Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Research Articles

A comparative analysis of deep learning and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithms with contrast-enhancement-boost post-processing on the image quality of indirect computed tomography venography of the lower extremities

PurposeTo examine whether there is a significant difference in image quality between the deep learning reconstruction (DLR [AiCE, Advanced Intelligent Clear-IQ Engine]) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR [AIDR 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional]) algorithms on the conventional enhanced and CE-boost (contrast-enhancement-boost) images of indirect computed tomography venography (CTV) of lower extremities.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, seventy patients who underwent CTV from June 2021 to October 2022 to assess deep vein thrombosis and varicose veins were included. Unenhanced and enhanced images were reconstructed for AIDR 3D and AiCE, AIDR 3D-boost and AiCE-boost images were obtained using subtraction software. Objective and subjective image qualities were assessed, and radiation doses were recorded.ResultsThe CT values of the inferior vena cava (IVC), femoral vein ( FV), and popliteal vein (PV) in the CE-boost images were approximately 1.3 (1.31–1.36) times higher than in those of the enhanced images. There were no significant differences in mean CT values of IVC, FV, and PV between AIDR 3D and AiCE, AIDR 3D-boost and AiCE-boost images. Noise in AiCE, AiCE-boost images was significantly lower than in AIDR 3D and AIDR 3D-boost images ( P < 0.05). The SNR (signal-to-noise ratio), CNR (contrast-to-noise ratio), and subjective scores of AiCE-boost images were the highest among 4 groups, surpassing AiCE, AIDR 3D, and AIDR 3D-boost images (all P < 0.05).ConclusionIn indirect CTV of the lower extremities images, DLR with the CE-boost technique could decrease the image noise and improve the CT values, SNR, CNR, and subjective image scores. AiCE-boost images received the highest subjective image quality score and were more readily accepted by radiologists.

Computed Tomography Effective Dose and Image Quality in Deep Learning Image Reconstruction in Intensive Care Patients Compared to Iterative Algorithms.

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithms employ convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for CT image reconstruction to produce CT images with a very low noise level, even at a low radiation dose. The aim of this study was to assess whether the DLIR algorithm reduces the CT effective dose (ED) and improves CT image quality in comparison with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We identified all consecutive patients referred to the ICU of a single hospital who underwent at least two consecutive chest and/or abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scans within a time period of 30 days using DLIR and subsequently the FBP or IR algorithm (Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction [ADMIRE] model-based algorithm or Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D [AIDR 3D] hybrid algorithm) for CT image reconstruction. The radiation ED, noise level, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were compared between the different CT scanners. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for statistical comparison. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. A total of 83 patients (mean age, 59 ± 15 years [standard deviation]; 56 men) were included. DLIR vs. FBP reduced the ED (18.45 ± 13.16 mSv vs. 22.06 ± 9.55 mSv, p < 0.05), while DLIR vs. FBP and vs. ADMIRE and AIDR 3D IR algorithms reduced image noise (8.45 ± 3.24 vs. 14.85 ± 2.73 vs. 14.77 ± 32.77 and 11.17 ± 32.77, p < 0.05) and increased the SNR (11.53 ± 9.28 vs. 3.99 ± 1.23 vs. 5.84 ± 2.74 and 3.58 ± 2.74, p < 0.05). CT scanners employing DLIR improved the SNR compared to CT scanners using FBP or IR algorithms in ICU patients despite maintaining a reduced ED.

Three-dimensional CT imaging in extensor tendons using deep learning reconstruction: optimal reconstruction parameters and the influence of dose.

The purpose of this study was to assess the optimal reconstruction parameters and the influence of tube current in extensor tendons three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) using deep learning reconstruction, using iterative reconstruction as a reference. In the phantom study, a cylindrical phantom with a 3mm rod simulated an extensor tendon was used. The phantom images were acquired at tube current of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mA. In the clinical study, CT scans of hand tendons were performed on nine hands from eight patients. All images were reconstructed using advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE) parameters (body, body sharp, brain CTA, and brain LCD) and adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional (AIDR 3D). The objective image quality for tendon detectability was evaluated by calculating the low-contrast object specific contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRLO) in the phantom study and CNR and coefficient of variation (CV) in the clinical study. In the phantom study, CNRLO (at 200 mA) of AiCE parameters (body, body sharp, brain CTA, and brain LCD) and AIDR 3D were 5.2, 5.3, 5.3, 5.8, and 5.0, respectively. In the clinical study, AiCE brain CTA was higher CNR and lower CV values compared to other reconstruction parameters. AiCE without dose reduction may be an effective strategy for further improving the image quality of extensor tendons 3D CT. Our study suggests that the AiCE brain CTA is more suitable for extensor tendons 3D CT compared to other AiCE parameters.

