Adefovir Group Research Articles

Telbivudine Plus Adefovir Versus Lamivudine Plus Adefovir for Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B: TeSLA Randomized Trial

Background: In countries with unavailable tenofovir, a combination of lamivudine (LMV) and adefovir (ADV) is recommended for the treatment of LMV-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Considering that telbivudine (L-dT) was demonstrated to be superior to LMV in previous studies, L-dT and ADV combination therapy is expected to show better antiviral efficacy than the combination of LMV and ADV in patients with LMV-resistant CHB. Methods: This was a prospective randomized multicenter study. The primary endpoint was Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA reduction after 52 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints were HBV DNA undetectability, hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, the incidence of virological and biochemical breakthroughs, and safety during the study period. Results: A total of 43 LMV-resistant CHB patients were enrolled. Twenty-one were treated with LMV + ADV and 22 with L-dT + ADV. After 52 weeks of antiviral treatment, the HBV DNA reduction showed no significant intergroup difference (-4.54 ± 1.23 log IU/mL in the LMV + ADV group, -4.24 ± 1.46 log IU/mL in the L-dT + ADV group, P = 0.475). There were no significant intergroup differences in HBV DNA undetectability rates, mean HBV DNA level, or hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rate at 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks of treatment. In terms of safety, the mean creatine phosphokinase level was significantly higher in the L-dT + ADV group. Conclusions: In the treatment of LMV-resistant CHB, the combination of L-dT and ADV did not show any clinical benefit compared to the combination of LMV and ADV.

Efficacy of different nucleoside analog rescue therapies for entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients

BackgroundEntecavir (ETV) is recommended as a first-line anti-HBV treatment. However, many chronic hepatitis B patients initiate anti-HBV treatment such as lamivudine and telbivudine with low genetic barriers in China, which leads to compensatory mutations and increases the rate of ETV resistance. The management of ETV resistance in China is an essential clinical issue.MethodsPatients from 2011 to 2017 with nucleos(t)ide analog resistance were screened and 72 patients with ETV resistance were included. These patients received different rescue therapies including an ETV and adefovir (ADV) combination therapy group (n = 25), a tenofovir (TDF) monotherapy group (n = 27), and an ETV and TDF combination therapy group (n = 20). Virologic, biochemical, and serologic responses were compared among the three groups.ResultsThe rate of ETV resistance among all HBV-resistant variants increased from 6.04% in 2011 to 15.02% in 2017. TDF monotherapy and TDF combination groups showed similar rates of negative HBV DNA at 48 weeks (74.07% vs 70.00%, P > 0.05), while the ETV and ADV group showed the worst virologic response (28.00%). Also, TDF monotherapy and TDF combination therapy showed similar decline of HBV DNA at weeks 12, 24, and 48. There was no significant difference in the rates of HBeAg clearance, ALT normalization, and abnormal renal function among the three groups.ConclusionsTDF monotherapy showed a comparable virologic response to TDF and ETV combination therapy and a better virologic response than ETV and ADV combination therapy. Thus, TDF monotherapy is the preferred rescue therapy for ETV resistance.

Kinetics of hepatitis B surface antigen and estimated glomerular filtration rate in telbivudine-treated hepatitis B patients with different rescue strategies

This study investigated the kinetics of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) in telbivudine (LdT)-treated chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients whose treatment was subsequently adjusted with the adding on adefovir or by switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as rescue. Of 295 CHB patients initially treated with LdT, 102 of them who subsequently receiving either adding-on adefovir (group A, n = 58) or switching to TDF (group B, n = 44) for more than 24 months were enrolled. Serial eGFR and qHBsAg levels (3 to 6 monthly) in both LdT monotherapy and rescue therapy periods were analyzed retrospectively. Subsequent decline of qHBsAg especially in rescue therapy period were noted (p<0.001 and p = 0.068 in group A and B). However, patients in group B achieved a significant increase of eGFR (p = 0.010) in LdT monotherapy period but had a significant decline of eGFR (p<0.001) in rescue therapy period. In contrast, patients in group A maintained eGFR levels in both periods. Meanwhile, switch to TDF (hazard ratio: 3.036; 95% confidence interval: 1.040–8.861; p = 0.042) was the sole factor related to the decrease of eGFR>20% from baseline. Both rescue therapies achieved subsequent declines of qHBsAg over time but caused different changes in eGFR. LdT-based rescue therapy maintained eGFR but TDF switching therapy descended eGFR. Therefore, it is essential to monitor patient’s renal function intensively when switching from LdT to TDF as a rescue strategy.

