927 Purpose: This study compares the efficacy and tolerability of the microemulsion oral formulation of cyclosporine (NEORAL®), given in combination with three immunosuppressive regimens, in patients undergoing first renal transplantation from a living or cadaver donor. Methods: In a prospective, 12-month, parallel group, open label, multicenter study, 477 patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups with NEORAL initiated at 10 mg/kg/day as baseline therapy in addition to steroids. Group 1 received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for 3 months, replaced by azathioprine (AZA) for a further 9 months. Groups 2 and 3 received either MMF or AZA for 12 months. Starting doses of MMF or AZA were fixed at 2g/day and 1-2 mg/kg/day, respectively. The dose of NEORAL was adjusted to reach predetermined trough level ranges. All study medications were adjusted for tolerability. The primary endpoint is treatment failure at 12 months, defined as death, graft loss, biopsy-proven or treated rejection, or discontinuation. Results: Interim analysis (ITT) at 6 months of 276/477 randomized patients (Group 1: n=89; Group 2: n=92; Group 3: n=95) showed that baseline and demographic characteristics were comparable between the three groups. As expected, the incidence of treatment failure at month 3 was lower for the groups randomized to MMF (Group 1: 31.5%; Group 2: 37.0%) versus the group randomized to AZA (49.5%). This was mainly attributable to a lower rate of acute rejection (Group 1: 15.7%; Group 2: 19.6%; Group 3: 32.6%). The switch from MMF to AZA at month 3 in Group 1 did not affect the incidence of rejections (Group 1: +2.2%; Group 2: +1.1%; Group 3: +2.1%), nor the occurrence and severity of drug-related adverse events (Group 1: 16.9%; Group 2: 15.2%; Group 3: 15.8%) during the following 3 months. At month 6, the same pattern was observed for treatment failure (Group 1: 34.8%; Group 2: 39.1%, Group 3: 54.7%; Group 1 vs. Group 2: p=0.49; Groups 1 or 2 vs. Group 3: p<0.05). Overall the incidence and severity of adverse events was comparable between the groups, while the types of adverse events were compatible with the known tolerability profiles of the study medications. Conclusion: These interim results indicate that replacement of MMF by AZA after 3 months provides comparable efficacy and similar tolerability to the maintenance of MMF for 6 months. This therapeutic approach, if confirmed by the 12-month results, may offer substantial savings in treatment costs for the long-term maintenance of renal grafts. This research was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Read full abstract