Addition Of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Research Articles

Associations Between Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Genomic Testing, and Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Although prostate MRI and tissue-based gene expression (genomic) tests improve staging and estimates of prostate cancer prognosis, their association with the intensity of treatment patients receive is not well understood. We performed a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer in 2013 through 2017 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The primary study outcome was the receipt of treatment intensification in the first 12 months after diagnosis (defined as the addition of androgen deprivation therapy among patients receiving radiation or pelvic lymphadenectomy among those undergoing radical prostatectomy). We assessed associations between the receipt of prostate MRI and genomic testing and treatment intensification, adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic factors and further stratifying the analyses by risk status. We identified 37,064 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, including 6398, 22,011, and 5976 with low, intermediate, and high D'Amico-risk disease, respectively. Among all treated patients, receipt of prostate MRI was associated with increased odds of treatment intensification (odds ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.65-1.88, P < .001). In contrast, genomic testing was not significantly associated. Among treated patients with high-risk disease, genomic testing was associated with decreased odds of intensified treatment (odds ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-1.00, P = .05). Prostate MRI was associated with intensified treatment across risk strata, while genomic testing was associated with lower intensity of treatment among high-risk disease. Additional study is needed to determine whether use of imaging and risk stratification tools leads to improved long-term patient outcomes.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Outcomes After Radiation Therapy in Black Patients With Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer in Black men compared with White men may be more sensitive to radiation therapy resulting in better outcomes in equal-access settings. The outcomes of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) vs radiation therapy itself remains uncharacterized. To quantify any outcome modification by receipt of ADT on the association between Black race and prostate cancer outcomes following radiation therapy. This was a retrospective, nationwide cohort study of Black and White patients treated in the US Veterans Healthcare system between 2000 and 2020 receiving definitive radiation for localized prostate cancer. Data were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2020. Patient self-identified race and use of ADT defined as any gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist prescription within 6 months of radiation. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) from time of completion of radiation therapy (prostate-specific antigen nadir plus 2 ng/mL) and development of metastatic disease or prostate cancer mortality (PCSM) from time of recurrence. A total of 26 542 patients (8716 Black men with median [IQR] age of 64 [59-69] years and 17 826 White men with median [IQR] age of 67 [62-72] years) received definitive radiation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer and had complete staging and follow-up data. A total of 5144 patients experienced BCR (3384 White and 1760 Black patients). The cumulative incidence of BCR at 10 years was not significantly different between Black and White men (1602 [22.14%] vs 3099 [20.13%], respectively) with multivariable hazard ratio (HR) of 1.03 (95% CI, 0.97-1.09; P = .33). In men receiving ADT, Black men had an HR for BCR of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .03) compared with White men, and in men not receiving ADT, Black men had an HR of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.05-1.22; P = .002). Black race was associated with a decreased risk of developing metastatic disease (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P = .02) or PCSM (subdistribution HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63-0.82; P < .001) from time of biochemical recurrence. Black patients treated with radiation appear to specifically benefit from the addition of ADT with regard to biochemical control. Additionally, BCR in Black men results in a lower rate of metastatic disease and death from prostate cancer. Future analyses of radiosensitivity in Black men should evaluate for the possibility of outcome modification by ADT.

Variation in Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Among Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a Statewide Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium

PurposeFor men with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated with definitive therapy, the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) reduces the risk of distant metastasis and cancer-related mortality. However, the absolute benefit of ADT varies by baseline cancer risk. Estimates of prognosis have improved over time, and little is known about ADT decision making in the modern era. We sought to characterize variability and identify factors associated with intended ADT use within the [statewide quality consortium]. Materials and MethodsPatients with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy were enrolled from 6/9/20 to 6/26/23 (n=815). Prospective data was collected using standardized patient, physician, and physicist forms. Intended ADT use was prospectively defined and is the primary outcome. Associations with patient, tumor, and practice-related factors were tested with multivariable analyses (MVA). Random intercept modeling was used to estimate facility-level variability. ResultsFive-hundred seventy patients across 26 facilities were enrolled with intermediate risk disease. ADT was intended for 46% of men (n=262/570), which differed by NCCN favorable intermediate-risk (FIR) (23.5%, n=38/172) vs unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) disease (56.3%, n=224/398), p<0.001. After adjusting for the statewide case mix, the predicted probability of intended ADT use varied significantly across facilities, ranging from 15.4% (95% CI 5.4-37.0%) to 71.7% (95% CI 57.0-82.9%), p<0.01. MVA showed that grade group 3 (OR 4.60 [3.20-6.67]), ≥50% positive cores (OR 2.15 [1.43-3.25]), and PSA 10-20 (OR 1.87 [1.24-2.84]) were associated with ADT use. AUC was improved when incorporating MRI adverse features (0.76) or radiation treatment variables (0.76), but there remained significant facility level heterogeneity in all models evaluated (p<0.05). ConclusionsWithin a state-wide consortium, there is substantial facility-level heterogeneity in intended ADT use for men with intermediate risk prostate cancer. Future efforts are necessary to identify patients who will benefit most from ADT and to develop strategies to standardize appropriate use.

