Acute Treatment Of Migraine Research Articles

Use of rimegepant as an alternative to triptans in migraine treatment

Introduction and aim of study: Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder that is considered one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Increasing evidence indicates that the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide released during trigeminal nerve activation, plays a major role in pathophysiology and serves as an important therapeutic target. Rimegepant is an antagonist for the receptor of this peptide and an alternative to the commonly used triptans. Materials and Methods: Two databases, Pubmed and Medline, were searched using the terms "rimegepant" and "migraine." Results: By reducing the severity and frequency of migraine attacks, rimegepant significantly improves patients' daily functioning and quality of life. A single 75 mg dose of rimegepant provided better efficacy than placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Two hours after dosing, significantly more patients in the rimegepant group than in the placebo group reported pain relief (59.3% vs. 43.3%). Rimegepant was also effective in the long term when taken every other day for preventive treatment of migraine and/or as needed for acute migraine treatment. When used, rimegepant was well tolerated in both acute and preventive migraine treatment. The most common adverse events included nasopharyngitis, nausea, urinary tract infection, and upper respiratory tract infection. Conclusions: Rimegepant is an effective drug for treating migraine attacks, offering quick and long-lasting pain relief with a favorable safety profile, especially for patients with contraindications to triptans. Therefore, rimegepant represents a valuable alternative for patients who do not respond adequately to other available migraine therapies.

International Headache Society global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine.

In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications. An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group. A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained. Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.

Long-term safety of zavegepant nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine: A phase 2/3 open-label study.

Zavegepant is the first small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist for intranasal administration for the acute treatment of migraine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of zavegepant in the acute treatment of migraine under repeated, as-needed dosing for up to one year. This phase 2/3, one-year open-label safety study of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray for the acute treatment of migraine enrolled adults aged ≥18 years with a history of two to eight moderate to severe monthly migraine attacks. Participants used one dose of zavegepant as needed to self-treat migraine attacks of any severity, up to eight times per month, for 52 weeks. Participants were enrolled between 29 June and 4 December 2020. Of the 608 participants entering long-term treatment, 603 were treated with study drug. Participants administered a mean (SD) of 3.1 (1.55) zavegepant doses per month. There were no deaths. Of the seven serious adverse events reported, none was considered related to treatment. Altogether, 6.8% (41/603) of treated participants had an adverse event leading to study drug discontinuation. The most frequent adverse event leading to discontinuation was dysgeusia (1.5% [9/603]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5% of participants) were dysgeusia (39.1% [236/603]); nasal discomfort (10.3% [62/603]); COVID-19 (7.5% [45/603]); nausea (6.1% [37/603]); nasal congestion and throat irritation (5.5% [33/603] each); and back pain (5.3% [32/603]). Aminotransferases >3x the upper limit of normal occurred in 2.6% [16/603] of participants; none had concurrent elevations in bilirubin >2x upper limit of normal. One year of zavegepant 10 mg nasal spray up to eight times per month was safe and well tolerated.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04408794.

CGRP Modulating Therapies: An Update.

Calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) is a vasoactive neuropeptide involved in the pathophysiology ofmigraine. CGRP has been targeted for both preventive and acute treatment of migraine. Provide a summary of the most clinically relevant literature surrounding CGRP modulating therapies. This update on CGRP modulating therapies includes articles selected as most clinically relevant by theauthors. CGRP modulating therapies are an exciting new addition to migraine treatment given their safety andtolerability. Additionally, compared to traditional migraine preventive medication these treatments are migrainespecific.Further real-world and clinical data is ongoing to better understand these treatments that continue to gainfavor in the management of migraine.

Role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist in acute and preventive treatment of migraine.

Migraine is the most common neurological disease in the world. It is characterized by recurrent attacks of severe headaches of a one-sided, throbbing nature, often accompanied by sensory and motor disturbances and generally associated with nausea and increased sensitivity to light and sound. Migraine treatment can be divided into emergency treatment and preventive treatment, which aims to reduce the overall frequency and severity of attacks. In the first case, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be used, but in some patients they do not have the desired effect. The gold standard in the fight against migraine pain are triptans (selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists), although they too are not effective in all patients. Current understanding suggests that CGRP plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of migraines. Evidence supporting this includes increased CGRP levels during migraine attacks, causing inflammation and activation of other pathophysiological processes responsible for pain. The hope for patients are CGRP receptor antagonists, which greatly expand therapeutic options.

