You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD54-08 SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL VS TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL MATCHED-PAIR COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES Mahmoud Abou Zeinab, Ethan Ferguson, Aaron Kaviani, Alp T. Beksac, Marcio Moschovas, Luca Morgantini, Sij Hemal, Susan Talamini, Jean Joseph, Moses Kim, Simone Crivellaro, Vipul Patel, Jeffrey Nix, and Jihad Kaouk Mahmoud Abou ZeinabMahmoud Abou Zeinab More articles by this author , Ethan FergusonEthan Ferguson More articles by this author , Aaron KavianiAaron Kaviani More articles by this author , Alp T. BeksacAlp T. Beksac More articles by this author , Marcio MoschovasMarcio Moschovas More articles by this author , Luca MorgantiniLuca Morgantini More articles by this author , Sij HemalSij Hemal More articles by this author , Susan TalaminiSusan Talamini More articles by this author , Jean JosephJean Joseph More articles by this author , Moses KimMoses Kim More articles by this author , Simone CrivellaroSimone Crivellaro More articles by this author , Vipul PatelVipul Patel More articles by this author , Jeffrey NixJeffrey Nix More articles by this author , and Jihad KaoukJihad Kaouk More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002631.08AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The introduction of the ‘purpose-built’ Single-port (SP) robot successfully expanded the surgical approaches in the management of localized prostate cancer to include the extraperitoneal, in addition to the standard transperitoneal approach. We sought to perform a multi-institutional study to assess the perioperative, and functional outcomes between SP extraperitoneal (ERP) and SP transperitoneal (TRP) radical prostatectomy. METHODS: From February 2019 to October 2021, a prospective data collection from six different robotic centers was performed. Data of 412 patients who underwent ERP and 241 patients who underwent TRP were analyzed. All procedures were performed by surgeons with extensive robotic experience. A 1:1 matched-pair analysis for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk was performed. Baseline characteristics, intraoperative, postoperative and functional outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Before matching, there was a significantly higher percentage of NCCN high risk in the ERP group compared to the TRP group. After matching, patients in the ERP had a higher rate of previous abdominal surgery (p <.001). The median operative time was 203 vs 169 minutes, median estimated blood loss was 150 vs 87 cc for ERP and TRP, respectively (p <.001). TRP was more likely to include an additional surgical port (SP+1). 37.6% of the ERP group had more extraprostatic extension on pathology compared to 26.8% in the TRP, with no significant difference in the positive surgical margins (25.3% and 26.8%). The median lymph node yield was higher in the ERP group (6 vs 3 nodes, p=.017). ERP patients were more likely to be discharged the same day after the surgery (7 vs 14 hours, p <.001), and had their median Foley catheter stay for 7 days compared to 5 days In the TRP group (p <.007). There was no difference in the perioperative complications or continence rates after the surgery. Median follow-up was 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both SP ERP and TRP are comparable surgical options for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. ERP is more associated with same-day discharge and higher lymph node yield. TRP has a shorter operative time and less estimated blood loss. The two techniques have similar complications, positive surgical margin, and continence rates. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e918 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Mahmoud Abou Zeinab More articles by this author Ethan Ferguson More articles by this author Aaron Kaviani More articles by this author Alp T. Beksac More articles by this author Marcio Moschovas More articles by this author Luca Morgantini More articles by this author Sij Hemal More articles by this author Susan Talamini More articles by this author Jean Joseph More articles by this author Moses Kim More articles by this author Simone Crivellaro More articles by this author Vipul Patel More articles by this author Jeffrey Nix More articles by this author Jihad Kaouk More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Read full abstract