Adjuvant Trials Research Articles

Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio: A Prognostic Indicator of Limb Survival in CLI Patients

Aims and Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the admission neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the risk of amputation in critical limb ischemia patients who could not get surgical or radiological (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) revascularization. Methods: A total of 150 patients who presented with CLI to our hospital between June 2017 and June 2018 and who could not have radiological or surgical revascularization are included in the study. Critical limb ischemia patients are those with is defined with ischemic rest pain and/or skin ulceration/gangrene in accordance with current guidelines reflecting patients with Fontaine class 3 and 4. This is a comparative study, 75 with CLI and rest pain and 75 without rest pain, so the NLR was significant in the rest pain group substantiated with the p-value thus proving a a vascular endpoint. An optimal cut-off value for the continuous NLR was calculated by applying a receiver operating curve analysis to discriminate between CLI and non-CLI. In our study occurrence of CLI significantly increased with an increase in NLR. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant and the CI was 95%. Analyses were performed using SPSS software. Results: Using an NLR cutoff of ≥3.2, the area under the receiver–operating characteristic curve was 0.71 (95% CI 0.54-0.78). Overall, there were a total of 9 (0.06%) deaths and 135(90%) amputations. The amputations were above the ankle in 103 (77%) and below the ankle in 32 (23%). Conclusion: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is an independent predictive factor for amputation in critical limb ischemia patients. An increased NLR is significantly associated with patients at high risk for CLI and other vascular endpoints. Stratification of patients with CLI according to admission NLR should be considered in the limb survival analyses of future adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials to validate these findings.

Multigene signatures for early breast cancer in clinical practice: A report of the Lombardy genomic assays for breast cancer working group.

The increasing understanding of breast cancer biology has provided the basis for the development of multigene signatures aimed to improve the capability of clinicians to assess patients' prognostication and risk stratification. Incorporating these tools in clinical practice has profoundly impacted on the decision-making process for the adjuvant therapy of patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer and the results from prospective adjuvant trials have strengthened the clinical utility of multigene signatures in this setting. In July 2019, Lombardy was the first Region in Italy to reimburse genomic testing for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer. Three years later, a group of investigators from six referral Cancer Centers in Lombardy convened to debate the use of multigene signatures in clinical practice and share their own experience with the tests after reimbursement. Here, we reviewed relevant data on the role of multigene signatures in tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer and discussed about the optimal use of these assays in current clinical practice. As the treatment landscape of early breast cancer evolves and novel questions about the possible additional applications of multigene assays arise, we also provide our viewpoint on the potential implementation of the assays in the evolving scenario ER+/HER2- early breast cancer treatment.

External validation and improvement of the scoring system for predicting the prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional therapy.

Currently, locoregional therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and ablation, play an important role in the treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, an easy-to-use scoring system that predicts recurrence to guide individualized management of HCC with varying risks of recurrence remains an unmet need. A total of 483 eligible HCC patients treated by TACE combined with ablation from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, were included in the temporal external validation cohort and then used to explore possibilities for refinement of the original scoring system. We investigated the prognostic value of baseline variables on recurrence-free survival (RFS) using a Cox model and developed the easily applicable YA score. The performances of the original scoring system and YA score were assessed according to discrimination (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] and Harrell's concordance index [C-statistic]), calibration (calibration curves), and clinical utility [decision curve analysis (DCA) curves]. Finally, improvement in the ability to predict in the different scoring systems was assessed using the Net Reclassification Index (NRI). The YA score was lastly compared with other prognostic scores. During the median follow-up period of 35.6 months, 292 patients experienced recurrence. In the validation cohort, the original scoring system exhibited high discrimination (C-statistic: 0.695) and calibration for predicting the prognosis in HCC. To improve the prediction performance, the independent predictors of RFS, including gender, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (DCP), tumor number, tumor size, albumin-to-prealbumin ratio (APR), and fibrinogen, were incorporated into the YA score, an improved score. Compared to the original scoring system, the YA score has better discrimination (c-statistic: 0.712VS0.695), with outstanding calibration and the clinical net benefit, both in the training and validation cohorts. Moreover, the YA score accurately stratified patients with HCC into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups of recurrence and mortality and outperformed other prognostic scores. YA score is associated with recurrence and survival in early- and middle-stage HCC patients receiving local treatment. Such score would be valuable in guiding the monitoring of follow-up and the design of adjuvant treatment trials, providing highly informative data for clinical management decisions.

