Adjunctive Antibiotic Therapy Research Articles

Does adjunctive clindamycin have a role in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia? A protocol for the adjunctive treatment domain of the S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) randomized controlled trial.

The use of adjunctive antibiotics directed against exotoxin production in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is widespread, and is recommended in many guidelines, but there is limited evidence underpinning this. Existing guidelines are based on the theoretical premise of toxin suppression, as many strains of S. aureus produce toxins such as leucocidins (e.g., Panton-Valentine Leucocidin (PVL), toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1), exfoliative toxins, and various enterotoxins). Many clinicians therefore believe that limiting exotoxin production release by S. aureus could reduce its virulence and improve clinical outcomes. Clindamycin, a protein synthesis inhibitor antibiotic, is commonly used for this purpose. We report the domain-specific protocol, embedded in a large adaptive, platform trial, seeking to definitively answer this question. The Staphylococcus aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial is a pragmatic, randomized, multi-center adaptive platform trial that aims to compare different SAB therapies, simultaneously, for 90-day mortality. The adjunctive treatment domain aims to test the effectiveness of adjunctive antibiotics, initially comparing clindamycin to no adjunctive antibiotic, but future adaptations may include other agents. Individuals will be randomized to receive either five days of adjunctive clindamycin (or lincomycin) or no adjunctive antibiotic therapy alongside standard of care antibiotics. Most participants with SAB (within 72hr of index blood culture and not contraindicated) will be eligible to participate in this domain. Prespecified analyses are defined in the statistical appendix to the core protocol and domain-specific secondary analyses will be adjusted for resistance to clindamycin, disease phenotype (complicated or uncomplicated SAB) and PVL-positive isolate.

Comparative Study of Systemic vs. Local Antibiotics with Subgingival Instrumentation in Stage III-IV Periodontitis: A Retrospective Analysis.

To improve the clinical and microbiological outcomes of non-surgical mechanical periodontal therapy, the adjunctive use of antimicrobials has been utilized in treating moderate-to-severe periodontitis. In our study, the retrospective design included previously collected health-related patient data, obtained from the printed and digital charts of patients who received systemic or local antibiotic adjuncts to SI (subgingival instrumentation). A total of 34 patients (diagnosed with generalized Stage III/IV periodontitis) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were evaluated. The samples were tested for the following bacterial strains: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (A. actinomycetemcomitans), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis), Prevotella intermedia (P. intermedia), Tanererella forsythia (T. forsythia), and Treponema denticola (T. denticola). The inter-group comparisons of the bacterial species did not show statistically significant differences between groups. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects after SI and the adjunctive use of systemically administered (SA) AMX (amoxicillin) + MET (metronidazole) (administered for 7 days), with locally delivered (LDD) piperacillin + tazobactam in step 2 of periodontal therapy. Results: Overall, all parameters were improved in the groups, with a significant difference in inter-group comparison regarding the full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) (p < 0.05) in favor of the SA group, and the p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistically significant PPD (probing pocket depth) reductions and CAL (clinical attachment level) gains were observed in both groups at the 3-month follow-up. In conclusion, within the limitations, the outcomes of this study suggest that SI, with adjunctive local or systemic antibiotic therapy, provided comparable clinical improvements. Systemic AMX + MET protocols were more efficacious with regard to the reduction in FMBS. Follow-up studies with larger patient numbers are needed to further investigate this effect.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Adjunctive Phototherapy Versus Antibiotic Therapy Against Peri-Implant Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Peri-implantitis, an inflammatory condition in implant tissues, requires bacterial eradication and implant surface decontamination, with aPDT as a helpful surgical adjunct. Objective:This project was designed to investigate the effect of antibiotic therapy versus aPDT, as adjuncts to conventional mechanical debridement (MD), on the peri-implant clinical and/or radiographic parameters among patients with peri-implant diseases. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to and including April 2023, without any restriction on the language and year of publication, focusing the following research question: "Does adjunctive aPDT improve the peri-implant clinical and/or radiographic parameters in treating peri-implant diseases compared to antibiotic therapy?" Statistical analysis was performed on peri-implant clinical [plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP)] and radiographic parameters [marginal bone loss (MBL)]. The study included six randomized controlled trials and one clinical (nonrandomized) study. Results: The systematic review findings indicate that the application of aPDT as an adjunct to MD is equally effective as adjunctive antibiotic therapy in improving peri-implant clinical parameters and radiographic parameters in patients with peri-implant diseases. Only two studies were classified as having a low risk of bias (RoB), two were assessed as having an unclear RoB, and the remaining three studies were determined to have a high RoB. However, the meta-analysis results revealed no statistically significant difference in peri-implant PI, PD, and MBL scores between patients treated with adjunct aPDT or adjunct antibiotic therapy. Notably, there was a statistically significant difference favoring adjunct aPDT in peri-implant BOP values compared to the control group. Conclusions: Despite the limited number of included studies and the significant heterogeneity among them, the findings suggest that aPDT yields comparable peri-implant clinical and radiographic outcomes to adjunctive antibiotic therapy, as adjuncts to MD, for the potential treatment of peri-implant diseases.

