Adequate Pain Relief Research Articles

Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients with Opioid-Use Disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.

Pain management in pregnant and postpartum people with an opioid-use disorder (OUD) requires a balance between risks associated with opioid tolerance, including withdrawal or return to opioid use, considerations around social needs of the maternal-infant dyad, and the provision of adequate pain relief for the birth episode that is often characterized as the worst pain a person will experience in their lifetime. This multidisciplinary consensus statement between the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) provides a framework for pain management in obstetric patients with OUD. The purpose of this consensus statement is to provide practical and evidence-based recommendations and is targeted to health care providers in obstetrics and anesthesiology. The statement is focused on prenatal optimization of pain management, labor analgesia, and postvaginal delivery pain management, and postcesarean delivery pain management. Topics include a discussion of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic options for pain management, medication management for OUD (eg, buprenorphine, methadone), considerations regarding urine drug testing, and other social aspects of care for maternal-infant dyads, as well as a review of current practices. The authors provide evidence-based recommendations to optimize pain management while reducing risks and complications associated with OUD in the peripartum period. Ultimately, this multidisciplinary consensus statement provides practical and concise clinical guidance to optimize pain management for people with OUD in the context of pregnancy to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Effect of Obesity on Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Fentanyl: Single-Center Retrospective Study and Animal Study

A retrospective study and an animal study were conducted to investigate factors affecting the transdermal fentanyl dose to achieve adequate pain relief in patients switched from other opioids. In the retrospective study, patient factors were included as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and serum albumin concentration. In obese (BMI > 25) patients, the post-titration dose of transdermal fentanyl was significantly lower than in normal (BMI 18.5-25) patients despite the initial dose was the same. To support this unexpected finding, fentanyl was administered intravenously and transdermally to Zucker (fa/fa) rats as an obese model and Zucker (+/+) rats as a control. No difference in systemic clearance (CLtot) after intravenous administration was observed between the two groups. However, transdermal bioavailability (F) and fentanyl release ratio from the formulation (Fa) were significantly increased in Zucker (fa/fa) rats compared to Zucker (+/+) rats. Skin availability (Fskin), calculated as F divided by Fa, was also significantly increased. These results indicated that obesity should be considered as a factor in the titration of transdermal fentanyl dose.

Efficacy of an erector spinae plane block for renal colic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimThe passage of kidney stones through the ureter creates renal colic, a severe visceral abdominal pain. Renal colic is typically managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids. Yet,...

Popliteal plexus block compared with tibial nerve block on rehabilitation goals following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial

This trial examined the effectiveness of the popliteal plexus block (PPB) and tibial nerve block (TNB) for early rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We allocated 136 participants to receive PPB or TNB with 0.25% levobupivacaine 10 mL in a randomized, double-masked manner. The primary outcome was achieving rehabilitation goals with a non-inferiority 9-hour margin, including adequate pain relief, knee flexion angles over 90 degrees, and enabling ambulatory rehabilitation. The time to reach rehabilitation goals showed non-inferiority with 49.7 ± 10.5 h for TNB and 47.4 ± 9.7 h for PPB, whose mean difference (PPB - TNB) was − 2.3 h (95% CI -5.8 to 1.2 h; P < 0.001). PPB showed higher dorsal and plantar percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (dorsal, PPB 87.7% ± 11.4% vs. TNB 74.0% ± 16.5%: P < 0.001; plantar, PPB 90.9% ± 10.3% vs. TNB 72.1% ± 16.0%; P < 0.001) at six hours after nerve block. No significant differences between the two groups emerged in pain scores, knee range of motion, additional analgesic requirements, success in the straight leg raise, and adverse events. PPB exhibited non-inferiority to TNB in achieving postoperative rehabilitation goals and had superiority in preserving foot motor strength after TKA. (200)

The Emergent Role of Low-Dose Naltrexone in the Symptomatic Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal and Neuropathic Pain

As a result of the intricate mechanisms of pain transmission, traditional analgesics used alone, as well as concomitantly, often do not provide consistent and/or adequate pain relief for patients suffering with chronic pain conditions. Many analgesics, as well as antineuropathic and antispastic drugs, demonstrate synergistic CNS side effects, increasing the risk of respiratory depression and overdose when used in combination. Given the steady rise of opioid-related overdose deaths in the USA, pursuit of novel treatment options, such as low dose naltrexone (LDN) regimens, are of particular interest to researchers. Although multiple reliable studies exist which demonstrate the potential for LDN in pain management, large-scale, high-quality studies are lacking, or are in progress. This review article aims to analyze the currently available literature regarding low dose naltrexone therapy in order to evaluate its potential role in the management of chronic inflammatory, neuropathic, and generalized pain symptoms. Although promising, available data is limited in its utility, warranting further research and development regarding the clinical role and place in therapy of LDN in chronic pain management.

