Administration Of Epinephrine Research Articles

Management of anaphylaxis after pre-hospital epinephrine use in children with food-induced anaphylaxis

BackgroundPrevious guidelines recommend prompt epinephrine administration, followed by observation in the emergency department (ED). The need for transfer in all cases of anaphylaxis has recently been challenged. ObjectiveTo evaluate the need for additional ED treatment among children with anaphylaxis who received prehospital epinephrine. MethodsBetween 2011 and 2023, data were collected on symptoms, triggers, comorbidities, and prehospital and in-hospital management from children (<18 years) with food-induced anaphylaxis who received at least 1 dose of prehospital epinephrine presenting at 7 pediatric EDs. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with the use of 2 or more prehospital epinephrine autoinjectors (EAIs), epinephrine use in the ED, and hospital admission. ResultsOf the 1127 children (mean 8.1 ± 5.3 years; 60.6% male sex) with food-induced anaphylaxis who used at least 1 EAI prehospital, the most common trigger was peanuts (25.3%). There were 209 (18.5%) children who received additional epinephrine in the ED, most of whom (88.0%) received 1 dose. A total of 30 (2.7%) patients were admitted to hospital. Among all patients, severe reactions (cardiovascular instability/cyanosis/loss of consciousness) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22; 95% CI 1.12-1.33) and reactions to tree nuts (aOR 1.09; 95% CI 1.03-1.16) were associated with increased odds of in-hospital epinephrine use. Prehospital inhaled β-agonists (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01-1.16) use and severe reactions (aOR 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.22) were associated with the use of 2 or more EAI prehospital. ConclusionA minority of anaphylaxis cases that used prehospital EAIs required additional treatment, supporting that shared decision making about transfer to ED works for most patients.

Comparison of Systemic Exposure Between Epinephrine Delivered via Metered-Dose Inhalation and Intramuscular Injection.

Background: Primatene® MIST, an epinephrine metered-dose inhaler (MDI), has long been questioned by some medical professionals for asthma treatment despite having been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. One of the primary reasons for their concerns stemmed from potential cardiovascular complications following epinephrine administration. However, the majority of documented cardiovascular complications seemed to occur following the injection route of the epinephrine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the systemic exposure of epinephrine delivered through different administration routes and to understand its relationship with cardiovascular effects. Since albuterol inhalers are commonly recommended for asthma, albuterol was also studied as a comparator drug. Method: A randomized, evaluator-blinded, three-arm crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy adult subjects to compare the profiles of systemic exposure for epinephrine delivered by MDI versus epinephrine intramuscular (IM) injection and albuterol MDI. Serially sampled plasma epinephrine and albuterol levels were measured and compared between treatment groups. Safety was assessed by adverse events, serial vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and clinical laboratory tests obtained at each crossover dosing visit. Results: Systemic exogenous drug exposure for inhaled epinephrine MDI (39 pg/mL × hour) was ∼9 times lower than that of epinephrine IM (435 pg/mL × hour) and 122 times lower than that of albuterol MDI (3453 pg/mL × hour) after dose normalization. The Cmax in epinephrine MDI (345 pg/mL) was approximately half of that of epinephrine IM (816 pg/mL) and that of albuterol MDI (681 pg/mL). Plasma drug concentrations for epinephrine MDI dropped rapidly to baseline (∼0.6 hour), while epinephrine IM took ∼8 hours, and albuterol MDI required more than 24 hours. Epinephrine MDI and albuterol MDI resulted in minimal, clinically insignificant changes in vital signs and ECGs, whereas epinephrine IM led to mild transient increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and corrected QT interval. Conclusion: Epinephrine MDI (Primatene MIST) had ∼9 times lower systemic drug exposure (SDE) than that of epinephrine IM and ∼122 times lower than that of albuterol MDI. The lower SDE of inhaled epinephrine also correlated with reassuring safety findings, with no significant cardiovascular adverse effects found, compared with transient effects seen after IM epinephrine. Clinical trial registration number: NCT04207840.