Efficacy and Safety of Rimegepant 75 mg Oral Tablet, a CGRP Receptor Antagonist, for the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rimegepant 75 mg oral tablet - a small molecule calcitonin-gene receptor peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist - with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial enrolled adults aged ≥18 years with at least a 1-year history of migraine. Participants randomized to rimegepant 75 mg oral tablet or placebo treated a single migraine attack of moderate or severe pain intensity. The coprimary endpoints, pain freedom and freedom from the most bothersome symptom ([MBS] nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia) at 2 hours postdose, were evaluated using Mantel-Haenszel risk estimation. Of the 1485 participants enrolled, 1162 (78.2%) were randomized to rimegepant (n = 582) or placebo (n = 580). Most participants (85.5%) were female; the population had a mean (SD) age of 41.6 (12.2) years and a history of 4.7 (1.8) migraine attacks per month. At 2 hours postdose, rimegepant-treated participants had higher pain freedom rates (19.2% [104/543] vs 14.2% [77/541]; risk difference 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 9.3; P=0.0298) and MBS freedom rates (36.6% [199/543] vs 27.7% [150/541]; risk difference 8.9; 95% CI 3.4 to 14.4; P=0.0016) than placebo-treated participants. Rimegepant-treated participants also had higher rates of pain relief (56.0% [304/543] vs 45.7% [247/541]; risk difference 10.3; 95% CI 4.4 to 16.2, P=0.0006) at 2 hours postdose. The most common adverse events were nausea (0.9% [5/546] vs 1.1% [6/549]) and dizziness (0.7% [4/546] vs 0.4% [2/549]). No signal of drug-induced liver injury due to rimegepant was identified. Rimegepant 75 mg oral tablet was effective in the acute treatment of migraine. Tolerability and safety were similar to placebo, with no evidence of hepatotoxicity. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03235479.

Situational prevention: Pharmacotherapy during periods of increased risk for migraine attacks.

The small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists (gepants) are the only drug class with medicines indicated for both the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Given this dual capacity to both treat and prevent, along with their favorable tolerability profiles and lack of an association with medication-overuse headache, headache specialists have begun to use gepants in ways that transcend the traditional categories of acute and preventive treatment. One approach, called situational prevention, directs patients to treat during the interictal phase, before symptoms develop, insituations of increased risk for migraine attacks. Herein, we present three patients to illustrate scenarios of gepant use for situational prevention. In each case, a gepant was started in anticipation of a period of increased headache probability (vulnerability) and continued for a duration of 1 day to 5 consecutive days. Although this approach may expose patients to medication when headache may not have developed, the tolerability and safety profile and preventive effect of gepants may represent a feasible approach for some patients. Situational prevention is an emerging strategy for managing migraine before symptoms develop in individuals who can identify periods when the probability of headache is high. This paper is intended to increase awareness of this strategy and stimulate future randomized, placebo-controlled trials to rigorously assess this strategy.

Design, Optimization, and Characterization of Zolmitriptan Loaded Liposomal Gels for Intranasal delivery for acute migraine therapy

Zolmitriptan is the primary drug for the treatment of Migraine. However, the bioavailability of the drug is low and requires repetitive administration leading to side effects. Zolmitriptan's bioavailability can be improved by incorporating it into liposomes as a topical intranasal gel. The formulation was developed using a Central composite design employing a response surface approach. The new formulations were tested for particle size, shape, drug entrapment efficiency, and in vitro drug release. Permeation experiments and histopathology in rats were also conducted to determine the formulation's safety. The vesicle size was found to be in the range of 103.82±7.16 to 694.38±1.02 nm, zeta potential --19.28 to -32.8 mV, Entrapment Efficiency from 55.49±1.37 to 99.12±0.36 %, and cumulative drug release from 59.71±6.94 to 99.38±0.13 % respectively. In-vitro drug release of G1 and G3 gel formulations showed a non-Fickian released pattern during the studies. A comparison of the permeation coefficient of G1 (0.539 μg/cm2) and G3 (5.3 μg/cm2) showed a slight variation in the drug release rate after 24 hrs. For the liposomal gel and its solution, we found a significant difference in drug penetration of p0.05 after 12 hours compared to the control gel. There were substantial differences in bioavailability and pharmacokinetics between the optimal Liposomal Gel Formulation and other formulations, including the drug solution, liposomal suspension, and optimized formulation F12. The liposomal gel is non-irritating and safe for topical administration by histopathological investigations. Therefore, the study demonstrated that Zolmitriptan Liposomal gel has better efficacy, good tolerability, and enhanced bioavailability, making it an optimal treatment for acute Migraine.

