Acute GVHD Grade Research Articles

Patients with High-Risk Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Do Not Benefit from Remission Induction with Azacitidine Prior to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis with Extended Follow-up

Background: The value of remission induction in high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) with increased blasts prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains controversial. The new ELN recommendations include the re-designation of patients with 10-20% blasts as AML/MDS, raising the question of whether these patients should receive induction chemotherapy before HCT. An alternative is treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA) such as azacitidine, for which allo-sensitizing effects have been proposed. In contrast, bridging to HCT with HMA may increase drop-out rate for allogeneic HCT, while at the same time not further benefiting patients who subsequently receive HCT. Methods: We report on 135 patients diagnosed with MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm who received HCT at our center between 2010 and 2022. Median age was 60 years (range 26 to 77 years) and 44.4% of patients were female. IPSS-R score was high in 25.8% of patients and very high in 44.8% of patients. 33.3% of patients received remission induction prior to HCT, 28.8% of all patients with HMA. Conditioning regimens were myeloablative in 8.1%, FLAMSA-based reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in 26.7%, and RIC in 60.7% of cases. Donors were matched (8/8) related in 23.7%, matched (8/8) unrelated in 53.3%, and mismatched (7/8 or haploidentical) in 23%. Relationships between outcomes and patient, treatment and disease parameters were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and, in the case of relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), competing risk analysis. P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate adjustment. Results: Median follow-up after HCT was 46 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates for OS and RFS at 5 years were 56.6% and 43%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse, NRM, acute GVHD grade II to IV, and chronic GVHD at 5 years were 39%, 17.8%, 36.4%, and 40%, respectively. OS was significantly correlated with the IPSS-R cytogenetic risk category but not with the percentage of blasts in bone marrow before treatment initiation. In multivariate regression analysis, OS was significantly worse in patients with poor or very poor IPSS-R cytogenetic category (HR 1.56; p<0.001) but not in patients with a pre-treatment bone marrow blast count exceeding 10% (HR 1.25; p=0.19). Similarly, cytogenetic risk, but not bone marrow blast count, was significantly associated with worse RFS (HR 1.5 vs. 1.2; p<0.001 vs. 0.199) and higher cumulative hazard of relapse (HR 1.74 vs. 1.36; <0.0001 vs. p=0.31). Bridging or induction treatment with azacitidine before HCT by trend showed a higher cumulative hazard of relapse (HR 2.3; p=0.057) and worse RFS (HR 1.7; p=0.088). In exploratory subgroup analyses of patients with a bone marrow blast count above 10% (n=69), OS was not significantly different between patients who received remission induction prior to HCT and those who did not (HR 1.3; p=0.5), while the cumulative hazard of relapse by trend even increased in the first group (HR 1.85; p=0.13). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in OS between patients with a bone marrow blast count above 10% who received intensified sequential conditioning with FLAMSA-RIC versus fludarabine/treosulfan (n=44; HR 1.45; p=0.52). Donor mismatch was the only parameter significantly associated with higher NRM (HR 2.4 and p=0.044), and GVHD prophylaxis with anti-thymocyte globulin and/or tacrolimus the only parameters associated with a significant reduction of chronic GVHD severity (f²=0.05 and 0.06; p=0.03 and 0.02), while no single parameter was associated with a significant difference in acute GVHD severity. Conclusions: This study reports promising long-term outcomes for MDS patients undergoing HCT in the real-world setting. In our analysis, cytogenetic risk, but not bone marrow blast count, was the main determinant of transplantation outcomes. Furthermore, remission induction prior to HCT with azacitidine, which is commonly used in patients with increased bone marrow blasts, was not associated with a survival benefit but by trend even with higher relapse risk and worse RFS in multivariate analysis. This suggests that the perceived role of azacitidine as a bridge-to-transplant should be questioned. Rather, eligible patients should receive HCT as soon as possible.

A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis on the Outcomes of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel from Zuma-2 Study and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from the EBMT Database in Relapsed and Refractory Post-Btki Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Introduction Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy, is approved in the US for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and in Europe for r/r MCL after ≥2 prior lines of therapies, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). The pivotal ZUMA-2 trial demonstrated very good efficacy of brexu-cel in r/r MCL and tolerable safety including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (Wang et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is potentially curative but is associated with high treatment related mortality (TRM) and clinically significant graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The optimal choice of treatment between brexu-cel and alloHCTs is unclear. We conducted a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis of brexu-cel and alloSCT in patients (pts) with r/r MCL. Methods Pts from ZUMA-2 were matched with alloSCT pts from the EBMT database. Selection criteria to identify pts in the EBMT registry were: r/r MCL diagnosis and receipt of alloSCT from 2010 to 2020, age ≥18 years, prior treatment with anti-CD20, prior anthracycline- or bendamustine containing regimens, and prior BTKi. We performed a 1:1 nearest neighbor matching without replacement, balanced for 5 baseline parameters: age, sex, number of prior treatment lines, time from diagnosis to cellular immunotherapy, and prior autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from cellular immunotherapy. The following secondary endpoints were analyzed: progression-free survival (PFS), TRM, defined as incidence of deaths which are related to the treatment and occurred in absence of disease progression, and rate of GvHD. Competing risks were defined as relapse, progression or treatment-unrelated death for TRM, and death for GvHD. The EBMT registry includes pts who actually underwent alloSCT. To characterize the dropout rate prior to cellular therapy, we conducted a multicenter intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and identified 77 pts with r/r MCL for whom an unrelated donor search was initiated and an alloSCT was intended. Results Sixty-four of 68 pts from the ZUMA-2 cohort were included in the study; 4 pts were excluded because of inability to anonymize. A total of 270 pts who had undergone alloSCT and met eligibility criteria were identified in the EBMT registry. Patient characteristics between the brexu-cel and the alloSCT cohorts were imbalanced. Brexu-cel pts were older (p<0.001), had more prior lines of treatment (median 3 vs 2, p<0.001), had less prior autoSCT (41% vs 71%, p<0.001), and had longer time between diagnosis and treatment (53 vs 40 months, p=0.01). After 1:1 PSM matching, criteria were well balanced between cohorts. Median follow-up time was 36.5 and 46.4 months for the brexu-cel and the matched alloSCT cohort, respectively. PFS and long-term OS were similar between both cohorts (Fig. 1A). However, the risk of death within the first 12 months was significantly lower in the brexu-cel cohort vs the alloSCT cohort (logistic regression with inverse probability of censoring weighting, risk ratio=0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-0.9, p=0.02). This was mainly attributable to the significantly higher TRM rate in the alloSCT cohort (alloSCT vs brexu-cel: cause specific hazard ratio=7.7, 95% CI 1.9-31.6, p=0.005, Fig. 1B). The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD grade ≥3 at 3 months and chronic GvHD at 24 months was 17.9% (95% CI 9.1-29.0%) and 44.3% (95% CI 30.6-57.2%), respectively. In our ITT analysis, the dropout rate was significantly higher in the cohort intended to receive alloHCT (23%, [18/77]) vs the cohort intended to receive brexu-cel (8% [6/74]; Fisher test, p=0.01). For alloSCT, failure to proceed to cellular therapy was related to progression in 13%, change of patient's preference in 5% and ineligibility in 4%; in the brexu-cel cohort this was due to manufacturing failures in 4% and progression in 3%. Conclusion Brexu-cel is an effective treatment in pts with r/r MCL post-BTKi with a superior safety profile compared with alloSCT, as indicated by lower 12-month mortality, lower TRM, and absence of chronic GVHD-related morbidity. Despite efforts to match pts between the cohorts, the inherent limitations of this study, such as incongruent data sources and case selection bias, have to be considered. Additional analyses will be presented.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in HLA-Matched and Haploidentical Donor Transplants for Patients with Hodgkin disease: A Comparative Study of the LWP EBMT