Optimal weight-based epinephrine dosing for patients with a low likelihood of survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Cardiac arrest patients presenting with non-shockable rhythms have a low probability of survival, and epinephrine is one of the few pharmaceutical options for this group. The recommended 1.0mg adult dose is extrapolated from early animal studies and lacks adjustment for patient weight. Although several prior studies have investigated "low-" and "high-" dose epinephrine, none have identified a benefit to either strategy. To identify an optimal weight-based epinephrine dose for return-of-spontaneous-circulation (ROSC) after a single bolus among patients with low likelihood of survival. Included were adult patients who experienced a witnessed, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest prior to EMS arrival. Patients with shockable presenting rhythms or receiving bystander CPR were excluded. The AUROC was used to assess the predictive value of epinephrine dose (mg/kg) for ROSC following a single bolus. From the ROC curve, the optimal threshold dosage (OTD) was determined using the Youden Index. A logistic regression model calculated the adjusted odds ratio of OTD on ROSC. A total of 2,463 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 190 (7.7%) attained ROSC after the first epinephrine administration. The dosage AUROC for ROSC was 0.603 (p < 0.01). As calculated by the Youden index, the OTD was 0.013mg/kg. Patients receiving ≥ OTD were more likely to attain ROSC after a single epinephrine bolus (OR = 2.25,p < 0.001). Among patients with a low likelihood of survival, the optimal dose of epinephrine for attaining ROSC with a single bolus of epinephrine was 0.013mg/kg. These findings should inspire further investigation into optimal dosing strategies for epinephrine.

Does ECG monitoring affect resuscitation for neonates with pulseless electrical activity in the delivery room? A simulated, pilot, crossover randomised trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether ECG monitoring impacts resuscitative steps during simulated neonatal resuscitation in the setting of pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in the delivery room.DesignThis pilot, crossover randomised controlled trial recruited...

The association of intravenous vs. humeral-intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

AimWhile intravenous (IV) vascular access for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitation is standard, humeral-intraosseous (IO) access is commonly used, despite few supporting data. We investigated the association between IV vs. humeral-IO and outcomes. MethodsWe utilized BC Cardiac Arrest Registry data, including adult OHCA where the first-attempted intra-arrest vascular access route performed by advanced life support (ALS)-trained paramedics was IV or humeral-IO. We fit a propensity-score adjusted model with inverse probability treatment weighting to estimate the association between IV vs. humeral-IO routes and favorable neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2) and survival at hospital discharge. We repeated models within subgroups defined by initial cardiac rhythm. ResultsWe included 2,112 cases; the first-attempted route was IV (n = 1,575) or humeral-IO (n = 537). Time intervals from ALS-paramedic on-scene arrival to vascular access (6.6 vs. 6.9 min) and epinephrine administration (9.0 vs. 9.3 min) were similar between IV and IO groups, respectively. Among IV and humeral-IO groups, 98 (6.2%) and 20 (3.7%) had favorable neurological outcomes. Compared to humeral-IO, an IV-first approach was associated with improved hospital-discharge favorable neurological outcomes (AOR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.7) and survival (AOR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0–2.3). Among shockable rhythm cases, an IV-first approach was associated with improved favorable neurological outcomes (AOR 4.2; 95% CI 2.1–8.2), but not among non-shockable rhythm cases (AOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.39–1.4). ConclusionAn IV-first approach, compared to humeral-IO, for intra-arrest resuscitation was associated with an improved odds of favorable neurological outcomes and survival to hospital discharge. This association was seen among an initial shockable rhythm, but not non-shockable rhythm, subgroups.

A rare presentation of bone cement implantation syndrome as hypertensive anaphylaxis: A diagnostic and management dilemma.