Retrospective Analysis of HBV Pre-Existing Mutations and Drug-induced Resistance Mutations in Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-Related Cirrhosis

Background: The reported prevalence and necessity of detection of HBV reverse transcriptase (RT) mutation prior to treatment is varied and remains controversial. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of HBV pre-existing gene resistance mutations and compare the difference between pre-existing mutations and drug-induced resistance mutations in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis.Methods: 180 patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis which included 68 patients with virological breakthrough and 112 treatment-naive cirrhosis patients were retrospectively enrolled. The drug-resistant mutations of HBV reverse transcriptase domain were screened by direct gene sequencing. One-way ANOVA analysis was performed in the comparison among different groups. Ratios difference was compared with the chi-square test.Results: There were 48 patients (48/112, 42.86%) with drug resistance mutations in nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) treatment-naive group, 59 patients (59/68, 86.76%) showed drug-resistant mutations in the NAs treatment group. The gene resistance mutation patterns in treatment-naive group were mainly rtS213T, rtV214A, 191V/I and rtN/H238T/D, and the types of resistance mutations in the treated group were different. The adefovir (ADV) group: mainly rtA181T/V and rtS213T; lamivudine/ telbivudine (LAM/LDT) group: rtL180M+ rtM204I/V/S and rtM204I/V/S or a complex mutation pattern containing 204 site; entecavir (ETV) group: The drug resistance pattern is the simultaneous presence of multiple site mutations. LAM/LDT sequential ADV group: The variant type was multi-site and resistant to both ADV and LAM.Conclusion: There was a prevalence of pre-existing mutations in RT region of HBV polymerase in patients with hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis, The mutation pattern is mainly related to LAM and ADV-related compensatory mutations, while the drug-induced mutation pattern is more complicated, mainly related to the antiviral drugs used and there are mainly primary mutations. Patients with cirrhosis should be tested genetic resistance mutation before using antiviral drugs.

Antiviral and antifibrotic therapies reduce occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B and liver fibrosis: a 144-week prospective cohort study

To compare the efficacy and safety of different antiviral and antifibrotic regimens in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and hepatic fibrosis and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with these therapies. A total of 840 patients with CHB and concurrent hepatic fibrosis, who received antiviral therapy in Nanfang Hospital between June, 2010 and June, 2018, were enrolled in this follow-up cohort study. The patients were assigned to 3 cohorts matched for gender, age (difference≤5 years), HBeAg status and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for treatment with one of the 3 antiviral drugs, namely entecavir, tenofovir dipivoxil and adefovir dipivoxil; each cohort was divided into 2 groups, with one of the groups having a combined treatment with Fufang Biejiaruangan tablet. The cumulative negative conversion rate of HBV DNA, normalization rate of ALT, hepatic fibrosis regression and the incidence of HCC were compared among the 3 cohorts and across the 6 groups at 144 weeks. A total of 749 patients were available to follow-up at 144 weeks. Compared with the baseline data, the cumulative negative conversion rate of HBV DNA increased gradually and the abnormal rate of ALT decreased significantly over time during the treatment in all the 6 groups (all P &lt; 0.001). Compared with the any of the antiviral drugs used alone, the combined treatments all resulted in significantly better antifibrotic effects (χETV cohort2=11.345, χTDF cohort2=10.160, χADV cohort2=6.358; all P &lt; 0.05). At 144 weeks, the incidence of HCC were 2.2%, 1.7%, 1.7% and 3.3% in enecavir group, enecavir with Biejiaruangan tablet group, adefovir group, and adefovir with Biejiaruangan tablet group, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two cohorts (4 groups; χ2=6.813, P=0.138). None of the patients in the 2 groups with tenofovir treatment had HCC by the end of the observation. Antiviral therapy combined with antifibrotic therapy can effectively reverse hepatic fibrosis and reduce the incidence of HCC in patients with CHB; among the 3 antiviral drugs, tenofovir dipivoxil can be a better option for reducing the incidence of HCC in these patients.

