Adjacent Segment Research Articles

Bovine nucleus pulposus decellularization using freeze drying technique to form a biological scaffold

Introduction: As much as 40% of low back pain patients are caused by degenerative disc disease. The current treatments are fusion stabilization and total disc replacement, which have a risk for adjacent segment disease. These suboptimal results have become the beginning of the development of regenerative therapy. The success of this therapy will increase if the scaffold meets the ideal conditions. Biological scaffolds provide a cell growth environment that resembles the original tissue. Bovine intervertebral nucleus pulposus can become promising scaffolds. Objective: This research describes the proper freeze-drying approach for decellularizing bovine nucleus pulposus to create a biological scaffold. Methods: We conducted an experimental post-test control design study using bovine coccygeal nucleus pulposus material. All treatment groups underwent freeze-drying with Buchi Lyovapor™ L-200/L-200 Pro. All groups were evaluated for the level of decellularization using the Quick-DNA™ Miniprep Plus Kit (Zymo Research®) and remaining glycosaminoglycan levels by Alcian Blue staining. Results: Comparison of DNA concentrations obtained p-values respectively <0.0001 (p <0.05), which means that all the treatments showed a decrease in DNA concentration compared to the control group. The comparison of the glycosaminoglycan percentage between the P1 vs. Control group obtained a value of p=0.381 (p>0.05), which means that the glycosaminoglycan percentage results for the P1 group were not significantly different from the control group. Conclusion: This study of group P1 showed that decellularization of the bovine nucleus pulposus by freeze-drying technique can form an excellent biological scaffold.

Interscapular Pain after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Does Zygapophyseal Joints over Distraction Play a Role?

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical disc herniation (CDH) is commonly performed. Specific post-operative complications include dysphagia, dysphonia, cervicalgia, adjacent segment disorder, cage subsidence, and infections. However, interscapular pain is commonly reported by these patients after surgery, although its mechanisms have not been clarified yet. Methods: This retrospective series of 31 patients undergoing ACDF for CDH at a single Academic Hospital. Baseline and post-operative clinical, radiological, and surgical data were analyzed. The linear regression analysis was conducted to identify any factor independently influencing the incidence rate of post-operative interscapular pain. Results: The mean age was 57.6 ± 10.8 years, and the M:F ratio was 2.1. Pre-operative mean VAS-arm was 7.15 ± 0.81 among the 20 patients reporting brachialgia, and mean VAS-neck was 4.36 ± 1.43 among those 9 patients reporting cervicalgia. At 1 month, interscapular pain was still reported by 8 out of the 17 patients who experienced it post-operatively, and it was recovered in all patients after 2 months. The regression analysis showed that interscapular pain was not directly associated with age (p = 0.74), gender (p = 0.46), smoking status (p = 0.44), diabetes (0.42), pre-operative brachialgia (p = 0.21) or cervicalgia (p = 0.48), symptoms duration (p = 0.13), baseline VAS-arm (p = 0.11), VAS-neck (p = 0.93), or mJOA (p = 0.63) scores, or disc height modification (p = 0.90). However, the post-operative increase in the mean zygapophyseal joint rim distance was identified as an independent factor in determining interscapular pain (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our study revealed that the onset of interscapular pain following ACDF may be determined by over distraction of the zygapophyseal joint rim. Then, proper sizing of prosthetic implants could reduce this painful complication.

The efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in lenke type 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Spinal fusion is the standard treatment for severe forms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, with the lowest instrumented vertebra that is usually located at L3 or L4, patients are prone to develop adjacent segment degeneration in the long term. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) as motion preserving technique has become an alternative for select patients with AIS. Several studies have presented the outcome after thoracic VBT but no study has analyzed the outcome after VBT for Lenke type 6 curves. This is a retrospective single center data analysis of patients who have had bilateral VBT for Lenke type 6 curves and a minimum follow up of 24months. Radiographic analysis was performed on several time points. Suspected tether breakages were additionally analyzed with respect to location and time at occurrence. 25 patients were included. Immediate thoracic curve correction was 55.4% and 71.7% for TL/L curves. Loss of correction was higher for TL/L curves and resulted in a correction rate of 48.3% for thoracic curves and 48.9% for TL/L curves at 24months post-operatively. 22 patients were suspected to have at least one segment with a tether breakage. Three patients required a re-VBT but no patient received posterior spinal fusion. Bilateral VBT for Lenke type 6 curves is feasible and shows a significant curve correction for thoracic and TL/L curves at a minimum of 24months post-operatively. Tether breakage rate and loss of correction remain an unfavorable observation that needs to be improved in the future.