CT Reconstruction Algorithm and Low Contrast Detectability of Phantom Study: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

For almost three decades, computed tomography (CT) has been extensively used in medical diagnosis, which led researchers to conduct linking of CT dose exposure with image quality. In this study, a systematic review and a meta-analysis study were conducted on CT phantom for resolution study especially based on the low contrast detectability (LCD). Furthermore, the association between the CT parameter such as tube voltage and the type of reconstruction algorithm, the amount of phantom scanning affecting the image quality and the exposure dose were also investigated in this study. We utilize PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Scopus databases to search related published articles from the year 2011 until 2020. The notable keywords comprise "computed tomography", "CT phantom", and "low contrast detectability". Of 52 articles, 20 articles are within the inclusion criteria in this systematic review. The dichotomous outcomes were chosen to represent the results in terms of risk ratio as per meta-analysis study. Notably, the noise in iterative reconstruction (IR) reduced by 24%, 33% and 36% with the use of smooth, medium and sharp filters, respectively. Furthermore, adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR 3D) improved image quality and the visibility of smaller less dense objects compared to filtered back-projection. Most of the researchers used 120 kVp tube voltage to scan phantom for quality assurance study. Hence, optimizing primary factors such as tube potential reduces the dose exposure significantly, and the optimized IR technique could substantially reduce the radiation dose while maintaining the image quality.

Quality of Images Reconstructed by Deep Learning Reconstruction Algorithm for Head and Neck CT Angiography at 100 kVp

Objective To evaluate the impact of deep learning reconstruction algorithm on the image quality of head and neck CT angiography (CTA) at 100 kVp. Methods CT scanning was performed at 100 kVp for the 37 patients who underwent head and neck CTA in PUMC Hospital from March to April in 2021.Four sets of images were reconstructed by three-dimensional adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR 3D) and advanced intelligent Clear-IQ engine (AiCE) (low,medium,and high intensity algorithms),respectively.The average CT value,standard deviation (SD),signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the region of interest in the transverse section image were calculated.Furthermore,the four sets of sagittal maximum intensity projection images of the anterior cerebral artery were scored (1 point:poor,5 points:excellent). Results The SNR and CNR showed differences in the images reconstructed by AiCE (low,medium,and high intensity) and AIDR 3D (all P<0.01).The quality scores of the image reconstructed by AiCE (low,medium,and high intensity) and AIDR 3D were 4.78±0.41,4.92±0.27,4.97±0.16,and 3.92±0.27,respectively,which showed statistically significant differences (all P<0.001). Conclusion AiCE outperformed AIDR 3D in reconstructing the images of head and neck CTA at 100 kVp,being capable of improving image quality and applicable in clinical examinations.

Deep learning image reconstruction for quality assessment of iodine concentration in computed tomography: A phantom study.

Recently, deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technology aiming to improve image quality with minimal radiation dose has been applied not only to pediatric scans, but also to computed tomography angiography (CTA). To evaluate image quality characteristics of filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid iterative reconstruction [Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)], and DLR (AiCE) using different iodine concentrations and scan parameters. Phantoms with eight iodine concentrations (ranging from 1.2 to 25.9 mg/mL) located at the edge of a cylindrical water phantom with a diameter of 19 cm were scanned. Data were reconstructed with FBP, AIDR 3D, and AiCE using various scan parameters of tube current and voltage using a 320 row-detector CT scanner. Data obtained using different reconstruction techniques were quantitatively compared by analyzing Hounsfield units (HU), noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs). HU values of FBP and AIDR 3D were constant even when the iodine concentration was changed, whereas AiCE showed the highest HU value when the iodine concentration was low, but the HU value reversed when the iodine concentration exceeded a certain value. In the AIDR 3D and AiCE, the noise decreased as the tube current increased, and the change in noise when the iodine concentration was inconsistent. AIDR 3D and AiCE yielded better noise reduction rates than with FBP at a low tube current. The noise reduction rate of AIDR 3D and AiCE compared to that of FBP showed characteristics ranging from 7% to 35%, and the noise reduction rate of AiCE compared to that of AIDR 3D ranged from 2.0% to 13.3%. The evaluated reconstruction techniques showed different image quality characteristics (HU value, noise, and CNR) according to dose and scan parameters, and users must consider these results and characteristics before performing patient scans.