Abstract PL2: Plenary Lecture 2: Premenopausal ER+ Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

Abstract Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal ER+breast cancer had a relatively challenging initial pathway. The earliest trials testing adjuvant ovarian ablation in premenopausal breast cancer were hampered by the lack of ability to test for the relevant target, namely the estrogen receptor (ER). Therefore, trials testing adjuvant ovarian ablation and subsequently ovarian suppression with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) were diluted by the inclusion of women with estrogen receptor negative tumors. The subsequent demonstration of the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy, initially with the CMF regimen, diverted some attention away from adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women, notwithstanding the fact that CMF, initially given for 12 months, resulted in permanent ovarian function suppression in many premenopausal women. Use of adjuvant CMF made it even more challenging to discern the added value of ovarian ablation or suppression. Oral adjuvant endocrine therapy with the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen became recommended for postmenopausal women, subsequently refined to only those with ER+ breast cancer, but the value of tamoxifen in premenopausal women was initially considered uncertain. Eventually, 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen became a standard recommendation for premenopausal ER+ early breast cancer, although it took some time for evidence to emerge on the value of adding tamoxifen in women who received chemotherapy. The value of extending adjuvant endocrine therapy beyond 5 years was subsequently studied. More recent randomized premenopausal adjuvant endocrine therapy trials have focused of delineating the value of ovarian function suppression (OFS) added to tamoxifen or to an aromatase inhibitor. There are now a range of options for adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal ER+ breast cancer, and identifying the clinical-pathologic features most appropriate for intensification of adjuvant endocrine therapy can assist with optimizing recommendations for an individual patient. Citation Format: Carlos Arteaga, Prudence Francis. Plenary Lecture 2: Premenopausal ER+ Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PL2.

Effects of tamoxifen and exemestane on cognitive function in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Cognitive effects of tamoxifen have been described. We augment data from a previous short-term (ST) follow-up study with long-term (LT) data to evaluate ST and LT cognitive effects of tamoxifen followed by exemestane and exemestane in breast cancer patients. Patients from the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial received 5 years exemestane (exemestane group, n = 114) or 2.5 years tamoxifen followed by 2.5 years exemestane (sequential group, n = 92). Neuropsychological performance was assessed pre-endocrine therapy, after 1 year (ST follow-up) and at 5 years (LT follow-up). A control group of healthy participants (n = 120) were assessed with parallel intervals. With random effects modeling we evaluated cognitive changes from baseline to ST and LT follow-up. Statistical tests were 2-sided. After controlling for age, intelligence quotient, attrition, menopausal symptoms, anxiety and/or depression, and/or fatigue, the sequential group showed ST and LT decline compared with control participants on verbal memory (effect size [ES] = 0.26, P = .01; ES = 0.34, P = .003) and executive function (ES = 0.27, P = .007; ES = 0.38, P = .002). Compared with the exemestane group, the sequential group demonstrated ST decline on information processing speed (ES = 0.33, P = .01) and executive function (ES = 0.32, P = .01) and LT decline on verbal memory (ES = 0.33, P = .02). The exemestane group showed no cognitive decline compared with control participants. Cognitive adverse effects of tamoxifen alone and after switching to exemestane were observed, suggestive of a carryover effect of tamoxifen. Our results underline the need for well-controlled, prospective trials studying cognitive effects of endocrine therapy.

Abstract P4-06-01: Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract In early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC), platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to improve pathological complete response, but recommendations to include platinum chemotherapy are not consistent in international guidelines. We performed a systematic review of published randomized control trials to assess to assess survival outcomes and quality of life for people with early TNBC. The results presented in this abstract have not yet been peer-reviewed by Cochrane. If the final version of the review meets the necessary standards, the review is expected to be published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Methods: Randomized controlled trials examining neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum chemotherapy for eTNBC were included. We searched for published and unpublished data using standard Cochrane search strategies. The primary outcomes assessed were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included rate of pathological complete response (pCR), dose intensity and completion of regimens, grade III or IV toxicity related to chemotherapy, and quality of life. Prespecified subgroups included BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, frequency of chemotherapy, type of platinum agent used, and the presence or absence of anthracycline chemotherapy. Results: From 3972 records, 19 published studies were eligible. Twenty six ongoing studies were identified. Risk of bias was judged low for most trials. There were 14 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials, 4 adjuvant chemotherapy trials, and one trial of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. Most trials used carboplatin (16 trials) followed by cisplatin (2), and lobaplatin (1). Eight trials had an anthracycline free intervention arm, 5 of which had a carboplatin-taxane intervention compared to an anthracycline-taxane control. All studies reporting DFS and OS used carboplatin. Twelve of 19 studies with a total of 3347 participants reported DFS data. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy improved DFS in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting (HR 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.75; HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88 respectively)). Eleven studies collected OS data, with a total of 3229 participants and 460 deaths reported. Inclusion of platinum chemotherapy in the regimen improved OS (neoadjuvant: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.69, 0.55-0.86; adjuvant: 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96). Median follow up for survival outcomes ranged from 36 – 97.6 months. Our analysis confirmed platinum chemotherapy increased pCR rates (RR 1.46 [1.33-1.61], p< 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that survival outcome benefits were seen regardless of BRCA mutation status, HRD status, lymph node status, or whether the intervention arm contained anthracycline chemotherapy or not. Platinum chemotherapy was associated with reduced dose intensity, with participants more likely to require chemotherapy delays (RR 2.23 [1.70-2.94], 4 studies), dose reductions (RR 1.77 [1.56-2.02], 6 studies) and early cessation of treatment (RR 1.20 [1.04-1.38], 16 studies). Increased hematological toxicity occurred in the platinum group who were more likely to experience grade III/IV neutropenia (RR 1.55 [1.45-1.66]), anemia (RR 10.12 [6.61-15.50]) and thrombocytopenia (RR 7.59 [5.10-11.29]). There was no increase in febrile neutropenia (RR 1.16 [0.89-1.49]). Treatment-related death was very rare (7 events in 3094 patients) and similar across treatment groups (RR 0.58 [0.14-2.33]). Five studies collected quality of life data but did not report it. Conclusion: Platinum-based chemotherapy using carboplatin in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting improves long-term outcomes in eTNBC, regardless of the examined subgroups. This was at the cost of more frequent chemotherapy delays and dose reductions, and greater haematological toxicity. Benefit from platinum was seen both when platinum agents were added to anthracycline containing regimens, as well as in anthracycline-free regimens. Citation Format: Sofia Mason, Melina Willson, Annabel Goodwin, Jane Beith, Sam J. Egger, Rachel F. Dear. Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-06-01.

