Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Research Articles

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: role of specialized unit

AIM: to evaluate the rate and timeliness of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with stage II–III colon cancer (CC) after surgery in different medical units of the Arkhangelsk region and to assess its prognostic value.PATIENTS AND METHODS: all records on patients with CC after radical surgery in 2010–2021 were extracted from the Arkhangelsk Regional Cancer Registry (ARCR). Proportions of those who received ACT, the average waiting time for ACT and survival depending on the fact of ACT in specialized oncological unit (SOU), including the Arkhangelsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary (ACOD) and non-specialized medical units (NMU). Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed. The hazard ratio (HR) of death from CC was estimated by Cox regression depending on receiving ACT and the waiting time for it.RESULTS: the database included 1032 cases (538 patients with stage III and 494 with stage II patients, who had unfavorable prognosis factors). No differences were found in ACT rate among patients with stage II CC. In stage III CC, ACT was performed in 73.5% of patients operated on in the SOU and 46.3% in NMU (p < 0.0001). The median waiting time for ACT after radical surgery in the SOU was 33.5 (17.0; 43.5) days, and 46.5 (31.0; 64.5) days in the NMUs, p < 0.0001. The five-year CSS of those who received ACT was 67,2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 60.8–72.9%), and 64.1% (95% CI: 58.8–68.1%) for those who did not receive ACT, p = 0.012. Five-year CSS after chemotherapy started within 4 weeks after radical surgery was 73.2%, for the gaps 5-8, 9–12 and more than 12 weeks 70.4%, 63.7%, and 35.4%, respectively, p = 0.002. In the adjusted model, the HR for death from ROC was 3-fold higher in patients receiving ACT at 12 + weeks (HR = 2.6 (95% CI: 1.31–5.14), p = 0.006) compared with the 0–4-week interval.CONCLUSION: the study revealed lower and later incidence of ACT in NMU affected worse survival.

HPB O03 - Snapshot Audit of RELEVANCE: REal worLd outcomEs of adjuVant therapy in pANcreatic CancEr

Abstract Background Evidence-based medicine plays a critical role in shaping clinical practices and setting patient expectations. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer have demonstrated improved survival rates with newer regimens, their selective inclusion criteria often favor patients with better prognoses. This study aims to compare real-world outcomes with those from RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in typical clinical settings. Method In this retrospective study, we examined overall survival (OS) among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine, gemcitabine-capecitabine, or FOLFIRINOX) following the resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. We compared survival curves from RCTs (ESPAC 4, PRODIGE-24) with those from real-world cohorts selected based on RCT criteria. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records and institutional databases, covering OS, disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events. Results From July 2014 to December 2019, 303 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients underwent resections, with 209 (69%) receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 91 (44%) received gemcitabine, 69 (34%) gemcitabine-capecitabine, and 37 (18%) FOLFIRINOX. The median OS for gemcitabine was 21.6 months, close to ESPAC 4’s 25.5 months. Gemcitabine-capecitabine had a median OS of 25.2 months versus ESPAC 4’s 28 months. FOLFIRINOX had a lower median OS in our cohort (19.9 months) compared to PRODIGE 24’s 54.4 months. Additionally, gemcitabine OS in PRODIGE 24 was higher (35 months) than in our data. FOLFIRINOX had a 17% completion rate. Conclusion The real-world outcomes for gemcitabine-based adjuvant therapy align closely with RCT results, while FOLFIRINOX appears less effective in typical clinical settings, possibly due to tolerance issues. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating real-world data in clinical decision-making to better predict patient outcomes and improve treatment strategies for pancreatic cancer. Further research is needed to bridge the gap between RCTs and real-world practices, especially concerning patient selection and treatment tolerability.

HPB SO47 - Adjuvant chemotherapy for early pancreatic cancer: Meta-analysis of survival benefit and the need for a national study of UK practice