Prescription pattern of usage of analgesics in pain relief in cancer patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital - An observational prospective study

Objective The World Health Organization has developed guidelines for the pharmacological and radiotherapeutic management of cancer pain in adults and adolescents to provide evidence-based guidance to healthcare providers on the adequate relief of pain associated with cancer. This prospective study was done to evaluate the prescription pattern of analgesics for the treatment of cancer pain. Material and Methods This prospective observational study was conducted in cancer patients attending the pain clinic of the Anesthesia and Radiotherapy Outpatient Department. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Human Ethics Committee. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years of either gender, willing to provide written informed consent, and patients undergoing radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or palliative treatment. Exclusion criteria were patients having psychiatric illness, not willing to provide written informed consent, patients having renal and or hepatic dysfunction, patients with comorbidities with chronic pain, and patients who underwent surgical intervention. Results A total of 100 participants were recruited during the study period of July 2022–April 2024 whose data were assessed. Participants were prescribed different classes of analgesic drugs, which included 30% participants on opioid analgesics, 30% on non-opioid analgesics, and 40% on combination therapy. Among opioid analgesics, morphine was the most commonly prescribed. Among non-opioid, paracetamol was the most commonly prescribed. Among combination therapy, tramadol was the most commonly prescribed. Pregabalin was most commonly used as an adjuvant analgesic. Conclusion This study also emphasizes on need for adequate treatment of cancer pain and vigilant monitoring of patients on opioids to prevent drug abuse, drug dependence, and adverse drug reactions.

Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Adequate pain relief during childbirth is a very important issue for women and healthcare providers. This study investigates the effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes of two analgesic methods during labor: water immersion and epidural analgesia. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study at a first-level hospital, in Spain, from 2009 to 2019, 1134 women, low-risk singleton and at term pregnancy, were selected. Among them, 567 women used water immersion; 567 women used epidural analgesia for pain control. Maternal outcomes included mode of birth and perineum condition. Neonatal outcomes included 5 min Apgar score, umbilical cord arterial pH, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions. Chi-square tests and Mann–Whitney U tests, together with their effect sizes (Cramer’s V, odds ratio, and Cohen’s d) were used to test the main hypotheses. Results: Spontaneous vaginal birth was almost 17 times more likely in the water immersion group (OR = 16.866 [6.540, 43.480], p &lt; 0.001), whereas the odds of having a cesarean birth were almost 40 times higher in the epidural group (OR = 39.346 [3.610, 429.120], p &lt; 0.001). The odds of having an intact perineum were more than two times higher for the water immersion group (OR = 2.606 [1.290, 5.250], p = 0.007), whereas having an episiotomy was more than eight times more likely for the epidural group (OR = 8.307 [2.800, 24.610], p &lt; 0.001). Newborns in the water immersion group showed a better 5 min Apgar score and umbilical cord arterial pH and lower rates in admissions at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Conclusions: Women choosing water immersion as an analgesic method were no more likely to experience adverse outcomes and presented better results than women choosing epidural analgesia.

A Comparative Study Between Femoral Nerve Block and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Post-Operative Analgesia in Femur Fracture Fixation