Recent developments in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of Papillon-Lefèvre Syndrome.

A systematic search of PubMed, LIVIVO, and Ovid was conducted up to March 2021. These databases were searched for relevant clinical studies on periodontal treatment success in individuals with Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (PLS). Clinical studies reporting successful treatment outcomes defined as the loss of four or fewer permanent teeth due to periodontitis and the arrest of periodontitis or probing depths of 5 mm or less in individuals with PLS followed up for ≥24 months were included, and data extracted. Twelve studies reporting on nine PLS patients met the inclusion criteria. The extracted main outcomes in the studies reporting successful periodontal treatment in PLS were as follows: (1) clinical and genetic diagnosis of PLS; (2) age at baseline; (3) initial dental, periodontal parameters, and microbiological assessment, if available; (4) description of disease progression and applied therapies; and (5) outcome and follow-up. Twelve studies reporting nine individuals were included. The timely extraction of affected or all primary teeth, compliance with oral hygiene instructions, supra- and subgingival debridement within frequent supportive periodontal care intervals, and adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy in most patients affected a halt in disease progression. Suppression of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans below detection limits was associated with periodontal stabilization. An intensive, multidisciplinary approach with strict compliance may enable the decelerated progression of PLS-associated periodontitis. The early diagnosis of PLS and the suppression of A. actinomycetemcomitans below the detection level might be critical factors for treatment success. It required significant effort and patient compliance. The study emphasized the importance of timely interventions, oral hygiene maintenance, regular professional dental care, and, in some cases, systemic antibiotics.

Biocompatibility and Safety Assessment of Combined Topical Ozone and Antibiotics for Treatment of Infected Wounds.

Wound infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, particularly the Gram-negative strains, pose a substantial health risk for patients with limited treatment options. Recently topical administration of gaseous ozone and its combination with antibiotics through portable systems has been demonstrated to be a promising approach to eradicate commonly found Gram-negative strains of bacteria in wound infections. However, despite the significant impact of ozone in treating the growing number of antibiotic-resistant infections, uncontrolled and high concentrations of ozone can cause damage to the surrounding tissue. Hence, before such treatments could advance into clinical usage, it is paramount to identify appropriate levels of topical ozone that are effective in treating bacterial infections and safe for use in topical administration. To address this concern, we have conducted a series of in vivo studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a portable and wearable adjunct ozone and antibiotic wound therapy system. The concurrent ozone and antibiotics are applied through a wound interfaced gas permeable dressing coated with water-soluble nanofibers containing vancomycin and linezolid (traditionally used to treat Gram-positive infections) and connected to a portable ozone delivery system. The bactericidal properties of the combination therapy were evaluated on an ex vivo wound model infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a common Gram-negative strain of bacteria found in many skin infections with high resistance to a wide range of currently available antibiotics. The results indicated that the optimized combination delivery of ozone (4 mg h-1) and topical antibiotic (200 μg cm-2) provided complete bacteria eradication after 6 h of treatment while having minimum cytotoxicity to human fibroblast cells. Furthermore, in vivo local and systemic toxicity studies (e.g., skin monitoring, skin histopathology, and blood analysis) on pig models showed no signs of adverse effects of ozone and antibiotic combination therapy even after 5 days of continuous administration. The confirmed efficacy and biosafety profile of the adjunct ozone and antibiotic therapy places it as a strong candidate for treating wound infection with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and further pursuing human clinical trials.