Bone cement implantation syndrome characteristically involves acute alterations in the function of respiratory and cardiovascular systems. We present a case report of cement reaction with unusual presentation, that is, hypoxia, hypertension and tachycardia. A 74-year-old hypertensive male on regular medications sustained a slip and fall, presented with a right intertrochanteric neck of femur fracture, now posted for cemented hemiarthroplasty. Intraoperatively, after applying bone cement, the patient developed sweating, dyspnoea, bilateral wheezing and tachypnoea and desaturation of up to 80%-84%. Respiratory symptoms were associated with tachycardia (140-160 bpm) and hypertension (220/110 mm Hg). The surgeon was alerted about the event, the patient was reassured, and respiration was assisted with positive pressure ventilation with supplementation of 100% oxygen. Several mechanisms have been proposed, such as the toxic effect of systemically absorbed methyl methacrylate, exothermic reaction, fat and marrow embolism, high marrow pressure during cementing and anaphylactic reaction. The administration of adrenaline, which can worsen the clinical picture, is the mainstay in managing anaphylaxis. The association of hypertension and tachycardia with bone cement implantation syndrome, previously not reported, can have distinct pathomechanisms and cause a diagnostic and management dilemma.

β-Adrenoceptor Agonists Attenuate Thrombin-Induced Impairment of Human Lung Endothelial Cell Barrier Function and Protect the Lung Vascular Barrier during Resuscitation from Hemorrhagic Shock.

β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) agonists are known to antagonize thrombin-induced impairment (TII) of bovine and ovine lung endothelial barrier function. The effects of adrenoceptor agonists and other vasoactive agents on human lung microvascular endothelial cell (HULEC-5a) barrier function upon thrombin exposure have not been studied. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the in vitro effects of adrenoceptor agonists translate to lung protective effects in vivo. We observed that epinephrine, norepinephrine, and phenylephrine enhanced normal and prevented TII of HULEC-5a barrier function. Arginine vasopressin and angiotensin II were ineffective. α1B-, α2A/B-, and β1/2-ARs were detectable in HULEC-5a by RT-PCR. Propranolol but not doxazosin blocked the effects of all adrenoceptor agonists. Phenylephrine stimulated β2-AR-mediated Gαs activation with 13-fold lower potency than epinephrine. The EC50 to inhibit TII of HULEC-5a barrier function was 1.8 ± 1.9 nM for epinephrine and >100 nM for phenylephrine. After hemorrhagic shock and fluid resuscitation in rats, Evans blue extravasation into the lung increased threefold (p < 0.01 vs. sham). Single low-dose (1.8 μg/kg) epinephrine administration at the beginning of resuscitation had no effects on blood pressure and reduced Evans blue extravasation by 60% (p < 0.05 vs. vehicle). Our findings confirm the effects of β-adrenoceptor agonists in HULEC-5a and suggest that low-dose β-adrenoceptor agonist treatment protects lung vascular barrier function after traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

Adrenaline intravenous therapy persistence grade I severe allergic reaction: A case report and literature review.

At present, there is still insufficient understanding of the progression from persistent allergic reactions to severe reactions. Adrenaline remains the preferred medication for severe allergic reactions, and intramuscular injection of adrenaline can also be considered for patients with grade I reactions that are difficult to alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms. It is worth further discussing whether it is possible to break the conventional intramuscular injection recommended by the guidelines when the effect of intramuscular injection is not ideal for persistent grade I severe allergic reactions. A young male, 20 years of age, was admitted to emergency department because of repeated rash for 3 days and abdominal pain for 6 hours after taking traditional Chinese medicine. After hormone therapy, the rash continued to recur and secondary gastrointestinal symptoms occurred on the 3th day. Adrenaline intramuscular injection was given to temporarily relieve the rash and abdominal pain, but symptoms still persisted. The patient was diagnosed with persistent severe allergic reaction (grade I). Continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose adrenaline under electrocardiographic monitoring, real-time monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure, and routine treatment with methylprednisolone, diphenhydramine, calcium gluconate, and cetirizine. During this period, adrenaline intramuscular injection is temporarily added when abdominal pain symptoms are obvious. The entire treatment process used a total of 6.8 mg of adrenaline. During the entire period of adrenaline intervention, the patient did not experience any new discomfort, and there were no abnormal fluctuations in heart rate, rhythm, or blood pressure. The symptoms of rash and abdominal pain gradually improved. For patients with persistent grade I severe allergic reactions, intravenous administration of low-dose adrenaline under close vital sign monitoring is safe, feasible, and highly effective in preventing biphasic, persistent, or worsening allergic reactions.