Abstract PD18-02: Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Trial (APT) for Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive (HER2+) Breast Cancer: final 10-year analysis

Abstract Background: The APT trial evaluated the activity of adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab (TH) among patients with small, node negative HER2+ breast cancer. This regimen showed a 7-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) of 93%, a recurrence-free interval (RFI) of 97.5% with only four (1.0%) distant recurrences, and a 7-year overall survival (OS) of 95%. In this end-of-study analysis, we report the survival outcomes at 10 years and assess the role of HER2DX testing in predicting long-term outcomes with adjuvant TH. Methods: APT was a single-arm multicenter investigator-initiated phase II study in which patients with HER2+ breast cancer with tumors ≤3 cm and negative nodes (one single micrometastatic node allowed) received IV weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) with IV weekly trastuzumab for 12 weeks, followed by IV trastuzumab for 9 months. The primary endpoint was 3-year iDFS. Here we report 10-year iDFS, RFI, breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and OS. In an exploratory analysis, the risk of recurrence was evaluated with the HER2DX genomic assay. Results: A total of 410 patients were enrolled from October 2007 to September 2010, of which 406 started the study treatment and were included in the intent to treat analysis. Median age at enrollment was 55 years (range, 24 to 85 years), and most patients (67%) had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. Fifty percent of patients had tumors 1.0 cm or smaller and only 9% of patients had tumors between 2 cm to 3 cm. Mean tumor size was 1.1 cm. After a median follow-up of 10.2 years (122 months), 36 iDFS events were observed, consistent with a 10-year iDFS of 89.7% (95% CI, 86.3%-93.1%). Ten-year iDFS was 90.2% (95% CI, 86.3%-94.3%) and 88.5% (95% CI, 82.4%-95.1%) for patients with HR-positive and HR-negative tumors at baseline, respectively. 10-year RFI was 96.8% (95% CI, 95.0%-98.7%), 10-year OS was 94.2% (95% CI, 91.6%-96.8%) and 10-year BCSS was 99.1% (95% CI, 98.1%-100.0%). Of the iDFS events observed in the trial, 6 were non-breast cancer related deaths and 9 were contralateral tumors, all but one locally found to be HER2-negative upon biopsy (Table 1). Among patients experiencing an iDFS event, 7 patients (1.7%) had distant recurrences, including 1 with a T2 tumor, 3 with a T1c tumor and 3 with a T1b tumor. At baseline, 6 of them had HR-positive disease, 1 had HR-negative disease, and 6 had high-grade disease. Upon biopsy of metastatic lesions, 5 of the 7 distant recurrences were locally found to be HER2+, 1 was HER2-negative and 1 had unknown HER2 status. HER2DX testing was conducted on available baseline archival tumor tissue and analyses of patients’ survival outcomes based on the HER2DX score will be presented. Conclusion: After 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant TH confirmed excellent long-term outcomes for small, node-negative HER2+ breast cancer, with a 10-year RFI of 96.8% and a 10-year BCSS of 99.1%. Table 1: iDFS events with adjuvant paclitaxel plus trastuzumab after 10.2 years of follow up Citation Format: Sara Tolaney, Paolo Tarantino, Noah Graham, Nabihah Tayob, Chau T Dang, Denise Yardley, Beverly Moy, Paul K. Marcom, Kathy S. Albain, Hope Rugo, Matthew Ellis, Iuliana Shapira, Antonio C. Wolff, Lisa Carey, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Michelle K. DeMeo, Molly K. DiLullo, Ann Partridge, Adrienne Waks, Clifford Hudis, Ian Krop, Harold Burstein, Aleix Prat, Eric Winer. Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab Trial (APT) for Node-Negative, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive (HER2+) Breast Cancer: final 10-year analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD18-02.

