Adjuvant Radiotherapy In Patients Research Articles

Cardiac Exposure Related to Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients Affected by Thymoma: A Dosimetric Comparison of Photon or Proton Intensity-Modulated Therapy.

Radiotherapy for thymoma is delivered post-operatively in selected cases. Given the particular location of the thymic bed and the excellent prognosis, late cardiac toxicities may be an issue. The purpose of this retrospective dosimetric study is to investigate whether intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) compared to photon therapy could better spare cardiac substructures, given prespecified dose constraints. We retrospectively selected patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for thymoma in our institution. We manually contoured fourteen cardiac substructures (CSs), with the supervision of a team of cardioradiologists. The photon-based plans were re-optimized in adherence to the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique with specific dose constraints for the new contoured structures. The proton-based plans were optimized in adherence to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using the beam spot scanning technique. Twenty-nine patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with a prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions for radically resected thymoma were selected. IMPT demonstrated better sparing of most cardiac substructures in terms of Dmax, Dmean and V5Gy. Finally, IMPT plans more easily achieved the proposed dose constraints. Cardiac substructures can be successfully spared with IMPT. Clinical studies are needed to establish a relationship between dose parameters and the development of cardiac events.

Adjuvant radiation therapy is not associated with a survival benefit after R0 resection in non-metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma.

The benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is not well characterized for those who undergo initial R0 surgical resection. Patients in the NCDB who underwent R0 resection were placed into two cohorts - those who underwent adjuvant RT and those who did not. 388 patients were identified with 51 receiving RT. No difference was observed between Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of the two cohorts (p​=​0.54). After adjusting for age, sex, co-morbidity index, race, receipt of chemotherapy, tumor size, grade, stage, and nodal stage, RT was not associated with improved OS. However, tumor size ≥6​cm (HR 1.54, [1.03-2.32], p​=​0.04), high tumor-grade (HR 3.46, [1.83-6.55], p​<​0.001), and N1-stage (HR 2.30, [1.06-4.94], p​=​0.03) were associated with worse OS, without benefit of RT on subgroup analysis of these factors. Treatment with adjuvant RT in patients with ACC who underwent R0 resection was not associated with an OS benefit.

Outcomes of definitive radiotherapy vs. laryngectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: real-world experience in a referral cancer center

BackgroundLaryngeal cancer is a common head and neck cancer. Surgical treatment can impair patients’ voice and swallowing function, making definitive radiotherapy a viable alternative for locally advanced cases.MethodsTo compare the outcomes of definitive versus adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with primary locally advanced laryngeal cancer, we retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients treated from 2007 to 2020. We assessed and compared the median and 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis control (DMC), and local recurrence-free survival (LRC) in all patients and in T4 patients exclusively.ResultsOne hundred patients were studied, including definitive (N = 64) and adjuvant (N = 36) radiotherapy. The median follow-up was 29 months. Overall, the median OS in the definitive vs. adjuvant group was 100 months (95%CI = 46.5-153.5) vs. not reached, respectively (log-rank P = 0.506). The median DFS in the definitive vs. adjuvant group was 20 months (95%CI = 7.7–32.3) vs. not reached, respectively (log-rank P = 0.148). Three-year OS and DFS rates in all patients were 64% (95%CI: 48–78) vs. 75% (95%CI: 55–95) and 43% (95%CI:29–57) vs. 61% (95%CI: 41–81) in the definitive vs. adjuvant groups, respectively. Among T4 patients, the median OS in the definitive RT group vs. adjuvant group was not reached vs. 48 (95%CI = 0-105.3), respectively (log-rank P = 0.788). The median DFS in the definitive RT group vs. adjuvant group was 12 months (95%CI = 9.34–14.65) vs. 36 months (95%CI = 4.4–67.5), respectively (log-rank P = 0.868). Three-year OS and DFS rates were 71% (95%CI: 42–100) vs. 75% (95%CI: 50–100) and 40% (95%CI:21–79) vs. 56% (95%CI: 25–87) in the definitive vs. adjuvant groups, respectively.ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that definitive radiotherapy in laryngeal cancer does not lead to a poorer outcome than total laryngectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. In T4 patients, our findings should reassure clinicians and patients about the viability of definitive radiotherapy as a treatment approach.