INTRODUCTION Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has proven to be a highly effective strategy in preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but it is being increasingly used in HLA-matched transplants. The outcomes of haplo HSCT with PTCY in various hematologic malignancies, particularly in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin disease (HD), have shown promising results, challenging those obtained in transplant patients from HLA-matched donors without PTCy. However, there is limited information on the impact of donor types on the outcomes of patients with HD undergoing allogenic HSCT when using homogeneous GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy. To address this knowledge gap, we have conducted an extensive study using the Lymphoma Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (LWP-EBMT) registry. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with HD undergoing HSCT from both HLA-matched donors, which include matched sibling donors (MSD) and matched unrelated donors (MUD), and haplo donors, using PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis approach in all cohorts. PATIENTS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria All adults (≥ 18 years) patients diagnosed with HD who underwent their first HSCT between January 2010 and December 2020 from either a MSD, MUD or haplo, and whose data were reported to the EBMT registry were included. For the purposes of this study, only transplants who received PTCy-based as GVHD prophylaxis were considered. Statistical Analysis The study utilized statistical methods such as Kaplan-Meier estimation, Log-Rank test, competing risks analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression. The analyses included OS, PFS, NRM, aGVHD, cGVHD, and graft failure. The statistical software R and packages were used. RESULTS Patient and Transplantation Characteristics Patient, disease and transplant-related characteristics of the 860 patients are summarized in Table 1. Engraftment The cumulative incidence (Cum Inc) of neutrophil recovery at day 30 was 95% (95% CI, 93-96) in the HLA-matched group and 96% (95% CI, 91-98) in the haplo cohort (p=0.18). The 60-day Cum Inc of platelet recovery in similar order was 94% (95% CI, 88-97) and 86% (95% CI, 83-88) (p<0.001). GVHD The Cum Inc of acute GVHD grade II-IV at 100 days in the HLA-matched and the haplo cohorts was 24% (95% CI, 17-31) and 34% (95% CI, 30-37), respectively (p=0.01), whereas for grade III-IV it was 8% (95% CI, 4-13) and 10% (95% CI, 8-13), (p=0.44). In multivariable analysis (table 2), haplo was associated with an increased risk of acute GVHD grades II-IV, when compared with HLA-matched (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.93; p=0.01). Other variables are shown in table 2. The 2-year Cum Inc of chronic GVHD in the HLA-matched and haplo cohorts was 26% (95% CI, 19-33) and 27% (95% CI, 24-31), respectively (p=0.75). Other variables are shown in table 2. NRM and relapse The Cum Inc of NRM at 2 years was 10% (95% CI; 6-16) for HLA-matched and 18% (95% CI; 15-21) for haplo (p=0.02). In multivariable analysis (table 2), haplo was associated with an increased risk of NRM, when compared to HLA-matched (HR 0.5; 95% CI, 0.28-0.89; p=0.01). Other variables are shown in table 2. The Cum Inc of relapse at 2 years was 22% (95% CI; 15-29) for HLA-matched and 24% (95% CI; 20-27) for haplo (p=0.81). Other variables are shown in table 2. Survival The 2-year OS for the HLA-matched and haplo cohorts was 82% (95% CI; 75-88) and 70% (95% CI; 67-74), respectively (p=0.002). In multivariable analysis (table 2), compared to HLA-matched, haplo (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.77; p=0.001) was associated with worse survival. Other variables are shown in table 2. The 2-year PFS was similar between HLA-matched and haplo (66%; 95% CI, 58-74; and 58%; 95% CI, 54-62, respectively; p=0.17). Other variables are shown in table 2. Comparison of outcomes for MSD and MUD With regards to the donor type, most posttransplant outcomes did not exhibit significant differences, except for a higher incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD in the MUD group (33%; 95% CI, 32-44) compared to the MSD group (17%; 95% CI, 10-25) (p=0.01). CONCLUSION Our study shows that in patients with HD undergoing HSCT with PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis, no significant differences in 2-year PFS were observed between HLA-matched and haplo. A higher risk of acute GVHD and NRM is associated with haplo, leading to lower OS compared to HLA-matched transplantation.

Sequential Conditioning Does Not Improve Outcomes of Allogeneic Stemcell Transplantation in CMML Patients

Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is potentially curative therapy for patients with CMML. Data on optimal allo-SCT conditioning in CMML Patients is scarce. Methods: This retrospective study from the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation at the University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany, compared allo-SCT outcomes in CMML patients across three conditioning regimes: Thiotepa-Busulfan (TB), Sequential FLAMSA-Busulfan Fludarabine (FLAMSA-FB), and Treosulfan-Fludarabine (Treo-Flu). TB consisted of Thiotapa ( 5mg/Kg; a total dose of 10mg/Kg) on day -6 and -5 and Busulfan (3.2mg/Kg; total dose 6.4mg/Kg or 9.6mg/Kg) on days -4 and -3 or -4 to -2. FLAMSA-FB regimen consists of fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 ; total dose 120 mg/m 2 ), amsacrine (100 mg/m 2 ; total dose 400 mg/m 2 ), and cytarabine (1 g/m 2 ; total dose 4 g/m 2 ) therapy from days -11 to minus -8, followed by a three-day interval without therapy and Busulfan from day -4 to -2 with a total dose of 6.4mg/Kg and Fludarabine on day -4 and -3 (30 mg/m 2, total dose 60mg/m 2 ).Treo-Flu regimen consisted of Treosulfan (12 g/m 2 , total dose 36 mg/m 2 ) on days-6 to -4 and fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 ; total dose 150 mg/m 2 ) on days -6 to -2. Results Sixty-nine consecutive patients with CMML who underwent allo-SCT between the years 2006-2022. Twenty-two received TB, 27 received FLAMSA-FB, and 20 received Treo-Flu conditioning. Transplant sources included matched related donors (MRD, 8 patients), mismatched related donors (MMRD, 8 from TB), matched unrelated donors (MUD, 31), and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD, 23) with significant group variations (p<0.001). Most Patients received ATLG for GVHD prophylaxis (TB 68%, FLAMSA-FB 93%, Treo-Flu 85%, p=0.08). Regarding CPSS-mol scores, the TB group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of high (46%) and intermediate-2 scores (32%) than FLAMSA-FB (11% high, 7% intermediate-2) and Treo-Flu (40% high, 20% intermediate-2) (p=0.001). One TB patient experienced primary graft failure, but engraftment times were comparable across groups. Although not statistically significant (p=0.07), the TB group showed a trend towards improved 3-year OS rates (84%) compared to FLAMSA-FB (37%) and Treo-Flu (49%). The TB group also displayed significantly higher 3-year PFS rates (79%) compared to FLAMSA-FB and Treo-Flu (both 30%), (p=0.03). (Figure 1) No significant differences were observed in 3-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) across the TB (17%), FLAMSA-FB (30%), and Treo-Flu (26%) groups (p=0.7). Interestingly, no TB patients relapsed at 3 years, contrasting with the FLAMSA-FB (41%) and Treo-Flu groups (43%, p=0.02). Lastly, cumulative incidences of acute GVHD grade II-IV (TB 41%, FLAMSA-FB 35%, Treo-Flu 30%, p=0.75) and all-grade chronic GVHD (TB 50%, FLAMSA-FB 65%, Treo-Flu 40%, p=0.35) were similar across groups. Conclusion Our study suggests that sequential conditioning with FLAMSA-FB does not improve Transplant outcomes in patients undergoing allo-SCT for CMML.

Outcomes of Tcrαβ and CD19-Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Matched, Mismatched Unrelated and Haploidentical Donors for Pediatric Patients with Hematological Malignancy: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction: TCR αβ+/CD19+ depletion in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an emerging graft manipulation technique to help overcome the HLA barrier in the mismatched or haploidentical transplant setting and reduce or prevent graft-versus-host disease. Limited research has explored the impact of various donor sources, and type of malignancy on the outcomes of TCR αβ+/CD19+ depleted HSCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Therefore, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of published clinical studies using individual patient data (IPD) to address this scientific gap. Methods: This meta-analysis combined patient-level data from studies involving AML/MDS and ALL patients treated with TCR αβ+/CD19+ depleted HSCT. By utilizing the IPDfromKM technique, we reconstructed time-to-event data from aggregated Kaplan-Meier curves, specifically focusing on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Additionally, we conducted parallel meta-analyses to calculate the pooled incidences of GVHD, graft failure, mortality, as well as CMV and EBV reactivation, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) using aggregate data. All analyses were performed using STATA software. Our comprehensive literature search included publications up to May 2023, excluding studies with significant sample overlap. Results: The meta-analysis incorporated 817 children with AML/MDS or ALL from 12 studies. Successful primary engraftment was observed in 95% of patients (95% CI: 92 - 98), with an average time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 12 days. The incidence of acute GVHD grades I-II was 24% (95% CI: 14 - 34), while grades III and IV were 11% (95% CI: 3.0 - 0.18). Chronic GVHD was observed in 19% of patients (95% CI: 11 - 28). The relapse and graft failure rates were 25% (95% CI: 19 - 32) and 6% (95% CI: 2.0 - 9.0), respectively. The all-cause mortality was 34% (95% CI: 29 - 38), with HSCT-related mortality at 11% (95% CI: 8.0 - 13), while relapse-related mortality accounted for 22% (95% CI: 17 - 28). At a median follow-up of 2.55 years, the 1-year and 5-year OS rates were 74.7% (95% CI: 60.6 - 78.3) and 64.4% (95% CI: 59.9 - 68.5), respectively. No significant differences in OS were found between ALL and AML/MDS patients (HR= 0.99, 95% CI: 0.48 - 2.02, P=0.98) or between different donor types (Figure 1A). The DFS rates at 1- and 5-year were 72.8% (95%CI: 67.6 - 77.3) and 61.8% (95%CI: 56.1 - 67.0), respectively. No significant differences in DFS were observed between ALL and AML/MDS patients (HR = 0.74 95%CI: 0.48 - 1.14, P=0.17) or between different donor types (Figure 1B). The overall 1- and 5-year GRFS rates were 71.1% (95% CI: 64.1 - 77.4) and 63.0% (95% CI: 55.3 - 69.8), respectively. The overall incidence of CMV and EBV reactivation was 33% (95% CI: 19 - 46) and 16% (95% CI: 0 - 38), respectively. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis confirms the effectiveness and safety of TCRαβ and CD19-depleted HSCT for hematological malignancies, demonstrating high engraftment success, low graft failure, and a manageable incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. The consistently favorable outcome data across different donor types and malignancies support the broad applicability of this form of graft manipulation.

Post-transplant сyclophosphamide after matched donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with acute leukemia.

The data on post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in pediatric acute leukemia after matched allo-HSCT are limited to case series. The present study aimed to assess the results of PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis in a large cohort of children with acute leukemia after matched allo-HSCT. A retrospective analysis of 190 pediatric patients with acute leukemia who had a first allograft between 2008 and 2020 from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD) was carried out. In the MSD setting, GVHD prophylaxis consisted of PTCy alone (n=28) for the study group, and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)±antimetabolite (n=30) for the control group. In MUD setting, most patients in the study group received GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy+CNI+mycophenolate mofetil (n=42, 66.7%) or PTCy+CNI+sirolimus (n=12, 19%). All patients (n=69) in the control group received ATG+CNI+antimetabolite. After MUD allo-HSCT, the incidences of acute GVHD grade III-IV and moderate/severe chronic GVHD were significantly lower in the PTCy group compared to control (6.6%vs. 35.0% and 12.7%vs. 47.1%, respectively, p<.0001). Five-year GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) after MUD allo-HSCT was higher in the PTCy group compared to control (35.1%vs. 7.3%, p<.0001). At the same time, there was no significant difference between both groups after MSD allo-HSCT. In pediatric acute leukemia, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis for MUD allo-HSCT is a feasible and effective option that results in a low incidence of GVHD. Compared to the ATG-based approach, PTCy provides better control of GVHD in children. In pediatric allo-HSCT from MSD, PTCy demonstrates comparable effectiveness to conventional GVHD prophylaxis.