Antibiotics in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

Four electronic databases (MEDLINE via Pubmed; EMBASE via Ovid; EBSCO Dentistry and Oral Science Source), in addition to six related journals (Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research; Clinical Oral Implants Research; International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants; International Journal of Oral Implantology; Journal of Clinical Periodontology; Journal of Periodontology), were searched for publications until 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), evaluating the effectiveness of local or systemic antibiotics as an adjunct in the non-surgical treatment (NST) for peri-implantitis (PI), were assessed. The eligibility criteria included RCTs with a parallel group, split-mouth design and appropriate NST interventions over a three to twelve month period. Data were extracted from RCTs to capture a multitude of primary outcomes, including: implant success rate, radiographic marginal bone loss rate, periodontal health changes and PI resolution. Risk of bias assessments were made using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool, by two authors independently and in duplicate. RCTs with similar observation periods and interventions were included in the meta-analyses. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences or relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, in additional to data heterogeneity calibration through I2 statistics. Following the screening of 270 papers, six RCTs were included, which resulted in the evaluation of 391 patients (375 implants). Adjunctive local antibiotic therapy at disease sites showed statistically significant periodontal outcomes; improvements in success rate (risk ratio = 9.89; 95% CI 2.39-40.84), probing pocket depth (mean difference (MD) = 0.6 mm; 95% CI 0.42-0.78) and bleeding on probing (MD = 0.15%; 95% CI 0.10-0.19). Conversely, adjunctive systemic antibiotics improved probing pocket depths (MD = 1.15 mm; 95% CI 0.31-1.99) and probing attachment levels only (MD = 1.10 mm; 95% CI 0.13-2.08). Across the six included RCTs, the bone loss rate and PI resolution rate determined no significant differences between the groups; mirrored in the single studies and in the meta-analysis. Disease resolution ranged from 2 to 65%. Two of the studies were found to be at low risk of bias and four presented with some concerns. Adjunctive antibiotics aid NST. However, the heterogeneity of study methods and low quality of current RCTs evidenced, deem their role in NSTs of PI as inconclusive.