Real-World Survival Impact and Utilization of Adjuvant Radiation in Advanced Laryngeal Cancer.

Background: Optimal treatment of locally advanced cancer of the larynx is controversial. In this study, we aim to compare outcomes in patients with T3-4N0-1 cancer of the larynx who underwent surgery alone versus surgery followed by radiation therapy (RT). Materials and Methods: A total of 1820 patients with advanced laryngeal cancer were identified from the national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database and stratified based on postoperative RT status, and clinical outcomes were compared between these 2 groups. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics. Results: The majority of patients (53.4%) received adjuvant RT. N0 patients who received laryngectomy and who did not undergo adjuvant radiation had a 47% higher risk of cancer-specific death than patients receiving adjuvant RT (adj. HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.84). N1 patients who did not undergo adjuvant radiation had a 90% higher risk of cancer-specific death than patients receiving RT after surgery (adj. HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.27-2.84). After adjusting for propensity scores, adjuvant RT carried a significant overall survival benefit (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.87). Conclusions: This study provides real-world support for adjuvant radiation in patients with T3-4N0-1 laryngeal carcinoma. Nearly half of patients did not receive RT, indicating a need for national provider education and process improvement strategies to improve utilization.

Evidence for Radiation Therapy in Stage III Locoregionally Advanced Cutaneous Melanoma in the Post-Immunotherapy Era: A Literature Review.

In the landscape of Stage III locoregionally advanced cutaneous melanoma treatment, the post-immunotherapy era has sparked a number of questions on the management of the nodal basin. However, much of the available literature is not focused on radiation therapy as an adjuvant therapy. This literature review aims to illuminate the evidence surrounding radiation therapy's potential to mitigate regional recurrences in the adjuvant setting for melanoma. Additionally, it seeks to identify adjunct systemic therapy options and explore the synergy between systemic therapy and radiation. Despite strides in surgical techniques and systemic therapies, controlling regional Stage III melanoma remains a formidable clinical hurdle. While historical data strongly suggest the efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy in reducing regional recurrence risk, its evaluation predates the advent of MAPK pathway inhibitors and robust immunotherapy options. Notably, clinical trials have yet to definitively demonstrate a survival advantage with adjuvant radiation therapy. Additional research should focus on refining the definition of high risk for regional recurrence through gene expression profiling or tumor immune profiling scores and elucidate the optimal role of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

1383: The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Monocentric Experience

1383: The Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients with Vulvar Cancer: A Monocentric Experience

Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.

To evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). The data of EC patients who received adjuvant therapy after NCRT between 2004 to 2019 was retrieved from the SEER database. The patients were split into the adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT±CT) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) groups. The process of propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. Following PSM, 157 patients in total were recruited in each treatment group. There were no significant variations in either overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the RT±CT and CT groups (median OS: 28 months versus. 51 months, p=0.063; median CSS: 31 months versus. 52 months, p=0.16). Within the CT group, patients with ypI/II or cI/II tumor stage, positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≤0.1, and tumor size ≥50mm (p<0.05) had higher OS compared to the RT±CT groups. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging group, the OS and CSS were significantly greater for those underwent RT±CT as opposed to the CT group (5-year OS:56.6% versus 19.4%, p=0.042; 5-year CSS:67.9% versus. 19.4%, p=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the tumor histology grade as an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS. Radiotherapy-based adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve the prognosis of EC patients after NCRT, although it may provide a survival benefit for patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging.

Functional Status Predicts Delay to Radiation in Free Tissue Transfer for Head and Neck Cancer.

Evaluate the effect of functional status and patient factors on delays in treatment with adjuvant therapy. Retrospective chart review (2020-2022) was conducted at a single tertiary referral center. Data were collected between January 2020 and October 2022, and 63 patients underwent free flap reconstructive surgery of the head and neck due to the presence of cancer and received adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). The main outcomes measured were Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Beale scores, distance to radiation center, functional status, patient demographics, gender, and length from surgery to initiation of RT. Of the 63 patients who were reviewed, the average age was 65.5 years old and 63.8% were male. The average ADI state score was 5.6 and the national percentile of 77.1. The average Beale score was 3.7. The average distance traveled was 101.1 miles. Thirty-five patients were living independently, 16 were living in assisted living or received home care, and 15 were dependent or lived in a nursing home. Mann-Whitney U analysis revealed a significant association of increasing levels of dependence to delays in treatment compared to on-time treatment (p = 0.002). The odds of treatment delay were increased almost 10-fold for every additional increase in dependency level (OR = 9.87, 95% CI = 1.42-68.83). Degree of dependent functional status correlates with delays in postoperative adjuvant RT in patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck cancer. Preoperative risk stratification allows for physicians to address barriers to adjuvant therapy prior to delay. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:4979-4984, 2024.