A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Assessing the Impact of Adding First Generation Non-Steroidal Anti-Androgens (NSAA) to LHRH Agonists (LHRHa) in Men Receiving Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Randomized clinical trials consistently demonstrate that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to prostate radiation therapy improves overall survival (OS). However, there is substantial heterogeneity regarding the type of ADT: LHRHa alone, first generation NSAA alone (e.g., bicalutamide) or combination androgen blockade (CAB) with NSAA and LHRHa. There are no published randomized trials in localized disease that specifically compare the efficacy of NSAA to LHRHa, nor the utility of CAB over monotherapy ADT. We herein performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the impact of NSAA in relation to LHRHa in men receiving radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed to identify clinical trials of patients with localized prostate cancer for which ADT duration was the primary randomization variable. Both definitive and salvage radiation trials were included. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated from data extracted from published survival curves. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare OS by ADT regimens. We defined NSAA toxicity as early discontinuation of any ADT agent due to side effects given the inconsistent reporting of specific related toxicity. A meta-regression was performed to assess association with NSAA toxicity, adjusted for study year, patient age, T stage, Gleason score and total ADT duration. NSAA duration was assessed as a continuous variable. Of the 11 trials (8,169 patients) with OS data, the median duration of any ADT was 3 months (range 0-36 months) and the median duration of NSAA specifically was 3.5 months (range 0-24 months). There was no significant difference in OS between those treated with LHRHa (n = 369) vs. CAB (n = 4,792; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.78-1.55). Among those receiving CAB, increased NSAA duration did not improve OS (versus 0 months; 1-6 months HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.94-2.13; 7-12 months HR 1.43, 95% CI 0.87-2.34) when controlling for total ADT duration. Of the 19 trials (15,067 patients) with toxicity data, patients on NSAA (n = 503) appeared more likely to discontinue treatment early compared to those receiving LHRHa (n = 902), though this was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] 4.20, 95% CI 0.16-109.19). A longer duration of NSAA did not adversely affect ADT compliance. Patients were more likely to discontinue ADT prematurely, regardless of type, if the planned duration was longer (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.07-1.09). We did not detect an overall survival benefit to adding NSAA to LHRHa, and NSAA appeared less well tolerated than LHRHa in men receiving radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. These data suggest that providers should consider LHRHa without the addition of a NSAA as optimal when clinically appropriate.

Multi-Institutional Analysis of Metastasis Directed Therapy with or without Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Oligometastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Several prospective trials in oligometastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) have shown metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) can delay time to progression and initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to observation. However, the optimal integration of ADT with MDT remains unclear. Here we report a multi-national, multi-institutional retrospective cohort of omCSPC treated with MDT to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients treated with MDT alone or in combination with ADT. Patients with a controlled primary site and omCSPC (defined as ≤ 5 lesions on conventional imaging) treated with MDT with or without concurrent ADT and with at least 36 months follow-up were retrospectively screened across 13 institutions. The primary endpoints included biochemical progression free survival (bPFS) and radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by treatment group (MDT alone vs MDT + ADT). Multivariable Cox regression was performed adjusted for variables found to be prognostic on univariate analysis. Among 414 patients screened, a total of 263 patients treated between 2003 and 2018 met inclusion criteria and included. Of these, 105 received MDT alone and 158 received MDT+ADT, with median follow-up of 49.5 and 54.5 months, respectively. The majority were metachronous (90%) and had bone lesions (60%). Median ADT duration was 21.3 months (IQR 12.0- 31.9). Patients who received ADT vs. no ADT had poorer prognostic features including 23% vs. 1% synchronous (p<0.001), and 55% vs 40% Gleason 8-10 (p = 0.012). ADT use was associated with a better 5-year bPFS 24% vs 11% (p<0.0001) and rPFS 41% vs 29% (p<0.001). On multivariable Cox regression adjusting for post-MDT PSA nadir and salvage therapy, ADT use maintained significance for both bPFS (HR 0.51 (0.36, 0.71), p<0.001) and rPFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96, p = 0.03). Long-term outcomes with MDT alone suggest a small proportion of patients experience sustained disease control. The addition of ADT appears to improve rPFS, however prospective studies are needed in order to allow for personalization of care in patients with omCSPC.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use among Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy across a Statewide Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium

For men with intermediate (INT) risk prostate cancer, the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) reduces risk of PSA failure, distant metastasis, and cancer-related mortality. Moreover, the relative reduction in cancer-related adverse outcomes with ADT use appears consistent across all INT risk subgroups. The absolute benefit of ADT, however, varies by baseline risk. In contemporary practice, it is unknown which clinical factors are most strongly associated with intended ADT use. Therefore, we sought to identify such factors within the diverse practices of the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium (MROQC). Patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive radiation therapy were enrolled from 6/9/20 to 11/4/22 (n = 599). Standardized patient, physician, and physicist forms were used to collect baseline and follow-up information. Intended ADT use, defined by the treating physician, was prospectively collected and is the primary outcome of this analysis. Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) associations with patient (age, race, comorbidities), tumor (T stage, Gleason, percent cores positive, and PSA), and practice-related (academic vs private) factors were performed. In addition, advanced modality testing (PET, MRI, and genomic classifiers) was available as of March 2021, and subgroup analysis were performed where appropriate. A total 351 patients across 26 centers were enrolled with INT risk disease. ADT use was intended for 46% of men (n = 162/351) which differed by men with NCCN favorable INT (21%, n = 22/105) vs unfavorable INT risk disease (57%, n = 140/246), p<0.001. Sixty two percent (n = 100/162) had an intended ADT duration of 4-6 months and 21% (n = 34/162) had ≥12 months. Older age was associated with ADT use (70 vs 67, p < 0.01); there were no significant differences by race or comorbidities number. MVA showed Gleason 4+3 (OR 4.61 [2.91 - 7.42]) and > = 50% positive cores (2.56 [1.52 - 4.37]) were significantly associated with ADT use. No significant differences were noted based on practice setting. Pelvic MRI was obtained for 71% of men (n = 197/279), genomic classifiers in 47% (n = 130/279), and PET in 2% (n = 6/282). In the subset with MRI (n = 197), adverse features (ECE, SVI, or equivocal LNs) were associated with intended ADT use (OR 3.0 [1.4 - 7.1]) after adjustment for NCCN favorable/unfavorable INT risk classification. Within a state-wide consortium, intended ADT use for intermediate prostate cancer is most strongly associated with Gleason score, ≥50% positive cores, NCCN unfavorable intermediate risk classification, and adverse features on MRI. Nearly half of men had genomic classifier testing underscoring the importance ongoing trials such as NRG/GU 010.

Quality of Life Results of Addition of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Pelvic Lymph Node Treatment to Prostate Bed Salvage Radiotherapy: NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT

Report the quality of life (QOL) analysis of the SPPORT trial of men with a detectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) after prostatectomy for prostate cancer randomized to (Arm 1) salvage prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT), (Arm 2) 4-6 months of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (STADT) + PBRT, and (Arm 3) pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT) + STADT + PBRT. Primary analysis established a benefit of adding PLNRT and STADT to PBRT. There was higher short term but no statistically significant difference in long term adverse events with the exception of blood or bone marrow events. QOL endpoints were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks after RT start, 1 and 5 years, including Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal domains), Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25) (depressive symptoms), and the EuroQol (EQ-5D) (health state weights used in quality adjusted life years (QALYs). In addition to statistical significance, differences in scores were assessed using 0.5 standard deviation (SD) as the criterion for clinical importance. Difference among arms was assessed using pairwise t-tests, Fisher's exact test, and mixed effects regression modeling. To control for multiplicity, the p-value required for statistical significance is p<0.025. Six hundred forty-four patients consented to QOL, about 210 on each arm. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different among arms: 81% were white and 54% <65 years. For EPIC, bowel domain scores decreased at 6 weeks post-RT then increased by years 1 and 5, although not to baseline levels. One clinically significant difference in bowel scores was Arm 3 vs. Arm 1 at 6 weeks. For the urinary domain, scores decreased at 6 weeks post-RT and remained below baseline at 1 and 5 years, but there were no significant differences among arms. For the sexual domain, there were statistically significant differences between arms at 6 weeks and 1 year with patients receiving STADT exhibiting poorer sexual QOL scores. By year 5 the differences were no longer significant. A similar pattern was seen for the hormonal domain. For HSCL-25, differences at 6 weeks were statistically but not clinically significant, and there were no significant differences at the later time points. Comparisons of QALYs for overall survival over an 8-year horizon showed no significant group differences, with a mean of about 7.8 in each arm. Regarding freedom from progression, QALY means were 5.7, 6.5, and 7.4 years for Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with a significant difference between Arms 3 and 1 (p = <.001) favoring the more intensive treatment. While QOL generally declined among all arms at 6 weeks post RT, there were no clinically significant differences in QOL among arms at 5 years. QALYs for freedom from progression favored STADT + PLNRT + PBRT for salvage treatment of prostate cancer.

Real-world evidence analysis of early-stage prostate cancer using natural language processing.

e17007 Background: Real-world evidence (RWE) on the epidemiology and management of localized/locally advanced prostate cancer (LPC) is lacking. Here we used EHRead, a natural language processing framework based on SNOMED CT terminology, to extract clinical information from electronic health records (EHRs) to perform a comprehensive description of a real-world cohort of LPC patients. Here we present a follow-up of the project already communicated at ESMO 2020. Methods: This is an observational, multicenter, retrospective study based on the secondary analysis of free-text and structured clinical information found in EHRs from all observed adult patients with LPC between January 2014 and December 2018 in 12 Spanish hospitals. A total of 375 variables were extracted using EHRead to assess patient clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and journey across different prostate cancer stages. Event-free survival (EFS) was analyzed in incident LPC patients with presence of Gleason or PSA and follow-up greater than 0 days. A multivariable Cox-proportional hazards model was applied to obtain adjusted hazard ratios (aHR). Results: We observed 19788 patients with LPC during a median of 3.5 (interquartile range 1.4-7.4) years of follow-up. 52% of patients had low- (LR), 21% intermediate- (IR) and 27% high-risk (HR) disease. 3938 (18%) patients transitioned to other disease stages, leading to castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in 4%, 7%, 16% of patients with LR, IR, and HR LPC, respectively. 7884 (42%) patients received radiotherapy (RT), 7021 (38%) prostatectomy (PT), 6061 (31%) androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and 1034 (6%) active surveillance. Local recurrence was observed in 3% and distant metastasis in 11% (57% bone, 37% visceral). Distant metastases were observed in 7%, 12% and 21% of HR, IR and LR; 8% vs. 9% of PT vs. RT; and 16% vs 6% of ADT vs. no ADT, respectively. EFS was assessed in 7465 (38%) patients, with a 4-year EFS rate of 18%. Median EFS was 22, 13, and 8 months for LR, IR, HR; 23 vs. 12 months for PT vs. RT; and 8 vs. 21 months for ADT vs. no ADT, respectively. A multivariable cox proportional hazards model is presented in the following Table. Conclusions: During the study period, 11% of all LPC patients developed metastatic disease, with only 18% remaining event-free at 4 years. Transition to mCRPC was 4- and 2-fold higher in HR vs. IR and LR disease, respectively. Disease risk, treatment with RT and/or addition of ADT were independently associated with shorter EFS. Our findings suggest that, despite adjuvant treatment, LPC local extension and histopathological characteristics at diagnosis remain critical determinants of patient prognosis. A more detailed analysis in patients with available Gleason and PSA is underway. [Table: see text]