980. Enterobacter: An Early-Onset Pathogen of Prosthetic Hip and Knee Infections with Poor Prognoses

Abstract Background Enterobacter sp. is a gram-negative, often drug-resistant bacillus that is classically identified from mucosal surfaces, such as pulmonary or urinary tracts. Despite its virulence, Enterobacter represents a less common pathogen in prosthetic joint infections (PJI). This study aims to resolve the current paucity of described clinical characteristics and treatment success of Enterobacter PJI. Methods Thirty-three patients with Enterobacter aerogenes-, cloaecae/asburiae-, or hormachei-positive PJIs were identified at a single institution. Infection clearance was defined as absence of infection or repeat surgery at one year and off all adjunct antibiotic therapy. Patient demographics, PJI characteristics, treatments, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without clearance. Results In this cohort, mean age was 66.8 years (SD: 11.6), mean BMI was 31.0 (SD: 7.1), and mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Score was 9.1 (SD: 4.5). 54.5% had a prior PJI in the same joint, and 87.9% had more than one prior surgery in that joint. Median time of PJI diagnosis after surgery was 22 days [IQR: 18-60]. Patients initially treated with debridement antibiotics and implant retention (n=11) had a 45.5% clearance rate, compared to 23.1% for 2-stage exchange (n=13) and 44.4% for those requiring resection arthroplasty or amputation (n=9). With a median follow-up of 2.9 years, final joint outcomes included resection arthroplasty in 9 (27.3%), above-knee amputation in 7 (21.2%), definitive treatment with an articulating spacer in 6 (18.2%), and arthrodesis in 2 (6.1%) patients. Conclusion Enterobacter PJI often presents acutely and is a difficult pathogen to treat. The outcomes of our cohort reflect the virulence of Enterobacter, with high rates of failure and ultimate joint- or limb-sacrificing procedure. Despite being a less common cause of PJI, prognosis is exceptionally poor with traditional treatment algorithms when compared to historical cohorts of more common pathogens. Disclosures William A. Jiranek, MD, Biomech Holdings LLC: Stocks/Bonds|DePuy, A Johnson &amp; Johnson Company: IP royalties Thorsten M. Seyler, MD, PhD, Heraeus: Paid consultant|Pattern Health: IP royalties|Restor3d: IP royalties|Smith &amp; Nephew: Paid consultant|Total Joint Orthopedics: Paid consultant|Zimmer: research.

Abstract 14200: Pacemaker Dependent Patients Can Be Discharged With Active Fix Temporary Pacemakers Following CIED Extraction for Infection

Introduction: Management of infected CIEDs includes removal of the device with adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Temporary device management has historically consisted of a balloon-tipped temporary pacemaker (TPM). In recent years, TPMs with an externalized standard permanent pacing generator and an active fixation permanent pacing lead have become an alternative option to the balloon tipped pacemaker. These patients are typically kept in the hospital; however, this temporary pacing system is very secure, and with adequate social supports, these patients can be discharged. Methods: We reviewed data from patients who had CEID extraction between July 2012 and October 2021 at Oregon Health and Science University, and identified patients who were pacer dependent, underwent extraction for infection, and were discharged with an active fix TPM via the right internal jugular. Data for this study were collected prospectively in an IRB-approved clinical and research database for all patients undergoing lead extraction procedures. Results: A total of 14 individuals were identified between July 2012 and October 2021. Of the 14 patients identified, the majority were male (57.1%), had a median age of 71 years, and had systemic infections (92.9%). The mean length of hospitalization was 12 days, with a follow up visit occurring 5 days after discharge on average. One patient was lost to follow up following discharge with a plan for reimplantation at an outside hospital. The remaining 13 patients were seen weekly in pacer clinic for device and site checks. The total duration of TPM implantation ranged from 6 days to 153 days, with a mean of 36 days. There were no complications including systemic or local infection from TPM implantation or from reimplant of a new permanent device. Conclusions: Discharging patients with TPMs is a safe, cost saving, and well-tolerated option for pacemaker dependent individuals while they await reimplant of a new permanent device. The active fix TPM allows for antibiotics to be given at home, opens hospital beds, and relieves pressure to reimplant a permanent device as soon as possible.