Adefovir accumulation and nephrotoxicity in renal interstitium: Role of organic anion transporters of kidney

Common characteristics of drug induced nephrotoxicity are renal tubular and interstitial injury. Many studies have only focused on renal tubular injury. However, less is known about the effects of drugs in the renal interstitium on the nephrotoxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of adefovir (ADV) and the nephrotoxicity in the renal interstitium. Rats were treated with ADV alone or in combination with probenecid for 1, 7, 14, or 28 days. The renal interstitial fluid was collected by renal microdialysis. The concentration of ADV was determined by HPLC-MS/MS. Nephrotoxicity was evaluated by biochemical parameters or histological analysis. The results showed that organic anion transporters (OATs) inhibitor probenecid significantly increased the area under concentration-time curves (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax) of ADV in the renal interstitium, while the clearance (CL) in the renal interstitium was decreased in the ADV plus probenecid group compared to the ADV groups. After long-term treatment, interstitial fibrosis was present in the ADV plus probenecid group, whereas no trace of that could be detected in the ADV groups. Furthermore, a decrease was observed in the expression of OATs/Oats, which was dependent upon the concentrations and time of ADV treatment. In conclusion, it is possible that ADV could be accumulated in the interstitium when Oats were inhibited, which could cause renal interstitial fibrosis. Simply reducing cell uptake in long-term treatment might not be an effective method to protect against chronic nephrotoxicity.

Management of individuals with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and persistent normal or mildly elevated aminotransferase levels.

No consensus exists with respect to positive hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA results and persistent normal or mildly elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). The aim of this study is to investigate the appropriate management and prognosis of these populations with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). A total of 235 subjects with positive HBV DNA results and persistent normal or mildly elevated ALT were enrolled in this study. Liver biopsy and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) were performed in all participants at baseline. Antiviral therapy was initiated in patients with significant hepatic inflammation (G ≥ 2) and/or fibrosis (S ≥ 2). The patients were divided into entecavir and adefovir groups based on HBV DNA load (>2000 IU/mL vs <2000 IU/mL). The liver biopsies were repeated at 72 weeks for the patients received antiviral therapy. We found that 112 subjects were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive, and 123 subjects were negative. The corresponding median ALTs were 46 (39.5-52.5) and 48 (41.5-57.0) U/mL, respectively. G ≥ 2 and/or S ≥ 2 diseases were present in 48.8% (82/168) of the HBeAg-positive and 51.2% (86/168) of HBeAg-negative patients, respectively. In addition, 96 HBeAg-positive and 72 HBeAg-negative patients were divided into entecavir and adefovir groups. Meanwhile, liver biopsies had greater diagnostic accuracy for determining cirrhosis than LSM (0.711 vs 1.0, P < 0.0001). At the end of the study period, undetectable HBV DNA levels and normal ALT levels were observed in CHB-infected patients. Furthermore, the patients showed histologic improvement at 72 weeks compared with baseline measurements (G, 1.72 ± 1.00 vs 0.73 ± 0.88, P = 0.0002; S, 1.484 ± 0.90 vs 0.99 ± 1.13, P < 0.0001). Collectively, liver biopsy enhanced diagnostic accuracy for CHB-infected individuals with persistent normal or mildly elevated aminotransferase levels. Moreover, antiviral therapy can improve or regress the hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Compare the effect of combined therapy between telbivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine plus adefovir dipivoxil corresponding to renal function in patients with hepatitis B virus infection