Introduction: Femur fractures and their surgical fixations are common. Adequate postoperative pain relief is mandatory as it facilitates rapid recovery by enhancing early ambulation and mitigating stress response. This is barely achievable with conventional pain control methods. Ultrasound-guided regional blocks like femoral nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block are simple yet promising techniques for postoperative analgesia in femur fractures. Aims: To compare post-operative analgesia duration and satisfaction attained between the patients receiving ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with, those receiving ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block, after femur fracture fixation. Methods: Seventy-four patients, aged 16−85 years, of either sex, ASA I−II, who underwent femur fracture surgical fixations under spinal anesthesia, were randomly divided into two equal groups: groups 1 and group 2. Postoperatively, Group 1 (n= 37) received a femoral nerve block with 15 ml 2.5% bupivacaine whereas Group 2 (n = 37) received a supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block with 30 ml 2.5% bupivacaine. Duration of analgesia, patients' level of satisfaction, visual analogue scale scores, and hemodynamic parameters at different time intervals were recorded in the first 24 hours postoperatively and compared. Results: The demographic profiles between the two groups were comparable. Group 2 had a significantly longer duration of analgesia than Group 1, with the means 795.14 vs 538.65 minutes respectively, and a P value of .002. Although group 1 patients had predominantly 3 and 4 levels of satisfaction whereas group 2 had 4 and 5, there was no statistically significant difference in patients’ level of satisfaction between the groups (P=.249). Conclusion: Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block provides a longer duration of analgesia than femoral nerve block in femur fracture fixation. The level of satisfaction in both groups is high and comparable.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Classic and Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

BackgroundTrigeminal neuralgia is a debilitating disease, with severe recurrent paroxysms of shock-like facial pain. Although pharmacotherapy may suffice in the majority of cases, a proportion of patients require surgical treatment. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) represents a potential non-invasive alternative to surgery in these patients. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed all patients that underwent GKRS for classic/idiopathic TN between 2013 and 2023. Pain prior to GKRS was graded per the Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score, which was also used to define outcomes. “Complete pain relief (CPR)” was defined as a BNI pain score of I or II, while “Adequate pain relief (APR)” was defined as a BNI pain score of III, and “Failure” as a BNI score of IV or V. ResultsThe mean age of 70 patients (50 females and 20 males) was 47.4 ± 12.4 years. The mean follow-up was 51.3 ± 16.2 months. Although initial pain relief was achieved in 64 patients (91.4%), recurrence of pain at the latest follow-up occurred in 10 patients (14.3%). Overall, 41 patients (58.6%) achieved CPR, while 13 patients (18.6%) achieved APR. Multivariate analysis revealed that multiple prior failed procedures for TN predicted failure of pain relief. ConclusionGKRS is effective among patients with classic/idiopathic TN, with complete pain relief in 58.6% of patients, and adequate pain relief in 18.6% of patients. The most frequent complication is facial hypesthesia, affecting 38.6% of patients. Multiple prior failed procedures for TN significantly predict failure of pain relief at latest follow-up.

Effect of propofol infusion vs ketamine plus dexmedetomidine infusion on the amplitude of motor evoked potential in pediatric patients undergoing tethered spinal cord surgeries; a randomized, double blind controlled study

Background &amp; objective: The use of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) has increased over the past two decades for the detection and prevention of iatrogenic neurologic injuries. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) are extremely sensitive to changes in physiological variables and inhalational agents reduce MEPs in a dose dependent manner. So IV anesthetics (propofol or ketamine) and opioids (fentanyl or remifentanil), are frequently used in spinal surgeries under MEPs monitoring. We compared the effects of propofol and fentanyl to those of ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and fentanyl in terms of minimizing their effects on MEP amplitude and hemodynamic stability during surgery Methodology: This double blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted on 46 children, who were randomly allocated into 2 groups Ketamine–dexmedetomidine group: (n = 23) Maintenance throughout the procedure, by infusing Dexmedetomidine (0.4 -0.6 μg/.kg /.hr) ketamine, (1 -2m/.kg/.hr.) and giving bolus of fentanyl, (1-2μg/.kg/ ). Propofol-group:(n = 23) Maintenance throughout the procedure, By infusing propofol (100 ug L/kg/min) and giving bolus of fentanyl, (1-2μg/.kg/ ), with keeping mean arterial blood pressure changes within 25% of the baseline in both groups. Results: Right and left quadriceps muscle measurements were insignificantly different between both groups at base line and were significantly higher in Group KD than Group P at skin incision, surgical manipulation and surgical closure. Right and left adductor hallucis muscle measurements were insignificantly different between both groups at base line and were significantly higher in Group KD than Group P at 5 mins, 10 mins, 15 mins, skin incision, surgical manipulation and surgical closure (P value &lt;0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in Group KD than Group P. Conclusion: The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine infusion is efficacious, safe, and has minimal effect on evoked potentials compared with the propofol-based TIVA group during spine pediatrics surgery. In addition, this combination increases the reliability and accuracy of MEP monitoring with hemodynamic stability and adequate post-operative pain relief. Using dexmedetomidine and ketamine infusions during pediatric spine surgery might successfully replace the typical propofol-based TIVA, although more studies are required . Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT05591001. Keywords: Motor evoked potential, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, propofol. Citation: Saleh AH, Hammad SH, Hassan PF. Effect of propofol infusion vs ketamine plus dexmedetomidine infusion on the amplitude of motor evoked potential in pediatric patients undergoing tethered spinal cord surgeries; a randomized, double blind controlled study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(4):692−699; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i4.2218 Received: May 08, 2023; Reviewed: February 02, 2024; Accepted: July 03, 2924