Reduced hepatic impairment study to evaluate pharmacokinetics and safety of zavegepant and to inform dosing recommendation for hepatic impairment.

Zavegepant, a high-affinity, selective, small-molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, is approved in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults. The effects of moderate hepatic impairment (8 participants with Child-Pugh score 7-9 points) on the pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg intranasal dose of zavegepant versus eight matched participants with normal hepatic function were evaluated in a phase I study. Pharmacokinetic sampling determined total and unbound plasma zavegepant concentrations. Moderate hepatic impairment increased the exposure of total zavegepant (~2-fold increase in AUC0-inf and 16% increase in Cmax) versus normal hepatic function, which is not considered clinically meaningful. The geometric least squares mean ratios (moderate impairment/normal) of plasma zavegepant AUC0-inf and Cmax were 193% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 112, 333; p = 0.051) and 116% (90% CI: 69, 195; p = 0.630), respectively. The geometric mean fraction unbound of zavegepant was similar for participants with moderate hepatic impairment (0.13; coefficient of variation [CV] 13.71%) versus those with normal hepatic function (0.11; CV 21.43%). Similar exposure findings were observed with unbound zavegepant versus normal hepatic function (~2.3-fold increase in AUC0-inf and 39% increase in Cmax). One treatment-emergent adverse event (mild, treatment-related headache) was reported in a participant with normal hepatic function. No dosage adjustment of intranasal zavegepant is required in adults with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

The evolving landscape and research trend of calcitonin gene-related peptide in migraine: A bibliometric analysis and visualization.

Migraine is a global public health concern, affecting both social and individual well-being. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a crucial neuropeptide, holds important research value in understanding migraine pathogenesis. CGRP receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibodies that target CGRP or its receptors have shown efficacy in reducing migraine frequency and severity, presenting a promising therapeutic approach. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to analyze the current state, research trends, and future directions of CGRP in migraine. Bibliometric tools including CiteSpace, VOSviewer, etc., were utilized to extract and summarize publications related to CGRP in migraine from the Web of Science Core Collection Database (WOSCC) between 2004 and 2023, as of December 31, 2023. The analysis focused on trends in annual publications, leading countries/regions and institutions, prominent journals and references, influential authors, and high-frequency keywords in the field. A total of 1,821 articles and reviews involving 5,180 authors from 1,315 organizations across 64 countries were included in the study. These publications were distributed across 362 journals and accumulated 56,999 citations by December 31, 2023. An increasing trend was observed in annual publications on CGRP in migraine. The United States emerged as the leading nation in both publications and citations, with academic Peter Goadsby contributing the highest number of publications. The University of Copenhagen stood out as the institution with the most publications, and Cephalalgia emerged as the most influential journal. The most cited paper identified was "Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN4096BS for the acute treatment of migraine" by Jes Olesen, published in the New Engl Med. Keyword frequency analysis revealed prevalent terms such as "migraine," "CGRP," and "episodic migraine," along with emerging topics represented by keywords including "trial," "monoclonal antibodies," "preventive treatment," and "safety." CGRP is pivotal in migraine pathogenesis, and there is a robust research foundation exploring its role. The US leads in research output on CGRP in migraine. Investigating the mechanism of CGRP and its receptor in migraine remains a key area of interest, particularly focusing on signaling pathways. Future research should target identifying critical therapeutic targets in CGRP antagonist pathways for migraine treatment.

A Dutch cost-effectiveness analysis of fremanezumab versus best supportive care in patients with chronic migraine and inadequate response to prior preventive therapy

BackgroundChronic migraine (CM) is the most severe and burdensome subtype of migraine. Fremanezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway as a migraine preventive therapy. This study aimed to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of fremanezumab from a societal perspective in the Netherlands, using a Markov cohort simulation model.MethodsThe base-case cost-effectiveness analysis adhered to the Netherlands Authority guidelines. Fremanezumab was compared with best supportive care (BSC; acute migraine treatment only) in patients with CM and an inadequate response to topiramate or valproate and onabotulinumtoxinA (Dutch patient group [DPG]). A supportive analysis was conducted in the broader group of CM patients with prior inadequate response to 2–4 different classes of migraine preventive treatments. One-way sensitivity, probabilistic sensitivity, and scenario analyses were conducted.ResultsOver a lifetime horizon, fremanezumab is cost saving compared with BSC in the DPG (saving of €2514 per patient) and led to an increase of 1.45 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). In the broader supportive analysis, fremanezumab was cost effective compared with BSC, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2547/QALY gained. Fremanezumab remained cost effective in all sensitivity and scenario analyses.ConclusionIn comparison to BSC, fremanezumab is cost saving in the DPG and cost effective in the broader population.