A Novel Protocol Improves Engraftment in Tαβ + Cell Depleted Haplo-HSCT for Patients with Thalassemia Major

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a proven curative approach for patients with thalassemia major (TM) over long-term practice. However, achieving successful engraftment and managing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) continue to pose significant challenges. While low incidence of GVHD has been observed in Tαβ + cell-depleted HSCT (TDH) from haploidentical donors, graft failure (GF) remains a considerable concern, particularly in patients with TM. To enhance the engraftment in TM-TDH, we conducted this prospective/retrospective single-center clinical study. Method: A total of 137 patients diagnosed with TM received TDH at the BMT-center, Taixin Hospital, between March 2021 and April 2023. The median age of the patients was 7 years (ranging from 2 to 19 years), with 89 males and 48 females. The median follow-up time was 408 days (ranging from 99 to 857 days). The conditioning regimen consisted of Thymoglobulin on -day 21, followed by 3-Gy total body irradiation on -day 11. On -day 10, the patients received an infusion of donor lymphocytes (2*10 8/kg), followed by cyclophosphamide (Cy) at a dose of 50mg/kg on days -8, -7, and -2, and 25mg/kg on day -1. Additionally, blood-concentration adjusted busulfan was administered on days -6 to -4, fludarabine at a dose of 40mg/kg on days -6 to -2, and thiotepa at 10mg/kg on day -3. For GVHD prophylaxis, short-term (&amp;lt; 6 months) low-dose tacrolimus or sirolimus with or without mycophenolate mofetil was used. The mean infused CD34+ cells were 31.09 (ranging from 14.25 to 61.12) *10 6/kg, TCRγδ+ cells were 39.49 (ranging from 5.18 to 140.39) *10 6/kg, and NK cells were 109.18 (ranging from 27.52 to 309.41) *10 6/kg, respectively. The targeted infusion of TCRαβ+ cells was aimed at 1.5-2.0*10 5/kg. Results: Out of the 137 patients, 133 achieved successful engraftment (97.1%) with median engraftment times of 16 days (ranging from 9 to 48 days) for ANC to reach 0.5x10 9/L, 11 days (ranging from 1 to 23 days) for HB to reach 80g/L, and 10 days (ranging from 5 to 22 days) for platelets to reach 20x10 9/L, respectively. GF was observed in four patients. Among them, two patients with GF underwent salvage alternative donor second HSCT on +day 19 and +day 32, respectively, and are currently thalassemia-free. One patient received infusion of cryopreserved auto-peripheral blood stem cell and continues to live with TM. Unfortunately, four patients passed away, with one GF patient dying from suspected virus myocarditis on +day 11, one potentially due to virus hepatitis or hepatic GVHD on day +188, and the remaining two from virus bronchiolitis obliterans on +day 211 and +day 254, respectively. The overall survival (OS) and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) rates were 96.5% and 94.3%, respectively. The incidence of GF and transplant-related mortality (TRM) were 2.9% and 3.5%, respectively (Fig.). Acute GVHD of grade I-II and grade III-IV was observed in 10.53% and 9.02% of patients, respectively, while mild and moderate chronic GVHD occurred in 7(5.1%) and 1(0.7%) patient(s), respectively. The incidence of veno-occlusive disease was mild and limited. C onc lusion: The current study demonstrates the efficacy of a novel protocol in enhancing engraftment in TDH for patients with TM and with low incidence of both acute GvHD and chronic GvHD. This approach represents a significant advancement in the field of TM-TDH. Fig.1 Curve of OS, TFS, TRM and Rejection in TM-TDH

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients: The Experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplantation and Cell Therapy (GETH-TC)

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is associated with significant toxicity and high risk of related mortality in older patients, especially when myeloablative conditioning is used. However, the upper limit of age for this procedure is not clearly defined. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of allo-HSCT in a cohort of elderly patients transplanted in Spain, considering non-relapse mortality (NRM), cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). As secondary objectives, we evaluate the potential toxicity of allo-HSCT analyzing the days from infusion to hospital discharge, the number of readmissions within the first year, the CI of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS). Finally, we also looked for prognostic factors significantly impacting OS. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 529 patients ≥65 years of age undergoing a first allo-HSCT between 2011 and 2020 in 17 Spanish centres, regardless of the indication and characteristics of transplantation. Subanalyses were performed according to chronological age (65-69 vs ≥70 years of age) and conditioning intensity (myeloablative vs non-myeloablative). Results Median age was 67.2 years (range 65.0-82.5) and 54 patients were ≥70 years. The most frequent indication was acute leukemia in 260 patients (49.1%). Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients ≥70 years were more frequently male and had a lower HCT-CI than patients &amp;lt;70, without any other differences in patients' or transplant characteristics. The median follow-up was 51.2 months (range 9.3-139.6). At 1- and 4-years post-transplant, NRM were 24.3% (95%CI 21-28) and 32.0% (95%CI 28-36), CI of relapse were 21.4% (95%CI 18-25) and 29.1% (95%CI 25-33), OS were 61.2% (95%CI 57-65) and 43.4% (95%CI 39-48) and PFS were 54.3% (95%CI 50-58) and 38.9% (95%CI 35-43), respectively (Figure 1). No differences were found according to age group 65-69 vs ≥70 ( p=0.822, p=0.835, p=0.648 and p=0.743, respectively). Patients who had received myeloablative conditioning had lower CI of relapse (at 4 years post-transplant 19.3% vs. 30.7%, p=0.030), with no differences in NRM ( p=0.308), OS ( p=0.440) or PFS ( p=0.261). Regarding the duration of allo-HSCT admission, 486 patients were discharged alive, with a median number of hospital days from infusion to discharge of 22 (range 8-142). There were no differences based on age group ( p=0.635) or conditioning intensity ( p=0.606). Among 486 patients who were primary discharged, 320 (66.0%) needed a new readmission during the first-year post-transplant, with a median of 1 (range 0-6) up to day +100 and 2 (range 1-10) up to day +365. There were also no differences according to age ( p=0.789 and p=0.779, respectively) or conditioning intensity ( p=0.264 and p=0.818, espectively). Acute GvHD occurred in 265 patients (58.2%), 205 (45.1%) grades I-II and 60 (13.2%) grades III-IV. The CI of acute GvHD grades II-IV and grades III-IV at day +100 was 43.5% and 16.9%, respectively. A total of 174 patients (38.2%) developed chronic GvHD, 66 (14.6%) mild, 49 (10.8%) moderate and 56 (12.4%) severe. The CI of moderate-severe chronic GvHD at 1 and 2 years was 18.2% and 22.4%, respectively. According to age group, there were no differences in the CI of acute GvHD grades II-IV ( p=0.920), acute GvHD grades III-IV ( p=0.853) or chronic moderate-severe GvHD ( p=0.798). At 1- and 4-years after allo-HSCT, GRFS were 37.6% (95%CI 33-42) and 23.7% (95%CI 20-28), with no differences by age group ( p=0.569) or conditioning intensity ( p=0.707). In multivariate analysis, ECOG pretransplant ≥1 (HR 1.32, 95%CI 1-1.7; p=0.028), HCT-CI ≥3 (HR 1.34, 95%CI 1.1-1.7; p=0.016), high/very high DRI (HR 1.62, 95%CI 1.3-2.1; p&amp;lt;0.001) and no development of chronic GvHD (HR 2.99, 95%CI 2.3-3.9; p&amp;lt;0.001) were associated with worse OS. Age, gender, previous lines of treatment or autologous HSCT, donor type, stem cell source, conditioning intensity and development of acute GvHD did not influence OS. Conclusions Allo-HSCT is effective and safe at ages over 65 years, or even 70 years old. Myeloablative conditioning regimen may offer a lower risk of relapse without increasing toxicity. In our experience, ECOG, HCT-CI, DRI and chronic GvHD are more relevant parameters for post-transplant survival than chronological age.