Objective: To compare the effect of combined therapy using lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) versus telbivudine (LdT) plus adefovir corresponding to the renal function of CHB patients. Methods: A total of 120 patients with chronic hepatitis B were enrolled. According to single daily dosing, they were divided into 4 groups: LdT + ADV group (n = 32), ADV+LdT group (n = 28), LAM + ADV group (n = 38) and ADV + LAM group (n = 22). Hepatorenal function, HBV serological markers, HBV DNA quantification, creatine kinase (CK) and other parameters were examined every 3 months. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization rate, undetectable HBV DNA rate, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate, level of serum creatinine (CR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were analyzed at baseline time, and at weeks 24 and 52.Stastical data were analyzed by t- test and analysis of variance, count data using χ (2) test. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the four groups in terms of ALT normalization rate, HBeAg seroconversion rate, undetectable HBV DNA rate at 24 and 52 weeks. Compared with baseline, at 24 weeks of treatment, there was no significant change in serum creatinine and eGFR in the 4 groups, but after 52 weeks of treatment, serum creatinine decreased in LdT + ADV and ADV + LdT groups and eGFR increased (P < 0.05); Serum creatinine in ADV and ADV + LAM increased, and eGFR was decreased than before (P < 0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference in renal function between the four groups at 24 weeks, but at week 52, eGFR increased and serum creatinine decreased in LdT + ADV group compared with LAM + ADV group (P < 0.05); ADV + LdT Compared with ADV + LAM group, eGFR increased and serum creatinine decreased (P < 0.05). At 52 weeks of treatment, 5 patients with mildly impaired renal function in the ADV + LdT group [n = 10, eGFR 60-90 ml·min(-1) ·(1.73 m(2))(-1)] returned to normal, and none of the ADV + LAM group (n = 9) returned to normal. Conclusion: For patients with mild impaired renal function, adding LdT combined with ADV can improve renal function compared to that of LAM plus ADV.

Monitoring by high-sensitivity HBV DNA assay during treatment in chronic hepatitis B e antigen negative patients

Objective: To explore the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil and adefovir dipivoxil treatment in patients with hepatitis B virus e antigen (HBeAg) negative was analyzed through the comparison of highly sensitive HBV viral load monitoring with HBV genotyping and drug resistance mutations. Methods: The clinical data of newly diagnosed chronic hepatitis B patients from January 2015 to June 2017 in outpatients and inpatients were randomly divided into tenofovir and adefovir group. Quantitative detection of HBV DNA levels before therapy and at 12, 24, 48, 96, and 120 weeks after therapy were determined for HBV genotypes and drug-resistant mutations in HBeAg-negative patients. Student's t-test was used to compare the measurement data between groups. The data of comparison between groups were tested by χ (2). Results: A total of 106 cases of HBeAg-negative patients were collected. Tenofovir disoproxil had a higher rate of HBV DNA suppression (54%) than adefovir dipivoxil treatment (42%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.19). After 120 weeks of treatment, a total of 46 patients (93.9%) were enrolled in the tenofovir disoproxil group with HBV DNA quantitation < 2 000 IU / ml. Adefovir dipivoxil group of patients with HBV DNA < 2 000 IU / ml a total of 40 cases, accounting for 75.5%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). For 49 cases of HBeAg-negative patients, HBV B, C, B and C were mixed before tenofovir dipivoxil treatment, and C1653T, A1762T and G1764A mutation sites were detected in patients with D genotype. Patients C, B, C, B, and C were examined for C1673T, G1896, G1858, G1899A. After treatment, the detection rate of the above mutation sites decreased, but C1653T, C1673T and G1899A were not detected. New mutation sites such as G1915A / C, L180M, M204V, V207I / L, T184A and V173L were detected, Low resistance rate (25%). Conclusion: Tenofovir disoproxil can be recommended as a treatment for HBeAg-negative patients. For HBeAg-negative patients, the choice of high-sensitivity detection of HBV DNA levels, better monitoring of anti-HBV efficacy.

Predictors for efficacy of combination therapy with a nucleos(t)ide analogue and interferon for chronic hepatitis B.

This study aims to explore the efficacy of interferon-α (IFN-α) combined with either entecavir (ETV) or adefovir (ADV) therapy versus IFN-α mono-therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, and to identify the factors associated with treatment outcomes. Totally, 159 CHB patients receiving interferon-based treatment for 48 weeks were enrolled in this retrospective study, including IFN-α mono-therapy group (group A, n=44), IFN-α plus ADV group (group B, n=53) and IFN-α plus ETV group (group C, n=62). The primary measures of efficacy assessments were the changes in HBsAg. Cox regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of treatment outcomes. The predictive values of the factors were assessed by ROC analysis. For patients with baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level <1000 IU/mL, the reductions in mean HBsAg levels at week 48 were greater in group C than that in group A (P<0.05). Higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in the combined therapy group than in IFN-α mono-therapy group at week 48 (P<0.05). Two factors were independently associated with HBeAg seroconversion: baseline HBeAg level <2.215 log10 index/mL and ΔHBeAg (decline in HBeAg from baseline) >0.175 log10 at week 12. In conclusion, interferon-α plus ETV therapy can accelerate HBsAg decline as compared with interferon-α mono-therapy in CHB patients with lower baseline HBsAg levels, and the combination therapy was superior to IFN-α mono-therapy in increasing the rate of HBeAg seroconversion. Baseline HBeAg and ΔHBeAg at week 12 can independently predict HBeAg seroconversion in patients subject to interferon-based therapy for 48 weeks.