Adjunct Therapy at Time of Examination-Indicated Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Physical examination-indicated cerclage for cervical insufficiency prolongs gestation, but evidence on the addition of adjuncts to further prolong latency is limited. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare gestational latency between those who did and did not receive adjunct antibiotic or tocolytic therapy at the time of examination-indicated cerclage. Electronic databases (1966-2020) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing adjunct antibiotic or tocolytic use versus nonuse at time of examination-indicated cerclage, defined as placement for cervical dilation ≥1 cm, in a current singleton pregnancy. Studies including individuals with intra-amniotic infection, cerclage in place, nonviable gestation, or ruptured membranes were excluded. The primary outcome was latency from cerclage placement to delivery. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, birth weight, and neonatal survival. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ 2 and I 2 tests. Results were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects model. This study is registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration no.: CRD42021216370. Of 923 unique records, 163 were reviewed in full. Three met inclusion criteria: one RCT and two retrospective cohorts. The included RCT (n = 50) and one cohort (n = 142) compared outcomes with and without adjunct use of antibiotic and tocolytic, while the second cohort (n = 150) compared outcomes with and without adjunct tocolytic, with a subpopulation also receiving antibiotics. The RCT was nested within one of the cohorts, and therefore only one of these two studies was utilized for any given outcome to eliminate counting individuals twice. Risk of bias was "critical" for one cohort study, "moderate" for the other cohort study, and "some concerns" for the RCT. Gestational latency could not be pooled and meta-analyzed. Adjunct tocolytic-antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decrease in risk of preterm delivery <28 weeks (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.26; χ 2 = 0.0, I 2 = 0.0%) or neonatal survival to discharge (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.35; χ 2 = 0.05, I 2 = 0.0%). There is not enough evidence to robustly evaluate the use of adjunct tocolytics or antibiotics at time of examination-indicated cerclage to prolong latency. · Limited data on adjunct antibiotic tocolytics at cerclage.. · Widely variable practices at time of cerclage identified.. · Role of adjunct therapies at time of examination-indicated cerclage remains unclear..

Wearable adjunct ozone and antibiotic therapy system for treatment of Gram-negative dermal bacterial infection

The problematic combination of a rising prevalence of skin and soft tissue infections and the growing rate of life-threatening antibiotic resistant infections presents an urgent, unmet need for the healthcare industry. These evolutionary resistances originate from mutations in the bacterial cell walls which prevent effective diffusion of antibiotics. Gram-negative bacteria are of special consideration due to the natural resistance to many common antibiotics due to the unique bilayer structure of the cell wall. The system developed here provides one solution to this problem through a wearable therapy that delivers and utilizes gaseous ozone as an adjunct therapy with topical antibiotics through a novel dressing with drug-eluting nanofibers (NFs). This technology drastically increases the sensitivity of Gram-negative bacteria to common antibiotics by using oxidative ozone to bypass resistances created by the bacterial cell wall. To enable simple and effective application of adjunct therapy, ozone delivery and topical antibiotics have been integrated into a single application patch. The drug delivery NFs are generated via electrospinning in a fast-dissolve PVA mat without inducing decreasing gas permeability of the dressing. A systematic study found ozone generation at 4 mg/h provided optimal ozone levels for high antimicrobial performance with minimal cytotoxicity. This ozone treatment was used with adjunct therapy delivered by the system in vitro. Results showed complete eradication of Gram-negative bacteria with ozone and antibiotics typically used only for Gram-positive bacteria, which showed the strength of ozone as an enabling adjunct treatment option to sensitize bacteria strains to otherwise ineffective antibiotics. Furthermore, the treatment is shown through biocompatibility testing to exhibit no cytotoxic effect on human fibroblast cells.

Septic Arthritis of Neonates: Descriptive Study of a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Nosocomial Outbreak.

Purpose This is a retrospective descriptive study of a nosocomial outbreak of septic arthritis in a neonatal intensive care unit with a Pseudomonas species as the predominant organism. There have been no previous reports of the same. The risk factors for this disease were analysed. The different diagnostic modalities that we used are described and the short-term outcomes are reported after antibiotic therapy and surgery.Methods Fourteen patients and 16 joints were included in the study over a three-month period. The risk factors were analysed from the records and included prematurity, birth weight, sex and joint predilection. The causative organisms were also analysed from microbiological profiling. The outcomes after surgery and adjunctive antibiotic therapy were analysed in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters.Results Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found to be the predominant organism in this series. The hip joint was predominantly involved and the majority of the patients were found to be premature. All the neonates affected were found to have low birth weight.Conclusion Prematurity and low birth weight were found to have an association with risk for septic arthritis. In our setting of a nosocomial outbreak, a Pseudomonas species was more common than other organisms. A treatment regimen of arthrotomy surgery and adjunctive antibiotic therapy was found to be effective in all our patients.