Effects of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Paranasal Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Filtered Back Projection and Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction.

Iterative reconstruction (IR) improves image quality compared with filtered back projection (FBP). This study investigated the usefulness of model-based IR (forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution [FIRST]) in comparison with FBP and hybrid IR (adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional processing [AIDR 3D]) in low-dose paranasal CT. Twenty-four patients with paranasal sinusitis who underwent standard-dose CT (120 kV) and low-dose CT (100 kV) scanning before and after medical treatment were enrolled. Standard-dose CT scans were reconstructed with FBP (FBP120), and low-dose CT scans with FBP (FBP100), AIDR 3D, and FIRST. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in three anatomical structures and effective doses were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Two radiologists independently evaluated the visibility of 16 anatomical structures, overall image quality, and artifacts. Effective doses in lowdose CT were significantly reduced compared with those in standard-dose CT (0.24 vs 0.43 mSv, p<0.001). FIRST achieved significantly higher SNR (p<0.01, respectively) and CNR (p<0.001, respectively) of evaluated structures and significant improvement in overall image quality (p<0.001), artifacts (p<0.001), and visibility related to muscles (p<0.05) compared to FBP120, FBP100, and AIDR 3D. FIRST allowed radiation-dose reduction, while maintaining objective and subjective image quality in low-dose paranasal CT.

Effect of Deep Learning-based Contrast-enhanced CT Image Reconstruction on the Image Quality of the Biliary System

Objective To evaluate the effect of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) method on the visibility of contrast-enhanced CT images of the biliary system by comparing it with different iterative reconstruction algorithms including the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) algorithm,forward projected model based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST),and filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm. Methods A total of 30 patients subjected to abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and diagnosed with dilatation of common bile duct or extrahepatic bile duct were retrospectively included in this study.The images of the portal phase were reconstructed via four different algorithms (FBP,AIDR 3D,FIRST,and DLR).Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of the dilated bile duct,liver parenchyma,measurable bile duct lesions,and image noise were compared between the four datasets.In subjective analyses,two radiologists independently scored the image quality (best:4 points,second:3 points;third:2 points;fourth:1 point) of the four datasets based on the noise and image visual quality of the biliary system.The Friedman and the Bonferroni-Dunn post-hoc tests were performed for comparison. Results The DLR images (bile duct:4.42±0.87;liver parenchyma:3.78±1.47) yielded higher CNR than the FBP (bile duct:2.21±1.02,P<0.001;liver parenchyma:1.43±1.29,P<0.001),AIDR 3D (bile duct:2.81±0.91,P=0.024;liver parenchyma:2.39±1.94,P=0.278),and FIRST (bile duct:2.51±1.24,P<0.001;liver parenchyma:2.45±1.81,P=0.003) images.Furthermore,the DLR images had higher SNR (bile duct:1.39±0.85,liver parenchyma:9.75±1.90) than the FBP (bile duct:0.86±0.63,P<0.001;liver parenchyma:3.31±1.12,P<0.001) and FIRST (bile duct:1.01±0.61,P=0.013;liver parenchyma:5.73±1.37,P<0.001) images,and showed lower noise (10.51±3.53) than the FBP(4.10±3.92,P<0.001),AIDR 3D (15.72±2.41,P=0.032),and FIRST (17.20±3.82,P<0.001) images.SNR and CNR showed no significant differences between FIRST and AIDR 3D images (all P>0.05).DLR images [4(4,4)] obtained higher score than FPB [1(1,1),P<0.001],AIDR3D[3 (2,3),P=0.029],and FIRST[2 (2,3),P<0.001] images. Conclusion DLR algorithm improved the subjective and objective quality of the contrast-enhanced CT image of the biliary system.

