In their letter to the editor, Sheehy and colleagues [1Sheehy A.M. Coursin D.B. Keegan M.T. Risks of tight glycemic control during adult cardiac surgery (letter).Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88: 1384-1385Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar] express their concern about hypoglycemia that occurs during tight glycemic control (TGC). They also draw our attention to the fact that large amounts of insulin administered intraoperatively may induce postcardiopulmonary bypass hypoglycemia. Finally, they note the importance of the methodology used for glucose measurement. We agree with the authors that adopting a tight glucose range is a cause of concern and, therefore, have made the focus of our guidelines the importance of avoiding glucose levels exceeding 180 mg/dL without strict guidance on a set goal range [2Lazar H.L. McDonnell M. Chipkin S.R. et al.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: blood glucose management during adult cardiac surgery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87: 663-669Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (326) Google Scholar]. Our practice at the Boston Medical Center is to maintain blood glucose levels between 120 and 180 mg/dL during cardiac operations and in the postoperative period in the intensive care unit (ICU). Using this regimen, we have had a low incidence of hypoglycemia (< 80 mg/dL) and no complications related to this event. We also agree with the authors that the administration of large amounts of insulin intraoperatively, especially in patients who have had no preoperative history of diabetes, can result in severe hypoglycemia in the ICU. The key to avoiding this problem is frequent and judicious monitoring of serum glucose. In Section VI of the guidelines, “Intraoperative Control Recommendations,” we specifically mentioned, “patients receiving IV infusions of insulin should have their blood glucose monitored every 30 to 60 minutes. More frequent monitoring, as often as every 15 minutes, should be made during periods of rapidly fluctuating sensitivity, such as during the administration of cardioplegia and systemic cooling and rewarming.” Furthermore, we caution that “patients with no history of diabetes prior to surgery may exhibit transient elevation of blood glucose >180 mg/dl during cardiopulmonary bypass. These patients may have insulin resistance and should be treated with a single or intermittent dose of IV insulin to maintain glucose <180 mg/dl. Caution should be exercised in initiating a continuous IV insulin drip in these patients, because insulin requirements may decrease rapidly in the immediate postoperative period resulting in serious hypoglycemia.” In the study of Gandhi and colleagues [3Gandhi G.Y. Nuttall G.A. Abel M.D. et al.Intensive intraoperative insulin therapy versus conventional glucose management during cardiac surgery: a randomized trial.Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 233-243Crossref PubMed Scopus (481) Google Scholar], only 20% of patients had diabetes mellitus. The increased number of strokes seen in their study was unrelated to hypoglycemia because the frequency of hypoglycemia was low and not associated with any clinical event. It is also important to note that it is as yet unclear how, or if, hypoglycemia due to insulin therapy affects morbidity or mortality. Hypoglycemia in critically ill patients may be more reflective of widespread organ dysfunction and not insulin therapy [4Kosiborod M. Inzucchi S. Goyal A. et al.Relationship between spontaneous iatrogenic hypoglycemia and mortality in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.JAMA. 2009; 301: 1556-1564Crossref PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar]. Patients receiving TGC during cardiac operations receive this protocol for short periods, and their blood glucose levels are more frequently checked. This contrasts with the medical ICU, where TGC protocols are used in patients requiring long-term care in whom glucose monitoring is less frequent. Finally, although we have noted in our own practice fluctuations in glucose levels due to changes in temperature, cardiac index, and the need for inotropic support, glucose values obtained from arterial, venous, or subcutaneous sources appear to vary little and have had no effect on clinical outcomes. In summary, we agree with the authors that more moderate control is a more judicious approach, but that the potential side effects of hypoglycemia are negated by more frequent glucose monitoring, which is a key component of all surgical TGC protocols. Risks of Tight Glycemic Control During Adult Cardiac SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 88Issue 4PreviewThe recent guidelines of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series on glucose control deserve cautionary comment [1]. Consideration of the adverse events reported by Gandhi and colleagues [2] (STS guideline reference 17), when tight glucose control (TGC) was maintained in cardiac surgical patients intraoperatively seems merited. The incidence and risks of hypoglycemia in TGC protocols in other critically ill adult patients should also be highlighted. Full-Text PDF