Outcomes associated with prehospital epinephrine in adult and pediatric patients with anaphylaxis

BackgroundPrompt epinephrine administration is important to improve outcomes in anaphylaxis. ObjectiveTo assess the impact of prehospital epinephrine on clinical outcomes of hospital admission, biphasic reactions, and emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) in a cohort of ED patients who had anaphylaxis including both children and adults. MethodsWe conducted a single-center prospective and retrospective cohort study of patients who had anaphylaxis from April 2008 to December 2022. Associations between prehospital epinephrine administration with biphasic reactions and ED LOS were assessed with univariable models and the association with ED disposition was assessed with both univariable and multivariable logistic regression. ResultsA total of 1107 patient visits were included for analysis. The median patient age was 29 (IQR: 14-50), 593 (53.6%) patients were of female sex, and 366 (33.1%) were younger than 18 years of age. Patients in the prehospital epinephrine group were also less likely to experience a biphasic reaction (5.4% vs 9.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.92) and had a decreased ED LOS (median 4.0 hours vs 4.7 hours). There was no difference in hospital admission between patients with and without prehospital epinephrine in both the univariable (19.5% vs 15.7%; OR 1.30, 95% CI: 0.94-1.79) and multivariable (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.71-1.64) models. ConclusionPrehospital epinephrine administration reduced the odds of a biphasic reaction and decreased ED LOS but did not reduce hospitalization in this cohort of ED patients who had anaphylaxis. Our findings suggest that timely administration of prehospital epinephrine is associated with improved patient outcomes.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning for anaphylaxis algorithms.

Anaphylaxis is a severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that requires rapid identification and intervention. Current management includes early recognition, prompt administration of epinephrine, and immediate medical attention. However, challenges remain in accurate diagnosis, timely treatment, and personalized care. This article reviews the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in enhancing anaphylaxis management. Artificial intelligence and machine learning can analyze vast datasets to identify patterns and predict anaphylactic episodes, improve diagnostic accuracy through image and biomarker analysis, and personalize treatment plans. Artificial intelligence-powered wearable devices and decision support systems can facilitate real-time monitoring and early intervention. The ethical considerations of artificial intelligence use, including data privacy, transparency, and bias mitigation, are also discussed. Future directions include the development of predictive models, enhanced diagnostic tools, and artificial intelligence-driven educational resources. By leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning, healthcare providers can improve the management of anaphylaxis, ensuring better patient outcomes and advancing personalized medicine.

Efficiency and Safety of Intracoronary Epinephrine Administration in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Refractory Coronary No-Reflow

Studies assessing the treatment of refractory no-reflow in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients are limited to clinical cases and pilot studies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary epinephrine administration in such patients. Ninety consecutive patients with refractory coronary no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were prospectively included after initial failure of conventional treatment. They were randomized into 2 groups: 45 patients in group 1 received epinephrine, and 45 patients in group 2 (control) received conventional treatments alone. Following intracoronary drug administration, the epinephrine group demonstrated significantly higher rates of coronary flow restoration in the infarct-related artery to the level of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 (56% versus 29% (p=0.01)) and resolution of ST-segment elevation >50% post PCI (78% versus 36% (p<0.001)). Additionally, the epinephrine group showed a lower indexed microvascular obstruction (MVO) volume compared to the control group (0.9 (0.3; 3.1)% versus 1.9 (0.6; 7.9)% (p=0.048)). A significant improvement in ejection fraction (EF) was observed in the epinephrine group (p=0.025). Intracoronary epinephrine administration during PCI in STEMI patients with refractory no-reflow is more effective compared to conventional treatments. This approach improves coronary flow in the infarct-related artery, facilitates a faster resolution of ST segment elevation, enhances EF, and reduces MVO volume. Intracoronary epinephrine administration demonstrates a comparable safety profile to conventional treatment strategies in terms of life-threatening arrhythmias occurrence. The study suggests that intracoronary epinephrine administration during PCI could be an effective treatment strategy for STEMI patients with refractory no-reflow.

