Adequacy Of Law Research Articles

An Examination on Adequacy of Law in India to Regulate and Monitor Media

The two horrible conditions ahead of time than the organizers worldwide are to diminish the stack at the conventional fills and to reduce the continually developing basic spoiling. This test is proposed to discover probably the execution of the DI diesel motor at various loads when fuelled with mixes of palm methyl esters and diesel. The primers have been pushed on a completely utilized diesel motor without changes. Every one of the appraisals were consistent usa of america and outfitted toward dependable pace. The impact of moving weight develop to be assessed the volume that brake warm temperature ability, mass flow rate, brake one of a kind gas use and fumes gas temperature. Exploratory impacts show that at complete weight conditions, the B-20, B-40and B-60 mixes bring 33.23%, 32.81%, 32.39% and 31.ninety seven% higher brake heat usefulness than sole diesel freely. It wound up confirmed that the brake warmth ability of palm biodiesel is higher than that of diesel, and it is a delayed consequence of the oxygenated atom of biodiesel which acknowledges total ingesting of the biodiesel fuel. In addition the mass development rate of biodiesel is evidently superior to anything that of diesel fuel; it is through method for exact capacity of the calorific estimation of biodiesel is a ton parcels less appeared in one another way as far as diesel gas. At the reason for results obtained from this test utilizing palm biodiesel as a fuel is proposed for the utilized as a piece of a diesel motor with diesel mixes.

Facets of domestic Violence suffered by women and girls in India and the legislative Framework

‘Domestic violence’ is multifaceted, an eminent challenge being recognized worldwide as tool for oppression of women and girls. It is the major social and economic issue in the Indian society, being raising concerns for the violation of women and girls right to life, health, development and to live with peace and comfort of house where large numbers of women’s and girls are subjected to cruelty, physical harm and various forms of violence having devastating and ill effect on them emotionally as well psychologically. This research paper aims to significantly contribute to the understanding of the various issues relating to domestic violence on women and girls occurring or alleged to have occurred within family between persons sharing same household, married couples or between intimate partners, its effects and causes. This paper further examines the adequacy of law in India to deal with the Domestic violence.

A Gestão dos Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos na Região Sudoeste Baiana

No ano de 2010, foi instituída em 2 de agosto a Lei n° 12.305/2010, que prevê a implementação, por parte dos municípios, dos consórcios intermunicipais, inclusão social de catadores de resíduos recicláveis, realização de projetos de educação ambiental, bem como outras propostas de caráter socioambiental. Este trabalho pretende analisar a realidade dos municípios do sudoeste da Bahia em relação à adequação da Lei n° 12.305/2010. Dos municípios inquiridos, somente 9 aceitaram participar deste trabalho. Observou-se, nesta pesquisa, que os municípios possuem dificuldades para cumprir o que exige a Lei, por questões financeiras e deficiência no quadro técnico de funcionários.

(Still) Fighting the Financial Crisis of 2008: Ten Years Later

Set in the spring of 2018, the US Congress contemplated changes to the Dodd-Frank Act in an effort to improve financial regulation in the United States. The case offers details on the slow recovery from the financial crisis of 2008, on protest and political movements that ensued, on the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, and on 14 proposals for new financial regulation. As of 2018, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeb Hensarling offer differing regulatory agendas for the financial services industry in the United States. Excerpt UVA-F-1838 Jul. 27, 2018 (Still) Fighting the Financial Crisis of 2008: Ten Years Later A decade after the financial crisis of 2008, Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jeb Hensarling led continuing debates over the adequacy of laws and regulations to prevent or mitigate future financial crises. Senator Warren advocated tighter regulation; Representative Hensarling argued that regulations were ineffective, costly, and had retarded the recovery of the economy from the crisis of 2008. By 2018, the ongoing political ferment around financial crises revealed that anger about the crisis of 2008 had not yet subsided. Over a dozen new remedies commanded the consideration of public leaders. What problems were these proposals trying to fix? And from the vantage point of a decade later, which remedies seemed appropriate? Why? More generally, should the aim of regulation be to reduce the risk of future crises to zero? In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Act (see Exhibit1) that imposed special stress tests and capital requirements on “significantly important financial institutions” (SIFIs), limited the ability of the US Federal Reserve (Fed) to respond as a lender of last resort, and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to regulate new financial products. In signing the act, President Barack Obama said, “These reforms represent the strongest consumer financial protections in history…because of this law, the American people will never again be asked to foot the bill for Wall Street's mistakes.” In 2011, a commission chartered by Congress issued a report on the crisis that sparked controversy and recriminations about the causes of and responsibility for the crisis. In 2008, 2010, and 2012, the Fed pursued programs of “quantitative easing” (QE), massive asset purchases aimed at driving interest rates to historically low levels and stimulating the economy. Protests and new political movements met these and other government actions with hostility—and culminated in an especially polarizing presidential campaign in 2016. . . .