A 3-year follow-up study of outcomes associated with patterns of traditional acute and preventive migraine treatment: An administrative claims-based cohort study in the United States.

To describe treatment patterns and direct healthcare costs over 3 years following initiation of standard of care acute and preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine in the United States. There are limited data on long-term (>1 year) migraine treatments patterns and associated outcomes. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using US claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Database (January 2010-December 2017). Adults were included if they had a prescription claim for acute migraine treatments (AMT) or preventive migraine treatments (PMT) in the index period (January 2011-December 2014). The AMT cohort was categorized as persistent, cycled, or added-on subgroups; the PMT cohort was categorized PMT-persistent, switched without gaps, or cycled with gaps. Migraine-specific annual direct costs (2017 US$) across AMT and PMT cohort subgroups were summarized at baseline through 3 years from index (follow-up). During the index period, 20,778 and 42,259 patients initiated an AMT and a PMT, respectively. At the 3-year follow-up, migraine-specific direct costs were lower in the persistent subgroup relative to the non-persistent subgroups in both AMT (mean [SD]: $789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149] in the added-on subgroup and $862 [$5426] for the cycled subgroup) and PMT cohorts (mean [SD]: $1817 [$5892] in the persistent subgroup vs. $4257 [$11,392] in the switched without gaps subgroup and $3269 [$18,540] in the cycled with gaps subgroup). Acute medication overuse was lower in the persistent subgroup (1025/6504 [27.2%]) vs. non-persistent subgroups (11,236/58,863 [32.2%] in cycled with gaps subgroup and 1431/6504 [39.4%] in the switched without gaps subgroup). Most patients used multiple acute (19,717/20,778 [94.9%]) or preventive (38,494/42,259 [91.1%]) pharmacological therapies over 3 years following treatment initiation. Gaps in preventive therapy were common; an average gap ranged from 85 to 211 days (~3-7 months). Migraine-specific annual healthcare costs and acute migraine medication overuse remained lowest among patients with persistent AMT and PMT versus non-persistent treatment. Study findings are limited to the US population. Future studies should compare costs and associated outcomes between newer preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine.

Preferences and perceptions of 617 migraine patients on acute and preventive migraine treatment attributes and clinical trial endpoints

ABSTRACT Background To identify the preferences and perceptions of migraine patients for acute and preventive treatment options and to investigate which treatment outcomes are the most important. Design and Methods The authors performed a choice-format survey in a cohort of migraine patients from Greece and Cyprus. A self-administered questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Greek Society of Migraine Patients was used. Results Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients’ needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.

Traditional Chinese Medicine for Acute Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives: A meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of acute migraine was conducted to obtain a consistent evaluation of its efficacy. Methods: The search databases were China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and PubMed. The publication time of randomized controlled studies (RCT) documents is limited to before June 30, 2023. Results: Data from 399 patients from 5 RCTs were included. Compared with Western medicine, Traditional Chinese medicine has a higher efficacy ([RR=0.81, 95%CI (0.75, 0.89), P<0.00001]), a lower adverse reaction rate ([RR=1.37, 95%CI (0.74, 2.54), P=0.32]) and an improved VAS ([MD=-1.37, 95%CI (-2.00, -0.75), P<0.00001]). Conclusion: Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of acute migraine can enhance clinical efficacy, reduce treatment side effects, and improve patients’ visual analogue score.

Concentration-QTc and cardiac safety analysis of single and multiple zavegepant nasal spray doses in healthy participants to support approval.

Zavegepant is a novel gepant administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States at a 10 mg dose for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The cardiovascular safety of zavegepant nasal spray was assessed in both single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies in healthy participants. The SAD study included 72 participants (54 active/18 placebo) who received 0.1-40 mg zavegepant or placebo. The MAD study included 72 participants (56 active/16 placebo) who received 5-40 mg zavegepant or placebo for 1-14 days. Plasma zavegepant pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF], heart rate, PR interval, ventricular depolarization [QRS], T-wave morphology, and U-wave presence) were analyzed pre- and post-zavegepant administration. Using pooled data from the SAD and MAD studies, the relationship between time-matched plasma zavegepant concentrations and QTc interval was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the potential for QTc interval prolongation. Results showed that single and multiple doses of zavegepant had no significant impact on ECG parameters versus placebo, and there was no concentration-dependent effect on QTcF interval. The estimated slope of the plasma zavegepant concentration-QTcF model was -0.053 ms per ng/mL with a 90% confidence interval of -0.0955 to -0.0110 (p = 0.0415), which is not considered clinically meaningful. At doses up to four times the recommended daily dose, zavegepant does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.