Early bolus epinephrine administration during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bradycardia with poor perfusion: an ICU-resuscitation study

BackgroundHalf of pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) events have an initial rhythm of non-pulseless bradycardia with poor perfusion. Our study objectives were to leverage granular data from the ICU-RESUScitation (ICU-RESUS) trial to: (1) determine the association of early epinephrine administration with survival outcomes in children receiving CPR for bradycardia with poor perfusion; and (2) describe the incidence and time course of the development of pulselessness.MethodsPrespecified secondary analysis of ICU-RESUS, a multicenter cluster randomized trial of children (< 19 years) receiving CPR in 18 intensive care units in the United States. Index events (October 2016–March 2021) lasting ≥ 2 min with a documented initial rhythm of bradycardia with poor perfusion were included. Associations between early epinephrine (first 2 min of CPR) and outcomes were evaluated with Poisson multivariable regression controlling for a priori pre-arrest characteristics. Among patients with arterial lines, intra-arrest blood pressure waveforms were reviewed to determine presence of a pulse during CPR interruptions. The temporal nature of progression to pulselessness was described and outcomes were compared between patients according to subsequent pulselessness status.ResultsOf 452 eligible subjects, 322 (71%) received early epinephrine. The early epinephrine group had higher pre-arrest severity of illness and vasoactive-inotrope scores. Early epinephrine was not associated with survival to discharge (aRR 0.97, 95%CI 0.82, 1.14) or survival with favorable neurologic outcome (aRR 0.99, 95%CI 0.82, 1.18). Among 186 patients with invasive blood pressure waveforms, 118 (63%) had at least 1 period of pulselessness during the first 10 min of CPR; 86 (46%) by 2 min and 100 (54%) by 3 min. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation was highest after bradycardia with poor perfusion (84%) compared to bradycardia with poor perfusion progressing to pulselessness (43%) and bradycardia with poor perfusion progressing to pulselessness followed by return to bradycardia with poor perfusion (62%) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn this cohort of pediatric CPR events with an initial rhythm of bradycardia with poor perfusion, we failed to identify an association between early bolus epinephrine and outcomes when controlling for illness severity. Most children receiving CPR for bradycardia with poor perfusion developed subsequent pulselessness, 46% within 2 min of CPR onset.

Association of diastolic blood pressure with coronary perfusion pressure during resuscitation in pediatric swine.

Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is suggested as a surrogate for coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We examined the correlation between DBP and CPP and hypothesized that both would be associated with survival in a pediatric swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. We performed a retrospective, secondary analysis of 102 pediatric swine resuscitations. DBP and CPP were recorded every 30 s during resuscitation. Values were compared between survivors and non-survivors. DBP mirrored CPP in survivors and non-survivors throughout resuscitation and both were associated with survival. Improvements in DBP and CPP after the first epinephrine administration were greater in survivors (DBP: 25.1 ± 3.0 vs. 5.4 ± 0.8 mmHg, p < 0.01; CPP: 24.9 ± 3.2 vs. 4.8 ± 0.9 mmHg, p < 0.01). DBP and CPP after epinephrine administration were highly predictive of survival, with an area under the curve of 0.95 (0.89-1.00) for DBP and 0.90 (0.81-0.99) for CPP. The optimal threshold for DBP was 22.5 mmHg, whereas that for CPP was 14.5 mmHg. DBP and CPP were associated with survival throughout resuscitation, and the response of both to the first epinephrine administration was highly predictive of survivalin this model. Clinically, the availability of DBP makes it useful as a target for physiologic feedback during resuscitation. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) mirrored coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) throughout prolonged resuscitation in a pediatric model of asphyxial cardiac arrest. Mean DBP and CPP were significantly greater in survivors than in non-survivors both before and after administration of epinephrine. The response of both DBP and CPP to the first dose of epinephrine was highly predictive of return of spontaneous circulation. Given the clinical availability of DBP, these findings support its use as a surrogate for CPP to guide high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation in this pediatric swine model.