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple sclerosis-associated trigeminal neuralgia

BackgroundGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has well-known efficacy in the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of GKRS in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS)-related TN. This study analyzed the efficacy and complications of GKRS for MS-related TN. MethodsThis retrospective study included 28 MS-related TN patients who underwent GKRS with a median follow-up of 27 (range, 12–181) months. The cisternal segment of the trigeminal nerve was targeted with a median radiation dose of 80 (80–90) Gy. Pain intensity was assessed using Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI)-Pain Intensity Scores (BNI-PIS). Before GKRS, all patients suffered from BNI pain levels of 4 or 5. A reduction in pain to BNI 3b or below was deemed as adequate pain relief. ResultsThe initial proportion of patients who experienced adequate pain relief was 71.4%, with a median interval of 21 (1–45) days. At the final follow-up, 50% of patients had achieved adequate pain relief. Ten patients (35.7%) suffered from complications, including four with facial sensorial dysfunctions, four with a decline in their corneal reflexes, and two with jaw weakness. Among the 20 initial responders, six (30%) patients suffered pain recurrence after a median interval of 35 (12–180) months. ConclusionsGKRS is an effective means of pain relief in MS-related TN, but has side effects that are relevant to other ablative treatments. The benefits and risks of GKRS should be discussed with patients who wish to avoid surgery or when previous treatments fail.

Primary Isolated Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint for Hallux Rigidus: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pedobarographic Evaluation.

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is an effective treatment of advanced hallux rigidus. Numerous options have been described for performing this intervention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes following a consistent surgical technique of joint preparation with hand tools and fixation with 2 crossed screws and a dorsal compression plate. Thirteen patients (16 feet) who underwent primary isolated arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint between March 2019 and June 2021 were available for clinical, radiologic, and pedobarographic evaluation at a minimum of 12 months after surgery. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society scores, numerical pain rating scale, the radiologic hallux valgus and intermetatarsal 1-2 angles as well as the distribution of plantar pressure during gait were compared between the pre- and postoperative conditions. After an average follow-up period of 26 months, union was achieved in all cases and the mean AOFAS score raised significantly by 39 points. All the patients were satisfied with the result. Only 1 patient complained of mild residual pain at walk. Hardware removal was performed in 2 cases. The mean hallux valgus angle dropped from 12.3 to 6.3 degrees. The mean postoperative dorsiflexion angle was 21.6 degrees. After the procedure, peak pressure was significantly higher beneath the first metatarsal head and heel, whereas pressure-time integral was significantly lower beneath the hallux and medial lesser toes. Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint with 2 crossed screws and a dorsal compression plate is a safe and effective treatment of advanced hallux rigidus. This procedure provides adequate pain relief and functional improvement of gait. Level IV, therapeutic, retrospective case series.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fractures.

The incidence of hip fractures has continued to increase as life expectancy increases. Hip fracture is one of the leading causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the geriatric population. Early surgical treatment (<48 h) is often recommended to reduce morbidity/mortality. In addition, adequate pain management is crucial to optimize functional recovery and early mobilization. Pain management often consists of multimodal therapy which includes non-opioids, opioids, and regional anesthesia techniques. In this review, we describe the anatomical innervation of the hip joint and summarize the commonly used peripheral nerve blocks to provide pain relief for hip fractures. We also outline literature evidence that shows each block's efficacy in providing adequate pain relief. The recent discovery of a nerve block that may provide adequate sensory blockade of the posterior capsule of the hip is also described. Finally, we report a surgeon's perspective on nerve blocks for hip fractures.