Can deep learning improve image quality of low-dose CT: a prospective study in interstitial lung disease.

To investigate whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could keep image quality and reduce radiation dose in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients compared with HRCT reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction (hybrid-IR). Seventy ILD patients were prospectively enrolled and underwent HRCT (120 kVp, automatic tube current) and LDCT (120 kVp, 30 mAs) scans. HRCT images were reconstructed with hybrid-IR (Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional [AIDR3D], standard-setting); LDCT images were reconstructed with DLR (Advanced Intelligence Clear-IQ Engine [AiCE], lung/bone, mild/standard/strong setting). Image noise, streak artifact, overall image quality, and visualization of normal and abnormal features of ILD were evaluated. The mean radiation dose of LDCT was 38% of HRCT. Objective image noise of reconstructed LDCT images was 33.6 to 111.3% of HRCT, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was 0.9 to 3.1 times of the latter (p < 0.001). LDCT-AiCE was not significantly different from or even better than HRCT in overall image quality and visualization of normal lung structures. LDCT-AiCE (lung, mild/standard/strong) showed progressively better recognition of ground glass opacity than HRCT-AIDR3D (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001), and LDCT-AiCE (lung, mild/standard/strong; bone, mild) was superior to HRCT-AIDR3D in visualization of architectural distortion (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.01; p < 0.05). LDCT-AiCE (bone, strong) was better than HRCT-AIDR3D in the assessment of bronchiectasis and/or bronchiolectasis (p < 0.05). LDCT-AiCE (bone, mild/standard/strong) was significantly better at the visualization of honeycombing than HRCT-AIDR3D (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.01). Deep learning reconstruction could effectively reduce radiation dose and keep image quality in ILD patients compared to HRCT with hybrid-IR. • Deep learning reconstruction was a novel image reconstruction algorithm based on deep convolutional neural networks. It was applied in chest CT studies and received auspicious results. • HRCT plays an essential role in the whole process of diagnosis, treatment efficacy evaluation, and follow-ups for interstitial lung disease patients. However, cumulative radiation exposure could increase the risks of cancer. • Deep learning reconstruction method could effectively reduce the radiation dose and keep the image quality compared with HRCT reconstructed with hybrid iterative reconstruction in patients with interstitial lung disease.

Effects of contrast enhancement boost postprocessing technique in combination with different reconstruction algorithms on the image quality of abdominal CT angiography

ObjectivesTo investigate whether contrast-enhancement-boost (CE-boost) in combination with hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR, also named HIR [AIDR 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional]) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR [FIRST, forward projected model-based IR solution]) algorithms can improve the image quality of abdominal CT angiography (CTA). MethodsThis retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent abdominal CTA. Both arterial and portal phases were reconstructed using three different algorithms [filtered-back projection (FBP), AIDR 3D, and FIRST] separately. CE-boost was performed additionally to generate AIDR 3D-boost and FIRST-boost images. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the arteries and portal system were compared among the five datasets (FBP, AIDR 3D, FIRST, AIDR 3D-boost, FIRST-boost). In subjective analyses, two radiologists independently ordered images (5, best; 1, worst) based on the visual image quality of distal arterial or portal venous branches. The Friedman and the Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis. ResultsFIRST-boost arterial and portal images had the lowest noise compared with FBP, AIDR 3D, FIRST, and AIDR 3D-boost images (all P < 0.05), and significantly higher SNR and CNR than FBP, AIDR 3D, and FIRST images (all P < 0.05). AIDR 3D-boost images showed lower noise, and higher SNR and CNR than FBP and AIDR 3D images (all P < 0.05). FIRST-boost images had higher subjective grading scores than FBP, AIDR 3D, and AIDR 3D-boost images (all P < 0.05). ConclusionThe postprocessing technique CE-boost can improve the image quality of abdominal CTA images. MBIR in combination with CE-boost (FIRST-boost) images had the best image quality compared with the other four image datasets.