A national survey of medication utilization for cardiac resuscitation in the emergency department: A survey of emergency medicine pharmacists.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Vasoactive medications are used during advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) to shunt oxygenated blood to vital organs and after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to maintain hemodynamic goals. However, limited evidence exists to support vasoactive medication recommendations in such scenarios, and it is unknown how practices vary among emergency departments across the US. A survey questionnaire (15 questions) was electronically distributed to emergency medicine pharmacists (EMPs) in the US through various professional listservs. Demographic information, American Heart Association ACLS algorithm medication use, and use of continuous vasopressor infusions and adjunct medications following ROSC were assessed and are reported descriptively. The survey was distributed to 764 EMPs, with a 23% response rate from a wide geographic distribution and 48% of respondents practicing in academic medical centers. Epinephrine dosing and administration during cardiac arrest were reported by most to be in accordance with ACLS cardiac arrest algorithms. Calcium, magnesium sulfate, and sodium bicarbonate were the most common adjunct intravenous medications given during cardiac arrest. Norepinephrine was the first-choice vasopressor (81%) for post-ROSC hypotension, while epinephrine was preferred less frequently (17%). Antibiotics and sodium bicarbonate were the most frequently administered post-ROSC adjunct medications. This survey of a geographically diverse group of EMPs demonstrated high ACLS algorithm adherence for epinephrine during cardiac arrest with frequent additional administration of nonalgorithm medications. Sodium bicarbonate and calcium were the most frequently administered adjunct medications during cardiac arrest, while sodium bicarbonate and antibiotics were the most frequently used adjunct medications following ROSC. Norepinephrine was the most commonly used vasopressor following ROSC.

The Impact of Intraoperative Hyperlactatemia on Weaning from Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients Undergoing on-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: An Observational Study

Abstract Background: Hyperlactatemia after cardiac surgery is common. However, the association and the implications of hyperlactatemia on the prognosis after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains controversial. This study investigated the associations between early-onset hyperlactatemia and the need for doses of inotropes and vasopressors during weaning from CPB, hemodynamic stability after weaning from CPB, and the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation. Patients and Methods: This prospective cohort study included 300 patients who underwent elective on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and had normal systolic function &gt;55%. Serum lactate levels were measured 1 h before induction, upon initiation of CPB, after removal of aortic cannula and on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients were divided into two groups: patients with lactate levels &lt;4 mmol/L (Group N) and those with lactate levels ≥4 mmol/L (Group H). Results: Patients with hyperlactatemia constituted 20.7% of the study population. The number of patients who required adrenaline and noradrenaline administration upon weaning from CPB, as well as the doses of these drugs, were significantly higher in Group H (P &lt; 0.001). Arterial blood pressure levels after weaning from CPB and upon admission to the ICU were significantly lower in Group H patients (P &lt; 0.001). The duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation was longer in Group H patients (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: Early-onset hyperlactatemia was associated with worse outcomes after CABG surgery. There was difficult weaning from CPB with increased inotrope and vasopressor drug support, early post-operative hemodynamic instability, and a prolonged duration of post-operative mechanical ventilation.

Identifying Subgroups with Differential Responses to Amiodarone among Cardiac Arrest Patients with a Shockable Rhythm at Hospital Arrival using the Machine Learning Approach.

There are few reports of studies on the differential effects of amiodarone among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical heterogeneity of OHCA patients with a shockable rhythm upon hospital arrival and to identify subgroups with differential responses to amiodarone, using a machine learning approach. We used the Japanese nationwide OHCA registry of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine for this study; data from OHCA patients with a shockable rhythm at hospital arrival were included in the analyses. The primary outcome was a favorable neurological outcome at 30 days. We developed a scoring system by the weighting method with logistic likelihood loss to identify patient subgroups showing differential effects of amiodarone from the point of view of the neurological outcome and survival at 30 days. Among the 68,111 cases of OHCA in the registry, the data of 2333 OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm at hospital arrival were analyzed. The developed score identified higher age, longer interval between the call to the emergency medical service and hospital arrival, absence of a "witness", no defibrillation prior to hospital arrival, hypothermia at hospital arrival, and pre-hospital epinephrine administration as variables that were significantly associated with a beneficial effect of amiodarone. Based on the results of the developed scoring system, 47% (1107/2333) of the patients were considered to greatly benefit from amiodarone administration, whereas 53% (1226/2333) of patients were considered to not benefit from amiodarone administration. The effect of amiodarone on the neurological outcome at 30 days varied significantly among the subgroups identified by the developed score ( : 1.07 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-1.13], p = 0.005). We successfully developed a model that could discriminate between OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm at hospital arrival who would benefit or not benefit from the administration of amiodarone in terms of the neurological outcome at 30 days. There was clinical heterogeneity among OHCA patients with a shockable rhythm in terms of their response to amiodarone.

