In recent years, density function theory (DFT) calculations have indicated that the trends in oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity of various catalysts can be correlated to the energetics of some key reaction intermediates, which oftentimes leads to a specific trend, namely “volcano plot” where the catalytic activity rises and falls as the absorption free energies of the intermediates change.1 More importantly, researchers found out the absorption free energies of the three species are strongly correlated, which implies the difficulty of optimizing the absorption free energies of the three independently.1,2 This finding suggests that reduction of the energy barrier for one reaction step will presumably lead to an increase for another.2–4 There are several proposed strategies to circumvent the absorption free energy scaling relations, such as N, S-doping,5 introducing additional absorption site,6,7 strain effect,8 etc. Of all the strategies, the introduction of reducible transition oxides has recently shown the great potential in tailing adsorption energies of reaction intermediates on the active sites.In this work, a group of Pt(CuNi)x ternary alloy nanoparticles on carbon support were synthesized using a modified solid-state chemistry method (x = 0.33, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 1.5, 2, 3). It is believed that alloying Pt with transition metals could shift the d-band center of the alloy downwards, which causes lower absorption energy of the intermediate oxygenated species. By changing the composition of Pt(CuNi)x alloy, we could essentially tune the reaction intermediate absorption energy. Interestingly, the ORR catalytic activity test shows as x (i.e., the content of Cu and Ni) increased, the intrinsic area-specific activity (SA) increased, then deceased, exhibiting a “volcano trend” where the Pt(CuNi)0.66 peaked with a SA of 4.15 mA cm-2 Pt. Since the catalytic activity can be correlated with the reaction intermediate absorption energy, the volcano trend can be explained by Pt(CuNi)0.66 alloy having the most suitable intermediate absorption energy compared to alloys with other compositions. However, the scaling relations between oxygenated intermediate species (*O, *OH, and *OOH) limited the further improvement of catalytic activity. Thus, the deposition of molybdenum oxide as an additional active site was proposed to break the scaling relations and improve further beyond the volcano peak. After the typical synthesis of Pt(CuNi)x catalyst, molybdenum hexacarbonyl (Mo(CO)6) was deposited onto the fresh Pt(CuNi)x catalyst and reduced to metallic Mo. The MoOy/Pt(CuNi)x catalyst was obtained by oxidizing Mo to MoOy in the air. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis reveals that the MoOy consisted of a mixture of MoO3 and MoO2. The electrochemically active area (ECSA) value for MoOy/Pt(CuNi)0.66 decreased from 32.1 to 24.0 m2 g-1 Pt, suggesting a 25% coverage of the metal alloy surface by MoOy. The SA of MoOy/Pt(CuNi)0.66 increased by roughly 14%, from 4.4 to 5.0 mA cm-2 Pt. The SA enhancement was observed for all synthesized MoOy/Pt(CuNi)x catalyst causing the activity volcano plot to shift upwards, which provides strong experimental evidence the activity limit imposed by scaling relations was broken by the deposition of MoOy. The synergistic effect between Pt surface and metal oxides provides several benefits: (i) providing additional active sites for reaction intermediate absorption and reducing the intermediate coverage by enabling spillovers of intermediates between Pt and metal oxide surface.6,7,9 The dual-site cascade oxygen reduction mechanism was reported in detail previously by our group.6 (ii) facilitating O2 absorption and bond breakage by tailoring the electronic structure of adjacent Pt sites.7,10 Therefore, the utilization of reducible transition oxide has shown great potential to overcome the scaling rations to achieve higher ORR activity on Pt-based catalysts.Reference A. Kulkarni, S. Siahrostami, A. Patel, and J. K. Nørskov, Chem. Rev., 118, 2302–2312 (2018).J. K. Nørskov et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, 108, 17886–17892 (2004).Z. W. Seh et al., Science (80-. )., 355, eaad4998 (2017).T. Z. H. Gani and H. J. Kulik, ACS Catal., 8, 975–986 (2018).Y.-Y. Wang, D.-J. Chen, T. C. Allison, and Y. J. Tong, J. Chem. Phys., 150, 41728 (2019).X. Shen et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 141, 9463–9467 (2019).W. Gao, Z. Zhang, M. Dou, and F. Wang, ACS Catal., 9, 3278–3288 (2019).A. Khorshidi, J. Violet, J. Hashemi, and A. A. Peterson, Nat. Catal., 1, 263–268 (2018).Z. Awaludin, J. G. S. Moo, T. Okajima, and T. Ohsaka, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 14754–14765 (2013).Y. Lu, Y. Jiang, X. Gao, X. Wang, and W. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 11687–11697 (2014). Figure 1