Treatment and Staging Intensification Strategies Associated with Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Evaluation and Exploration of Novel Approaches.

The management of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) presents a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating treatment intensification due to the potential presence of micrometastases. While radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes one of the primary treatment modalities, the integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies suggests a paradigm shift towards more aggressive treatment strategies, also guided by new imaging modalities like positron emission tomography using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET). Despite the benefits, treatment intensification raises concerns regarding increased side effects. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on perioperative treatment intensification and de-escalation for high-risk localized and locally advanced PCa patients eligible for surgery. Through a non-systematic literature review conducted via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, we explored various dimensions of perioperative treatments, including neoadjuvant systemic therapies, adjuvant therapies, and the role of novel diagnostic technologies. Emerging evidence provides more support for neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Preliminary results from studies suggest the potential for treatments traditionally reserved for metastatic PCa to show apparent benefit in a non-metastatic setting. The role of adjuvant treatments remains debated, particularly the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at higher risk of biochemical recurrence. The potential role of radio-guided PSMA lymph node dissection emerges as a cutting-edge approach, offering a targeted method for eradicating disease with greater precision. Innovations such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are potential game-changers, offering new avenues for personalized treatment and improved prognostication. The intensification of surgical treatment in high-risk PCa patients is a dynamic and evolving field, underscored by the integration of traditional and novel therapeutic approaches. As evidence continues to emerge, these strategies will refine patient selection, enhance treatment efficacy, and mitigate the risk of progression, although with an attentive consideration of the associated side effects.

Abstract PO3-22-02: Concurrent chemotherapy with adjuvant radiation for patients with high-risk locally advanced breast cancer: safety and outcomes

Abstract Background: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer are at high risk for locoregional and distant recurrence and novel strategies are needed to enhance the efficacy of adjuvant radiation therapy. Selected chemotherapies act synergistically to safely radiosensitize residual disease to radiation therapy and may improve locoregional control when given concurrently. We report our institutional experience using concurrent chemotherapy with adjuvant radiotherapy for high-risk breast cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of breast cancer patients treated definitively with chemotherapy, surgery, and concurrent chemo-radiation (chemo-XRT) in the adjuvant setting between May 2006 and April 2019. The decision to combine chemotherapy with adjuvant conventionally fractionated radiation was based on provider discretion regarding patient’s risk of recurrence. The primary outcome was risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR). Secondary outcomes included disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence was estimated with distant recurrence and death as competing risks. DFS and OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 42 patients met inclusion criteria; of these 35 (83%) patients were receiving treatment for their initial breast cancer diagnosis and 7 (17%) patients were receiving treatment for a locoregional recurrence. Of the 35 patients treated in the primary setting, the majority had stage III disease (91%). Twenty-nine patients (83%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) all of which had residual disease after NAC and 6 patients (17%) received upfront primary surgery. Overall median total radiation dose was 57 Gy (range 45-68 Gy) with a majority receiving comprehensive regional nodal irradiation (25, 60%). Chemotherapy agents used for chemo-XRT included capecitabine (29, 69%), paclitaxel (8, 19%), and cisplatin (5, 12%). Median follow-up was 5 years after surgery (range: 4 months-16 years). At 5 years, the cumulative risk of LRR was 7% (95% CI: 2-21%). DFS was 47% (95% CI: 34-65%) and OS was 56% (95% CI: 42-74%). Of note, there were multiple exceptional responders, with OS of 51% at 10 years and 45% at 15 years. Chemo-XRT was well tolerated with 7% grade 3 toxicity (dermatitis), no grade 4 toxicity, and no new toxicity signals observed. Conclusions: Concurrent chemo-XRT for breast cancer patients with high risk locally advanced disease was safe and well tolerated. Chemo-XRT showed promise as a method to decrease risk of locoregional recurrence: the studied patient population was at very high risk, but only 7% of patients had a locoregional recurrence at 5 years. Further prospective evaluation of concurrent chemo-XRT is needed. Table 1. Patient characteristics and outcomes (N = 42) XX- XX Citation Format: Lynn Symonds, Sasha Swenson, Macklin Nguyen, Daniel Hippe, Hannah Linden, Jennifer M. Specht, WIlliam Gwin, Janice Kim. Concurrent chemotherapy with adjuvant radiation for patients with high-risk locally advanced breast cancer: safety and outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-22-02.

Platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma

PurposeThe objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in comparison to postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC).Materials and methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients diagnosed with HNACC at our center between January 2010 and April 2020. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to create a matched cohort.ResultsIn this study, 206 patients were analyzed, with 147 patients (71.4%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and 59 patients (28.6%) receiving POCRT. Twenty-one patients experienced local–regional failure. The 3-, 5-, and 10-yr local–regional control (LRC) rate for the cohort were 92.0%, 90.6%, and 86.9%, respectively. In both the entire cohort and the matched cohort, the POCRT group exhibited superior LRC compared to the PORT group (Gray's test, all P < 0.05*). Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for LRC (Competing risks regression, HR = 0.144, 95% CI 0.026–0.802, P = 0.027*). In addition, the POCRT group had higher incidences of upper gastrointestinal toxicity and hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia (all P < 0.05*).ConclusionIn terms of reducing locoregional failures in HNACC patients, POCRT may potentially offer a more effective therapeutic approach than using PORT alone, although it also entails an augmented burden of treatment-related toxicity.

Tolerance of Concurrent Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Pembrolizumab for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Real Life Experience

The current standard-of-care management of locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is based on neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab, surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and adjuvant pembrolizumab. However, the safety of combining pembrolizumab with adjuvant breast RT has never been evaluated. This study evaluated the tolerance profile of concurrent pembrolizumab with adjuvant RT in patients with locally advanced TNBC. This bicentric ambispective study included all the patients with early and locally advanced TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab and adjuvant RT as part of their treatment. The tolerance profile of adjuvant RT was evaluated and compared in patients who received concurrent pembrolizumab and in patients for whom pembrolizumab was withheld. Fifty-five patients were included between July 2021 and March 2023. Twenty-eight patients received adjuvant RT with concurrent pembrolizumab (RT+P group), and 27 patients had pembrolizumab withheld while receiving adjuvant RT (RT-only group). Two patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity (1 grade 3 pain in the RT+P group and 1 grade 3 radiodermatitis in the RT-only group), and there were no differences in terms of toxicity between the RT-only and the RT+P groups. No cardiac or pulmonary adverse event was reported during RT. With a median follow-up of 12 months (10-26), no patient relapsed. In this study of limited size, the authors did not find a difference between the RT-only and RT+P groups in terms of toxicity. More studies and longer follow-up may add to the strength of this evidence.

Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients with Cervical Cancer Undergoing Radical Hysterectomy.

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine adjuvant RT's impact on survival in accordance with Sedlis criteria. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy between 2005 and 2022 at a single tertiary care institution were included. A multivariate analysis was performed to determinate if RT was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence or death. We also analysed whether there was a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients who met only one or two Sedlis criteria, depending on whether they received adjuvant RT or not. 121 patients were included in this retrospective study, of whom 48 (39.7%) received adjuvant RT due to the presence of unfavourable pathological findings. In multivariate analysis, RT was not found to be a statistically significant prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.584) or disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.559). When comparing patients who met one or two Sedlis criteria, there were no statistically significant differences in OS between RT and no adjuvant treatment in either group. Since the selection of patients with cervical cancer eligible for surgery is becoming more accurate, adjuvant RT might not be necessary for patients with intermediate risk factors.

