTBS) testing. The obtained data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA test (alpha=.05). None of the experimental groups demonstrated complete elimination of marginal microleakage. There were significant differences in microleakage of the tested adhesives (P>.001). IDS microleakage scores were similar to those obtained using the conventional cementation technique (CCT) for both adhesives. The highest mean bond strengths were obtained with TEBI (51.1 MPa), whereas SEAI showed the lowest mean bond strengths (1.7 MPa). IDS resulted in significantly higher bond strengths than CCT (P<.001). Total-etch and self-etch adhesives have a significant effect on IDS. IDS resulted in high bond strengths for both adhesives; however, the microleakage was similar to that obtained with CCT. (J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:1-9).

Phosphoric acid esters cannot replace polyvinylphosphonic acid as phosphoprotein analogs in biomimetic remineralization of resin-bonded dentin

Polyvinylphosphonic acid (PVPA), a biomimetic analog of phosphoproteins, is crucial for recruiting polyacrylic acid (PAA)-stabilized amorphous calcium phosphate nanoprecursors during biomimetic remineralization of dentin collagen matrices. This study tested the null hypothesis that phosphoric acid esters of methacrylates in dentin adhesives cannot replace PVPA during bimimetic remineralization of resin–dentin interfaces. Human dentin specimens were bonded with: (I) XP Bond, an etch-and-rinse adhesive using moist bonding; (II) XP Bond using dry bonding; (III) Adper Prompt L-Pop, a self-etching adhesive. The control medium contained only set Portland cement and a simulated body fluid (SBF) without any biomimetic analog. Two experimental Portland cement/SBF remineralization media were evaluated: the first contained PAA as the sole biomimetic analog, the second contained PAA and PVPA as dual biomimetic analogs. No remineralization of the resin–dentin interfaces could be identified from specimens immersed in the control medium. After 2–4 months in the first experimental medium, specimens exhibited either no remineralization or large crystal formation within hybrid layers. Only specimens immersed in the second remineralization medium produced nanocrystals that accounted for intrafibrillar remineralization within hybrid layers. The null hypothesis could not be rejected; phosphoric acid esters in dentin adhesives cannot replace PVPA during biomimetic remineralization of adhesive-bonded dentin.

Effects of dentine moisture on the permeability of total-etch and one-step self-etch adhesives

Objectives The aim of this study was to compare the technique sensitivity of a one-bottle total-etch adhesive and a self-etch primer adhesive to the moisture condition of the dentine substrate. Methods The methods used were hydraulic conductance, light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Results When the moisture conditions of the dentine surface are modified with respect to the standard, the bonded interfaces obtained with the one-bottle total-etch Adper Scotch Bond 1 XT (SB) and the all-in-one self-etch Adper Prompt L-Pop (AP) are morphologically highly perturbed. But, although this study also showed a significant ( p < 0.01) relationship between increases in permeability of resin-bonded dentine and variations of dentine moisture conditions with SB, a significant relationship was found only for the influence of the over-wet condition with AP. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, the self-etch primer tested gave a greater reduction in dentine permeability than the one-bottle adhesive, while being more tolerant to handling. Although excess water should be avoided with both these systems, air-drying can be an alternative to wet-bonding with the self-etch primers, thus reducing the sensitivity to technique.

Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etching adhesives in posterior restorations.

To evaluate the 2-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives and one etch-and-rinse adhesive (control) in posterior composite restorations. Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled composite resin (Filtek Supreme, 3M ESPE) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Statistical analyses included the McNemar and the Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests (p < 0.05). At 2 years, 91 out of 121 restorations were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. The number of alpha ratings decreased significantly from baseline to 2 years for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For One-Step Plus, only marginal staining was significantly worse at 2 years than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for One-Step Plus at 2 years, but this improvement was already detected at 1 year. When the 2-year evaluation criteria were pooled by pairs of adhesives, One-Step Plus resulted in a significantly greater number of alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than the other three adhesives. On the other hand, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of alfa ratings than any of the other 3 adhesives for color match and marginal staining. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and One-Step Plus resulted in a statistically similar number of alfa ratings for marginal staining and color match. There were no significant differences in any of the evaluation criteria between Clearfil S3 Bond and Adper Prompt L-Pop. Only One-Step Plus, the etch-and-rinse adhesive, resulted in good marginal adaptation at 2 years. One of the self-etching adhesives, iBond, resulted in unacceptable clinical performance.