A potentially lifesaving error: unintentional high-dose adrenaline administration in anaphylaxis-induced cardiac arrest; a case report

BackgroundCardiopulmonary resuscitation is a crucial skill for emergency medical services. As high-risk-low-frequency events pose an immense mental load to providers, concepts of crew resource management, non-technical skills and the science of human errors are intended to prepare healthcare providers for high-pressure situations. However, medical errors occur, and organizations and institutions face the challenge of providing a blame-free error culture to achieve continuous improvement by avoiding similar errors in the future. In this case, we report a critical medical error during an anaphylaxis-associated cardiac arrest, its handling and the unexpected yet favourable outcome for the patient.Case presentationDuring an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to chemotherapy-induced anaphylaxis, a patient received a 10-fold dose of epinephrine due to shortcomings in communication and standardization via a central venous port catheter. The patient converted from a non-shockable rhythm into a pulseless ventricular tachycardia and subsequently into ventricular fibrillation. The patient was cardioverted and defibrillated and had a return of spontaneous circulation with profound hypotension only 6 min after the administration of 10 mg epinephrine. The patient survived without any residues or neurological impairment.ConclusionsThis case demonstrates the potential deleterious effects of shortcomings in communication and deviation from standard protocols, especially in emergencies. Here, precise instructions, closed-loop communication and unambiguous labelling of syringes would probably have avoided the epinephrine overdose central to this case. Interestingly, this serious error may have saved the patient’s life, as it led to the development of a shockable rhythm. Furthermore, as the patient was still in profound hypotension after administering 10 mg of epinephrine, this high dose might have counteracted the severe vasoplegic state in anaphylaxis-associated cardiac arrest. Lastly, as the patient was receiving care for advanced malignancy, the likelihood of termination of resuscitation in the initial non-shockable cardiac arrest was significant and possibly averted by the medication error.

Epidemiology and Triggers of Severe Perioperative Anaphylaxis: An 8-Year Single-Center Study

ObjectiveTo determine the features, rescue measures, outcomes, re-allergic reactions, and independent risk factors associated with severe anaphylaxis during surgery. DesignInstances of severe perioperative anaphylaxis were identified through perioperative electronic records, adverse event reporting records, and surveys of anesthesiologists. Confirmed cases were randomly matched 4:1 with control cases on the same operation day. Patient risk factors, surgery type, anesthetic technique, and perioperative medications, fluids, and blood transfusions were given in instances of severe perioperative anaphylaxis were compared with control cases. SettingA tertiary hospital in China. PatientsAll patients undergoing surgery and anesthesia in the operating room from January 2014 to February 2022. MeasurementsIncidence and the independent risk factors for severe perioperative anaphylaxis. Main results97 patients experienced severe perioperative allergic responses during the 266,033 surgeries performed, with the incidence rate of 3.6 per 10,000. 3 of 97 anaphylaxis patients experienced a severe allergic reaction again during the second surgery. The nested case-control study revealed that the independent triggers during surgery were allergy history (odds ratio 5.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-11.68; P<0.001), cisatracurium use (odds ratio 5.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-20.70; P<0.001), hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 use (odds ratio 5.36; 95% confidence interval, 2.99-9.60; P=0.025), and allogeneic plasma (odds ratio 11.02; 95% confidence interval, 3.78-35.95; P<0.001). ConclusionsPerioperative severe anaphylaxis is a rare but life-threatening complication. Previous allergic history, cisatracurium, hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, and allogeneic plasma may be the independent triggers. Early diagnosis of anaphylaxis and the timely administration of epinephrine are critical to allergic treatment. Avoiding exposure to allergens is effective for preventing severe allergic responses and the efficacy of glucocorticoids and antihistamines is controversial.