Influence of field of view size and reconstruction methods on single-energy metal artifact reduction: a phantom study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) for metal artifacts using CT images reconstructed with adaptive iterative dose reduction three dimensional (AIDR3D) and advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE) in calibration-field of view of various sizes. A prosthetic hip joint was arranged at the center of the phantom. The phantom images were scanned by changing calibration-field of view of 320mm and 500mm, and were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), AIDR3D, and AiCE with and without SEMAR, respectively. The metal artifact reduction with SEMAR was evaluated by calculated the relative artifact index value and visual scores in degree of artifact by seven radiology technologists. Relative artifact index of FBP, AIDR3D, and AiCE with 320mm/500mm calibration-field of views were 10.2/10.0, 16.3/16.4, and 17.8/17.9 without SEMAR, 3.3/3.1, 2.6/2.5, and 2.3/2.0 with SEMAR, respectively. Visual scores were not significantly different between 320 and 500mm calibration-field of views in all reconstruction methods. The effect of metal artifact reduction was not affected by calibration-field of view sizes in the SEMAR combined with AIDR3D or AiCE.

Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.

We aimed to compare the radiation dose and image quality of a low-dose abdominal computed tomography (CT) protocol reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of a routine-dose protocol reconstructed with hybrid-iterative reconstruction. This retrospective study enrolled 71 patients [61 men; average age, 71.9 years; mean body mass index (BMI), 24.3 kg/m2] who underwent both low-dose abdominal CT with DLR [advanced intelligent clear-IQ engine (AiCE)] and routine-dose abdominal CT with hybrid-iterative reconstruction [adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D)]. Radiation dose parameters included volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), effective dose (ED), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Image noise was measured in the hepatic parenchyma and bilateral erector spinae muscles. Moreover, subjective assessment of perceived image quality and diagnostic acceptability was performed. The low-dose protocol helped reduce the CTDIvol by 44.3%, ED by 43.7%, and SSDE by 44.9%. Moreover, the noise was significantly lower and CNR significantly higher with the low-dose protocol than with the normal-dose protocol (P<0.001). In the subjective assessment of image quality, there was no significant difference between the protocols with regard to image noise. Overall, AiCE was superior to AIDR 3D in terms of diagnostic acceptability (P=0.001). The use of AiCE can reduce overall radiation dose by more than 40% without loss of image quality compared to routine-dose abdominal CT with AIDR 3D.

Reliability and benefits of single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction (SEMAR) in the different orthopedic hardware for the hip.

To evaluate the performance and reliability of the single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with different orthopedic hardware at the hips. A total of 153 patients with hip instrumentation who had undergone CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D and SEMAR algorithms between February 2015 and October 2019 were included retrospectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups by the hardware type. Two readers with 21 and 13years of experience blindly reviewed all image sets and graded the extent of artifacts and imaging quality using 5-point scales. To evaluate reliability, the mean densities and image noises were measured at the urinary bladder, veins, and fat in images with artifacts and the reference images. No significant differences were found in the mean densities of the urinary bladder, veins, and fat between the SEMAR images with artifacts (7.57 ± 9.49, 40.29 ± 23.07, 86.78 ± 38.34) and the reference images (7.77 ± 6.2, 40.27 ± 8.66, 89.10 ± 20.70) (P = .860, .994, .392). Image noises of the urinary bladder in the SEMAR images with artifacts (14.25 ± 4.50) and the SEMAR reference images (9.69 ± 1.29) were significantly higher than those in the AIDR 3D reference images (9.11 ± 1.12) (P < .001; P < .001). All AIDR 3D images were non-diagnostic (overall quality ≤ 3) and less than a quarter of the SEMAR images were non-diagnostic (16.7-23.7%), mainly in patients with prostheses [reader 1: 91.7% (22/24); reader 2: 92.6% (25/27)]. The SEMAR algorithm significantly reduces metal artifacts in CT images, more in patients with internal fixations than in patients with prostheses, and provides reliable attenuation of soft tissues.

Improvement of Image Quality Using Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction with Noise Power Spectrum Model in Computed Tomography During Hepatic Arteriography.