Cardiovascular safety of dihydroergotamine mesylate delivered by precision olfactory delivery (INP104) for the acute treatment of migraine.

To report the cardiovascular (CV) safety of dihydroergotamine mesylate (DHE) administered by precision olfactory delivery (INP104) from two clinical trials. Although the absolute risk is low, migraine is associated with an increased risk of CV events. DHE is a highly effective acute treatment for migraine, but due to its theoretical risk of promoting arterial vasoconstriction, DHE is contraindicated in patients with CV disease or an unfavorable risk factor profile. The INP104 is a novel drug-device combination product approved for acute treatment of migraine that delivers DHE to the upper nasal space using precision olfactory delivery (POD®). The STOP 101 was a Phase 1 open-label study that assessed the safety, tolerability, and bioavailability of INP104 1.45 mg, intravenous DHE 1.0 mg, and MIGRANAL (nasal DHE) 2.0 mg in healthy participants. The STOP 301 was a pivotal Phase 3, open-label study that assessed the safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of INP104 1.45 mg over 24 and 52 weeks in patients with migraine. In both studies, active or a history of CV disease, as well as significant CV risk factors, were exclusion criteria. In STOP 101, 36 participants received one or more doses of investigational product. Treatment with intravenous DHE, but not INP104 or nasal DHE, resulted in clinically relevant changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (BP; 11.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9-15.0) and diastolic BP (13.3 mmHg, 95% CI 9.4-17.1) at 5 min post-dose, persisting up to 30 min post-dose for systolic BP (6.3 mmHg; 95% CI 3.0-9.5) and diastolic BP (7.9 mmHg, 95% CI 3.9-11.9). None of the treatments produced any clinically meaningful electrocardiogram (ECG) changes. In STOP 301, 354 patients received one or more doses of INP104. Over 24 weeks, five patients (1.4%) experienced a non-serious, vascular treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Minimal changes were observed for BP and ECG parameters over 24 or 52 weeks. Off-protocol concomitant use of triptans and other ergot derivatives did not result in any TEAEs. In two separate studies, INP104 demonstrated a favorable CV safety profile when used in a study population without CV-related contraindications.

Acute treatment of migraine in children aged 6−11: Real‐world analysis of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN)

AbstractObjectivesMigraine is a prevalent neurological disorder severely impacting children and adolescents, yet only one pharmacological treatment is approved for ages 6−12 years. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a nonpharmacological, prescribed, wearable device cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years and older. This study evaluates REN's safety and efficacy in ages 6−11 years.MethodsProspective acute treatment of migraine data were collected through the REN device (Nerivio) smartphone application. Endpoints were device safety (primary); consistent treatment efficacy (headache pain, functional disability, associated migraine symptoms), and REN‐medication combinations 2 h post‐treatment.ResultsChildren (n = 293), median age 11 years (interquartile range = 9−11), 73.7% girls, conducted 5493 REN treatments. No adverse events were reported. Efficacy in at least 50% of REN treatments was calculated from all patients who voluntarily reported pain levels, symptoms, and/or disability at treatment onset and at 2 h post‐treatment, with 72.2% (13/18) of patients reporting pain relief, 36.0% (9/25) pain freedom, 83.3% (15/18) functional disability relief, and 38.9% (7/18) functional disability freedom. Migraine‐associated symptoms disappeared in at least 50% of REN treatments in 70.0% (7/10) of patients for nausea/vomiting, 50.0% (4/8) phonophobia, and 22.2% (2/9) photophobia; 63.6% (7/11) reported freedom from at least one associated symptom. REN was used as a standalone treatment, with over‐the‐counter medications, and with prescribed headache medications in 45.4%, 34.4%, and 20.9% of treatments, respectively.InterpretationREN may serve as a safe and efficacious acute treatment of migraine for children. Providers and families seeking a safe, effective, pill‐ and needle‐free treatment option for children suffering from migraine may consider REN.