Short Courses of Antibiotics Are Safe in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) carry high morbidity and mortality. While early aggressive surgical debridement is well-accepted treatment for NSTIs, the optimum duration of adjunct antibiotic therapy is unclear. An increasing focus on safety and evidence-based antimicrobial stewardship suggests a value in addressing this knowledge gap. To determine whether shorter antibiotic courses have similar outcomes compared to longer courses in patients with NSTI following adequate source control. 142 consecutive patients with surgically managed NSTI were identified on retrospective chart review between December 2014 and December 2018 at two academic medical centers. Patients were predominately male (74%) with a median age of 52 and similar baseline characteristics. The median number of debridements to definitive source control was 2 (IQR 1-3) with the short course group undergoing a greater number of debridements control 2.57 ± 1.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.2, (P = .01). Of 142 patients, 34.5% received a short course and the remaining 65.5% received a longer course of antibiotics. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bacteremia or wound culture positivity between groups. There was also no significant difference in in-hospital mortality, 8% vs 6% (P = .74), incidence of C. difficile infection, median length of stay, or 30-day readmission. Provided adequate surgical debridement, similar outcomes in morbidity and mortality suggest antibiotic courses of 7days or less are equally safe compared to longer courses.

Regenerative periodontal surgery and orthodontic tooth movement in stage IV periodontitis: A retrospective practice‐based cohort study

Evaluation of the effectiveness of regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects in combination with consecutive orthodontic tooth movements in stage IV periodontitis. A total of 526 intra-bony defects in 48 patients were analyzed after regenerative therapy using collagen-deproteinized bovine bone mineral with or without collagen membrane or enamel matrix derivative followed by orthodontic tooth movement initiated 3 months after surgery. Changes in radiographic bone levels (BL) and probing pocket depths (PPD) were evaluated after 1 year and up to 4 years. Tooth loss amounted to 0.57%. Mean BL gain was 4.67mm (±2.5mm) after 1 year and 4.85mm (±2.55mm) after up to 4 years. Mean PPD was significantly reduced from 6.00mm (±2.09mm) at baseline to 3.45mm (±1.2 mm) after 1 year, and to 3.12mm (±1.36mm) after 2 - 4 years. Pocket closure (PPD ≤ 4 mm) was accomplished in 87 % of all defects. Adjunctive antibiotic therapy did not show any statistically significant impact on treatment outcomes. Within the limits of this retrospective study design, the findings suggest that the combination of regenerative treatment and consecutive orthodontic tooth movements resulted in favorable results up to 4 years.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Versus Probiotics As Adjuncts to Mechanical Debridement for the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis.

The objective was to compare the efficiency of probiotic therapy (PT) vs antibiotic therapy (AT) as adjuvants to nonsurgical-mechanical debridement (NSMD) for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (Pi-M). Volunteers with Pi-M were encompassed. Therapeutically, patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: (a) Group 1: NSMD + PT; (b) Group 2: NSMD + AT; and (c) Group 3: NSMD alone. Peri-implant plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), and crestal bone loss (CBL) were recorded at baseline and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. P < .05 was selected as the indicator of statistical significance. Forty-two male individuals (14, 14, and 14 in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were included. At 3 and 6 months of follow-up, PI (P < .01), BOP (P < .01), and PD (P < .01) were higher in Group 2 than Group 1. At 3 months of follow-up, PI (P < .01), BOP (P < .01), and PD (P < .01) were higher in Group 3 than Group 2. At 6 months of follow-up, PI, BOP, and PD were comparable in Groups 2 and 3. In Group 3, PI, BOP, and PD were comparable with the respective baseline values at 6 months of follow-up. The CBL in all groups remained unchanged up to 6 months of follow-up. The NSMD with adjuvant PT is more effective than adjunct AT for the treatment of Pi-M for up to 3 months.

Local Antibiotic Delivery Systems in the Surgical Treatment of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Again, No Benefit?