Decision Regret and Bother With the Addition of Androgen Deprivation Therapy to Definitive Radiation Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation treatment (RT) is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for unfavorable intermediate and high-risk localized prostate cancer. Although there is a variable survival benefit conferred by ADT, there are potential side effects to consider for patient decision-making. We aimed to assess the side effects and bother of adding ADT to RT, the degree of regret, and what overall survival (OS) benefit men would want to justify adding or extending the duration of ADT, after their experience with this treatment. Men receiving ADT with definitive RT completed a questionnaire asking about the side effects and degree of bother from ADT using a 4-point scale. They were also asked about regret, and what survival benefit would warrant ADT. In the study, 846 patients received definitive RT, of whom 356 received ADT and were asked about their experience with ADT. Of these, 234 responded (66%). In 54%, ADT caused some bother, most commonly hot flushes (32%), fatigue (29%), and sexual problems (29%). Five percent regretted receiving ADT "quite a lot" or "very much." Approximately one-third of men deemed a 1% OS benefit from ADT worthwhile, whereas one-third (34%) would want a >10% OS benefit enough to justify choosing ADT again. In addition, 49% of patients who received short-term ADT would accept longer duration ADT for a 6% OS benefit. Significant regret for ADT was low (5%). There was a clear dichotomy between those who deemed any OS benefit from ADT worthwhile versus those who needed a significant survival benefit to justify the side effects. Given that some men may change their opinion on the relative value of ADT after experiencing its effects, this study emphasizes the importance of revisiting patients after 6 months to given patients an opportunity to renegotiate their treatment.

Re: The Addition of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Pelvic Lymph Node Treatment to Prostate Bed Salvage Radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): An International, Multicentre, Randomised Phase 3 Trial

Re: The Addition of Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Pelvic Lymph Node Treatment to Prostate Bed Salvage Radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): An International, Multicentre, Randomised Phase 3 Trial

A systematic review and meta-analysis on overall survival, failure-free survival and safety outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with new anti-androgens.

Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with new antiandrogens have shown to improve the outcomes of patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in this specific scenario. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were identified after systematic searching of databases. A random-effect model was used to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival according to the inverse-variance method. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for treatment-related adverse events (AEs) grade 3 or higher. Heterogeneity was determined using the Tau 2 and I2 statistics. Seven trials were included in this meta-analysis ( n = 7544). The addition of ADT plus new-generation anti-androgens, specifically: abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide was associated with improved OS (pooled HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.71; P < 0.00001) with no significant heterogeneity detected among trials. (Tau 2 = 0; I2 = 0%; P = 0.88). Failure-free survival was significantly longer in the combination-therapy group than in the control group (pooled HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.39-0.47; P < 0.00001) This effect was consistent among trials (Tau 2 = 0; I2 = 27%; P = 0.22). The overall OR of AEs grade 3 or higher was significantly increased with the use of the combination therapy (pooled OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.13-1.74; P = 0.002), with significant heterogeneity among trials (Tau 2 = 0.07; I2 = 82%; P < 0.0001). The addition of either abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide to ADT improves OS and failure-free survival in hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, albeit an increase in AEs.

1381P A transcriptomic signature of AR activity prognosticates development of castration-resistance following metastasis-directed therapy in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

Prospective reports suggest metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) is associated with improved treatment outcomes. When the addition of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) to MDT for omCSPC is needed is unclear. Here we assess the ability of an androgen receptor activity (AR-A) signature to provide prognostic information for omCSPC patients treated with MDT without and with ADT.

The addition of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node treatment to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial

In men with a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after prostatectomy for prostate cancer, salvage prostate bed radiotherapy (PBRT) results in about 70% of patients being free of progression at 5 years. A three-group randomised trial was designed to determine whether incremental gains in patient outcomes can be achieved by adding either 4-6 months of short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to PBRT, or both short-term ADT and pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT) to PBRT. The international, multicentre, randomised, controlled SPPORT trial was done at 283 radiation oncology cancer treatment centres in the USA, Canada, and Israel. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) were those who after prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate had a persistently detectable or an initially undetectable and rising PSA of between 0·1 and 2·0 ng/mL. Patients with and without lymphadenectomy (N0/Nx) were eligible if there was no clinical or pathological evidence of lymph node involvement. Other eligibility criteria included pT2 or pT3 disease, prostatectomy Gleason score of 9 or less, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-1. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive PBRT alone at a dose of 64·8-70·2 Gy at 1·8 Gy per fraction daily (group 1), PBRT plus short-term ADT (group 2), or PLNRT (45 Gy at 1·8 Gy per fraction, and then a volume reduction made to the planning target volume for the remaining 19·8-25 ·2 Gy) plus PBRT plus short-term ADT (group 3). The primary endpoint was freedom from progression, in which progression was defined as biochemical failure according to the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥2 ng/mL over the nadir PSA), clinical failure (local, regional, or distant), or death from any cause. A planned interim analysis of 1191 patents with minimum potential follow-up time of 5 years applied a Haybittle-Peto boundary of p<0·001 (one sided) for comparison of 5-year freedom from progression rates between the treatment groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00567580. The primary objectives of the trial have been completed, although long-term follow-up is continuing. Between March 31, 2008, and March 30, 2015, 1792 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the three treatment groups (592 to group 1 [PBRT alone], 602 to group 2 [PBRT plus short-term ADT], and 598 to group 3 [PLNRT plus PBRT plus short-term ADT]). 76 patients subsequently found to be ineligible were excluded from the analyses; thus, the evaluable patient population comprised 1716 patients. At the interim analysis (n=1191 patients; data cutoff May 23, 2018), the Haybittle-Peto boundary for 5-year freedom from progression was exceeded when group 1 was compared with group 3 (difference 17·9%, SE 2·9%; p<0·0001). The difference between groups 2 and 3 did not exceed the boundary (p=0·0063). With additional follow-up beyond the interim analysis (the final planned analysis; data cutoff May 26, 2021), at a median follow-up among survivors of 8·2 years (IQR 6·6-9·4), the 5-year freedom from progression rates in all 1716 eligible patients were 70·9% (95% CI 67·0-74·9) in group 1, 81·3% (78·0-84·6) in group 2, and 87·4% (84·7-90·2) in group 3. Per protocol criteria, freedom from progression in group 3 was superior to groups 1 and 2. Acute (≤3 months after radiotherapy) grade 2 or worse adverse events were significantly more common in group 3 (246 [44%] of 563 patients) than in group 2 (201 [36%] of 563; p=0·0034), which, in turn, were more common than in group 1 (98 [18%] of 547; p<0·0001). Similar findings were observed for grade 3 or worse adverse events. However, late toxicity (>3 months after radiotherapy) did not differ significantly between the groups, apart from more late grade 2 or worse blood or bone marrow events in group 3 versus group 2 (one-sided p=0·0060) attributable to the addition of PLNRT in this group. The results of this randomised trial establish the benefit of adding short-term ADT to PBRT to prevent progression in prostate cancer. To our knowledge, these are the first such findings to show that extending salvage radiotherapy to treat the pelvic lymph nodes when combined with short-term ADT results in meaningful reductions in progression after prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. National Cancer Institute.

Androgen Receptor Gene Pathway Upregulation and Radiation Resistance in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is currently used as a salvage intervention for men with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PC), and increasingly so since the results of the Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers (SABR-COMET) trial reported a significant improvement in overall survival with SABR. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to localised prostate radiotherapy improves survival as it sensitises PC to radiotherapy-induced cell death. The importance of the androgen receptor (AR) gene pathway in the development of resistance to radiotherapy is well established. In this review paper, we will examine the data to determine how we can overcome the upregulation of the AR pathway and suggest a strategy for improving outcomes in men with oligometastatic hormone-sensitive PC.

Adjuvant or Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer after Prostatectomy: Current Status, Controversies and Perspectives.

Simple SummaryThe management of patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy has undergone significant changes in recent years. Currently, close monitoring of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with early salvage radiotherapy (RT) in case of recurrence is the standard of care based on several randomized trials and a meta-analysis that has demonstrated its non-inferiority to adjuvant RT. Uncertainties remain regarding the management of patients at very high risk of recurrence, including appropriate selection criteria for adjuvant hormone therapy, and the role of imaging in refining the treatment strategy. This review explains this paradigm shift, raises points of controversy, and suggests ways to think about the future.Nearly one-third of the patients who undergo prostatectomy for prostate cancer have a biochemical recurrence (BCR) during follow-up. While several randomized trials have shown that adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) improves biochemical control, this strategy has not been widely used because of the risk of toxicity and the fear of overtreating patients who would not have relapsed. In addition, the possibility of close PSA monitoring in the era of ultrasensitive assays enables to anticipate early salvage strategies (sRT). Three recent randomized trials and their meta-analysis have confirmed that aRT does not improve event-free survival compared to sRT, imposing the latter as the new standard of treatment. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to RT has been shown to improve biochemical control and metastasis-free survival, but the precise definition of to whom it should be proposed is still a matter of debate. The development of genomic tests or the use of artificial intelligence will allow more individualized treatment in the future. Therapeutic intensification with the combination of new-generation hormone therapy and RT is under study. Finally, the growing importance of metabolic imaging (PET/CT) due to its performance especially for low PSA levels will help in further personalizing management strategies.