Outcomes of Treosulfan Vs. Busulfan Based Conditioning Regimens in Adult Patients Undergoing Allogeneic HSCT: Real Life Data from a Single Center

Introduction The type of conditioning regimen has a great impact on the outcome of patients who undergo allogeneic HSCT since graft versus host disease (GVHD), infections, regimen related organ and tissue toxicities are among the most important causes of post-transplant mortality. Despite the regimen related toxicity profile of busulfan, supported by information from the results of clinical trials and real-world data, it is still commonly used worldwide. Treosulfan has advantages in terms of dose of administration, lower incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and lower neurotoxicity. We aimed to retrospectively investigate outcomes and compare results of patients who underwent matched and haploidentical allogeneic HSCT with treosulfan based or busulfan based reduced intensity conditioning, non-myeloablative conditioning and myeloablative conditioning regimens in our institution. Methods From September 2016 to November 2022, treosulfan was administered to 94 patients while 85 patients received busulfan. We analyzed outcomes as regimen related-toxicity, chronic and acute GVHD, overall survival, non-relapse mortality, relapse related mortality and fungal infection. The myeloablative dose of busulfan was 12.8 mg/kg while it was 9.6 mg/kg for the non myeloablative regimen which was combined with fludarabine. The myeloablative dose of treosulfan was 42 mg/m2 while a dose range of 30-36 mg/m2 was administered for the reduced intensity conditioning. Results The median follow up was 14 months for the treosulfan group while it was 11 months for the busulfan group (p = 0.16). Regimen related toxicity, which was monitored during the hospital stay and 3 months after discharge were 11.7% and 7.1% for treosulfan and busulfan respectively and were similar between two groups. Extensive chronic GVHD was encountered in 15.7% of the patients in the treosulfan group compared to 32.1% in the busulfan group (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Similarly, chronic skin GVHD was observed in 3.6% of the patients who received treosulfan while it was seen in 22.6% of the busulfan group (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Acute GVHD (grade 3 or higher) was encountered in 32.2% of the patients within the treosulfan group while it was encountered in 31.6% of the patients in the busulfan group. Overall survival was 47.5% and 36.5 % in the treosulfan group and busulfan groups respectively. The relapse-related mortality was 17 % in the treosulfan group while it was 34% in the busulfan group. Fungal infection was observed in 23.4% and 36.5% of the patients in treosulfan and busulfan groups respectively. Conclusion Treosulfan, with a lower chronic GVHD incidence and similar regimen related toxicity profile appears to be a safe alternative to busulfan and prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results in our study. Keywords: Busulfan; treosulfan; conditioning regimen; stem cell transplantation

Outcome of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in FLT3-TKD-Mutated AML - a Study on Behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Introduction The overall prognostic impact of point mutations in the tyrosine-kinase domain 1 of FLT3 (FLT3-TKD mut) in patients (pts) with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) remains controversial. Furthermore, co-occurrence of FLT3-TKD mut and mutated nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1 mut) was shown to have a favorable prognostic impact on AML pts receiving conventional chemotherapy. However, little is known about the outcome of AML pts with FLT3-TKD mut with or without co-occurring NPM1 mut treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Patients and Methods This is a retrospective study of the acute leukemia working party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow transplantation (EBMT) investigating the outcome of adult AML pts with FLT3-TKD mut with or without NPM1 mut after first alloSCT using matched sibling (MSD), unrelated (UD) or haploidentical (haplo) donors between 2005 and 2022. All patients were in first or second complete remission (CR1 of CR2). Information on cytogenetic risk was necessary for inclusion. No ex-vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) was allowed. The primary endpoint was leukemia-free survival (LFS) at two years after alloSCT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of relapse (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and GVHD-free, relapse free survival (GRFS). One hundred and eighty-two adult AML pts with FLT3-TKD mut were identified, of which 74 (40.7%) had a co-occurring mutation in NPM1. Median age was 55.1 years (range 18.6-79.1) and 46.7% were male. Median follow-up was 21.4 months [IQR 13.6-28.1]. 78% of the pts were in CR1. Cytogentic risk was favorable, intermediate and adverse in 12.6%, 75.3% and 12.1% of pts, respectively. Additional FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) was present in 25.8% of pts. Information on measurable residual disease (MRD) was available for 68.7% of pts, being positive in 48% of these. Karnofsky performance score was &amp;lt; 90% in 21.1%, and hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was &amp;gt;=3 in 28.1% of pts. 69.6% of pts were cytomegalovirus (CMV) positive. Conditioning was myeloablative in 52.8% and reduced intensity in 47.2% of pts. Stem cell donors were MSD, UD and haplo in 25.8%, 55.5% and 18.7% of cases. Stem cell source was bone marrow in 10.4%, peripheral blood in 87.4% and both in 2.2%. In-vivo TCD was performed in 59.2% of pts. GVHD prophylaxis was calcineurin inhibitor-based in 92.2% of pts. Results Engraftment was achieved in 99.4% of pts with a day-60 absolute neutrophil count (ANC) &amp;gt;0.5 x 10 9/L of 97.7% [95% CI: 93.7-99.2]. Day-180 rates of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV and grade III-IV were 26.2% (95% CI:19.9-32.9) and 8.1% (95% CI:4.6-12.8), respectively. At two years, rates of total chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and extensive cGVHD were 30% (95% CI: 22.5-38) and 16.6% (95% CI:10.6-23.7), respectively. Two-year LFS and OS were 66.1% (95% CI: 57.6-73.2) and 74% (95% CI: 65.4-80.8), respectively. Two-year RI, NRM and GRFS were 22.5% (95% CI:16-29.8), 11.4% (95% CI: 7-17), and 51.1% (95% CI: 42.4-59.1), respectively. Cause of death was original disease in 47.5%, infection in 27.5%, GVHD in 22.5% and non-SCT related in 2.5% of cases. In univariate analysis the only factor with significant impact on LFS was donor type (haplo [n=34] vs. others, p=0.006). For GRFS, patient CMV negativity (p=0.014) and in-vivo TCD (p=0.01) were significant. Interestingly, co-occurring mutations in FLT3 (FLT3-ITD) or NPM1 were not identified as having a significant impact on LFS or GRFS. Moreover, MRD status before alloSCT was also not shown to have a significant impact on these outcomes. In multivariate analysis of LFS and GRFS, only donor type (haplo [n=34] vs. others) was shown to be significant for both endpoints, hazard ratio (HR) 2.54; 95% CI: 1.4-4.6; p=0.002, and HR 2.01; 95% CI: 1.18-3.41; p=0.01, respectively. Conclusion Acknowledging the limitations of our retrospective study in this rare entity results are encouraging given the high-risk population (median age 55.1 years, CR2 in 22%, co-occurring FLT3-ITD in 25.8%, positive MRD in 48%, HCT CI &amp;gt;=3 in 28.1%). LFS, OS and GRFS rates were 66.1%, 74% and 51.1%, respectively, and both RI and NRM were comparably low with rates of 22.5% and 11.4%, respectively. No positive prognostic impact of co-occurring mutations in FLT3-TKD and NPM1 was detected, unlike what was found for conventional chemotherapy.