Objectives:In CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA), the addition of a noise power spectrum (NPS) model to conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) may improve spatial resolution and reduce image noise. This study aims at assessing the image quality provided by HIR with a NPS model at CTHA.Methods:This institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis included 26 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) who underwent CTHA. In all acquisitions, images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR), and AIDR enhanced (eAIDR) with the NPS model. Four radiologists analyzed the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of HCC nodules and its associated feeding arteries. The radiologists used a semiquantitative scale (–3 to +3) to rate the subjective image quality comparing both the FBP and eAIDR images with the AIDR images.Results:The feeding arteries’ attenuation was significantly higher in eAIDR compared to AIDR [514.3 ± 121.4 and 448.3 ± 107.3 Hounsfield units (HU), p < 0.05]. The image noise of eAIDR was significantly lower than that of FBP (15.2 ± 2.2 and 28.5 ± 4.8 HU, p < 0.05) and comparable to that of AIDR. The SNR of feeding arteries on eAIDR was significantly higher than on AIDR (34.1 ± 7.9 and 27.4 ± 6.3, p < 0.05). Subjective assessment scores showed that eAIDR provided better visibility of feeding arteries and overall image quality compared to AIDR (p < 0.05). The HCC nodule visibility was not significantly different among the three reconstructions.Conclusion:In CTHA, eAIDR improved the visibility of feeding arteries associated with HCC nodules without compromising nodule detection.

Comparison of low-contrast detectability between uniform and anatomically realistic phantoms\u2014influences on CT image quality assessment

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of anatomical phantom structure on task-based image quality assessment compared with a uniform phantom background.MethodsTwo neck phantom types of identical shape were investigated: a uniform type containing 10-mm lesions with 4, 9, 18, 30, and 38 HU contrast to the surrounding area and an anatomically realistic type containing lesions of the same size and location with 10, 18, 30, and 38 HU contrast. Phantom images were acquired at two dose levels (CTDIvol of 1.4 and 5.6 mGy) and reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). Detection accuracy was evaluated by seven radiologists in a 4-alternative forced choice experiment.ResultsAnatomical phantom structure impaired lesion detection at all lesion contrasts (p < 0.01). Detectability in the anatomical phantom at 30 HU contrast was similar to 9 HU contrast in uniform images (91.1% vs. 89.5%). Detection accuracy decreased from 83.6% at 5.6 mGy to 55.4% at 1.4 mGy in uniform FBP images (p < 0.001), whereas AIDR 3D preserved detectability at 1.4 mGy (80.7% vs. 85% at 5.6 mGy, p = 0.375) and was superior to FBP (p < 0.001). In the assessment of anatomical images, superiority of AIDR 3D was not confirmed and dose reduction moderately affected detectability (74.6% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.027 for FBP and 81.1% vs. 73%, p = 0.018 for AIDR 3D).ConclusionsA lesion contrast increase from 9 to 30 HU is necessary for similar detectability in anatomical and uniform neck phantom images. Anatomical phantom structure influences task-based assessment of iterative reconstruction and dose effects.Key Points• A lesion contrast increase from 9 to 30 HU is necessary for similar low-contrast detectability in anatomical and uniform neck phantom images.• Phantom background structure influences task-based assessment of iterative reconstruction and dose effects.• Transferability of CT assessment to clinical imaging can be expected to improve as the realism of the test environment increases.

Relative Enhancement Ratio of Portal Venous Phase to Unenhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Lipid-poor Adrenal Adenomas.

Background The development of an accurate, practical, noninvasive, and widely available diagnostic approach to characterize lipid-poor adrenal lesions (greater than 10 HU at unenhanced CT) remains an ongoing demand. Purpose To investigate whether combined assessment of unenhanced and portal venous phase CT allows for the differentiation of lipid-poor adrenal adenomas from nonadenomas. Materials and Methods Patients with lipid-poor adrenal lesions who underwent unenhanced and portal venous phase CT with a single-energy scanner between January 2016 and March 2020 were identified retrospectively. For each lesion, the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced attenuation were measured; the absolute enhancement (contrast-enhanced minus unenhanced attenuation [HU]) and relative enhancement ratio ([absolute enhancement divided by unenhanced attenuation] × 100%) were calculated. The sensitivity achieved at 95% specificity to distinguish adenomas from nonadenomas was determined with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and compared among parameters with use of the McNemar test. Results A total of 220 patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 66 years ± 12; 134 men) with 131 lipid-poor adenomas and 89 nonadenomas were analyzed. The sensitivity (achieved at 95% specificity) of the relative enhancement ratio (86% [113 of 131 adenomas; 95% CI: 79, 92] at a threshold of >210%) was higher than that of unenhanced attenuation (50% [66 of 131 adenomas; 95% CI: 42, 59] at a threshold of ≤21 HU), contrast-enhanced attenuation (3% [four of 131 adenomas; 95% CI: 1, 8] at a threshold of >120 HU), and absolute enhancement (24% [32 of 131 adenomas; 95% CI: 17, 33] at a threshold of >74 HU; all P < .001). The sensitivities of the relative enhancement ratio were 100% (58 of 58 adenomas; 95% CI: 94, 100), 83% (52 of 63 adenomas; 95% CI: 71, 91), and 30% (three of 10 adenomas; 95% CI: 7, 65) for adenomas measuring unenhanced attenuation of more than 10 HU up to 20 HU, 21-30 HU, and more than 30 HU, respectively. Conclusion A relative enhancement ratio threshold of greater than 210%, measured at unenhanced and portal venous phase CT, accurately differentiated lipid-poor adenomas from nonadenomas, particularly for lesions with unenhanced attenuation of 10-30 HU. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Quantification of airway dimensions using a high-resolution CT scanner: A phantom study.