Peg-interferon plus nucleotide analogue treatment versus no treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load: a randomised controlled, open-label trial

Antiviral treatment is currently not recommended for patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load. However, they might benefit from acquiring a functional cure (hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] loss with or without formation of antibodies against hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs]). We assessed HBsAg loss during peg-interferon-alfa-2a (peg-IFN) and nucleotide analogue combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load. In this randomised controlled, open-label trial, patients were enrolled from the Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands. Eligible patients were HBsAg positive and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative for more than 6 months, could be treatment naive or treatment experienced, and had alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations less than 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by a computerised randomisation programme (ALEA Randomisation Service) to receive peg-IFN 180 μg/week plus adefovir 10 mg/day, peg-IFN 180 μg/week plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 245 mg/day, or no treatment for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with serum HBsAg loss among those who received at least one dose of study drug or had at least one study visit (modified intention-to-treat population [mITT]). All patients have finished the initial study of 72 weeks and will be observed for up to 5 years of follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00973219. Between Aug 4, 2009, and Oct 17, 2013, 167 patients were screened for enrolment, of whom 151 were randomly assigned (52 to peg-IFN plus adefovir, 51 to peg-IFN plus tenofovir, and 48 to no treatment). 46 participants in the peg-IFN plus adefovir group, 45 in the peg-IFN plus tenofovir group, and 43 in the no treatment group began treatment or observation and were included in the mITT population. At week 72, two (4%) patients in the peg-IFN plus adefovir group and two (4%) patients in the peg-IFN plus tenofovir group had achieved HBsAg loss, compared with none of the patients in the no treatment group (p=0·377). The most frequent adverse events (>30%) were fatigue, headache, fever, and myalgia, which were attributed to peg-IFN dosing. Two (4%) serious adverse events were reported in the peg-IFN plus adefovir group (admission to hospital for alcohol-related pancreatitis [week 6; n=1] and pregnancy, which was electively aborted [week 9; n=1]), three (7%) in the peg-IFN plus tenofovir group (admission to hospital after a suicide attempt during a severe depression [week 23; n=1], admission to hospital for abdominal pain [week 2; n=1], and an elective laminectomy [week 40; n=1]), and three (7%) in the no treatment group (admission to hospital for septic arthritis [week 72; n=1], endocarditis [week 5; n=1], and hyperthyroidism [week 20; n=1]). In patients with chronic hepatitis B with a low viral load, combination treatment (peg-IFN plus adefovir and peg-IFN plus tenofovir) did not result in significant HBsAg loss compared with no treatment, which does not support the use of combination treatment in this population of patients. Roche, Fonds NutsOhra.

Pre-existing mutations related to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue drugs treatment by ultra-deep pyrosequencing.

AimsThe dynamics of resistance-associated mutations under combination therapy were explored.MethodsA total of 46 patients were classified into adefovir (n=14) and entecavir (n=32) groups. In the adefovir (ADV) group, six patients receiving combined therapy were DNA-positive after more than 3 years of therapy. Ultra-deep pyrosequencing was used to analyze the dynamics of multi-drugs resistance mutations.ResultsAt baseline, all 46 treatment-naïve patients harbored rtA181V/T substitutions (1.2%-4.6%) and rtN236T substitutions (1.6%-6.1%). In the ADV group, eight patients with long-term treatment were consecutively HBV DNA-positive for more than 3 years. During treatment, the rtA181T resistance-associated site appeared with increasing frequency in six of eight patients (NOs. 1-6), and two patients (NOs.4 and 8) carrying the rtA181T resistance mutations increasingly showed high levels of rtN236T. One patient (NO. 8) experienced virological breakthrough. Other known pre-existing mutations showed no dynamic fluctuations, including in rtA194T, rtP177G, rtF249A, and rtD263E. In addition to the common substitutions, some previously unknown amino acid substitutions, such as rtD134N, rtL145M/S, rtF151Y/L, rtR153Q, and rtS223A, should be further studied.ConclusionsHBV-resistance substitutions conferring to nucleoside analogs are present at baseline. The dynamics of the HBV RT-region quasispecies variation are heterogeneous and complex.