This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes and healing parameters of 3 groups of surgical treatment combined with and without local antibiotic administration in diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Overall, 25 patients with DFO who met the criteria were included in the study. Surgical debridement was used with systemic antibiotic administration alone (group A; n = 8) or combined with local application of antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate beads (group B; n = 9) or antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulfate beads (group C; n = 8). In total, 87.5% patients in group A, 100% in group B, and 87.5% in group C healed (P = .543). Median time to healing was 17 weeks in group A, 18 weeks in group B, and 19 weeks in group C (P = .094). One patient (12.5%) in group A was amputated. DFO recurrence rate was 12.5% in group A and 12.5% in group C (P = .543). Median hospitalization was 9 days in group A, 8 days in group B, and 9 days in group C (P = .081). In conclusion, adjunctive local antibiotic therapy was not shown to improve outcomes in surgically treated DFO.

The Effect of Adjunctive Antibiotic Oral Therapy on the Recurrence of Infective Endocarditis After Valve Surgeries

Adjunctive oral antibiotics following intravenous antibiotics are administered after valve surgery in some patients with active infective endocarditis (IE); however, little is known about their efficacy. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of adjunctive antibiotic oral therapy after IE surgeries. Between 2009 and 2017, 585 patients underwent valve surgery for left-sided active IE at 14 hospitals. Patients who died during hospitalization or transferred with intravenous antibiotics were excluded. Of the remaining 460 patients, 239 were treated with oral antibiotics at discharge (group O) and 221 did not take the oral antibiotic (group N). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the recurrence of IE and a subset analysis of it. The 2 groups had similar background, postoperative inflammatory responses, and an almost similar duration of postoperative intravenous antibiotics. The overall survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 96% and 88% in group O and 92% and 84% in group N, respectively (P = 0.425). The rates of freedom from the recurrence of endocarditis at 1 and 5 years were 98% and 94% in group O and 97% and 93% in group N, respectively (P = 0.309). In chronic hemodialysis patients, the rates of freedom from the recurrence were significantly higher in group O than in group N (1 year: 100% vs 87.5%; 5 years: 95% vs 69%, P = 0.022). Adjunctive oral antibiotics following intravenous antibiotics in patients with active IE after valve surgery did not affect the overall survival and recurrence of IE, except in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Adjunctive antibiotic therapy in cases of periodontitis and peri-implantitis

Introduction Periodontitis and peri-implantitis are plaque-induced diseases, which are associated with certain bacteria. The conventional treatment aims primarily at tooth or implant surface debridement. In certain cases, surgical therapy is necessary. To improve the outcome of the treatment, systemic or topical antibiotics could be considered. Aim The aim of this review is to investigate the effect of the adjunctive systemically or topically delivered antibiotics on the outcome of the periodontitis and peri-implantitis treatment. Materials and Methods Articles related to the topic were searched in the PubMed database. Articles published from 2000 to 2019, only in English language, were included in the review. The search was conducted with a variety of keywords in different combinations being used. These were: “periodontitis”, “peri-implantitis”, “antibiotic”, “local”, “metronidazole”, “amoxicillin”, “azithromycin”, “tetracycline”. Results Forty-seven articles were included in the review. The selected articles described the adjunctive systemic and/or local delivery of metronidazole, azithromycin, the combination of metronidazole and amoxicillin and some representatives of the tetracycline group, such as doxycycline and minocycline in cases of periodontitis and peri-implantitis. Conclusion The adjunctive systemic and topical antibiotic therapy could benefit the outcome of periodontitis and peri-implantitis treatment.

Clinical and microbiological outcomes of photodynamic and systemic antimicrobial therapy in smokers with peri-implant inflammation.