Abstract PD17-03: Cell-free DNA monitoring in a phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib for localized HR+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER)

Abstract Background: While adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) reduces recurrence risk in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, many patients still experience disease recurrence. Adjuvant therapeutic advances are needed to improve outcomes. Meanwhile, monitoring for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the adjuvant setting may detect molecular residual disease and/or emergences of molecular recurrence from tumor dormancy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors have shown efficacy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and abemaciclib is now approved for adjuvant use in high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Adjuvant clinical trials have evaluated upfront use of adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibition; however, the optimal timing of adding a CDK 4/6 inhibitor for HR+/HER2- breast cancer remains unknown. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial to evaluate the addition of the CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib in patients with at least one remaining year of adjuvant ET regardless of duration of ET prior to trial enrollment, and we prospectively collected plasma for ctDNA analysis. Methods: Eligible patients had Stage I-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer and had been on adjuvant ET (any number of years) with at least one year of treatment remaining. Patients were randomized to one of two ribociclib schedules: continuous (400 mg daily, 28-day cycle) or intermittent (600 mg daily days 1-21, 28-day cycle) for one year. Patients were concurrently treated with an aromatase inhibitor (plus GnRH agonist, if premenopausal). Time to recurrence was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ctDNA monitoring was performed using the SignateraTM platform, a tumor-informed assay based on whole exome sequencing of the primary tumor for multiplex PCR-NGS ctDNA assay design with targeting of up to 16 single nucleotide variants. Plasma samples were collected at the start of ribociclib/ET and serially during follow-up visits. Results: Among 81 patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy and the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib, 42 patients had samples suitable for ctDNA analysis: 3 (7%) had a single ctDNA test, 17 (40%) had 2 serial ctDNA tests, and 22 (52%) had 3 serial ctDNA tests. After a median follow-up of 20 months, 2 patients who received ribociclib (intermittent dosing) experienced disease recurrence with recurrence-free survival of 100% at 1 year from study entry and 97% (95% CI 88-99%) at 2 years. ctDNA was detected exclusively in the only 2 patients that experienced recurrence, with lead times of 7 months and 8 months prior to clinical recurrence. Both patients had no detectable ctDNA at the start of ribociclib/ET. One patient had detectable ctDNA [mean tumor molecules/mL (MTM/mL) = 0.1] while on ribociclib/ET for 5 months, after which she completed a full 12 months of treatment. One month after completing ribociclib/ET (8 months after ctDNA detection), she presented with metastases in the liver and bones. The second patient had 2 negative ctDNA tests at days 0 and 147 while receiving ribociclib/ET and became ctDNA positive (MTM/mL = 0.1) at day 350. She developed CNS-only metastatic disease 7 months after completing ribociclib/ET. Among the other 40 patients who did not have detectable ctDNA, none have experienced recurrence. Conclusions: Overall, only 2 patients had detectable ctDNA, and both patients developed recurrent metastatic disease after completion of ribociclib with ET. Notably, one of these patients developed CNS-only disease. While follow-up is early, the remaining patients did not have detectable ctDNA and have not developed recurrent disease. This study suggests monitoring for ctDNA may identify patients at increased risk for recurrence in the extended adjuvant period and potentially guide therapy escalation. Citation Format: Arielle J. Medford, Lauren Scarpetti, Andrzej Niemierko, Steven J. Isakoff, Beverly Moy, Seth A. Wander, Elizabeth Deluca, Elizabeth Abraham, Jennifer Shin, Lowell Schnipper, Amy E. Comander, Therese Mulvey, Erik Spickard, Ekaterina Kalashnikova, Angel Rodriguez, Leif Ellisen, Aditya Bardia, Laura M. Spring. Cell-free DNA monitoring in a phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib for localized HR+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-03.

Abstract PD17-05: Development and Validation of a Composite Biomarker Predictive of Palbociclib + Endocrine Treatment Benefit in Early Breast Cancer: PENELOPE-B and PALLAS Trials