Mutational analysis of reverse transcriptase and surface proteins of patients with partial virological response during mono and combination antiviral therapies in genotype D chronic hepatitis B.

IntroductionThe mutational pattern of chronic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is unclear in patients who show incomplete response to antiviral therapy. The aims of this study were 1) to determine the benefit of combination therapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) and Lamivudine (LAM) versus ADV or LAM alone in maintaining virological, biochemical and histological responses and 2) to investigate the patterns of mutations in the reverse transcriptase and surface proteins of HBV with LAM and/or ADF-resistant in partially-responded chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsThe study group consisted of 186 chronic HBV carriers who were admitted to the Tehran Hepatitis Network from 2010 to 2013. We retrospectively selected 86 patients who partially responded to different nucleoside analogue regimens. After 48 weeks of therapy, five groups of patients were defined including eight Lamivudine (LAM) Group (I), 30 Adefovir (ADV) Group (II), 16 ADV add on LAM Group (III), 32 ADV+LAM Group (IV), and 100 controls (no therapy). Reverse transcriptase (RT) and surface genes were amplified and sequenced for mutational analysis.ResultsAll groups showed differences between mean values for age, gender, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), and HBV DNA levels groups showed significant differences than other groups (p < 0.05). The mutation frequencies for groups were I (1.7%), II (1.39%), III (2.28%), IV (2.0%), and V (0.38%). T54N, L80I/V, I91L/V, L180M, M204I/V, Q215P/S, and F221Y/S showed the highest number of mutations in all groups with different frequencies. Four new, unreported mutations were found.ConclusionThose patients who failed to respond in the first 48 weeks, whether they were receiving mono or combination therapy, should be tested genotypically, for the early modification of treatment.

A randomized controlled trial on 240-week monotherapy with entecavir or adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis

To compare the efficacies ofentecavir and adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and cirrhosis when administered as monotherapies using a 240-week course. Ninety patients diagnosed with CHB and cirrhosis (compensated or decompensated) were randomly divided into two treatment groups for administration of either entecavir (0.5 mg/day, oral; n =38) or adefovir (10 mg/day, oral; n =52) for 240 weeks. All participants underwent B-ultrasound and were tested for levels of HBV-DNA, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and various serological markers of the hepatitis B virus at baseline and at treatment weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, and 240. Instances of drug-related complications and adverse reactions were recorded. Patients who did not achieve complete virological response by treatment week 48 or who experienced virological breakthrough at any time during the study course were recorded and started on an appropriate combination therapy regimen. Statistical analyses were carried out using the t-test, chi-square test, and Cox regression modeling. The dropout rate in the entecavir group was 2.6% and in the adefovir group was 13.5%. At treatment week 240, significantly more patients in the entecavir group had undetectable serum HBV-DNA (91.9% vs. adefovir group: 57.8%; x2=10.362, P=0.001), a negative conversion rate of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (46.2% vs. adefovir group: 24%; x2=5.055, P=0.025), and rate of HBeAg seroconversion (23.1% vs. adefovir group: 8%, P=0.047).The entecavir group and the adefovir group showed no significant differences upon per-protocol analysis and intention-to-treat analysis, nor in the rates of hepatocellular carcinoma development (entecavir group: 8.1% vs. adefovir group: 6.7%; x2=0.000, P=1.000) or mortality (entecavir group: 8.1% vs. adefovir group: 4.4%; x2=0.051, P=0.821). The possibility of achieving undetectable serum HBV-DNA was 2.761 times higher in the entecavir group than in the adefovir group (95.0% CI: 1.630 to 4.679). The possibility of HBeAg seroconversion was 0.192 times higher for males than for females (95.0% CI: 0.046 to 0.806). Compared to adefovir, entecavir provides high efficiency and rapid viral suppression as a monotherapy for CHB patients when administered in a 240-week course.