Abstract Background Stage I pancreatic cancer is defined as disease localised to the pancreas (T1-T2, N0, M0). Whilst landmark trials have demonstrated adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves survival in resectable disease, early stages comprise only 3-8% of cases. The benefit of AC in stage 1 pancreatic cancer is yet to be defined and there currently exists no data outlining the use of AC for early disease in the United Kingdom (UK). We aimed to perform a meta-analysis evaluating comparative outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection with or without AC in patients with stage I pancreatic cancer and outline plans for a national collaborative study. Method A systematic search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science and bibliographic reference lists were conducted. All comparative studies reporting outcomes of pancreatic cancer resection for stage I cancer with or without AC were included and their risk of bias were assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Survival outcomes were analysed using hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) for the time-to-event and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Results We included six studies reporting 6,874 patients with resected stage 1 pancreatic cancer of whom 3,951 patients had no AC and the remaining 2,923 patients received AC. The use of AC was associated with significantly higher overall survival (HR 0.71, P<0.00001) and 2-year survival (65.1% versus 57.4%, OR 1.99, P=0.04) compared to no use of AC. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-year (86.8% versus 78.4%, OR 1.60, P =0.25), 3-year (46.0% versus 44.0%, OR 1.07; P =0.43), or 5-year survival (24.8% versus 23.3%, OR 1.03; P =0.81) between the two groups. Conclusion Meta-analysis of best available evidence (level 2a with low to moderate certainty) demonstrates that AC may confer survival benefits for stage I pancreatic cancer when compared to the use of surgery alone. National evaluation of the use of AC within the UK is currently lacking but is necessary. Randomized control trials are required to escalate the level of evidence and confirm these findings with consideration of contemporary chemotherapy agents and regimens.

ASO Visual Abstract: Downstaging Effect Rather Than the Full Intended Cycles of the Perioperative Chemotherapy Determines the Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer.

ASO Visual Abstract: Downstaging Effect Rather Than the Full Intended Cycles of the Perioperative Chemotherapy Determines the Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer.

Advantages of adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer versus open surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

It is essential to ensure optimal adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy regimens following gastric cancer surgery. However, treatment intensity for S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy has not as yet been compared between minimally invasive (MI) and open (Open) surgery. We retrospectively compared dose modification of adjuvant S-1 between MI and Open surgery in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for gastric or esophago-gastric junction cancer at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo, Japan, during the period from 2012 to 2022, and receiving S-1 for pStage II or S-1 plus docetaxel for pStage III as adjuvant chemotherapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for possible confounders. In total, 323 patients were initially included. After PSM, 158 patients remained, 79 in each group. The adjuvant chemotherapy completion rates were similar in the two groups. However, the proportion of patients who required S-1 dose reduction was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (43.0% vs. 65.8%, p = 0.004). In addition, the MI group had significantly fewer patients requiring suspension of S-1 than the Open group (46.8% vs. 64.6%, p = 0.025). Moreover, the frequency of adverse events of grade ≥ 3 was significantly lower in the MI than in the Open group (17.7% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.042). In adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, minimally invasive surgery may offer better treatment intensity for oral S-1 administration than open surgery.

Clinical impact of the prognostic nutritional index and skeletal muscle index for the incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy is a standard therapeutic option for resected pancreatic cancer. However, the risk factors for incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 72 patients who underwent radical pancreatectomy and received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. The patients were assigned to two groups according to their completion or incompletion of adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared the perioperative skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) and nutritional status using prognostic nutritional index (PNI) between the two groups. ResultsThe completion and incompletion groups included 46 (64 %) and 26 (36 %) patients, respectively. Overall survival was shorter in the incompletion group than in the completion group (median survival time, 20.2 months vs. 42.0 months; log-rank, p = 0.018). Decreasing rate of PNI (12.7 % vs. 0.2 %, p = 0.010) and decreasing rate of SMI (26.9 % vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.001) were significantly larger in the incompletion group than in the completion group. Multivariate analysis showed that decreasing rate of PNI (p = 0.016), decreasing rate of SMI (p = 0.013), and old age (p = 0.049) were independent risk factors for incompletion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding the time-series variations, PNI improved from 1 to 3 months after pancreatectomy in the completion group (p = 0.006). Furthermore, the decreasing slope of SMI was stronger in the incompletion group. ConclusionPostoperative decrease of PNI and SMI is associated with the incompletion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.