Abstract Background: The PENELOPE-B (NCT01864746) and PALLAS (NCT02513394) trials are large prospective, randomized, phase III trials that evaluated adjuvant palbociclib (PAL) + endocrine treatment (ET) vs ET in patients with hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC). Both studies did not meet the primary endpoint of improving invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). We conducted biomarker analyses to identify patients who might benefit from PAL + ET in EBC. Methods: Resected tumor tissue was collected from consenting patients. Gene expression analyses were conducted using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology Biomarker Panel including 2549 genes. Based on 91 genes from the HTG panel, the intrinsic molecular subtypes were calculated using Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping (AIMS). Potential predictive treatment biomarkers were established in PENELOPE-B (n=906 with resected tissue) as the development set using an outcome-oriented approach based on iDFS with a selection procedure that maximized the log-rank statistic to estimate a standard Z score–based optimal cutoff. Independent validation was conducted on PALLAS (n=2085; PENELOPE-B-like with resected tissue and HTG data). Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model, and iDFS distributions between treatment arms were compared using the log-rank test. Interaction between treatment and biomarker status was assessed. Results: Patient baseline characteristics were well balanced, with no differences in iDFS between the intent-to-treat set and the biomarker set for both trials. Approximately 73% of patients (PENELOPE-B [n=663] and PALLAS [n=1516]) had luminal A subtypes whereas only 7.1 % (PENELOPE-B [n=64]) and 8.3 % (PALLAS [n=172]) had a luminal B subtype. AIMS subtypes showed overall similar prognostic patterns for iDFS between PENELOPE-B and PALLAS. The biomarker-defined subgroup found in PENELOPE-B with optimal cutoff demonstrated a preferential benefit from PAL + ET (n=364 [96 events]; hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.63 [0.42, 0.95]; P=0.025). Independent validation of the PALLAS subgroup using the pre-defined optimal cutoff confirmed a significant benefit from PAL + ET (n=916 [70 events]; 0.55 [0.34–0.90]; P=0.015) while not in the rest of the patients (interaction p=0.0025). Significant treatment effects remained (0.55 [0.34–0.89]; P=0.015) after adjusting for the randomization stratification factors of PALLAS. Conclusions: The composite predictive biomarker defined from PENELOPE-B was independently validated in a prospectively defined retrospective analysis of a subset of patients selected from PALLAS. The composite biomarker identified a subset of EBC patients deriving benefit from the addition of PAL to ET. This patient stratification approach can potentially be applied to future adjuvant clinical trials for treatment of hormone receptor–positive/HER2– EBC. Citation Format: Sibylle Loibl, Carsten Denkert, Yuan Liu, Erik S. Knudsen, Angela DeMichele, Zhe Zhang, Julia Teply-Szymanski, Martin Filipits, Peter A. Fasching, Michael Gnant, Shibing Deng, Marija Balic, Federico Rojo, Mark Watson, Chetan Deshpande, Nicholas Turner, Otto Metzger, Kathy Puyana Theall, Agnieszka Witkiewicz, Olga Valota, W. Fraser Symmans, Erica L. Mayer. Development and Validation of a Composite Biomarker Predictive of Palbociclib + Endocrine Treatment Benefit in Early Breast Cancer: PENELOPE-B and PALLAS Trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-05.

Abstract OT1-01-02: EMBER-4: A phase 3 adjuvant trial of imlunestrant vs standard endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) with an increased risk of recurrence who have previously received 2 to 5 years of adjuvant ET

Abstract Background: Adjuvant ET has been the standard of care for patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) EBC. A significant proportion of patients with increased risk still experience disease relapse despite available ET and more optimum ET is needed to prevent patients developing incurable metastatic cancer. Distant recurrence risk ranges from 20% to 40% after 5 years of adjuvant ET, depending on clinicopathological (clin-path) features at diagnosis. Consequently, there is a need to further optimize adjuvant treatment, particularly in those patients who are at increased risk of recurrence. Imlunestrant is an orally bioavailable selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) with pure antagonistic properties and the potential to overcome ET resistance. In early phase trials, imlunestrant monotherapy showed favorable safety with pharmacokinetic (PK) exposures exceeding fulvestrant and preliminary efficacy in ER+, HER2- advanced breast cancer patients (EMBER, Jhaveri 2022) along with robust biological/pharmacodynamic activity and tolerability in EBC (EMBER-2, Neven). Trial Design: EMBER-4 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing imlunestrant versus physicians’ choice of ET, in patients who are at an increased risk of recurrence based on clin-path features and who have received 2 to 5 years of standard adjuvant ET. Approximately 6,000 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive imlunestrant (400 mg daily) for 5 years or physicians’ choice of adjuvant ET (tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor, AI, dosed per label). Study treatment duration is 5 years. Males and pre-/peri-menopausal women will receive concomitant treatment with a GnRH agonist if receiving imlunestrant or an AI. Stratification factors include time from initial adjuvant ET, use of prior adjuvant cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, nodal status, menopausal status, and geographic region. Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients are adult males and females (pre-, peri- or postmenopausal) with ER+, HER2- EBC who have completed definitive locoregional therapy and have received 2 to 5 years of prior adjuvant ET without disease recurrence, but who are at increased risk of recurrence based on clin-path features at diagnosis. Prior (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy with a CDK4/6- or PARP- inhibitor is permitted. Study endpoints: The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), excluding second non-breast primary invasive cancers. Key secondary endpoints include distant relapse-free survival, overall survival, IDFS including second non-breast primary invasive cancers, safety, PK and patient reported outcomes. Recruitment for EMBER-4 begins globally in Q4 2022. Citation Format: Komal Jhaveri, Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Fabrice Andre, Matthew P. Goetz, Nadia Harbeck, Miguel Martín, Francois-Clement Bidard, Zachary M. Thomas, Suzanne Young, Roohi Ismail-Khan, Lillian M. Smyth, Michael Gnant. EMBER-4: A phase 3 adjuvant trial of imlunestrant vs standard endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER+, HER2- early breast cancer (EBC) with an increased risk of recurrence who have previously received 2 to 5 years of adjuvant ET [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-01-02.