Lumbar Apex Position as an Independent Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Diseases in Patients Undergoing Short-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Retrospective study. To investigate whether lumbar apex position had an impact on the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Previous studies have demonstrated that solely concentrating on lumbar lordosis value is not suitable, and neglecting the significance of lumbar apex can lead to mechanical complications. However, the relationship between lumbar apex and ASD is still not well understood. In this retrospective study, 234 consecutive patients who underwent L3-5 or L4-5 TLIF for degenerative diseases were reviewed. The study evaluated the associations between sagittal parameters and pelvic incidence (PI). Patients were labeled "matched" when lumbar apex position aligned with the theoretical target, and "mismatched" when it did not. Multivariate analysis was applied to find the independent risk factors of ASD. In addition, a focused subanalysis was performed based on the lumbar apex position (ideal match, cranial from ideal, and caudal from ideal). After an average follow-up period of 70.6 months, 68 cases were identified as having ASD. Postoperatively, 64.7% (44 of 68) of the patients with ASD exhibited a mismatched lumbar apex, compared with 41% (68 of 166) of those without ASD ( P < 0.001). PI correlated significantly with proximal lordosis (PL) and lordosis distribution index (LDI) but not with distal lordosis (DL). Multivariate analysis identified age, L3-5 fusion, postoperative DL, and postoperative mismatched lumbar apex as independent risk factors of ASD. Upon the subanalysis, it was discovered that there were unique compensatory strategies in the cranial and caudal groups, with notable variations in postoperative DL, PL, and LDI among three groups (all P value of <0.05). Lumbar apex position significantly influenced the risk of ASD. To restore the lumbar apex to its ideal position, a proper value and distribution of DL should be attained. 4.

Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare the incidence of adjacent segmental pathology (ASP) following minimally invasive (MI) vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to identify factors linked to ASP requiring reoperation. This retrospective study reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent MI-TLIF or open TLIF. Radiographic ASP (RASP) was evaluated using X-ray imaging to distinguish between degenerative changes, spondylolisthesis, and instability in the adjacent spinal segment. Clinical ASP (CASP) was assessed with the visual analog scale score for leg and back pain and the Oswestry disability index. Patient data were collected 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. The timing and frequency of ASP reoperation were analyzed. Five years postoperatively, the RASP rate was 35.23% and 45.95% in the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups. The frequency of CASP differed significantly between the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups at 1 year postoperatively. The rates of RASP, CASP, and ASP necessitating reoperation were not significantly different 10years postoperatively. Cranial facet violation significantly affected ASP in both groups. In the open TLIF group, preoperative adjacent segment disc degeneration significantly influenced ASP. The RASP rate at 5years postoperatively and the CASP rate at 1year postoperatively differed significantly between groups. There was no difference in the rate of ASP requiring reoperation. Cranial facet violation is a crucial driving factor for ASP after both surgical procedures.

Study on the Fracture of a Shield Segment in a Fully Excavated Hard Rock Section under the Influence of Construction Loads

In this paper, the initiation of the fracture of a segment caused by the pressure of the jack and other factors during shield construction is discussed. Based on the Rots model in the finite element software Diana 10.4, the fracture width is solved. Combined with in situ measurements, the mechanisms of concrete fracturing of a segment under external loads, such as the jack thrust deflection angle and uneven jack thrust caused by the changes in the segment due to the upward buoyancy and shield attitude, are studied; additionally, the occurrence conditions and engineering control measures for segment fracture are summarized. The results show that when the attitudes of the shield and segment are identical, the total thrust of the shield is recommended not to exceed 21,000 kN, and is strictly limited to 24,000 kN. When the attitude inclination angle between the shield machine and the segment is less than 1°, the impact on the segment quality is small. When the inclination angle reaches 2°, the total thrust of the shield is recommended not to exceed 16,000 kN, and is strictly limited to 18,000 kN. When the inclination reaches 3°, a fracture is easily produced. When the total thrust is 19,000 kN, it is recommended that the loading increase or decrease in the left and right four grippers should not exceed 20%, and they are prohibited to exceed 30%. The fracture width increases exponentially with the increase in misalignment between adjacent segment rings. These research results provide a theoretical basis for jack pressure control during shield construction.