OR08-06 Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Is Not Associated With A Survival Benefit After R0 Resection In Non-Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma

Abstract Disclosure: Y.J. Lee-Saxton: None. C.E. Egan: None. T.E. Marshall: None. A. Tumati: None. T. Beninato: None. R. Zarnegar: None. T.J. Fahey: None. B.M. Finnerty: None. Introduction: The benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is not well characterized, particularly for those who undergo initial R0 surgical resection without evidence of metastatic disease. We aimed to identify factors associated with administration of adjuvant RT in these patients, and to determine the association between adjuvant RT and overall survival in patients with non-metastatic ACC who underwent R0 surgical resection. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for histologic codes denoting ACC from 2004-2018. Patients who underwent R0 resection without evidence of metastatic disease were included and placed into two cohorts - those who underwent adjuvant RT and those who did not. Patients with incomplete or unknown data regarding clinically relevant variables were excluded from analysis. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of adjuvant RT administration. A multivariable Cox regression was performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank test were also performed to assess the impact of adjuvant RT on OS. Results: 388 patients were identified: 51 (13.1%) patients received adjuvant RT, while 337 (86.9%) did not. Adjuvant chemotherapy administration was the only factor associated with administration of adjuvant RT (OR 6.45, 95% CI 3.02 - 13.8, p&amp;lt;0.001). No significant difference was observed between the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of the two cohorts (p=0.54). After adjusting for patient characteristics including age, sex, co-morbidity index, race, receipt of chemotherapy, and tumor characteristics including tumor size, tumor grade, pathologic tumor stage, and pathologic nodal stage, adjuvant RT was not associated with improved OS in patients who underwent R0 resection (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.63 - 1.60, p=0.98). However, tumor size &amp;gt;6cm (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.03 - 2.32, p=0.04), high tumor grade (HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.83 - 6.55, p&amp;lt;0.001), and pathologic N1 stage (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.06 - 4.94, p=0.03) were associated with worse OS in patients who underwent R0 resection. Conclusions: Treatment with adjuvant RT in patients with ACC who underwent R0 resection was not associated with an OS benefit. Further studies assessing optimal treatment for large and high-grade tumors with lymph node metastases are warranted. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Atypical Meningioma: Are the Risks Worth the Benefit?

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in atypical meningiomas. Herein, we assess whether the treatment-related acute and long-term toxicity of upfront RT in atypical meningioma patients versus surveillance merits the PFS benefit. In our prior single institution retrospective study of 230 patients with resected intracranial atypical meningiomas between 2000-2015, adjuvant RT was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression/recurrence compared to surveillance (HR = 0.21 [95% CI 0.11-0.41]; p<0.01), with 36% of surveillance patients eventually requiring salvage RT. In the current study, the acute (≤6 months) and long term (>6 months) RT-related toxicities from the same patient cohort for those who received adjuvant RT (n = 51) were evaluated and compared to those who received salvage RT (n = 64) in the surveillance group. Additionally, overall treatment-related toxicity at time of last follow up was obtained for comparison between the adjuvant RT (n = 51) vs surveillance (n = 179) group. All toxicities were graded per CTCAE v5.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of toxicities; Pearson's chi-squared and log-rank test were used for comparison. Adjuvant RT as compared to salvage RT was generally associated with greater RT-related toxicities both in the acute (90% vs 69%, p = 0.006) and long term (57% vs 33%, p = 0.010). While there was no significant difference in grade 3-4 acute toxicities, long term grade 3-4 toxicities (including headache, seizure, vision loss, neuromotor deficit, and neurocognitive deficit) were present in 14% of adjuvant vs 3% of salvage RT group (p = 0.035). Radionecrosis occurred in 18% of adjuvant RT vs 8% of salvage RT group (p = 0.11). Between adjuvant RT vs surveillance groups, any-treatment related toxicity at last follow up was greater with adjuvant RT (31% vs 15%; p = 0.006), with trend towards greater grade 3-4 toxicities (including headache, vision loss, neuromotor deficit, neurocognitive deficit, and cerebral edema) as well (8% vs 3%; p = 0.101). Cumulative incidence of treatment-related neuromotor deficit (any grade) was significantly greater in the adjuvant RT vs surveillance group with 14% vs 2% at 10 years (p = 0.004). There was no difference in rate of cerebrovascular accident between adjuvant RT (6%) vs surveillance (4%) groups (p = 0.83). Adjuvant RT for patients with atypical meningioma was associated with greater acute and long-term treatment toxicities. Potential RT-related toxicity and impact on quality-of-life should thus be carefully weighed against the tumor control benefit of RT in deciding the optimal use and timing of RT.

