Administration Of Iodinated Contrast Media Research Articles

Adverse Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media Administered at the Time of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)

Adverse reactions after intravascular administration of iodine contrast media are common and prophylactic regiments consisting of the use of steroids and low osmolality contrast media are highly effective in significantly decreasing the adverse reactions rate. The same type of contrast media are also used for opacification of the biliary tree and the pancreatic duct at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Systemic absorption of contrast media after ERCP routinely occurs. Although the adverse reaction rate appears to be very low the exact incidence remains unknown due to the retrospective nature of all reports. Despite the lack of formal recommendations, numerous prophylactic regiments are routinely used prior to ERCP in patients with history of prior reaction to intravascular contrast media. Moreover, the use of prophylaxis has even expanded to patients with no prior reaction to intravascular contrast media who are somehow perceived to be at increase risk (e.g. shellfish allergy). Recently, the first large scale prospective study reported exceedingly low incidence of adverse reaction to high oslmolality iodine-containing contrast media administered at the time of ERCP done without prophylactic premedication even in patients considered to be at the highest risk (prior severe reaction to intravascular contrast media administration). These data suggest that the use of prophylactic regiments prior to ERCP appears to be unnecessary.

Role of IV Iodinated Contrast Material in 18F-FDG PET/CT of Liver Metastases

The purpose of our study was to investigate the role of IV iodinated contrast material in the evaluation of hepatic metastases at (18)F-FDG PET/CT. We retrospectively identified 39 patients (25 men and 14 women) with suspected isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer who underwent FDG PET/CT. The CT protocol included acquisition of unenhanced and multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images through the liver. At two separate sittings, four readers (two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians) noted and characterized all hepatic lesions in consensus, first based on PET and unenhanced CT images and later based on PET and contrast-enhanced CT images. The nature of detected lesions was established by histopathologic or clinicoradiologic correlation. A total of 178 hepatic lesions were identified, consisting of 137 metastases and 41 benign lesions. Using lesion-based analyses with Obuchowski's method for paired observations, 172 of 178 lesions (97%) were detected at PET/contrast-enhanced CT compared with only 135 of 178 (76%) at PET/unenhanced CT (p = 0.0004). Specifically, 114 of 137 (83%) hepatic metastases were detected on PET/contrast-enhanced CT compared with 92 of 137 (67%) on PET/unenhanced CT (p = 0.012). One hundred thirty-one of 178 lesions (73%) were accurately characterized at PET/contrast-enhanced CT compared with 101 of 178 (57%) at PET/unenhanced CT (p = 0.004). IV iodinated contrast material administration improves the detection of hepatic metastases and the characterization of focal hepatic lesions at PET/CT.

Monitoring non-immediate allergic reactions to iodine contrast media

Non-immediate reactions to iodine contrast media (ICM) affect 2-5% of patients receiving these agents. We studied the immunological mechanisms involved in patients with a confirmed non-immediate reaction, maculopapular exanthema, after administration of ICM. The diagnosis was carried out by skin testing or drug provocation test. The immunological study was performed in sequential peripheral blood mononuclear cells taken from the onset of the reaction by flow cytometry and in skin biopsy by immunohistochemistry, with specific recognition by the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) with different ICM. Flow cytometry showed an increase in the different activation markers [CD69, CD25 and human leucocyte antigen D-related (HLA-DR)] and the skin homing receptor [cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA)] in CD4 lymphocytes, whereas perforin was higher in the CD8 lymphocytes. The skin biopsy showed a perivascular mononuclear infiltrate composed of CD4 lymphocytes, expressing CD25, HLA-DR and CLA, with eosinophils. Intradermal skin tests and the LTT were positive to several ICM, including the culprit agent in four and three patients, respectively, with negative results in all 10 tolerant controls. We showed that a specific immunological mechanism was implicated in patients with non-immediate reactions to ICM. Moreover, the positive results in skin tests and lymphocyte proliferation tests indicated that an important cross-reactivity exists.

Effect of iodinated contrast agents on residual renal function in PD patients

Residual renal function (RRF) is an important predictor of outcome in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Although increasing emphasis has been placed on preserving RRF, the nephrotoxicity associated with contrast medium administration in PD patients remains a controversial issue. In the present prospective study, we evaluated the evolution of RRF 2 weeks after iodinated contrast medium administration (ICMA) in a group of stable PD patients, and compared it with that in a non-treated control group of stable PD subjects. The study was conducted from January 2003 to October 2004. RRF was quantified by the average of 24 h urinary urea and creatinine clearance and peritoneal creatinine clearance (PcrCl) were analyzed, the levels of which were analysed prior to and 2 weeks following ICMA in 36 PD patients and also assessed at the same time points in a group of 36 PD non-ICMA control subjects, matched according to RRF characteristics. Two weeks following ICMA, the values for RRF, daily urine volume and PcrCl were assessed against those at baseline, and the evolution of RRF was compared between the two groups. In the ICMA group, this study was performed with adequate pre-hydration and a minimum dose of contrast medium. Compared with baseline values, RRF, daily urine volume and PcrCl were not found to be significantly different 2 weeks after ICMA (7.0+/-4.3 vs 7.2+/-4.3 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.12; 1324+/-696 vs 1360+/-755 ml/day, P = 0.5; and 41.1+/-9 vs 40.6+/-9 l/week/1.73 m(2), P = 0.6, respectively). Following ICMA, variations in RRF and daily urine volume were found to be comparable with those of the control group (0.1+/-0.5 vs 0.1+/-0.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.9; 36+/-440 vs 40+/-493 ml/day, P = 0.8, respectively). In this study, 2 weeks following ICMA, no accelerated decline in RRF was determined in stable PD patients with adequate pre-hydration, i.e. subjects treated under optimal circumstances compared with the control group.

In which patients should serum creatinine be measured before iodinated contrast medium administration?

Routine measurement of serum creatinine before injection of intravascular iodinated contrast material in all patients would be cumbersome and have an associated cost. There is doubt about whether serum creatinine should be measured routinely in all patients or selectively. The Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology decided to review the literature and draw up guidelines on this important practical issue. A literature search was carried out and summarized in a report. Based on the available information and discussions amongst the members of the Committee, guidelines were produced. The report and guidelines were discussed at the 11th European Symposium on Urogenital Radiology in Santiago de Compostela, Spain. The practice for identifying patients at risk of contrast medium induced nephropathy varies considerably from one institution to another. Patients at risk constitute only a small percentage of all cases referred for contrast enhanced imaging examination. However, it is important to identify them and take the necessary precautions. Recent serum creatinine level should be available in patients with an increased probability of a raised serum creatinine level (renal disease, renal surgery, proteinuria, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, gout, current intake of nephrotoxic drugs). A simple guideline has been produced.