Causes and clinical symptoms of anaphylactic reactions in children: implementation into clinical practice of the first Pediatric Moscow Anaphylaxis Registry in the Russian Federation

BACKGROUND: For a long time in the Russian Federation, there was a problem of the lack of registry of anaphylaxis, as the most important tool for recording and monitoring this group of patients. Since 2022, the first Pediatric Moscow Anaphylaxis Registry has started working at the Morozov Children's Hospital. AIM: Objectification and analysis of data from the Pediatric Moscow Anaphylaxis Registry to determine the frequency, causes and characteristics of anaphylaxis clinical symptoms among children of the Moscow region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The statistical analysis of the questionnaire data of the patient-oriented questionnaire of 69 children aged 0 to 18 years, who were prospectively included in the Register during emergency hospitalization due to anaphylaxis, was carried out. RESULTS: The incidence of anaphylaxis among children hospitalized with acute allergic reactions from May 2022 to September 2023 was 5.8%. A higher percentage of anaphylaxis episodes (38%) were observed among adolescents aged 13–18 years, three patients developed anaphylaxis in the first year of life (minimum age 1 month). Boys (70%) prevailed among patients with anaphylaxis under the age of 13, and girls (56%) prevailed among adolescents aged 13–18 (p=0.042). In 75%, anaphylaxis developed at home. For patients of all age groups, food anaphylaxis was dominant (75–91%). Tree nuts were the most common suspected trigger of food anaphylaxis ― 35% of reactions, and confectionery products in 17% of cases. With anaphylaxis, 56% of children experienced symptoms from four or more organ systems, the most common symptoms were from the skin/mucous (94%), respiratory organs (78%) and laryngeal symptoms (64%). At the stage of emergency medical care, the frequency of diagnosis of anaphylaxis was 22%, and the administration of epinephrine was 54%. The frequency of epinephrine use among children under 3 years of age was lower compared to adolescents aged 13–18 years (25% vs 76%, p=0.003) CONCLUSION: The data from the work of the first Pediatric Moscow Anaphylaxis Registry in the Russian Federation demonstrate a high incidence of anaphylaxis among patients with acute allergic reactions. More than 1/3 of anaphylactic reactions occur in adolescents aged 13–18 years, while anaphylaxis occurs even in the first month of life. Anaphylaxis most often develops at home, which dictates the special need for careful training of patients in the rules of elimination of the trigger. The dominant cause of anaphylaxis in children in the Russian Federation, regardless of age, are food allergens, tree nuts induce anaphylaxis in more than 1/3 of cases. The frequency of diagnosis of anaphylaxis at the stage of emergency medical care does not exceed 22%, administration of epinephrine ― 54%, minimal use of epinephrine is observed among children under 3 years of age.

Liver electrical activity upon epinephrine action

The electrical potential of the liver is an integrative indicator the activity of the cells in this organ. Here we tried to elucidate a link between liver functional state and its electrical activity. For that, electrical potential of the liver, the content of bile acid and blood glucose concentration were measured in control conditions and after intravenous epinephrine administration. Epinephrine at dose 0.2 µg/kg body weight caused short-term increase in blood glucose concentration and a decrease in hydroxylation ratio of bile acids. The administration also resulted in an increase in power spectral density (PSD) of liver electric potential in a frequency range of 1.6-2.5 Hz. In addition, a trend to increasing in PSD at 0.6-1.5 and 2.6-10 Hz ranges and decreasing in conjugation ratio of bile acids were shown. Correlation between liver electrical activity and blood glucose concentration observed in control conditions vanished upon epinephrine administration. In contrast, epinephrine administration potentiated correlation between liver electrical activity and content of bile acids. Thus, we conclude that the liver electrical activity could reflect its secretory processes.