Successful Treatment Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Reduced-Toxicity Conditioning Regimen Incorporating Treosulfan in Pediatric Patients with XIAP Deficiency

Background X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) defciency is an inherited primary immunodefciency characterized by chronic infammasome overactivity and associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and infammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although hematopoietic stem celltransplantation (HSCT) is the only curative therapy, the outcomes of HSCT for XIAP deficiency remain unsatisfactory. Methods We have performed HSCT with treosulfan based RTC regimen for pediatric patients with non-malignant disorders since January 2016, and reviewed the medical records of patients with XIAP deficiency who underwent treosulfan based HSCT to investigate outcomes of HSCT for patients with XIAP deficiency. Results Since January 2016, 4 patients with XIAP deficiency had undergone HSCT using RTC regimen consisted of fludarabine (150-180 mg/m 2), treosulfan (42 g/m 2), rabbit ATG (5-7.5 mg/kg), and thiotepa (10 mg/kg). All patients were male and received HSCT (2 from URD and 2 from HFD) at median 13.7 years old (range, 12.8-15.3), median 2 years (range, 0.5-3.9) after diagnosis of XIAP. They all achieved engraftment and complete donor chimerism at the time of last evaluation. One patient who received HFD HSCT developed acute GI GVHD grade 3 and VOD within 1 month from HSCT, which was recovered after treatment with systemic steroid and defibrotide. Except the patient, there was no fatal acute regimen related toxicity ≥ CTCAE grade 3. Two patients developed chronic GVHD: one had limited disease which was resolved after systemic steroid therapy and the other had extensive disease. During the median 43 months (range, 33.1-63.0) follow-up, all survived without disease recurrence. Conclusions HSCT with treosulfan based RTC regimen is promising treatment option for pediatric patients with XIAP deficiency, with successful engraftment and low treatment-related toxicity. However, further studies including a larger multicenter trial and measures to refine the regimen are mandate to verify efficacy and safety of this regimen.

Favorable Outcomes for High-Risk MDS and Oligoblastic AML with MDS-Related Changes with Reduced Intensity Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

Introduction: Newer classification systems label myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with 10-20% blasts and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with MDS-related changes (AML-MR) on a continuum as they share common biologic features. The prognostic implication of blast percentage is less clinically relevant particularly in diseases with high-risk molecular features such as MDS/AML with TP53 mutations. The recently introduced Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) allows for a more personalized prognosis for MDS patients (pts) than the prior revised IPSS (IPSS-R), but it is less clear if this translates to better therapeutic choices or outcomes for pts. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) remains the only potentially curative approach. Increasingly clinical trials of novel compounds combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have not shown improved efficacy over single agent HMAs, necessitating further study of BMT approaches for durable disease control across the spectrum of disease biology. No uniform approach to the conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis for this pt population has proven superior. In the current study, we describe the outcomes of BMT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for patients with high-risk MDS and oligoblastic AML-MR, and analyze the prognostic implication of their chromosomal and molecular profiles within the international scoring systems. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients with 5-30% blasts and IPSS-R ≥3 who underwent BMT with PTCy at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 1/2013 and 12/2020. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed within 12 months of diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Competing risks analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cox-regression models were performed in univariate analyses with false discovery rate adjustment and then subsequently conducted for multivariable analyses to identify statistically significant and independent prognostic factors. Results: Ninety-four consecutive patients (65% male) were identified with a median age of 61 (range 22 - 75) years at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 4.8 years (range 5 days-9.6 years) post BMT. Two-thirds (63%) underwent haploidentical transplantation, and 91% received reduced intensity conditioning with Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and TBI. Median age at BMT was 65 years (range 22 - 76). The median time from diagnosis to BMT was 7.9 months. 52 (57%) received HMA based treatment and 36 (39%) intensive chemotherapy prior to BMT. Graft failure occurred in 6 patients (6.4%) The 5-year OS rate was 53% (95% CI: 43%-65%), the 5-year RFS rate was 47% (95% CI: 38%-59%) ( Figure 1A). The incidence of relapse was 21% (95% CI: 13% - 30%) at 1 year and 31% (95% CI: 21% - 40%) at 2 years after BMT ( Figure 1B). NRM rate in the first-year was 7% (95% CI: 2%-13%) and 11% (95% CI: 4%-17%) in the first two years ( Figure 1B). The incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grades 3 to 4 was 3.2%, whereas chronic GVHD (cGVHD) presented in 12 patients (12.7%) with only 2 patients (2.1%) having moderate to severe disease based on the NIH grading criteria. Univariate analysis showed that higher IPSS-R (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.39 - 2.04), poor or very poor karyotype risk (HR 7.48, 95% CI 3.49 - 16.02), complex karyotype (HR 3.72, 95% CI 2.01 - 6.88), higher IPSS-M (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.38 - 2.14), TP53 mutations (HR 6.53, 95% CI 3.36 - 12.7) and RAS mutations (HR 4.96, 95% CI 1.7 - 14.5) were associated with worse OS. IPSS-R was significantly correlated with the patients' response to bridge therapy (OR 1.34, P=0.036). IPSS-R, IPSS-M, poor or very poor karyotype risk, complex karyotype, TP53 and any RAS mutations and response to bridge therapy were independently associated with worse OS and RFS ( Table 1, Figure 1C). Conclusion: This retrospective analysis supports that BMT with PTCy is a durable approach for patients with high-risk MDS and oligoblastic AML-MR leading to high OS and RFS associated with a promising safety profile with low NRM and severe GVHD incidence. IPSS-R, IPSS-M, karyotype and response to bridge therapy are independent predictors of OS and RFS post-BMT. The presence of TP53 and/or RAS mutations defines a sub-group of patients with dismal outcomes representing an unmet need within this patient population.

Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Vexas Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic (VEXAS) syndrome presents as an auto-inflammatory disorder with overlapping hematological and rheumatological features. It is caused by mutation in UBA1 and is often refractory to treatment. Corticosteroids and Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are being used for symptomatic treatment. Here, we review the literature for the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with VEXAS Syndrome. Methods: Following the preferred reporting items for systemic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was performed on three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov) using MeSH terms and keywords for “VEXAS Syndrome” AND “treatment” from the date of inception to May 31, 2023. Our search produced 100 results, and duplicates were removed. After excluding irrelevant and review articles during primary and secondary screening, six studies were included which mentioned the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult VEXAS syndrome patients. Inter-study variance was calculated using the Der Simonian-Laird Estimator. Proportions along with 95% confidence Interval (CI) were extracted to compute pooled analysis using the ‘meta’ package by Schwarzer et al. in the R programming language (version 4.16-2). Results: A total of 18 patients from six studies reporting the outcomes of allogeneic HSCT in VEXAS syndrome patients were included for this systematic review and meta-analysis. (Table 1) The median age of the participants was 59.5 years (43-69) and all the patients were male. The median follow-up time was 11.6 months (0.4-67). Manifestations of the disease included myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) 38.9% (n=7), refractory inflammatory symptoms 16.7% (n=3), transfusion dependent disease 16.7% (n=3), myelofibrosis (MF) 5.6% (n=1), MDS plus MF 5.6% (n=1), systematic lupus erythematosus 5.6% (n=1), multiple myeloma 5.6% (n=1), and IgG4-related disease 5.6% (n=1). Donor type was matched unrelated 50% (n=9), matched related 33.3% (n=6), mismatched unrelated 11% (n=2), and the donor type was unknown for one patient. The source of stem cells was peripheral blood and bone marrow in 83.3% (n=15) and 5.6 % (n=1) of the patients, respectively, while it was not reported for 11% (n=2) of the patients. The pooled overall survival (OS) at a median of 6 (0.4-67) months was 93.3% (95% CI 0.67-0.1, I 2=0%, p=0.64, n=18). The incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) grade I-II, acute GvHD grade III-IV, and chronic GvHD was 17% (n=3), 11% (n=2), and 11% (n=2), respectively. Among the 3 patients who died, one patient expired due to sepsis, multiorgan failure, and cardiac arrest, second patient due to infection, and the third patient due to severe hypoxic pneumonia. Conclusion: Allogeneic HSCT has shown promising results in treating patients with VEXAS syndrome with good overall survival and acceptable incidence of graft versus host disease. However, considering the small sample size more studies should be done to consolidate these findings.

Inflammatory Change of FoxP3 + Regulatory T Cells in Human Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease: Implication in Immunopathogenesis

FoxP3 + regulatory T (Treg) cells are a subset of CD4 + T cells that are requisite for control of immune responses in various settings, thereby preventing excessive inflammation and maintaining homeostasis of the immune system. Paradoxically, in several autoimmune disorders, it has been suggested that Treg cells undergo inflammatory conversion to produce effector cytokines promoting tissue inflammation. Although Treg cells are known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), such inflammatory changes have not been focused on so far especially in the setting of human acute GvHD. Herein, in a prospective cohort of patients with hematologic malignancies who were treated with allogeneic SCT, we investigated the quantitative and qualitative changes of Treg cells in subjects with acute GvHD, including production of inflammatory cytokines from Treg cells. We also studied a cellular mechanism for production of effector cytokines by Treg cells and clinical significance of inflammatory changes of Treg cells. We first determined the frequency of Treg cells in the peripheral blood of patients with acute GvHD and compared it with that of patients who did not develop acute GvHD. Percentage of CD25 hiCD127 loFoxP3 + Treg cells among CD4 + T cells was significantly lower in patients with acute GvHD. When we analyzed for the composition of Treg cell subsets in more detail, we observed that the proportion of CD45RA -FoxP3 hi (actively suppressive) Treg cells was decreased and the proportion of CD45RA -FoxP3 lo (cytokine-producing non-suppressive) Treg cells was increased in patients with acute GvHD. Next, we assessed the production of inflammatory cytokines from Treg cells following T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation of peripheral blood lymphocytes with anti-CD3/CD28 antibody, using intracellular cytokine staining. As a result, we found that a remarkable proportion of CD4 +CD25 hiFoxP3 + Treg cells of acute GvHD patients produced TNF-α upon TCR stimulation. Interestingly, a significant proportion of TNF-α-producing Treg cells also secreted IL-17A simultaneously. These findings are consistent with the increased CD45RA -FoxP3 lo fraction among the Treg cell subsets. To explore a potential mechanism underlying inflammatory change of Treg cells, we quantified a variety of soluble factors in systemic circulation before and after onset of acute GvHD. The concentration of IL-6 and IL-21 was significantly higher in the serum drawn after onset of acute GvHD compared to baseline, suggesting that these Th17-polarizing cytokines might be responsible for the inflammatory conversion of Treg cells during acute GvHD. We further checked the suppressive activity of TNF-α-producing CD4 +CD25 hiFoxP3 + Treg cells of acute GvHD patients. TNF-α + Treg cells of acute GvHD patients expressed lower level of FoxP3 than the TNF-α - counterpart. Similarly, the percentage of CD39 + cells was lower in TNF-α + Treg cells than in the TNF-α - counterpart. In fact, Treg cell suppressive activity during acute GvHD was significantly reduced compared with that of pre-SCT control when non-Treg CD4 + T cells or CD8 + T cells were used as responder cells. Finally, we examined the clinical significance of TNF-α-producing CD4 +CD25 hiFoxP3 + Treg cells in acute GvHD patients. The frequency of TNF-α + cells among circulating Treg cells significantly correlated with the severity of acute GvHD, with higher proportion of TNF-α + Treg cells in patients with the higher grade of acute GvHD. This result indicates that the pathologic conversion of Treg cells to produce TNF-α contributes to immune-mediated tissue injury during acute GvHD. Taken together, during human acute GvHD, Treg cells undergo functional alteration to produce proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IL-17A and to exhibit the reduced suppressive activity. TNF-α production by Treg cells is closely associated with the clinical severity of acute GvHD.