Antiviral therapy improves the survival rate and decreases recurrences and fatalities in liver cancer patients following curative resection: A meta-analysis.

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative antiviral treatment on tumor recurrence, fatalities and survival of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection-related primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A systematic meta-analysis was performed. All the studies comparing nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) versus placebo or no treatment were considered. The results were expressed as relative ratio (RR) for 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), recurrence HCC and fatalities with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using STATA 11.0. In total, 15 trials with 7,619 patients were included. There were significant improvements for 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS (RR, 1.09; P=0.003; RR, 1.202; P<0.001; and RR, 1.219; P=0.02; respectively) and in 3- and 5-year OS (RR, 1.087, P=0.006; and RR, 1.186; P<0.001) in the NAs group compared with the control group. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. In addition, the significantly high rate of recurrence HCC and fatalities existed in the control group (RR, 1.301; P=0.002; and RR, 1.816, P<0.001). One study was for an entecavir (ETV)-treated group compared with an adefovir (ADV)-treated group and lamivudine (LAM)-treated group. The 3-year disease-free survival rate for the ETV group was significantly better compared with the ADV and LAM groups [hazard ratio (HR), 0.810; P=0.049; and HR, 0.737; P=0.007]. The present study demonstrated the beneficial effects of NAs therapy following curative treatment of HBV-related HCC. ETV may be the superior choice compared to ADV or LAM for the antiviral treatment.

Impact of nucleos(t)ide analogue combination therapy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Monotherapy with telbivudine or adefovir can affect estimated the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, only a few studies have assessed changes in eGFR in patients who have chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and are receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination therapy. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of long-term NA combination therapy on eGFR in Chinese CHB patients.This retrospective study included 195 CHB patients. Patient subgroups included those treated with lamivudine plus adefovir (n = 73), telbivudine plus adefovir (n = 51), and entecavir plus adefovir (n = 35); untreated patients (n = 36) served as a control group.After an average follow-up duration of 24 months with combination therapy, analysis of changes in eGFR from baseline values, calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas, showed decrease by11.08 and 18.34 mL/min (P < .001), respectively, in the lamivudine plus adefovir group; decrease by 3.73 and 10.04 mL/min (P = .012), respectively, in the entecavir plus adefovir group; and increase by 0.91 and 2.12 mL/min (P = .46), respectively, in the telbivudine plus adefovir group. The eGFR in the telbivudine plus adefovir group was similar to that for the untreated group. The eGFR decreases due to adefovir therapy could be rescued by adding telbivudine, and the eGFR increase due to telbivudine could be compromised by adding adefovir.Adefovir in combination with lamivudine or entecavir therapy was significantly associated with decreased eGFR, but telbivudine could rescue the eGFR decrease that results from adefovir treatment.

Comparison of the efficacies of entecavir 0.5 and 1.0 mg combined with adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B who had failed on prior nucleos(t)ide analogue treatments.

Entecavir (ETV) plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy is one of the useful treatment option for the patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had failed on prior nucleos(t) ide analogue (NA) treatments. This study compared the efficacies of the combinations of ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV and ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV in patients who had failed on prior multiple NA treatments. This retrospective analysis included 148 consecutive patients with CHB infection in Korea (n = 37 with ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV and n = 111 with ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV). The virological and biochemical responses were compared between the two groups. The cumulative probability of viral suppression of ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV was not inferior to that of ETV 1.0 mg plus ADV (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-1.08; P = 0.094). The changes in serum HBV DNA level in the ETV 0.5 mg plus ADV group were not different between the two groups over 12 months. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in acquiring ETV-resistant variants between the two groups during the treatment (HR, 0.95; P = 0.953). This study suggests the proof-of-concept that the lower dose of NA in combination with other NA might be the theoretical option for rescue combination therapy in patients with CHB who had failed on prior multiple NA treatments in order to reduce systemic exposure and possible side effects of NA.