EQUITÀ NEL DIRITTO ODIERNO

The need for case-specific justice, going beyond the law as a general and abstract norm, deeply penetrates the legal practice, from its origins to the present day. Examples taken from Plato and Aristotle are illustrated in this regard. These could spark an interest in tracing the tension between abstract generalities and concrete details in the theories of justice and in the history of judicial institutions throughout the ages. These include the tensions that emerged during the Enlightenment, as well as those from the period dominated by the doctrine of law as an expression of general will that was therefore just. The work highlights the renewal of this issue, crucial for our vision of the law and our expectations of it in current constitutional state, which in many respects has gone beyond the concept of the law from the Enlightenment à la Montesquieu, Bentham and Beccaria, given the constitutional requirement to focus on the needs of specific cases. Within this revival, a particularly important role is played by the numerous cases in which the laws are declared unconstitutional because of their excessive generality or abstractness, or on the basis of the judiciary’s inability to pass a fair judgement on the case before them. This is a surprising result that has emerged from the principles of equality and adequacy of law, a result that also calls into question the concept of jurisdiction and problematises the suitability of a judicial organisation modelled on an official judge “subject only to the law” in relation to the important, delicate and even dangerous function referred to by Plato as the “arte regia”.

Parental Child Abduction In Malaysia: Is Everything Right with Our Domestic Laws?

Parental child abduction is an unacceptable and condemned act due to its bad implication caused especially on the child. Nevertheless, it was hard to charge parents for absconding or stealing their own child for a long accepted tradition and settled rule that both parents have equal rights over the child. Both would have justifications for their act to be considered as good and bad for the child even to the extent of abducting him or her from the other parent. However, as time passed, the laws particularly, family and criminal law, have also developed to face rapid changes in the family institution. The need to reform the laws for want of jurisdiction or lack of uniformity or adequacy of laws on a certain matter were among the result of the changes in family pattern. Experience from cases showed that it was very hard for any parent to get back his or her child once the subject has been brought outside the country. Thus, this article is aiming at scrutinising the domestic laws of Malaysia, particularly the family and criminal laws on parental child abduction as well as its enforcement aspect by referring to the relevant provisions and the decided cases. Suggestions are provided to strengthen the law and its enforcement aspect, being a tool to prevent parental child abduction.

‘Ma’ and a Political Theology of Hindi Cinema

Hindi commercial cinema appears distinctive in its assemblage of earthly law and divine justice or political theology. Historically, Hindi cinema’s mothers have embodied a postcolonial melancholia of the (in)adequacy of law to justice. This blog piece seeks to explain a shift in the relationship between law and justice in recent Hindi films through a rumination on the disappearing melancholic mother.

A comparative review between the updated models of Brazilian, United Kingdom and American eye banks and lamellar transplants

O transplante de córnea (CT) é o tipo de transplante mais realizado no mundo e os Bancos de Olhos (BO) são organizações que capturam, evoluem, preservam, guardam e distribuem tecidos oculares. Com a evolução das técnicas cirúrgicas e equipamentos para o CT, os BOs precisaram evoluir para acompanhar estas necessidades. Esta evolução vai desde técnicas de captura de tecidos; doação de dinheiro e esclarecimento ao paciente (baseadas na internet, por exemplo); utilização de equipamentos modernos, para fornecimento mais adequado de [...]

The Rights of Victims of Crime under Malaysian Law: Legal Framework and Prospect for Reforms

The rights of victims of crime should be protected. In conventional punitive justice as exercised in Malaysia, the law only focuses on punishment that is to be inflicted on the offender. Nevertheless, it ignores the needs of victims of crime. Even though the victim has certain rights, it does not mean that such rights can be obtained straight away. In fact, many victims neither realize nor understand about their rights. As a result, it is claimed, victims rarely experience justice when their case is dealt with by traditional punitive methods. Thus, it is timely to examine the existing legal framework and to suggest reform to the system so that the aspects relating to rights of crime victims can be formulated. This is significant in order to promote fair and just treatment for the parties concerned. This paper will focus on adequacy of law in protecting the rights of victims of crime in Malaysia.

The Adequacy of the Law of Torts

Any attempt to evaluate the adequacy or inadequacy of tort law in general is bound to fail unless the scope of inquiry is severely limited. All attempts to find some unifying principle have failed. In light of the diverse interests involved which may be political, domestic or economic, and the purposes to be achieved, which may range from the quasi-criminal to determination of title to property, it would be a miracle of intellectual abstraction if it were otherwise.To confine inquiry to “accidental” injuries, i.e., those arising as a by-product of some lawful activity carried on for reasons other than the invasion of a plaintiff's interest, is helpful but not satis-factory. For example, “accidental” injury to a person's privacy, honour or reputation could fall in this category. While issues of “strict liability” or liability for “fault” permeate this field and have, in England and Canada, been developed by the courts in favour of the former, public interest in freedom to disseminate news and the encouragement of freedom of speech is an important factor here which makes it impossible to compare other branches of the law where there is no counterpart. Here too legislation is playing an important role. By statute in England attempts have been made to mitigate some of the harsher features of strict liability by eliminating damages and substituting an “offer of amends” for accidental and non-negligent defamation. While legislation in Canada has been widespread, particularly with regard to the total or partial abolition of the distinction between libel and slander, such legislation has nowhere changed the strict liability of the common law.