The Maxillary Nerve Block in Cleft Palate Care: A Review of the Literature and Expert's Opinion on the Preferred Technique of Administration.

Although the maxillary nerve block (MNB) provides adequate pain relief in cleft palate surgery, it is not routinely used globally, and reported techniques are heterogeneous. This study aims to describe relevant anatomy and to present the preferred technique of MNB administration based on the current literature and the expert opinion of the authors. First, a survey was sent to 432 registrants of the International Cleft Palate Master Course Amsterdam 2023. Second, MEDLINE (PubMed interface) was searched for relevant literature on maxillary artery (MA) anatomy and MNB administration in pediatric patients. Survey response rate was 18% (n=78). Thirty-five respondents (44.9%) used MNB for cleft palate surgery before the course. A suprazygomatic approach with needle reorientation towards the ipsilateral commissure before incision was most frequently reported, mostly without the use of ultrasound. Ten and 20 articles were included on, respectively, MA anatomy and MNB administration. A 47.5% to 69.4% of the MA's run superficial to the lateral pterygoid muscle and 32% to 52.5% medially. The most frequently described technique for MNB administration is the suprazygomatic approach. Reorientation of the needle towards the anterior aspect of the contralateral tragus appears optimal. Needle reorientation angles do not have to be adjusted for age, unlike needle depth. The preferred anesthetics are either ropivacaine or (levo)bupivacaine, with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant. Described MNB techniques are heterogeneous throughout the literature and among survey respondents and not routinely used. Further research is required comparing different techniques regarding efficacy and safety.

Pain treatment individualization in patients with advanced cancer using immediate release morphine

Adequate pain relief through individual tailoring of the basic analgesic in suited dose and drug formulation, as well as the use of adjuvant and supportive therapy, relieves the suffering of patients with advanced cancer in most cases. Noninvasive opioids in immediate and modified release formulations play a key role in treating severe chronic pain syndrome. We present a series of case studies to illustrate morphine tablet and oral solution administration as part of an individual pain therapy regimen, such as opioid dose titration, treatment of breakthrough pain, and around-the-clock pain control.

Opioid metabolism and drug-drug interaction in cancer.

Concomitant use of multiple drugs in most patients with cancer may result in drug-drug interactions (DDIs), potentially causing serious adverse effects. These patients often experience unrelieved cancer-related pain (CRP) during and after cancer treatment, which can lead to a reduced quality of life. Opioids can be used as part of a multimodal pain management strategy when non-opioid analgesics are not providing adequate pain relief, not tolerated, or are contraindicated. However, due to their narrow therapeutic window, opioids are more susceptible to adverse events when a DDI occurs. Clinically relevant DDIs with opioids are usually pharmacokinetic, mainly occurring via metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP). This article aims to provide an overview of potential DDIs with opioids often used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe CRP and commonly used anticancer drugs such as chemotherapeutics, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), or biologics. A DDI-checker tool was used to contextualize the tool-informed DDI assessment outcomes with clinical implications and practice. The findings were compared to observations from a literature search conducted in Embase and PubMed to identify clinical evidence for these potential DDIs. The limited results mainly included case studies and retrospective reviews. Some potential DDIs on the DDI-checker were aligned with literature findings, while others were contradictory. In conclusion, while DDI-checkers are useful tools in identifying potential DDIs, it is necessary to incorporate literature verification and comprehensive clinical assessment of the patient before implementing tool-informed decisions in clinical practice.

Method of non-drug pain relief during childbirth

In modern obstetrics it is possible to regulate pain perception during childbirth. There are methods of both drug and non-drug pain relief during childbirth. Up to 25–30 % of women characterize labor pain as severe and excessive. Adequate labor pain relief provides psychological comfort and eliminates stress caused by pain. After labor pain, many women experience depression, decide to terminate the next pregnancy, or (up to 30 %) request a caesarean section without medical indications. Pain relief during labor is one of the priorities in obstetric care.