A study on colour stability of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives

Objectives The purpose of this study was to investigate the color change in two “self-etch” and one “etch and rinse” adhesive under dark/water and photoaging conditions and to evaluate the influence of these changes on the color stability of resin composite restorative systems. Methods The adhesives were: One-Up Bond F (OB/Tokuyama), Adper Prompt L-Pop (PL/3M Espe) and Optibond Solo Plus (OS/Kerr). 10 sample disks of each material were prepared (OB 1, LP 1, OS 1). Additionally, 30 sample discs of TPH Spectrum (Caulk/Dentsply) resin composite were prepared and bonded with the three adhesives tested (OB 2, LP 2, OS 2 groups) to freshly cut dentin discs. 30 days of storage in deionised water (37 ± 1 °C) in dark conditions was followed by exposure of all samples to UV light photoaging. A colorimetric evaluation (CIEL*a*b* system) was performed immediate after sample photopolymization (baseline), at 7 and 30 days of dark/water storage and after the 360 h of UV aging. Color changes (Δ E*) were calculated between baseline and subsequent measurements. The results were analyzed by independent two-way Anova and Sheffe's statistical tests ( a = 0.05). Results All the adhesives evaluated exhibited significant color changes even after early aging time into water. One-Up Bond F presented the highest color alterations under both experimental conditions and Optibond Solo Plus the lowest. The adhesives were proved able to influence the color stability of a resin composite, which is bonded to a dentin substrate. One-Up Bond F induced the strongest effect on color change of the resin composite while no differences were clarified between Adper Prompt L-Pop and Optibond Solo Plus. Conclusion Significant color changes were determined under water and photoaging conditions for the “self-etch” and “etch and rinse” adhesives evaluated and the resin composite combined with these agents.

Comparison of a recently developed nanofiller self-etching primer adhesive with other self-etching primers and conventional acid etching

The purpose of this ex vivo study was to compare the bond strengths and modes of failure of brackets bonded with three self-etching products [Adper Prompt L-Pop (3M Espe), Futurabond NR (Voco) and Transbond Plus (3M Unitek)] and a conventional 38 per cent phosphoric acid-etching system Etch-Rite (Pulpdent Corp.) at two different time points. Ninety-six defect-free premolars were randomly allocated to eight groups (n = 12). The etching procedure was carried out according to the manufacturers' instructions. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were measured after storage in distilled water for 12 and 24 hours. The brackets were debonded using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Multiple comparisons of the SBSs for the different etching types were performed using analysis of variance. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences in adhesive remnant index (CARI) scores among the groups. The differences between SBSs analysed at 12 and 24 hours were not significantly different. Although a significant difference (P < 0.01) was observed with conventional and self-etching primer (SEP) adhesive systems, SEP revealed bond strengths higher than clinically accepted limits (6-8 MPa). SEP systems can achieve successful orthodontic bond strengths. The rate of development of the bond strength must be determined to ensure sufficient maturation of orthodontic adhesives before functional loading.

Morphology of the smear layer after the application of simplified self-etch adhesives on enamel and dentin surfaces created with different preparation methods

Mild self-etching adhesive systems modify and/or incorporate the smear layer into the resin-infiltrated demineralised dentin. Some factors such as type of bur and use of water spray might affect the thickness of the smear layer on substrates, enamel and dentin. Because of this, the present study evaluated the thickness of smear layers created by different finishing procedures, after the application of three simplified self-etching primers (Adper Prompt L-Pop and two experimental formulations) on enamel and dentin. After the application and removal of the primers' resinous component, the specimens were prepared for examination under a scanning electron microscope. Smear layers were thicker on enamel than on dentin, irrespective of the finishing methods used. Therefore, different thicknesses of smear layer on enamel/dentin might be an important factor to consider when evaluating the bonding efficacy of self-etching adhesives to both tooth substrates.