Small airways with inner diameters less than 2mm are sites of major airflow limitations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the limitations for accurate assessment of small airway dimensions using both high-resolution CT (HRCT) and conventional normal-resolution CT at low dose levels. To model the normal human airways from the 3rd to 20th generations, a cylindrical polyurethane phantom with 14 airway tubes of inner diameters (ID) ranging from 0.3 to 3.4mm and wall thicknesses (WT) ranging from 0.15 to 1.6mm was placed within an Anthropomorphic QRM-Thorax phantom. The Aquilion Precision (Canon Medical Systems Corporation) HRCT scanner was used to acquire images at 80, 100, and 120kV using high resolution mode (HR, 0.25mm×160 detector configuration) and normal-resolution (NR) mode (0.5mm×80 detector configuration). The HR data were reconstructed using a 1024×1024matrix (0.22×0.22×0.25mm voxel size) and the NR data were reconstructed using a 512×512matrix (0.43×0.43×0.50mm). Two reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection; FBP and an adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D algorithm; AIDR 3D) and three reconstruction kernels (FC30, FC52, and FC56) were investigated. The dose values ranged from 0.2 to 6.2mGy. A refined automated full-width half-maximum (FWHM) method was used for the measurement of airway dimensions, where the density profiles were computed by radial oversampling using a polar coordinate system. Both ID and WT were compared to the known dimensions using a regression model, and the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and average error were computed across all 14 airway tubes. The results indicate that the ID can be measured within a 15% error down to approximately 0.8 and 2.0mm using the HR and NR modes, respectively. The overall RMSE (and average error) of ID measurements for HR and NR were 0.10mm (-0.70%) and 0.31mm (-2.63%), respectively. The RMSE (and average error) of WT measurements using HR and NR were 0.10mm (23.27%) and 0.27mm (53.56%), respectively. The WT measurement using HR yielded a factor of two improvement in accuracy as compared to NR. High-resolution CT can provide more accurate measurements of airway dimensions as compared with NR CT, potentially improving quantitative assessment of pathologies such as COPD and asthma. The HR mode acquired and reconstructed with AIDR3D and the FC52kernel provides most accurate measurement of airway dimensions. Low-dose HR measurements at dose level above 0.9mGy can provide improved accuracy on both inner diameters and wall thicknesses compared to full dose NR airway phantom measurements.

Comparison of CT image quality between the AIDR 3D and FIRST iterative reconstruction algorithms: an assessment based on phantom measurements and clinical images