Efficacy of Postoperative Opioid-Sparing Regimens for Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Multiple interventions have been implemented to reduce opioid prescribing in upper extremity surgery. However, few studies have evaluated pain relief and patient satisfaction as related to failure of these protocols. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of limited and nonopioid ("opioid-sparing") regimens for upper extremity surgery as it pertains to patient satisfaction, pain experienced, and need for additional refills/rescue analgesia. We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of opioid-sparing approaches in upper extremity surgery. An initial search of studies evaluating opioid-sparing regimens after upper extremity surgery from the elbow distal yielded 1,320 studies, with nine meeting inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, surgery type, postoperative pain regimen, satisfaction measurements, and number of patients inadequately treated within each study were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Nine randomized controlled trials with 1,480 patients were included. Six of nine studies (67%) reported superiority or equivalence of pain relief with nonopioid or limited opioid regimens. However, across all studies, 4.2% to 25% of patients were not adequately treated by the opioid-sparing protocols. This includes four of seven studies (57%) assessing number of medication refills or rescue analgesia reporting increased pill consumption, refills, or rescue dosing with limited/nonopioid regimens. Five of six studies (83%) reporting satisfaction outcomes found no difference in satisfaction with pain control, medication strength, and overall surgical experience using opioid-sparing regimens. Opioid-sparing regimens provide adequate pain relief for most upper extremity surgery patients. However, a meaningful number of patients on opioid-sparing regimens required greater medication refills and increased use of rescue analgesia. These patients also reported no difference in satisfaction compared with limited/nonopioid regimens. Therapeutic II.

Comparative Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Ropivacaine, and 0.75% Ropivacaine With Fentanyl as a Continuous Intraoperative Epidural Infusion on Post-operative Analgesia.

Introduction Persistent postoperative pain leads to impaired patient recovery and delays in discharge of patients. The aim was to compare the efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine to two varying concentrations of ropivacaine, specifically 0.5% and 0.75%, along with fentanyl as a continuous epidural infusion in providing adequate pain relief for patients subjected to infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and methods A prospective randomized comparative study was carried out on 150 patients and was divided into three groups, namely group B, group R, and group RP. Group B indicates (0.5% bupivacaine), group R means (0.5% ropivacaine),and finally, group RP means (0.75% ropivacaine); the three groups had 50 patients each. Group B was administered an epidural infusion of bupivacaine at a concentration of 0.5%, group R was given 0.5% ropivacaine, and group RP was treated with 0.75% ropivacaine; all three groups included 40 mcg fentanyl. The duration of the motor and sensory blockade and the time needed for the first rescue analgesia after the stoppage of epidural infusion were assessed in all three groups.The data were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA, "post hoc Tukey," and chi-square tests. Results Comparison of the duration of motor and sensory blockade among all three groups showed that group RP (0.75% ropivacaine with 2 mcg/cc fentanyl)had the longest duration of 328.8 and 406 minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Comparison of the time of stoppage of epidural infusion to the requirement of first rescue analgesia showed that the group that received 0.75% ropivacaine with 40 mcg fentanyl had the highest value of 258.6 minutes and was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion Epidural intraoperative infusion of 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl offers better postoperative pain relief as compared to both 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine with fentanyl.

Anesthesiological provision in hip and knee joint replacement (a scientific literature review)

Effective pain management during hip and knee replacement ensures the efficient and fast recovery of patients. Joint replacement surgery is typically accompanied by the use of general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia, despite certain risks, demonstrates better effectiveness compared to general anesthesia in hip and knee replacements. In other words, spinal anesthesia entails fewer perioperative complications. The addition of sedation and anesthesia monitoring during joint replacements using spinal anesthesia is of particular importance. After a successful surgical procedure of joint replacement, achieving adequate pain relief in the postoperative period is crucial. This is achieved through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia or epidural analgesia. A multimodal analgesia strategy combines analgesics with different mechanisms of action to enhance pain management. Intraoperative periarticular administration of multimodal agents is one of the most important procedures in the perioperative pain control during total hip arthroplasty. Peripheral nerve blocks have emerged recently as an alternative analgesic approach. During hip and knee replacements, various nerve blocks are utilized, including lumbar plexus block, fascia iliaca block, femoral and sciatic nerve block, adductor canal block, quadratus lumborum block, erector spinae plane block. Given the entire perioperative process, the use of preventive and multimodal therapy along with peripheral nerve blocks can help reduce the intensity of postoperative pain, thereby improving the functional status and quality of life for patients.