Biomechanical Effect of Different Posterior Fixation Techniques on Stability and Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture With Osteoporosis: A Finite Element Analysis.

Finite element analysis. To investigate the biomechanical effect of four posterior fixation techniques on stability and adjacent segment degeneration in treating thoracolumbar burst fractures with osteoporosis. In terms of stability and adjacent segment degeneration, there remains no consensus or guidelines on the optimal technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Images of CT scans were imported into MIMICS and further processed by Geomagic to build three-dimensional models of the T10-L5 region. A v-shaped osteotomy was performed on the L1 vertebral body to simulate a burst fracture in the setting of osteoporosis. Subsequently, four fixation techniques were designed using SolidWorks software. Range of motion (ROM) of the global spine, ROM distribution, ROM of adjacent segment, Von Mises stress on adjacent intervertebral disks, and facet joints were analyzed. Among the four groups, the cortical bone screw fixation (CBT) showed the highest global ROM at 1.86°, while long-segmented pedicle screw fixation (LSPS) had the lowest global ROM at 1.25°. The LSPS had the smallest percentage of ROM of fractured vertebral body to fixed segment at 75.04%, suggesting the highest stability after fixation. The maximum ROM of the adjacent segment was observed in the CBT at 1.32°, while the LSPS exhibited the smallest at 0.89°. However, the LSPS group experienced larger maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral disks (9.60MPa) and facet joints (3.36MPa), indicating an increasing risk of adjacent segment disease. LSPS provided the greatest stability, while CBT provided the smallest amount of stability. However, the elevated stress on adjacent intervertebral disks and facet joints after LSPS fixation increased the possibility of adjacent segment degeneration. Cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPS) and combined cortical bone screw and pedicle screw fixation (CBT-PS) demonstrated significant biomechanical advantages in providing moderate fixation strength while reducing stress on the intervertebral disks and facet joints.

Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare surgical outcomes, clinical outcomes, and complications between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) and midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) in patients with spondylolisthesis.MethodsThis study retrospectively compared the patients who underwent MIS TLIF (n = 37) or MIDLIF (n = 50) for spinal spondylolisthesis. Data of surgical outcomes (postoperative one-year fusion rate and time to bony fusion), clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] for spine function), and complications were collected and analyzed.ResultsThere was more 2-level fusion in MIDLIF (46% vs. 24.3%, p = 0.038). The MIS TLIF and MIDLIF groups had similar one-year fusion rate and time to fusion. The MIDLIF group had significantly lower VAS at postoperative 3-months (2.2 vs. 3.1, p = 0.002) and postoperative 1-year (1.1 vs. 2.1, p = < 0.001). ODI was not significantly different. The operation time was shorter in MIDLIF (166.1 min vs. 196.2 min, p = 0.014). The facet joint violation is higher in MIS TLIF (21.6% vs. 2%, p = 0.009). The other complications were not significantly different including rate of implant removal, revision, and adjacent segment disease.ConclusionIn this study, postoperative VAS, operation time, and the rate of facet joint violation were significantly higher in the MIS TLIF group. Comparable outcomes were observed between MIDLIF and MIS TLIF in terms of fusion rate, time to fusion, and postoperative ODI score.

Percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery ectasia and acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is defined as segmental or diffuse dilation of a coronary artery with a diameter of at least 1.5 times the normal adjacent segment, affecting more than one-third of the length of the artery. It has been described as a relatively infrequent finding with a prevalence from 0.3% to 5%, however, in our population we have previously found it higher, up to 6.7%. In patients with STEMI and ectatic infarct-related artery (EIRA), performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported to provide better in-hospital outcomes (3), but long-term prognosis remains controversial, with a high mortality risk and cardiovascular events after PCI. No standard approach has been defined for interventional treatment in the acute setting. High thrombus burden and coronary dilation make interventional treatment more challenging. Aim The aim of the present study was to assess the rate of MACE in the long-term according to the use of PCI in patients with CAE and ACS. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a randomized controlled trial (OVERTIME NCT). Sixty-two consecutive patients with ACS (STEMI or NSTEMI) in whom coronary angiography demonstrated CAE were included. Results The mean age of the 62 patients was 55.7+/- 10.6 years. Of them, 12.9% were women and 87.1% were men. The most common presentation was STEMI in 52 patients (83.8%) and 10 patients (19.2%) presented with NSTEMI. After coronary angiography, 48.4% received PCI and 51.6% did not. Baseline clinical characteristics were not different between groups. During follow up, 8 patients (12.9%) presented a MACE. We found that the risk of MACE was not statistically different, by PCI use (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.16-2.84, p = 0.5) (Figure 1). We also analyzed the intracoronary use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, with no long-term differences between groups. Conclusions In patients with CAE and ACS, we found non-statistically significant differences in the risk of MACE between patients who were treated with PCI compared to those without PCI.

Long-term efficacy of Waveflex semi-rigid-dynamic-internal-fixation system in delaying intervertebral disc degeneration at adjacent segments and improving spinal sagittal imbalance

The Waveflex semi-rigid-dynamic-internal-fixation system shows good short-term effects in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, but there are few long-term follow-up studies, especially for recovery of sagittal balance. Fifty patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated from January 2016 to October 2017 were retrospectively analysed: 25 patients treated with Waveflex semi-rigid-dynamic-internal-fixation system (Waveflex group) and 25 patients treated with double-segment PLIF (PLIF group). Clinical efficacy was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Imaging data before surgery and at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years postoperatively was used for imaging indicator assessment. Local disc degeneration of the cephalic adjacent segment (including disc height index (DHI), intervertebral foramen height (IFH), and range of motion (ROM)) and overall spinal motor function (including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and |PI-LL|) were analysed. Regarding clinical efficacy, comparison of VAS and ODI scores between the Waveflex and PLIF groups showed no significant preoperative or postoperative differences. The comparison of the objective imaging indicators showed no significant differences in the DHI, IFH, LL, |PI-LL|, and SS values between the Waveflex and PLIF groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). These values were significantly different at 1 and 5 years postoperatively (P < 0.05), and the Waveflex group showed better ROM values than those of the PLIF group (P < 0.05). PI values were not significantly different between the groups, but PT showed a significant improvement in the Waveflex group 5 years postoperatively (P < 0.05). The Waveflex semi-rigid dynamic fixation system can effectively reduce the probability of intervertebral disc degeneration in upper adjacent segments. Simultaneously, patients in the Waveflex group showed postoperative improvements in LL, spinal sagittal imbalance, and quality of life.

Finite element analysis of implanted lumbar spine: Effects of open laminectomy plus PLF and open laminectomy plus TLIF surgical approaches on L3-L4 FSU

Several finite element (FE) studies reported performances of various lumbar fusion surgical approaches. However, comparative studies on the performance of Open Laminectomy plus Posterolateral Fusion (OL-PLF) and Open Laminectomy plus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (OL-TLIF) surgical approaches are rare. In the current FE study, the variation in ranges of motions (ROM), stress-strain distributions in an implanted functional spinal unit (FSU) and caudal adjacent soft structures between OL-PLF and OL-TLIF virtual models were investigated. The implanted lumbar spine FE models were developed from subject-specific computed tomography images of an intact spine and solved for physiological loadings such as compression, flexion, extension and lateral bending. Reductions in the ROMs of L1-L5 (49 % to 59 %) and L3-L4 implanted FSUs (91 % to 96 %) were observed for both models. Under all the loading cases, the maximum von Mises strain observed in the implanted segment of both models exceeds the mean compressive yield strain for the vertebra. The maximum von Mises stress and strain observed on the caudal adjacent soft structures of both the implanted models are at least 22 % higher than the natural spine model. The findings indicate the risk of failure in the implanted FSUs and higher chances of adjacent segment degeneration for both models.