Effect of the local anaesthetic ropivacaine intraperitoneally during and after cytoreductive surgery on time-interval to adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial

BackgroundIn a previous phase II trial, intraperitoneal local anaesthetics shortened the time interval between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, an endpoint associated with improved survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Our objective was to test this in a phase III trial. MethodsA double-blind, phase III parallel superiority trial was conducted at two university hospitals in Sweden, within a public and centralised healthcare system. Women >18 yr with advanced ovarian cancer scheduled for cytoreductive surgery, an ASA physical status of 1–3 with no speech/language issues, were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned using a central computerised system to receive either ropivacaine 0.2% or saline 0.9% (placebo) intraperitoneally during and after surgery. The primary endpoint was time to return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT), analysed using t-test and linear regression adjusted for centre. ResultsOf the 225 women randomised between August 2020 and December 2023 (ropivacaine n=113; placebo n=112), 175 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (ropivacaine n=86; placebo n=89). Median age: ropivacaine group 64 yr (56–73 yr), placebo group: 66 yr (57–74 yr). The mean RIOT in the ropivacaine group was 26.5 days vs 25.8 days in the placebo group, with a mean difference of 0.7 days (−2.2 to 3.4 days; P=0.65). Per-protocol analysis of 166 women yielded similar results, mean difference of 0.5 days (−2.4 to 3.4 days; P=0.74) days. There were no differences in short-term recovery or postoperative morbidity. ConclusionIntraperitoneal local anaesthetic did not shorten the time to RIOT among women undergoing surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in this trial. Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04065009), European Union Clinical Trials Register (2019-003299-38/SE).

Downstaging Effect Rather than the Full Intended Cycles of Perioperative Chemotherapy Determines the Value of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer.

Perioperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment modality for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and indication of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who have already received neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear. This study aims to explore the association between adjuvant chemotherapy with patient prognosis in those who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus D2 gastrectomy in a real-world setting, and whether this association is affected by the duration of neoadjuvant treatment. A total of 174 patients with cT3-4N+ gastric cancer who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus D2 radical gastrectomy were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to assess and compare the survival outcomes between patients who received adjuvant therapy and those who did not. Patients who were younger age, had a lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, did not experience postoperative complication, and received fewer than six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, rather than those with advanced ypTNM stage or poor tumor regression grade. Patients who received adjuvant therapy had a better overall survival (OS) (2-year OS rate 86.2% versus 64.1%, p=0.002). Adjuvant therapy was associated with longer survival in patients who remained ypTNM stage III despite receiving at least six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, there was no significant longer survival observed in patients with ypTNM stages 0-II receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, even when they received less than six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer may still need adjuvant chemotherapy, even after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The value of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy depends more on the actual downstaging effect achieved after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, rather than the completion of "full intended" cycles of perioperative treatment.

Breast Cancer Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Sequencing: Sequential, Concomitant, or What Else? A Comprehensive Review of the Adjuvant Combinations Journey.

Background: To date, in breast cancer (BC) treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy (A-CT) has preceded adjuvant radiotherapy (A-RT). In the last twenty years, the adjuvant treatment of BC has quickly evolved due to better knowledge of its molecular biology, genetic profile, and α/β ratio of 3/4 Gy for tumor and normal tissue radiosensitivity. Thus, new schedules with hypofractionated radiotherapy have been tested, and a third generation of A-CT has been introduced, raising the question of whether it is time to rethink the sequencing between these two approaches. Methods: In the last 20 years, many attempts have been made worldwide to optimize the best sequencing strategy between these two approaches in terms of sequential CT-RT and RT-CT and concomitant and sandwich modalities using drugs and schedules. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the state of the art, analyzing all the available studies to assess the sequencing between A-CT and A-RT with different generations of chemotherapy schedules. Results: More than 8000 patients from 30 studies treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and whole breast radiotherapy who were enrolled in randomized, retrospective, and prospective studies were analyzed. Sequential, concomitant, and sandwich modalities of chemotherapy with conventional or hypofractionated RT schedules from the most important studies were included. The most used sequence was adjuvant chemotherapy followed by conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy. In the concomitant approach, i.v. CMF has been the most important adopted schedule, while the concomitant use of anthracyclines and taxanes with conventional or hypofractionated radiotherapy has been found to be more toxic. One study analyzed the benefit in terms of reducing adjuvant treatment time with upfront hypofractionated radiotherapy and third-generation chemotherapy. Conclusions: At present, the best sequencing strategy has not yet been defined. This comprehensive review is a journey among the most important randomized, retrospective, and prospective studies that highlights the past, current, and novel time sequencing proposals between A-CT and A-RT to assess the state of the art and provide useful information for future adjuvant approaches in breast cancer treatment.

The dyslipidemic effect of cytostatics in the treatment of early breast cancer as a serious risk factor of cardiovascular diseases.