Effects of nucleos(t)ide analogues initial treatment on virology and complications in hepatitis B virus related decompensated liver cirrhosis: a multicenter, prospective and observational study

Objective To evaluate the effects of nucleos(t)ide analogues initial treatment on virology and complications in hepatitis B virus (HBV) related decompensated liver cirrhosis. Methods From May 2012 to October 2013, a total of 209 patients with HBV related decompensated liver cirrhosis of 18 hospitals in China were enrolled. According to antiviral medicine taken by them, they were divided into entecavir (ETV) group (n=161), lamivudine (LAM) monotherapy or combined with adefovir (ADV) group (n=48, LAM 22 cases, LAM+ ADV 26 cases). During the 12-month follow-up period, Child-Pugh scores, the level of HBV DNA and complications of liver cirrhosis were documented every three months, the safety evaluation was also carried out. The t-test or chi-square test was performed for statistical analysis. Results In ETV group, before treatment and 12 months after treatment, Child-Pugh scores were 7.91±2.05 and 5.75±1.72, respectively, and the latter was lower than the former (t=10.130, P 0.05). The undetectable rates of HBV DNA gradually increased along with the treatment period. After 12 months treatment, the undetectable rate of HBV DNA of ETV group was 91.0%(61/67), and that of LAM alone or combined with ADV group was 87.5% (35/40), there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Before treatment and 12 months after treatment, the incidences of ascites were 59.4% (82/138) and 15.0% (12/80) in ETV group, the latter was lower than the former (χ2=40.740, P 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum urea nitrogen, serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rates between the two groups before treatment and at different time points after treatment (all P>0.05). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of ETV and LAM alone or combined with ADV are similar in patients with HBV related decompensated liver cirrhosis, however, the long-term efficacy should be identified by further clinical observation. Key words: Liver cirrhosis; Hepatitis B virus; Entecavir; Complications

Comparison of Lamivudine Plus Adefovir Therapy Versus Entecavir With or Without Adefovir Therapy for Adefovir-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

Data regarding the management of adefovir (ADV) resistance are still limited. The aim of this study is to investigate treatment outcomes of rescue therapy in ADV-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. CHB patients who began rescue therapy due to documented genotypic resistance mutations to ADV between October 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Most patients had history of lamivudine (LAM) resistance. Treatment response was evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. The cumulative rate of complete virologic response (CVR) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients (HBV DNA<60 IU/mL) was 15.9%, 27.2%, 28.9%, and 31.7% after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of rescue therapy. Thirty-five patients were treated with a combination of LAM plus ADV (LAM+ADV group) and 28 patients were treated with entecavir (ETV)-based therapy (ETV with or without ADV therapy, ETV±ADV group). The cumulative CVR rate was significantly higher in the ETV±ADV group than in the LAM+ADV group at month 12 (46.4% vs. 20.6%, respectively, P=0.040). Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment serum HBV DNA levels at <6 log10 IU/mL (hazard ratio: 34.109, P=0.001) and type of rescue therapy (hazard ratio: 4.944, P=0.036) were associated with CVR. Lower baseline HBV DNA level and ETV±ADV therapy were the important predictive factors for CVR in ADV-resistant CHB patients. This study suggests the need of early switching to a rescue therapy such as ETV±ADV at the time of low-level viremia.

Entecavir plus adefovir combination therapy versus lamivudine add-on adefovir for lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B: A meta-analysis.

To determine whether adefovir (ADV) in combination with entecavir (ETV) is more effective than with lamivudine (LAM) in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic HBV infection, electronic databases were searched through May 10th, 2013 to obtain relevant trials which met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. Four trials containing a total of 323 patients were included. Serum HBV DNA reductions after 3 and 6 months of treatment in the ETV + ADV group were greater than that of LAM + ADV group (mean difference (MD) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.07, P < 0.00001; MD = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.57-1.06, P < 0.00001). The rate of 6 months HBV DNA undetectability with ETV and ADV was higher than that of LAM and ADV (relative risk (RR) = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.14-2.34, P < 0.007). There were higher rates of serum ALT normalization than those in LAM + ADV group after 6 months of treatment (RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.11-1.77, P < 0.005). The ETV + ADV group had lower viral breakthrough and genotypic mutation rates than LAM + ADV group after 12 months of treatment (RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.10-0.58, P = 0.002). The combination of ETV plus ADV is a more effective rescue therapy than LAM add-on ADV in patients with LAM-resistant HBV.