Application of Genomic Sequencing to Refine Patient Stratification for Adjuvant Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Patients with resected localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remain at variable risk of recurrence. Incorporation of biomarkers may refine risk prediction and inform adjuvant treatment decisions. We explored the role of tumor genomics in this setting, leveraging the largest cohort to date of localized ccRCC tissues subjected to targeted gene sequencing. The somatic mutation status of 12 genes was determined in 943 ccRCC cases from a multinational cohort of patients, and associations to outcomes were examined in a Discovery (n = 469) and Validation (n = 474) framework. Tumors containing a von-Hippel Lindau (VHL) mutation alone were associated with significantly improved outcomes in comparison with tumors containing a VHL plus additional mutations. Within the Discovery cohort, those with VHL+0, VHL+1, VHL+2, and VHL+≥3 tumors had disease-free survival (DFS) rates of 90.8%, 80.1%, 68.2%, and 50.7% respectively, at 5 years. This trend was replicated in the Validation cohort. Notably, these genomically defined groups were independent of tumor mutational burden. Amongst patients eligible for adjuvant therapy, those with a VHL+0 tumor (29%) had a 5-year DFS rate of 79.3% and could, therefore, potentially be spared further treatment. Conversely, patients with VHL+2 and VHL+≥3 tumors (32%) had equivalent DFS rates of 45.6% and 35.3%, respectively, and should be prioritized for adjuvant therapy. Genomic characterization of ccRCC identified biologically distinct groups of patients with divergent relapse rates. These groups account for the ∼80% of cases with VHL mutations and could be used to personalize adjuvant treatment discussions with patients as well as inform future adjuvant trial design.

Cardiac and Pulmonary Dosimetric Parameters in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Postoperative Radiation Therapy Across a Statewide Consortium

The recently published Lung Adjuvant Radiotherapy Trial (Lung ART) reported increased rates of cardiac and pulmonary toxic effects in the postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) arm. It remains unknown whether the dosimetric parameters reported in Lung ART are representative of contemporary real-world practice, which remains relevant for patients undergoing PORT for positive surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to examine heart and lung dose exposure in patients receiving PORT for non-small cell lung cancer across a statewide consortium. From 2012 to 2022, demographic and dosimetric data were prospectively collected for 377 patients at 27 academic and community centers within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium undergoing PORT for nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Dosimetric parameters for target coverage and organ-at-risk exposure were calculated using data from dose-volume histograms, and rates of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) utilization were assessed. Fifty-one percent of patients in this cohort had N2 disease at the time of surgery, and 25% had a positive margin. Sixty-six percent of patients were treated with IMRT compared with 32% with 3D-CRT. The planning target volume was significantly smaller in patients treated with 3D-CRT (149.2 vs 265.4 cm3; P < .0001). The median mean heart dose for all patients was 8.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 3.5-15.3 Gy), the median heart volume receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) was 35.2% (IQR, 18.5%-60.2%), and the median heart volume receiving at least 35 Gy (V35) was 9% (IQR, 3.2%-17.7%). The median mean lung dose was 11.4 Gy (IQR, 8.1-14.3 Gy), and the median lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy (V20) was 19.6% (IQR, 12.7%-25.4%). These dosimetric parameters did not significantly differ by treatment modality (IMRT vs 3D-CRT) or in patients with positive versus negative surgical margins. With increased rates of IMRT use, cardiac and lung dosimetric parameters in this statewide consortium were slightly lower than those reported in Lung ART. These data provide useful benchmarks for treatment planning in patients undergoing PORT for positive surgical margins.

Adjuvant Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: End Points, Outcomes, and Risk Assessments.

Targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) revolutionized the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Efforts to translate these therapies into the adjuvant setting for local and locoregional RCC have been pursued over the past decade. We sought to provide an updated review of the literature regarding adjuvant therapy in RCC, as well as an analysis of patient characteristics that may portend the most favorable responses. Using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Wiley Online Library, we reviewed articles between 2000 and 2022. Search terms included "tyrosine kinase inhibitors," "adjuvant," "immunotherapy," and "renal cell carcinoma." The articles included were original and published in English. Information on clinical trials was collected from ClinicalTrials.gov, accessed in June 2022. Landmark trials investigating adjuvant vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors produced conflicting results, with only a single trial of sunitinib (S-TRAC) resulting in US Food and Drug Administration-approval on the basis of a slightly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS). Subsequent meta-analyses failed to show a benefit for adjuvant VEGF inhibitors. Several trials evaluating ICIs are currently ongoing, with pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-564) earning US Food and Drug Administration-approval for a prolonged PFS, although overall survival data are not yet mature. Preliminary results from other adjuvant ICI trials have been conflicting. There remains a lack of clear benefit for the use of adjuvant VEGF inhibitors in local and locoregional RCC. Adjuvant ICI investigations are ongoing, with promising results from KEYNOTE-564. It remains to be seen if PFS is an adequate surrogate end point for overall survival. Selection of patients at greatest risk for recurrence, and identification of those at greatest risk of rare but serious adverse events, may improve outcomes.

