Both large-scale mantle upwellings, comparable to terrestrial hotspots on Earth, and smaller scale mantle upwellings, known as coronae, occur on Venus. Corona-dominated rises have many of the characteristics of large-scale mantle upwellings, or hotspots, such as broad topographic rises greater than 1000 km in diameter and large positive gravity anomalies. Due to the presence of clusters of three to eight coronae, three large volcanic rises (or hotspots) on Venus have been classified as corona-dominated rises (CDRs): Themis, Eastern Eistla, and Central Eistla Regiones. CDRs have been interpreted to result from the break-up of a large-scale plume. Comparison of the topographic morphology for individual coronae at Themis and Eastern Eistla Region to a model of corona evolution indicate that they are in varying stages of evolution. At Eastern Eistla Regio all the coronae have essentially the same topographic morphology, consistent with a late stage of evolution and the presence of a depleted mantle layer at depth. The complex deformation sequences and stratigraphic relationships both between coronae and with respect to the regional plains observed at all three rises indicate a prolonged origin. This observation, as well as the varying stages of evolution, rule out the previously proposed interpretation of corona-dominated rises as a manifestation of the break-up of a large-scale mantle upwelling, which requires essentially simultaneous formation of the coronae. Instead we suggest that other large topographic rises are the manifestation of deep mantle plumes, likely to originate at the core–mantle boundary, and that CDRs are clusters of coronae that originate at a shallower interface, perhaps at an upper–lower mantle boundary. Using top- and bottom-loading flexural models to fit the gravity/topography admittance spectrum for each of the three CDRs yields elastic thickness estimates that are 10–15 km greater for bottom-loading at longer wavelengths than top-loading at shorter wavelengths. Estimates of elastic thickness assuming top-loading are 10, 12, and 22 km and 20, 25, and 35 km from bottom-loading for Eastern Eistla, Central Eistla, and Themis Regiones, respectively. We believe that the bottom-loading elastic thickness estimates are more reliable because using a top-loading model when both types of loading are present yields an unrealistically low elastic thickness estimate. As there is no obvious source of surface loading at either Themis or at Eastern Eistla, we interpret the top-loading admittance signature to be a result of delamination of the lower lithosphere depressing the surface, which is consistent with the observed coronae morphologies.