Strategies for Treating Acute Migraines and Identifying Triggers. Literature review

Introduction Migraine, a prevalent neurological disorder affecting a substantial portion of the global population, poses a significant burden on individuals' overall quality of life. While the exact pathophysiological mechanisms underlying migraine headache attacks remain elusive, the involvement of trigeminal pathway activation is well-documented. A multitude of factors, collectively termed triggers, have been identified as capable of precipitating migraine episodes, ranging from dietary components to environmental stimuli such as bright lights and weather fluctuations. Migraine headaches typically manifest as throbbing pain localized predominantly on one side of the head and are often accompanied by a constellation of additional symptoms including photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea. The management of migraine involves a diverse array of therapeutic modalities tailored to the specific characteristics of the pain experienced. These may include the administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, triptans, and antiemetics, among others. This study endeavors to explore the most prevalent triggers implicated in migraine onset, as well as contemporary treatment strategies, with an emphasis on incorporating the latest research findings and therapeutic advancements in this evolving field. Aim of the study This review aims to identify symptoms, triggers of acute migraine and solutions in its treatment process, including latest developments. Material and method This article presents the current state of knowledge about acute migraine, triggers and treatment options in various scientific articles. Publications describing acute migraine attacks and treatments including the most recent reports in the field were reviewed using the PubMed platform. The search included the keywords ‘migraine, 'migraine triggers', 'triptans', 'migraine with aura'.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single orally inhaled dose of PUR3100, a dry powder formulation of dihydroergotamine versus intravenous dihydroergotamine: A Phase 1 randomized, double-blind study in healthy adults.

Intravenous dihydroergotamine (DHE) has well-established efficacy for the acute treatment of migraine, but its use is limited by the need for in-hospital administration and the nausea/vomiting associated with a high maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Inhalation is an alternative to intravenous dosing. The surface area of the lung allows for rapid absorption of a self-administered dose. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) of a dry powder formulation (PUR3100) DHE when delivered via inhalation compared to intravenous delivery. In this double-blind, double-dummy Phase 1 study, healthy volunteers (N = 26) were randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of four groups: orally inhaled placebo plus intravenous DHE 1.0 mg or orally inhaled PUR3100 (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg) plus intravenous placebo. Blood samples were drawn pre-dose and at time points post-dose over 48 h. Standard PK and safety parameters were assessed and values for Cmax and area under plasma concentration time curve (AUC) were used to assess comparative exposures of PUR3100 versus intravenous DHE. All doses of PUR3100 were associated with a lower incidence of nausea (21% vs. 86%), vomiting (0% vs. 29%), and headache (16% vs. 57%) compared to intravenous DHE. The PK profile of PUR3100 versus intravenous DHE was characterized by a similar mean time to Cmax (5 vs. 5.5 min), with reduced AUC0-2h (1120-4320 vs. 6340), and a lower Cmax (3620-14,400 vs. 45,000). Compared to intravenous DHE 1.0 mg, the highest nominal PUR3100 dose (1.5 mg), which delivers a fine-particle dose of approximately 0.9 mg to the lungs, had a geometric mean ratio percentage (90% confidence interval [CI]) for Cmax of 32% [17.2, 59.6] and AUC0-inf of 93% (62.9, 138.5), the latter of which was not significantly different. Inhaled PUR3100 is associated with rapid systemic PK within the therapeutic window and an improved safety profile relative to intravenous DHE.

Auricular Therapy for Migraine.

Migraine brings hours or even days of disability, affecting 15% of the US population and one billion people worldwide. Migraine treatments have improved over the years and there is now a range of non-pharmacologic therapies that can be administered as monotherapy, combined with pharmacologic therapy or combined with other non-pharmacologic therapies to give greater options for those who do not tolerate, do not respond to, or who wish to reduce or avoid pharmacologic treatments. We conducted a review of the literature on auricular therapy as acute or preventive treatment for migraine, searching the databases of MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2013 to 2023. A total of 43 articles contained at least one search term, with three studies specific to acute or prevention of migraine (one for acute only, one for prevention only and one for both acute and prevention). The population was limited to, adults with migraine ages 18 or older, with the administration of auricular therapy as the intervention. While there have been studies on the use of auricular therapy for pain on two specific standardized auricular therapies, Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA) and National Acupuncture Detoxification Association (NADA), neither of these protocols were utilized in any of the studies specific to migraine management. Each of the three studies used different techniques, with one using acupuncture needles and five specific points and two using semi-permanent needles (remained in for a few days) that were placed in areas that showed high activity. Each of these studies showed auricular therapy to have benefit for the management of migraine. However, the authors of each of the studies recommended further studies. Auricular therapy may be a helpful adjunctive treatment to abort a current migraine attack or aid in reducing the frequency or severity of migraine attacks.