Short Course Adjuvant Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy (VCB) in Early Endometrial Cancer: Primary Endpoint Results of the SAVE Randomized Clinical Trial

Prospective trials in early stage endometrial cancer demonstrate increased locoregional control with adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with high risk features. VCB is widely utilized, yet there is substantial practice variation and limited randomized data examining optimal dose/fractionation. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of short course VCB compared to commonly used regimens. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial examining short course adjuvant VCB (11 Gy x 2 fractions at the surface) compared with other standard regimens (7 Gy x 3 fractions at 0.5 cm depth, 6 Gy x 5 fractions at the surface, or 5-5.5 Gy x 4 fractions at 0.5 cm depth). Eligible patients underwent hysterectomy and had pathologically confirmed endometrioid adenocarcinoma, serous, clear cell, or carcinosarcoma. Patients with stage I and II cancers were included, with lymphovascular invasion (LVI) required for stage IAG1. The primary outcome was Global Health Status measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30 with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 15 points. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes, toxicities as assessed by CTCAEv5, and patterns of recurrence. Data were collected at each brachytherapy fraction and at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. One hundred eight patients were enrolled, 54 in each study arm. Data completion was 94%, 91%, and 77% at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. 70% of patients had endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 18% serous carcinoma, and 12% other histologies. 23% were FIGO grade 1, 33% grade 2, and 43% grade 3 or high risk histologies. The majority of patients were stage I (56% IA, 38% IB). 22% of patients had LVI. The QLQ-C30 Global Health Status for the experimental arm was within the predefined boundary and thus 2 fractions were non-inferior to standard of care at one month (p = 0.000005) and 12 months (p = 0.0005). Using EORTC EN24 for patient reported vaginal/sexual, urologic, and gastrointestinal symptoms, the change in mean patient reported symptom score from baseline to 1 month and baseline to 12 months were not significantly different between arms. Using CTCAEv5, 51 patients experienced short-term AEs related to study treatment, 20 in the experimental arm and 31 in the control arm (p = 0.053). All study treatment-related AEs were grade 1-2, except for two grade 3-4 AEs, both on the control arm. At median follow-up of 19 months, the isolated vaginal control rate in each arm was 100%. There was no significant difference in the total number of recurrences between study arms, with 3 distant and 3 distant/pelvic/vaginal recurrences in the experimental arm, and 2 distant, 2 pelvic, and 1 pelvic/vaginal recurrence in the control arm. Short course VCB is safe with acceptable acute toxicity and non-inferior patient reported outcomes. Short course VCB improves patient convenience and may improve access to care for rural or underserved populations while providing similar local control.

The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in elderly women with T1-2N0 estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.

To evaluate whether adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) results in better survival among women ≥ 70 years with T1-2N0 estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer. In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Univariate and Multivariate Cox proportional analysis were used to identify the risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the prognosis of patients with or without adjuvant RT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to perform a 1:1 matched case-control analysis. A total of 4201 women were included in this study, with a median follow-up time of 64 months (range: 0-107 months). Of these patients, 2811 (66.9%) received adjuvant RT, while 1390 (33.1%) did not. Patients who did not receive adjuvant RT were more likely to be aged ≥ 80 years old, have a single marital status, larger tumors, and HER2-positive status (p < 0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional analysis indicated that receiving adjuvant RT was an independent factor associated with better OS and BCSS before and after PSM (P < 0.001). The survival curves before and after PSM showed that patients achieved an improved OS and BCSS from adjuvant RT (P < 0.005). In the subgroup analysis, there was no survival benefit trend from adjuvant RT in patients who were ≥ 80 years, or those with T1mic+T1a, T1b tumors. The use of RT following BCS in older women with T1-2N0 ER-negative breast cancer is associated with improve OS and BCSS. However, the potential benefit may be relatively limited for patients ≥ 80 years, or those with T1mic+T1a, T1b tumors.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Part 2. Treatment–Update 2023