The development of highly effective anti-cancer therapies over the past several decades has dramatically changed the situation of patients with malignant tumor disease, who currently achieve a high rate of cure in the early stages of the disease. Despite tremendous progress, chemotherapy remains the primary treatment modality for early breast cancer. However, chemotherapy-related complications have a major impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this group of patients. Almost 80% of women diagnosed with breast cancer are over 50 years of age and already have risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as age, family history, hypertension, elevated cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, and elevated body mass index. Most breast cancer patients do not die and, in line with the general population, cardiovascular disease remains the most common cause of death. Clinical research, extensive retrospective analyzes and prospective works describe the dyslipidemic effect of cytostatics, which may predispose to the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. The administration of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes can lead to an increase in total cholesterol, triacylglycerides, LDL cholesterol and a decrease in HDL cholesterol. Abnormally high concentrations of lipids in the blood represent one of the main risk factors for the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases. The works also indicate a correlation between serum lipid levels and the rate of achieving pathological complete remission after the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Dyslipidemia is associated with a worse prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of the thesis is to point out the dyslipidemic effects of cytostatics and the risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in breast cancer patients who have undergone adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. The identification of cardiovascular risk factors at the beginning of oncological treatment, the monitoring of the lipid spectrum during the treatment and the timely intervention of dyslipidemia treatment escape attention at present.

P54-7 Efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

P54-7 Efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in sarcopenic patients

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in sarcopenic patients

P3.13E.02 Adjuvant Chemotherapy in cT1N0M0 Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer with or without Pathological Upstaging

P3.13E.02 Adjuvant Chemotherapy in cT1N0M0 Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Cancer with or without Pathological Upstaging

CtDNA-based molecular residual disease and survival in resectable colorectal cancer

The interim analysis of the CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY observational study demonstrated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based molecular residual disease (MRD) detection with recurrence risk and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in resectable colorectal cancer (CRC). This updated analysis with a 23-month median follow-up, including 2,240 patients with stage II–III colon cancer or stage IV CRC, reinforces the prognostic value of ctDNA positivity during the MRD window with significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio (HR): 11.99, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS; HR: 9.68, P < 0.0001). In patients who experienced recurrence, ctDNA positivity correlated with shorter OS (HR: 2.71, P < 0.0001). The significantly shorter DFS in MRD-positive patients was consistent across actionable biomarker subsets. Sustained ctDNA clearance in response to ACT was an indicator of favorable DFS and OS compared to transient clearance (24-month DFS: 89.0% versus 3.3%; 24-month OS: 100.0% versus 82.3%). True spontaneous clearance rate with no clinical recurrence was 1.9% (2/105). Overall, our findings provide evidence for the utility of ctDNA monitoring for post-resection recurrence and mortality risk stratification that could be used for guiding adjuvant therapy.

554P Novel clinical decision support (CDS) system optimizing adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) by integrating deep learning and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) molecular residual disease (MRD): GALAXY histotyping

554P Novel clinical decision support (CDS) system optimizing adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for colorectal cancer (CRC) by integrating deep learning and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) molecular residual disease (MRD): GALAXY histotyping

1402MO An international study evaluating pathological response to guide adjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in gastroesophageal cancer

1402MO An international study evaluating pathological response to guide adjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in gastroesophageal cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy versus preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer treated with curative-intent resection: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Multimodal therapy (MMT), comprising surgery alongside perioperative chemotherapy (PCMT) or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACMT), has demonstrated improve in survival compared with surgery alone for advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the moment of administering chemotherapy for GC is still a matter of debate. This study aimed to compare PCMT and ACMT in patients with locally advanced GC. We included all gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy and curative-intent resection. Using propensity score matching (PSM), patients who received PCMT were matched with patients undergoing ACMT for 10 pretreatment variables. Among the 552 patients with indication for MMT, 377 (68.3%) received combining chemotherapy (CMT): 116 (30.8%) PCMT and 261 (69.2%) ACMT. After PSM, 109 patients were matched in each group. All variables assigned in the score were well matched and both groups became equivalent. Patients receiving PCMT had less angiolymphatic and perineural invasion, less advanced pT, pN and pTNM stage than ACMT group (p < 0.001 for all). There was no difference in the postoperative complication rate between both groups (p = 0.551). After the matching, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) became similar between PCMT and ACMT groups (DFS: 51.4% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.882, respectively; OS: 54.3% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.638, respectively). After controlling for pretreatments characteristics, there was no significant difference in survival between GC patients who underwent perioperative and adjuvant CMT. PCMT did not result in an increase in survival, but it provides a decrease in the stage of the disease, with no difference in surgical outcomes.