Adjuvant and neo-adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current status and perspectives.

Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for selected patients with early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, many of these patients still experience postoperative recurrence at 5 years. At present, peri-operative treatment methods are emerging to prevent early relapse, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Investigation on predictive biomarkers of responses to adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies is also continuously ongoing. Immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either by monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, has shown benefit in promoting pathological responses and prolonging survival for patients with NSCLC without oncogenic mutations. Exploratory studies have also provided evidence regarding the selection of patients who benefit from ICI-based perioperative treatment. This review focuses on the existing data of current clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant strategies with ICIs in resectable NSCLC, the exploration of predictive biomarkers, and the perspectives and urgent challenges in the future.

Association of Inflammatory Biomarkers With Survival Among Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

The association of chronic inflammation with colorectal cancer recurrence and death is not well understood, and data from large well-designed prospective cohorts are limited. To assess the associations of inflammatory biomarkers with survival among patients with stage III colon cancer. This cohort study was derived from a National Cancer Institute-sponsored adjuvant chemotherapy trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Southwest Oncology Group 80702 (CALGB/SWOG 80702) conducted between June 22, 2010, and November 20, 2015, with follow-up ending on August 10, 2020. A total of 1494 patients with plasma samples available for inflammatory biomarker assays were included. Data were analyzed from July 29, 2021, to February 27, 2022. Plasma inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin 6 [IL-6], soluble tumor necrosis factor α receptor 2 [sTNF-αR2], and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]; quintiles) that were assayed 3 to 8 weeks after surgery but before chemotherapy randomization. The primary outcome was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomization to colon cancer recurrence or death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Hazard ratios for the associations of inflammatory biomarkers and survival were estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression. Of 1494 patients (median follow-up, 5.9 years [IQR, 4.7-6.1 years]), the median age was 61.3 years (IQR, 54.0-68.8 years), 828 (55.4%) were male, and 327 recurrences, 244 deaths, and 387 events for disease-free survival were observed. Plasma samples were collected at a median of 6.9 weeks (IQR, 5.6-8.1 weeks) after surgery. The median plasma concentration was 3.8 pg/mL (IQR, 2.3-6.2 pg/mL) for IL-6, 2.9 × 103 pg/mL (IQR, 2.3-3.6 × 103 pg/mL) for sTNF-αR2, and 2.6 mg/L (IQR, 1.2-5.6 mg/L) for hsCRP. Compared with patients in the lowest quintile of inflammation, patients in the highest quintile of inflammation had a significantly increased risk of recurrence or death (adjusted hazard ratios for IL-6: 1.52 [95% CI, 1.07-2.14]; P = .01 for trend; for sTNF-αR2: 1.77 [95% CI, 1.23-2.55]; P < .001 for trend; and for hsCRP: 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17-2.34]; P = .006 for trend). Additionally, a significant interaction was not observed between inflammatory biomarkers and celecoxib intervention for disease-free survival. Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival and overall survival. This cohort study found that higher inflammation after diagnosis was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes among patients with stage III colon cancer. This finding warrants further investigation to evaluate whether anti-inflammatory interventions may improve colon cancer outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01150045.

Identification of high-risk patients with a seven-biomarker prognostic signature for adjuvant treatment trial recruitment in American Joint Committee on Cancer v8 stage I–IIA cutaneous melanoma

PurposeMany patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) early-stage cutaneous melanoma nonetheless die of melanoma; additional risk stratification approaches are needed. Patients and methodsUsing prospectively-collected whole-tissue sections, we assessed in consecutive stage I–IIA patients (N = 439), a previously-validated, immunohistochemistry-based, 7-biomarker signature to prognosticate disease-free survival (DFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS; primary end-point) and overall survival (OS), independent of AJCC classification. ResultsSeven-marker signature testing designated 25.1% of patients (110/439) as high-risk (stage IA, 13.3% [43/323], IB, 53.2% [42/79], and IIA, 67.6% [25/37]). A Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated high-risk patients to have significantly worse DFS, MSS and OS versus low-risk counterparts (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression modelling also including key clinicopathological/demographic factors, 7-marker signature data independently prognosticated the studied end-points. Models with the 7-marker signature risk category plus clinicopathological/demographic covariates substantially outperformed models with clinicopathological/demographic variables alone in predicting all studied outcomes (areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve 74.1% versus 68.4% for DFS, 81.5% versus 71.2% for MSS, 80.9% versus 73.0% for OS; absolute differences 5.7%, 10.3% and 7.9%, respectively, favouring 7-marker signature risk category-containing models). ConclusionIn patients with AJCC early-stage disease, the 7-marker signature reliably prognosticates melanoma-related outcomes, independent of AJCC classification, and provides a valuable complement to clinicopathological/demographic factors.