Modern CT iterative reconstruction algorithms are transitioning from a statistical-based to model-based approach. However, increasing complexity does not ensure improved image quality for all indications, and thorough characterization of new algorithms is important to understand their potential clinical impacts. This study performs both quantitative and qualitative analyses of image quality to compare Canon’s statistical-based Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) algorithm to its model-based algorithm, Forward-projected model-based Iterative Reconstruction SoluTion(FIRST). A phantom was used to measure the task-specific modulation transfer function (MTFTask), the noise power spectrum (NPS), and the low-contrast object-specific CNR (CNRLO) for each algorithm using three dose levels and the convolution algorithm (kernel) appropriate for abdomen, lung, and brain imaging. Additionally, MTFTask was measured at four contrast levels, and CNRLO was measured for two object sizes. Lastly, three radiologists participated in a preference study to compare clinical image quality for three study types: non-contrast abdomen, pulmonary embolism (PE), and lung screening. Nine questions related to the appearance of anatomical features or image quality characteristics were scored for twenty exams of each type. The behavior of both algorithms depended strongly on the kernel selected. Phantom measurements suggest that FIRST should be beneficial over AIDR 3D for abdomen imaging, but do not suggest a clear overall benefit to FIRST for lung or brain imaging; metrics suggest performance may be equivalent to or slightly favor AIDR 3D, depending on the size of the object being imaged and whether spatial resolution or low-contrast resolution is more important for the task at hand. Overall, radiologists strongly preferred AIDR 3D for lung screening, slightly preferred AIDR 3D for non-contrast abdomen, and had no preference for PE. FIRST was superior for the reduction of metal artifacts. Radiologist preference may be influenced by changes to noise texture.

CT based Acute Appendicitis Severity Index for acute appendicitis and validate its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis.

To propose a CT-based scoring system called Acute Appendicitis Severity Index (AASI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and validates its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis. Retrospective analyses of CT images of 120 adult patients with pathologically proven uncomplicated (n = 64) and complicated (n = 56) acute appendicitis were performed. All patients had undergone a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis using 320 multi-detectors computed tomography with Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). CT image parameters were identified and used to develop a CT-based scoring system (AASI) to predict the severity of acute appendicitis and its outcome. All image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists and the total score was assigned to each patient based on the proposed CT scoring system. Validation of the effectiveness of the proposed scoring system (AASI) was done using statistical models. The mean and standard deviation of AASI was found to be significantly higher (P value = 0.001) in the complicated appendicitis group (observer 1 = 10.2 ± 1.6 and observer 2 = 9.63 ± 2.3) as compared to that in uncomplicated acute appendicitis group (observer 1 = 7.09 ± 2.2 and observer 2 = 6.38 ± 1.9). There was an excellent interobserver agreement of the Acute Appendicitis Severity Index for both the uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis groups (K = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.87-0.92, P = 0.001). The cutoff value for AASI used to predict complicated appendicitis was taken as 9.5 and 8.5. This resulted in an AUC of 0.877 and 0.848, accuracy of 83% and 81%, the sensitivity of 75% and 80%, the specificity of 90% and 81%, the positive predictive value of 87% and 78%, and a negative predictive value of 81% and 83% by both reviewers respectively. The proposed CT-based AASI is a reliable parameter for the prediction of complicated appendicitis.

PERANAN ADAPTIVE ITERATIVE DOSE REDUCTION 3D (AIDR 3D) DALAM MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS CITRA MSCT ABDOMEN

Background: Abdominal MSCT has better sensitivity and specificity, however its radiation exposure is high. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction (AIDR) 3D is an iterative reconstruction technology on Toshiba which produces a better image quality by reducing noise and streak artifacts in low dose. Based on author’s observation, abdominal MSCT performed at the hospital uses a standard routine abdominal MSCT protocol without adjusting the level of AIDR 3D. AIDR 3D has several strength level allowing an optimal image quality. This study was aimed to explain the role of AIDR 3D in improving the image quality and radiation dose of abdominal MSCT.&#x0D; Methods: This research method is descriptive with the literature study approach, by collecting articles from ProQuest, Google Scholar, PubMed, SpringerLink, and ScienceDirect about the role of AIDR 3D on abdominal MSCT published 2013-2020. The articles were selected according to the inclusion criteria. So there were 4 relevant journals which were then analyzed by making a journal summary, evaluating, giving opinions so that conclusions and suggestions can be drawn.&#x0D; Result: The results showed that AIDR 3D can improve the image quality of abdominal MSCT by reducing noise, artifacts and increasing CNR, SNR, image sharpness. Noise reduction and CNR increase, the most prominent SNR is found in AIDR 3D Strong, followed by Standard and Mild. AIDR 3D can reduce radiation doses better without reducing image quality&#x0D; Conclusion: AIDR 3D can improve image quality on abdominal MSCT and the use of integrated AIDR 3D SUREExposore 3D can reduce radiation doses better without reducing image quality. Reduction of radiation dose between 23% to 76%.