Impact of clonal TP53 mutations with loss of heterozygosity on adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in gastric cancer

BackgroundThis study aimed to reveal the effect of TP53 status on clinical outcomes and underlying mechanism in gastric cancer (GC) patients.MethodsTP53 status was divided into three groups according to genome sequencing, namely clonal mutations with LOH (C-LOH), clonal diploid or subclonal mutations (CD-SC), and wild type (WT). The p53 protein activity was divided into over-expression (OE), Null and WT according to immunohistochemical staining. Four cohorts, including the TCGA, SMC, ZSHS and FUSCC cohort, were analyzed for association between TP53 mutation status and clinical outcomes and the underlying mechanism.ResultsIn TCGA cohort, TP53 CD-SC were associated with superior overall survival compared to TP53 C-LOH cases. GC patients could benefit from ACT only in TP53 CD-SC/ p53 OE and TP53/ p53 WT subgroups, and TP53 C-LOH subgroup demonstrated the worst response to pembrolizumab among three subgroups. Genomic and immunophenotypic deconvolution revealed that TP53 C-LOH, CD-SC and WT differed for genomic and immune-related features.ConclusionsTP53 C-LOH GCs with genomic instability and immune evasion phenotype have poor clinical outcomes in patients treated with ACT or immunotherapy.

Lymph node metrics following neoadjuvant therapy to refine patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer: A multi-institutional analysis.

In patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and resection, selection of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is typically guided by high-risk features on histopathologic examination. We evaluated the interaction between post-NAT lymph node metrics and AC receipt on survival. Patients who received NAT followed by pancreatectomy (2010-2020) at seven centers were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) in patients receiving AC or not was stratified by lymph node positivity (LNP) or lymph node ratio (LNR) dichotomized at 0.1. Cox models evaluated the independent association between these nodal metrics, AC receipt, and OS. Of 464 patients undergoing NAT and resection, 264 (57%) received AC. Patients selected for AC were younger (median 63 vs. 67 years; p < 0.001), received shorter duration of NAT (2.8 vs. 3.2 months; p = 0.01), had fewer postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade > 3: 1.2% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.001), and lower rates of pathologic complete response (4% vs. 11%; p = 0.01). The median number of nodes evaluated was similar between cohorts (n = 20 in both; p = 0.9). Post-NAT LNP rates were not different, and median LNR was 0.1, in AC and non-AC cohorts. Both LNP (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.1, p < 0.001) and LNR (0 < LNR ≤ 0.1: HR: 1.98, p = 0.002; LNR > 0.1: HR 2.46, p < 0.001) were independently associated with OS on Cox modeling, although receipt of AC was not associated with improved OS (median 30.6 vs. 29.4 months; p = 0.2). In patients with LNR > 0.1, receipt of AC was associated with significantly longer OS compared to non-AC (24 vs. 20 months, respectively; p = 0.04). LNR following NAT, not simply nodal positivity, may be useful to refine selection of AC in resected PDAC.

Novel nomogram and risk stratification for peritoneal recurrence after curative resection in gastric cancer

Peritoneal recurrence (PR) in gastric cancer after curative resection has poor prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to construct a nomogram to predict PR, and establish PR score for risk stratification to guide adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 315 patients with gastric cancer after radical surgery were included, and randomly stratified into training group (n = 221) and validation group (n = 94). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine predictive factors of PR. The nomogram was constructed to predict the risk of PR. We utilized the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor site, N stage, preoperative CEA, and postoperative CA199 were independent predictors of PR. A nomogram was constructed to predict PR based on these factors. The AUC value was 0.755 in the training group and 0.715 in the validation group. The calibration curves showed good agreement between prediction and observation in the training and validation groups. The decision curve analysis displayed a good net benefit of the nomogram. The novel PR score was developed and patients were stratified into the low-, medium-, and high -risk groups. For the high-risk group, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved patients' overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The establishment of nomogram facilitates the prediction of PR after radical gastrectomy, and a novel PR score may help guide adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.