An AI-derived digital pathology-based biomarker to predict the benefit of androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer with validation in NRG/RTOG 9408.

223 Background: The current standard of care for men with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT) is the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Presently, there are no validated predictive biomarkers to guide ADT use or duration in such men. Herein, we train and validate the first predictive biomarker for ADT use in prostate cancer using multiple phase III NRG Oncology randomized trials. Methods: Pre-treatment biopsy slides were digitized from five phase III NRG Oncology randomized trials of men receiving RT with or without ADT. The training set to develop the artificial intelligence (AI)-derived predictive biomarker included NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, 9910, and 0126, and was trained to predict distant metastasis (DM). A multimodal deep learning architecture was developed to learn from both clinicopathologic and digital imaging histopathology data and identify differential outcomes by treatment type. After the model was locked, an independent biostatistician performed validation on NRG/RTOG 9408, a phase III randomized trial of RT +/- 4 months of ADT. The DM rates were calculated using cumulative incidence functions in biomarker positive and negative groups, and biomarker-treatment interaction was assessed using Fine-Gray regression such that death without DM was treated as a competing event. Results: Clinical and histopathological data was available for 5,654 of 7,957 eligible patients (71.1%). The training cohort included 3,935 patients and had a median follow-up of 13.6 years (IQR [10.2, 17.7]). After the AI-derived predictive ADT classifier was trained, it was validated in NRG/RTOG 9408 (n = 1719, median follow-up 17.6 years, IQR [15.0, 19.7]). In the NRG/RTOG 9408 validation cohort that had digital histopathology data, ADT significantly improved DM (HR 0.62, 95% CI [0.44, 0.87], p = 0.006), consistent with the published trial results. The biomarker-treatment interaction was significant (p-value = 0.0021). In patients with AI-biomarker positive disease (n = 673, 39%), ADT had a greater benefit compared to RT alone (HR 0.33, 95% CI [0.19, 0.57], p &lt; 0.001). In the biomarker negative subgroup (n = 1046, 61%), the addition of ADT did not improve outcomes over RT alone (HR 1.00, 95% CI [0.64, 1.57], p = 0.99). The 15-year DM rate difference between RT versus RT+ADT in the biomarker negative group was 0.3%, vs biomarker positive group 9.4%. Conclusions: We have successfully validated in a phase III randomized trial the first predictive biomarker of ADT benefit with RT in localized intermediate risk prostate cancer using a novel AI-derived digital pathology-based platform. This AI-derived predictive biomarker demonstrates that a majority of patients treated with RT on NRG/RTOG 9408 did not require ADT and could have avoided the associated costs and side effects of this treatment.

The risk of death from prostate cancer in men with Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer treated using brachytherapy with or without a short course of androgen deprivation therapy.

We evaluated whether intermediate-risk factors, in addition to age, were associated with risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) among men with Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 1,920 men with Gleason 3+4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who received brachytherapy (BT) or BT and a median of 4 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Separate multivariable Fine and Gray competing risks regression models among men treated with BT or BT and ADT were used to assess whether percentage of positive biopsies (PPB), cT2b-T2c stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of 10.1-20.0 ng/ml, and age >70 years (median) were associated with risk of PCSM after adjustment for comorbidity. After median follow-up of 7.8 years, 284 men (14.8%) had died (31 from prostate cancer). For BT alone, increasing PPB, PSA of 10.1-20.0 vs. 4.0-10.0 ng/mL, and age >70 vs. ≤70 were significantly associated with increased risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio 1.015, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1.031, P = 0.048; 5.55, 2.01-15.29, P<0.001; and 3.66, 1.16-11.56, P = 0.03, respectively). The respective results for BT and ADT were 1.009, 0.987-1.031, P = 0.44; 4.17, 1.29-13.50, P = 0.02; and 3.74, 0.87-16.05, P = 0.08. Among men with Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer treated with BT, the risk of PCSM was elevated in those with PSA of 10.1-20.0 ng/mL and possibly age >70 years, despite the addition of ADT. Should these findings be validated in future studies, then advanced imaging and targeted biopsy of suspicious areas should be investigated in an effort to personalize treatment and minimize the risk of PCSM in these men.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Mono-institutional Experience.