30-day morbidity and mortality after transoral robotic surgery for human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of two prospective adjuvant de-escalation trials (MC1273 & MC1675)

ObjectiveDose de-escalation of adjuvant therapy (DART) in patients with HPV(+)OPSCC was investigated in two prospective Phase II and III clinical trials (MC1273 and MC1675). We report the 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with primary TORS resection in patients enrolled in these trials. Materials and methodsPatients with HPV(+)OPSCC, who underwent TORS resection between 2013 and 2020 were considered in this analysis. The severity of postoperative transoral bleeding was graded using both the Hinni Grade (HG) transoral surgery bleeding scale and the Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Post-surgical complications within 30 days of surgery, as well as rates of tracheostomy, PEG and nasogastric tube placement. Results219 patients were included. A total of 7 (3.2 %) patients had a tracheostomy placed at the time of surgery, and all were decannulated within 26 days (median: 5, range: 2–26). There were 33 (15.1 %) returns to the emergency department (ED) with 10 (4.6 %) patients requiring readmission. Using the HG scale, 10 (4.6 %) patients experienced ≥ Grade 3 bleeding with no Grade 5 or 6 bleeds. In contrast, using the CTCAE scale, 15 patients (6.8 %) experienced ≥ Grade 3 bleeding with no Grade 5 bleeds. There was one post-operative death in a patient withdrawn from the trial, and no deaths related to hemorrhage. Conclusion and RelevanceTORS for HPV(+)OPSCC in carefully selected patients at a high volume center was associated with low morbidity and mortality.

Rationale and trial design of NATALEE: a Phase III trial of adjuvant ribociclib + endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Ribociclib has demonstrated a statistically significant overall survival benefit in pre- and postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer. New Adjuvant Trial with Ribociclib [LEE011] (NATALEE) is a trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone in patients with HR+/HER2- early nonmetastatic breast cancer (EBC). NATALEE is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III trial in patients with HR+/HER2- EBC. Eligible patients include women, regardless of menopausal status, and men aged ⩾18 years. Select patients with stage IIA, stage IIB, or stage III disease (per the anatomic classification in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition) with an initial diagnosis ⩽18 months prior to randomization are eligible. Patients receiving standard (neo)adjuvant ET are eligible if treatment was initiated ⩽12 months before randomization. Patients undergo 1:1 randomization to ribociclib 400 mg/day (3 weeks on/1 week off) +ET (letrozole 2.5 mg/day or anastrozole 1 mg/day [investigator's discretion] plus goserelin [men or premenopausal women]) or ET alone. Ribociclib treatment duration is 36 months; ET treatment duration is ⩾60 months. The primary end point is invasive disease-free survival. The 36-month treatment duration of ribociclib in NATALEE is extended compared with that in other adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor trials and is intended to maximize efficacy due to longer duration of CDK4/6 inhibition. Compared with the 600-mg/day dose used in advanced breast cancer, the reduced ribociclib dose used in NATALEE may improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy. NATALEE includes the broadest population of patients with HR+/HER2- EBC of any Phase III trial currently evaluating adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03701334 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03701334).

Vascular Invasion Predicts Recurrence in Stage IA2-IB Lung Adenocarcinoma but not Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundLymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an adverse prognostic feature in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, it is unclear if the prognostic significance applies to both lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of H&E-stained slides from surgically resected AJCC 8th ed. stage IA2-IB LUAD (n = 344) and LUSC (n = 102) from two institutions was performed. LVI was defined as either lymphatic (LI) or vascular (VI) invasion. Outcomes were assessed by 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) estimates using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsThe cohorts of LUAD and LUSC showed no significant differences in 5-year RFS (81% each), stage, age, race, or surgical procedure. The presence of LVI, VI, and LI was predictive of 5-year RFS for LUAD (LVI + 71% vs. LVI - 92%, P < 0.001; VI + 64% vs. VI - 90%, P < 0.001; LI + 75% vs. LI - 84%, P = 0.030) but not LUSC (LVI + 84% vs. LVI - 79%, P = 0.740; VI + 83% vs. VI- 80%, P = 0.852; LI + 84% vs. LI - 81%, P = 0.757). Among LUAD with LVI, VI was a stronger predictor of 5-year RFS than the remaining subset of VI-LI + tumors (64% vs. 87%, P = 004). Subset analysis of LI among LUAD stratified by VI showed no significant prognostic advantage to adding LI for risk stratification (VI-LI + 87% vs. VI-LI - 92%, P = 0.347 & VI+LI + 62% vs. VI + LI- 66%, P = 0.422). VI was present in 36% of LUAD. ConclusionVascular invasion is a strong predictor of recurrence in stage IA2-IB LUAD but not in LUSC. Adjuvant therapy trials should be directed at this subgroup.

Sussing Out Adjuvant ICI's Utility in RCC.

Whether adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition cuts recurrence risk in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma, as the phase III KEYNOTE-564 study showed, is unclear. Three other adjuvant trials-CheckMate-914, IMmotion010, and PROSPER-recently reported no disease-free survival improvement, casting some doubt on the utility of this approach.