Lumbar Facet Arthroplasty Versus Fusion for Grade-I Degenerative Spondylolisthesis with Stenosis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

The comparative effectiveness of decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty versus decompression plus instrumented lumbar spinal fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis is unknown. In this randomized, controlled, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial, we assigned patients who had single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis to undergo decompression plus lumbar facet arthroplasty (arthroplasty group) or decompression plus fusion (fusion group). The primary outcome was a predetermined composite clinical success score. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Short Form (SF)-12, radiographic parameters, surgical variables, and complications. A total of 321 adult patients were randomized in a 2:1 fashion, with 219 patients assigned to undergo facet arthroplasty and 102 patients assigned to undergo fusion. Of these, 113 patients (51.6%) in the arthroplasty group and 47 (46.1%) in the fusion group who had either reached 24 months of postoperative follow-up or were deemed early clinical failures were included in the primary outcome analysis. The arthroplasty group had a higher proportion of patients who achieved composite clinical success than did the fusion group (73.5% versus 25.5%; p < 0.001), equating to a between-group difference of 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 33.0% to 62.8%). The arthroplasty group outperformed the fusion group in most patient-reported outcome measures (including the ODI, VAS back pain, and all ZCQ component scores) at 24 months postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in surgical variables or complications, except that the fusion group had a higher rate of developing symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration. Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and grade-I degenerative spondylolisthesis, lumbar facet arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of composite clinical success than fusion was at 24 months postoperatively. Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: Techniques and Outcomes in 107 Patients Undergoing Surgical Intervention.

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a known sequela of thoracolumbar instrumented fusions. Various surgical options are available to address ASD in patients with intractable symptoms who have failed conservative measures. However, the optimal treatment strategy for symptomatic ASD has not been established. We examined several clinical outcomes utilizing different surgical interventions for symptomatic ASD. A retrospective review was performed for a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision surgery for thoracolumbar ASD between October 2011 and February 2022. Patients were treated with endoscopic decompression (N = 17), microdiscectomy (N = 9), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF; N = 26), or open laminectomy and fusion (LF; N = 55). The primary outcomes compared between groups were re-operation rates and numeric pain scores for leg and back at 2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperation. Secondary outcomes included time to re-operation, estimated blood loss, and length of stay. Of the 257 patients who underwent revision surgery for symptomatic ASD, 107 patients met inclusion criteria with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The mean age of all patients was 67.90 ± 10.51 years. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, gender, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists scoring, number of previously fused levels, or preoperative numeric leg and back pain scores. The re-operation rates were significantly lower in LF (12.7%) and LLIF cohorts (19.2%) compared with microdiscectomy (33%) and endoscopic decompression (52.9%; P = 0.005). Only LF and LLIF cohorts experienced significantly decreased pain scores at all 4 follow-up visits (2 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months; P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) relative to preoperative scores. Symptomatic ASD often requires treatment with revision surgery. Fusion surgeries (either stand-alone lateral interbody or posterolateral with instrumentation) were most effective and durable with respect to alleviating pain and avoiding additional revisions within the first 12 months following revision surgery. This study emphasizes the importance of risk-stratifying patients to identify the least invasive approach that treats their symptoms and reduces the risk of future surgeries.

Segmental Sagittal Alignment in Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Review of Evidence-Based Evaluation of Preoperative Measurement, Surgical Planning, Intraoperative Execution, and Postoperative Evaluation.