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer. However, is it not clear whether the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to SRT is beneficial. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of a series of patients treated with SRT plus ADT for localized prostate cancer. Patients were treated with SRT with 42 Gy in 7 fractions with volumetric-modulated arc therapy plus Image Guided Radiotherapy (V-MAT IGRT) technique. ADT was administered to patients with intermediate unfavorable- and high-risk disease. Study endpoints were biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using international prostate cancer symptoms scale (IPSS) and international index of erectile function (IIEF). A total of 170 consecutive patients were identified, of which 49 (28.8%) with low-risk, 15 (8.8%) with favorable intermediate-risk 76 (44.7%) with unfavorable intermediate-risk and 30 (17.6%) with high-risk class. All patients of unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk groups were administered LHRH analogue concurrently to SRT and for at least 6 months. Patients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk presented a 5-year bDFS of 81.7% and 76.9%, respectively. SRT consisting of 42 Gy in seven fractions with short-term ADT represents a safe and effective treatment for unfavorable intermediate and high risk prostate cancer. Our results support the need of high quality studies to test the efficacy of ADT combined with SRT for unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined With Particle Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

PurposeThere is high-level evidence for addition of androgen deprivation therapy to photon-based radiotherapy of the prostate in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Little is known about the value of ADT in particle therapy of prostate cancer. We are conducting a systematic review on biochemical disease-free survival, overall survival, and morbidity after combined particle therapy and ADT for prostate cancer.MethodsA thorough search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted, searching for relevant studies. Clinical studies on prostate cancer and the treatment combination of particle therapy and androgen deprivation therapy were included. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021230801).ResultsA total of 298 papers were identified. Fifteen papers reporting on 7,202 patients after proton or carbon-ion therapy for localized prostate cancer where a fraction or all patients received ADT were selected for analysis. Three thousand five hundred and nineteen (49%) of the patients had received combined ADT and particle therapy. Primarily high-risk (87%), to a lesser extent intermediate-risk (34%) and low-risk patients (12%) received ADT. There were no comparative studies on the effect of ADT in patients treated with particles and no studies identified ADT as an independent prognostic factor related to survival outcomes.ConclusionsThe review found no evidence to support that the effects on biochemical disease-free survival and morbidity of combining ADT to particle therapy differs from the ADT effects in conventional photon based radiotherapy. The available data on the topic is limited.

Sexual function outcomes of radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer in men with good baseline function.

Sexual dysfunction, including erectile dysfunction and loss of libido, are common among men undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer. Both local treatments and systemic androgen deprivation therapy may contribute to these outcomes and are differentially indicated based on disease characteristics. We sought to compare sexual function through 5 years after radiation treatment with and without androgen deprivation therapy in men with good baseline sexual function to better understand long-term effects in this understudied subset of patients. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively assembled population-based cohort of men who underwent radiation with and without androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Sexual function was assessed longitudinally over 5 years. Men with erections sufficient for intercourse at baseline were selected for inclusion. Out of 167 patients included, 73 underwent radiation alone and 94 received androgen deprivation therapy plus radiation (51 with intermediate and 43 with high-risk disease). Androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with worse sexual function through 1 year regardless of disease risk. This difference was no longer statistically significant at 3 years in the intermediate-risk group. Compared to radiation alone, androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk disease was associated with worse sexual function at 3 years (effect: -20.3 points, CI [-31.8, -8.8], p < 0.001) but not at 5 years (effect: -3.4, CI [-17.2, 10.5], p = 0.63). Androgen deprivation therapy plus radiation is associated with worse sexual function through 3-years follow-up in men with high-risk prostate cancer compared to radiation alone. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of intermediate-risk disease does not appear to result in worse sexual function at 3 or 5-year follow-up compared to radiation alone.