To compare the effectiveness of two protocols in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) among cigarette smokers. Three groups were randomized into (i) single session of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) with mechanical debridement (MD) (Group-A), (ii) systemic AB with MD (Group-B), and (iii) MD alone (Group-C). Clinical peri-implant parameters including plaque scores (PS), bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Microbiological parameters included the assessment of percentage level of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus at baseline and 12 weeks. All parameters were analyzed using Friedman test and multiple comparisons performed using Bonferroni tests. P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. At 6 weeks of follow-up, there was a statistically significant reduction in PS (p < 0.001), BOP (p < 0.01), and PD (p < 0.05) among patients in groups A and B on intragroup comparison. At 12 weeks of follow-up, there was a further significant reduction in PS (p < 0.001) and BOP (p < 0.01) among patients in groups A and B on intragroup comparison but this reduction was comparable with 6-week follow-up. On inter-group comparison, only Group-A showed statistically significant reduction in BOP compared to Group-B and C at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). The levels of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in Group-A and Group-B showed statistically significant reductions at 12 weeks compared with baseline (p < 0.01). On inter-group comparison, Group-A and B showed no significant differences at follow-up (p > 0.05). This short term clinical study suggests that aPDT as an adjunct to MD is as efficacious as adjunctive antibiotic therapy. However, additional benefits in the reduction of bleeding scores were observed for aPDT in peri-implant inflammation among cigarette smokers.

Empirical or microbiologically guided systemic antimicrobials as adjuncts to non-surgical periodontal therapy? A systematic review.

It is unclear whether patients with specific subgingival microbiological profiles benefit more from adjunctive systemic antibiotics. To answer the question: "What is the clinical benefit in periodontitis patients taking adjunctive systemic antimicrobials to non-surgical therapy, depending on pre-treatment detection of periodontopathogenic bacteria?" A search was conducted in four electronic databases for randomized controlled trials reporting clinical outcomes following adjunctive antibiotic therapy for patients divided by baseline microbiological profiles. The initial search resulted in 643 papers, reduced to five after screening and author contact. Four of these studies were suitable for a fixed effects two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis adjusted for baseline data. Collectively, adjunctive amoxicillin and metronidazole yielded superior clinical results (measured as reduction of PPDs) compared to placebo. No significant differences were detected for the effect of adjunctive antibiotics by the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans on PPDs≥5mm (WMD=1.16, 95% CI [-5.37, 7.68], I2 =37.8%) or other clinical outcomes. All included studies had low risk of bias. There is no evidence to suggest that baseline detection of periodontopathogenic bacteria should be used as criterion for prescribing adjunctive antibiotics, although only limited information on microbial data and specific antimicrobials was available for analysis.

Endovascular Aortic Repair Is a Viable Strategy for Treatment of Primary Infected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Infected abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA) is rare, and information is limited whether endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) can be considered a permanent treatment or is a temporary fix preceding open surgery. This retrospective study reviewed the short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery, emergent EVAR, and elective EVAR in the treatment of primary IAAA. Between January 2008 and January 2017, 16 men and 3 women (aged 60.7y; range 30-76y) with IAAA were treated with emergent open repair, emergent EVAR, or elective EVAR, after adjunctive antibiotic therapy. Demographics, aneurysm anatomy, clinical presentations, laboratory tests, details of aneurysm repair, morbidity, mortality, and postoperative outcomes of these patients were reviewed. Positive microbial cultures were obtained in 12 patients. Six and 3 patients underwent emergent EVAR and open repair, respectively. Ten patients who completed the full antibiotic regimen received elective EVAR. The mean follow-up duration was 28.8mo (range, 1.5-96mo). The 30-day mortality rates of the emergent EVAR, open repair, and elective EVAR groups were 16.7% (1/6), 0%, and 0%, respectively; the 1-year survival rates were 16.7% (1/6), 100% (1/1), and 88.9% (8/9). Reduction in the blood erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) during the first week of antibiotic treatment was inversely related to aneurysm rupture and correlated with patients' post-EVAR survival time. Elective EVAR for IAAA had acceptable short- and long-term outcomes. Patients' response to initial antibiotic treatment may help facilitate management. Less than 0.130 reduction in ESR during the first week of antibiotic treatment may indicate risk of aneurysm rupture.