Maintaining and restoring global and regional sagittal alignment is a well-established priority that improves patient outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity. However, the benefit of restoring segmental (level-by-level) alignment in lumbar fusion for degenerative conditions is not widely agreed on. The purpose of this review was to summarize intraoperative techniques to achieve segmental fixation and the impact of segmental lordosis on patient-reported and surgical outcomes. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were queried for the literature reporting lumbar alignment for degenerative lumbar spinal pathology. Reports were assessed for data regarding the impact of intraoperative surgical factors on postoperative segmental sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcome measures. Included studies were further categorized into groups related to patient positioning, fusion and fixation, and interbody device (technique, material, angle, and augmentation). A total of 885 studies were screened, of which 43 met inclusion criteria examining segmental rather than regional or global alignment. Of these, 3 examined patient positioning, 8 examined fusion and fixation, 3 examined case parameters, 26 examined or compared different interbody fusion techniques, 5 examined postoperative patient-reported outcomes, and 3 examined the occurrence of adjacent segment disease. The data support a link between segmental alignment and patient positioning, surgical technique, and adjacent segment disease but have insufficient evidence to support a relationship with patient-reported outcomes, cage subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis. This review explores segmental correction's impact on short-segment lumbar fusion outcomes, finding the extent of correction to depend on patient positioning and choice of interbody cage. Notably, inadequate restoration of lumbar lordosis is associated with adjacent segment degeneration. Nevertheless, conclusive evidence linking segmental alignment to patient-reported outcomes, cage subsidence, or pseudoarthrosis remains limited, underscoring the need for future research.

Post Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) Coronary Aneurysm- A Case Report

Introduction Coronary aneurysm defined angiographically as luminal dilation 50% larger than that of the adjacent reference segment. (1) Drug-eluting stents (DES), which locally elute antiproliferative drugs, can dramatically inhibit neointimal growth. However, several pathological studies have indicated that DES may delay healing after vascular injury, and DES implantation may be theoretically associated with a risk of coronary artery aneurysm formation. Coronary aneurysms have been reported from 3 days to up to 4 years after DES implantation procedures, with varying clinical presentations. The incidence of coronary artery aneurysms after DES implantation is low within the first 9 months, with a reported incidence of 0.2% to 2.3%, a rate similar to that reported after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation (0.3% to 3.9%) in the DES versus BMS randomized trials.(2) However, the true incidence of coronary aneurysms in an unselected patient population is still largely unknown. It can be congenital, or secondary to vasculitis (Kawasaki disease) or after percutaneous coronary intervention. Drug-eluting stents (DES), which locally elute antiproliferative drugs, can dramatically inhibit neointimal growth has become standard of care for routine coronary angioplasty. However, several pathological studies have indicated that DES may delay endothelial healing after vascular injury, and DES implantation may be theoretically associated with a risk of coronary artery aneurysm formation (3)

Single-Stage Lateral Anterior-to-Psoas Interbody Fusion and Facet Screws as a Treatment for L5–S1 Adjacent Segment Disease in a Patient With a Long-Segment Construct

Objective: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) occurs in 9% of patients with long-segment lumbar spine fusion and results from the transmission of a greater degree of stress to the segments cranial and caudal to a fused segment. The treatment of symptomatic ASD typically involves extending fusion to the involved segment. Revision and extension of posterior instrumentation bears the disadvantage of involving the exposure and modification of old hardware. Lateral interbody fusion cannot be performed at L5/S1 due to the iliac crest. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion typically still requires flipping the patient to augment the construct posteriorly. Here, we present a method to treat L5/S1 ASD using single-position anterior-to-psoas (ATP) interbody fusion combined with facet screw instrumentation.Methods: An 80-year-old man, who had undergone L2-5 fusion 27 years ago, presented with persistent lower back pain and gait dysfunction with imaging findings of L5/S1 spondylosis and ASD. Under intraoperative computed tomography navigation, left L5/S1 ATP interbody fusion was performed with simultaneous L5/S1 percutaneous facet screw fixation. Results: The abdominal incision was 4.0 cm and the single posterior incision was 1.5 cm long. Blood loss was lower than 10 mL, and the procedure lasted for less than 1.5 hours. The patient was discharged to rehabilitation after 3 days.Conclusion: ATP interbody fusion enabled the placement of an interbody device with a large footprint to promote fusion and reduce the risk of subsidence and pseudoarthrosis. The combined use of interbody fusion and facet screws obviates the need to link to the previous construct.

RE: TLIF is Associated With Lower Rates of Adjacent segment Disease and Complications Compared to ALIF.

RE: TLIF is Associated With Lower Rates of Adjacent segment Disease and Complications Compared to ALIF.