In order to update recommendations on treatment, supportive care, education, and follow-up of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), a multidisciplinary panel of experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), and the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed. Recommendations were based on an evidence-based literature review, guidelines, and expert consensus. Treatment recommendations are presented for common primary cSCC (low risk, high risk), locally advanced cSCC, regional metastatic cSCC (operable or inoperable), and distant metastatic cSCC. For common primary cSCC, the first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment or micrographically controlled surgery. Achieving clear surgical margins is the most important treatment consideration for patients with cSCCs amenable to surgery. Regarding adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with high-risk localised cSCC with clear surgical margins, current evidence has not shown significant benefit for those with at least one high-risk factor. Radiotherapy should be considered as the primary treatment for non-surgical candidates/tumours. For cSCC with cytologically or histologically confirmed regional nodal metastasis, lymph node dissection is recommended. For patients with metastatic or locally advanced cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 agents are the first-line systemic treatment, with cemiplimab being the first approved systemic agent for advanced cSCC by the Food and Drugs Administration/European Medicines Agency. Second-line systemic treatments for advanced cSCC, include epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab) combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary board decisions are mandatory for all patients with advanced cSCC, considering the risks of toxicity, the age and frailty of patients, and co-morbidities, including immunosuppression. Patients should be engaged in informed, shared decision-making on management and be provided with the best supportive care to improve symptom management and quality of life. The frequency of follow-up visits and investigations for subsequent new cSCC depends on underlying risk characteristics.

Association of Race, Ethnicity, Insurance, and Language and Rate of Breast-Conserving Therapy Among Women With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer at an Urban, Safety-Net Hospital

IntroductionBreast-conserving therapy (BCT), specifically breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and adjuvant radiation, provides an equivalent alternative to mastectomy for eligible patients. However, previous studies have shown that BCT is underused in the United States, particularly among marginalized demographic groups. In this study, we examine the association between race, ethnicity, insurance, and language and rate of BCS among patients treated at an academic, safety-net hospital. Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 520 women with nonmetastatic breast cancer diagnosed and treated at an academic, safety-net hospital (2009-2014). We assessed eligibility for BCT and then differences in the rate of BCT among eligible patients by race, ethnicity, insurance, and language. Reasons for not undergoing BCT were documented. ResultsMedian age was 60 y; 55.9% were non-White, 31.9% were non-English–speaking, 15.6% were Hispanic, and 47.4% were Medicaid/uninsured. Three hundred seventy one (86.3%) underwent BCS; within this group, 324 (87.3%) completed adjuvant radiation. Among patients undergoing mastectomy, 30 patients (36.7%) were eligible for BCT; within this group, reasons for mastectomy included patient preference (n = 28) and to avoid possible re-excision or adjuvant radiation in patients with significant comorbidities (n = 2). Eligibility for BCT varied by ethnicity (Hispanic [100%], Non-Hispanic [92%], P = 0.02), but not race, language, or insurance. Among eligible patients, rate of BCS varied by age (<50 y [84.9%], ≥50 y [92.9%], P = 0.01) and ethnicity (Hispanic [98.5%], Non-Hispanic [91.3%], P = 0.04), but not race, language, or insurance. ConclusionsAt our safety-net hospital, the rate of BCS among eligible patients did not vary by race, language, or insurance. Excluding two highly comorbid patients, all patients who underwent mastectomy despite being eligible for BCT were counseled regarding BCS and expressed a preference for mastectomy. Further research is needed to understand the value of BCT in the treatment of breast cancer, to ensure informed decision-making, address potential misconceptions regarding BCT, and advance equitable care for all patients.

Adjuvant radiotherapy mitigates impact of perineural invasion on oncologic outcomes in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. A multi-institutional analysis of 557 patients

ObjectivesUnderstand the prognostic impact of perineural invasion (PNI) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Assess the influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes of patients with PNI-positive early-stage OCSCC. Materials and MethodsRetrospective seven-institution cohort study including patients with pathologic T1-2 N0-1 OCSCC who underwent primary surgery with negative margins. Outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional control (LRC). Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate oncologic outcomes. Interaction terms were introduced to assess relationships between PNI and adjuvant radiotherapy. ResultsAmong 557 patients (mean (SD) age 61.0 (13.9), 47.2% female, 66.6% pathologic T1, 93.5% pathologic N0), 93 had PNI-positive tumors, among which 87.1% underwent neck dissection and 39.6% received radiotherapy. On multivariable analysis, PNI was associated with lower DFS and LRC. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved outcomes on multivariable analysis of the entire cohort. However, among patients with PNI-positive tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy significantly decreased hazard for DFS. ConclusionAmong patients with low-risk, early-stage OCSCC, PNI was associated with worse DFS and LRC. In patients with PNI-positive tumors, adjuvant radiotherapy lowered hazard for DFS on multivariable analysis. These data support using adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with early-stage OCSCC with PNI.