Evaluation of a new beads reflux control microcatheter in drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization

Rationale and objectivesA new microcatheter was recently developed claiming to reduce beads reflux in drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE). The aim of this study was to compare the reflux control microcatheter ability versus a standard microcatheter for TACE treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Material and methodsPatients were prospectively included between November 2017 and February 2022. They received a DEB-TACE treatment with charged radiopaque beads using standard microcatheters or the SeQure reflux control microcatheter (Guerbet, France) and were assigned respectively to a control and a test group. Beads distribution mismatch was evaluated between the targeted territory on treatment planning CBCT and beads’ spontaneous opacities on the post-intervention CBCT and the 1-month CT scanner. ResultsTwenty-three patients (21 men, median age 64 years [12.5 years]) with 37 hepatocellular carcinoma nodules were treated. The control group consisted of 13 patients – 19 nodules, while the test group included ten patients - 18 nodules. Non target embolization (NTE) was found in 20 % (2/10) of patients in the test group and 85 % (11/13) in the control group. NTE involved only an adjacent segment in the test group while it affected the adjacent biliary sector or even the contralateral liver lobe in the control group. No complication linked to NTE was found in the test group, while it led to one case of ischemic cholangitis and another case of biloma in the control group. ConclusionThe reflux control microcatheter may be efficient in reducing NTE and thus eventual adverse events in comparison to standard of care end-hole microcatheters.

Risk factors for early-onset adjacent segment degeneration after one-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) is a major postoperative complication associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Early-onset ASD may differ pathologically from late-onset ASD. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for early-onset ASD at the cranial segment occurring within 2years after surgery. A retrospective study was performed for 170 patients with L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent one-segment PLIF. Of these patients, 20.6% had early-onset ASD at L3-4. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, preoperative larger % slip, vertebral bone marrow edema at the cranial segment on preoperative MRI (odds ratio 16.8), and surgical disc space distraction (cut-off 4.0mm) were significant independent risk factors for early-onset ASD. Patients with preoperative imaging findings of bone marrow edema at the cranial segment had a 57.1% rate of early-onset ASD. A vacuum phenomenon and/or concomitant decompression at the cranial segment, the degree of surgical reduction of slippage, and lumbosacral spinal alignment were not risk factors for early-onset ASD. The need for fusion surgery requires careful consideration if vertebral bone marrow edema at the cranial segment adjacent to the fusion segment is detected on preoperative MRI, due to the negative impact of this edema on the incidence of early-onset ASD.

Revision Extension of Fusion Surgery in Thoracolumbar Spine Using a Newly Designed Revision Rod - Comparative Matched Cohort Study Versus Implant-Replacement Surgery.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare the results of revision extension of fusion surgery using the newly designed revision rod and implant-replacement surgery in thoracolumbar spine. Thirty-one patients who underwent extension of fusion surgery using the revision rod for adjacent segment disease were included in this study. Thirty-one patients who underwent implant-replacement revision surgery were selected as a control group by matching age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, and number of revision segments. The mean age was 70.7 ± 8.0years in the revision rod (RR) group and 69.0 ± 8.4years in the control group. Preoperative diagnoses, underlying diseases, and mean number of revision segments (2.2 ± 1.1) were similar in both groups. The change of hemoglobin (1.0 ± 1.9 vs 2.5 ± 1.5g/dl; P < .01), hematocrit (4.1 ± 4.9 vs 7.2 ± 4.4 % P < .01) and albumin (.8 ± .9 vs 1.3 ± .4g/dl; P < .01) levels before and after surgery showed significant differences between the two groups. Hemovac drainage was significantly less in the RR group (P = .01). The mean operative time was shorter in the RR group (203.5 ± 9.5min vs 233.5 ± 8.7min; P = .12) with no statistical difference. Radiological results showed that the average lumbar lordosis 2years after surgery was lower in the RR group compared to the control group (25.1 ± 9.9° vs 32.9 ± 9.8°; P = .02). Union rates and clinical outcomes were not different between the two groups. Revision extension of fusion surgery using a newly designed revision rod had less hemovac drainage and superior laboratory findings compared to implant-replacement revision surgery.