Dynamics of Immune Reconstitution after Unrelated Allogeneic Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Compared to Classical Immunosuppression with ATG

Introduction: Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY), in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is responsible for the success of haploidentical stem cell transplantation and is also being used in matched transplants such as unrelated transplants, with promising outcomes in graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, we lack data on immune reconstitution with this type of immunosuppression, especially in unrelated transplantation. Immune reconstitution is directly involved with post-transplant morbidity and mortality, being related to GVHD, relapses and infections, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV). Objectives: To evaluate global and CMV-specific immune reconstitution after unrelated donor HSCT, comparing the use of thymoglobulin (ATG) or PTCY protocol. Methods: We prospectively included patients undergoing first unrelated donor HSCT with ATG, methotrexate and tacrolimus or PTCY (50mg/Kg D+3 and D+4), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus with patient and/or donor CMV IgG positive. Immune reconstitution analyzes were performed by flow cytometry and CMV-specific recovery by ELISPot technique on days +30, +60, +90 and +180 post HSCT. Results: Thirty-six patients were included in this study, 20 in the ATG group and 16 in the PTCY group (table 1). Only 2 patients were 9x10 match, and the others were 10x10 match. All patients were submitted to preemptive strategy of CMV treatment, without the use of letermovir. Regarding clinical outcomes, neutrophilic engraftment was earlier with ATG (median of 12 days), compared to PTCY (median of 16 days) (p=0.0001). There was no difference between the groups in terms of length of hospital stay (median 33 days in both groups), CMV reactivation (70% in ATG and 75% PTCY, p=0.98), acute GVHD grades II to IV (p=0.26) or grades III-IV (p=0.56), and chronic GVHD (p=0.45), as well as relapse (p=0.3), non relapse mortality (p=0.77) and overall survival (p=0.4). Regarding immune reconstitution we observed an initial expansion of monocytes and NK lymphocytes in both groups and a higher increase in CD8+ T lymphocytes was evidenced, with an inversion of the CD4/CD8 ratio (CD4 14.9% vs 15.5% p=0.9 and CD8 49.7% vs 54.5%p=0.5 in ATG and PTCY respectively). We identified a CD4+/CD8+ double-positive T cell (DP) population, which was higher in PTCY group compared to ATG on days +30 (3.5% vs 10.2%, p=0.009), +90 (3.1% vs 12% p= 0.01) and +180 (5.2% vs 13%, p=0.007, in ATG and PTCY respectively ). On day +30 there were higher proportion of T cells (19.9% vs 9.6% p=0.004), B cells (0.76% vs 0.2%, p=0.006) and NK cells (19.2% vs 8.6% p=0.006) in ATG group compared to PTCY and monocytes were higher in PTCY (31.7 vs 44.5%, p=0.02). On day +180 the proportion of B cell were higher in PTCY (6.1% vs 16.6% p=0.014) and the NK cells were higher in the ATG (22.4% vs 14.7% p=0.021) (Figure 1), with higher CD56dim population in ATG group (46% vs 33.6% p=0.0079), while in PTCY there were a higher NK population CD56high on day +60 (40.3% vs 61%, p=0.014). We identified a peripheral expansion of a CD56negCD16posNKG2Dpos NK cell population, which was higher in the PTCY group on day +180 (3.7% vs 13.2% p=0.017). Regarding CMV-specific immune response, we found no difference between the groups on days +30 (5 vs 5 spots/10 4 PBMC p=0.41), +60 (10 vs 6 spots/10 4 PBMC p=0.38), +90 (13 vs 4 spots/10 4PBMC p=0.33) or +180 (7 vs 6 spots/10 4 PBMC p=0.57). Conclusions: In the context of unrelated HSCT, we found no difference in CMV-specific immune response with the use of PTCY or ATG protocol. Post-transplant immunosuppression with PTCY compared to ATG protocol is related to lower levels of T cells, NK cells and B cells on day +30 and later neutrophil engraftment, but with a higher proportion of double positive T cells on days +30, +90 and +180 and a higher proportion of B cells on day +180. At 6 months after transplantation, a proportionately lower number of NK cells, but higher proportion of CD56negCd16posNKG2D NK population was observed in the PTCY group.

ATG/ATLG Improves GvHD-Free and Relapse-Free Survival in Myelofibrosis Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background Despite recent improvements in the field of JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis. However, HSCT is associated with a non-negligible treatment-related morbidity and mortality, with graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) being one of the major complications for these patients. In vivo T-cell depletion with antithymocyte/antilymphocyte globulin (ATG/ATLG, short ATG) as part of the conditioning regimen prior to HSCT is widely used as a GvHD prophylaxis, but data on its role in the setting of myelofibrosis is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ATG on clinical outcomes of patients with myelofibrosis undergoing HSCT in a large international retrospective study. Patients and Methods We leveraged a multicenter collaborative network of 7 European and US academic transplant centers to accrue myelofibrosis patients who underwent first HSCT. The primary endpoint was GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS), whereas secondary endpoints were acute and chronic GvHD, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). We applied multivariate Cox and Fine &amp; Gray modelling to adjust for potential confounders. In addition, a Dependent Dirichlet Process model for censored data was developed, which can adjust for potential violations of the ubiquitous proportional hazards assumption. Finally, to check results and to obtain another reliable comparison, we applied a propensity score matching of the two groups. Results Overall, we identified 806 patients, of whom 513 received ATG and 293 received non-ATG GvHD prophylaxis. No significant differences were observed between the two groups with regards to median age at HSCT (57 years for both) nor for gender, disease ontogenesis (primary or secondary), frequency of driver mutations, and treatment with ruxolitinib prior to transplant. Patients in the ATG and the non-ATG group differed for other characteristics including splenectomy prior to transplant (8% vs. 20%), donor type (matched related donor (MRD): 21% vs. 39%), Karnofsky Performance Status (&amp;lt;90%: 39% vs. 26%), intensity of conditioning therapy (reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) in 80% vs. 40%) and the presence of constitutional symptoms (58% vs. 44%). Regarding the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS), the ATG cohort was more enriched in intermediate-2 and high-risk diseases (64% vs. 58%). Notably, the most common stem cell source in the ATG and the non-ATG cohort was in both cases peripheral blood (98% vs. 95%). The cumulative incidence of acute GvHD grade II-IV was 35% (95% CI, 31-39%) for the ATG group vs. 58% (95% CI, 52-64%) for the non-ATG group (P&amp;lt;0.001). No difference in incidence of chronic GvHD was observed, showing 53% (95% CI, 49-57%) for the ATG group vs. 52% (95% CI, 47-57%) for the non-ATG group (P=0.52). With a median follow-up of 6.5 years for the ATG group and 7 years for the non-ATG group (P=0.10), the 5-year estimates for GRFS were 47% (95% CI, 43-51%) vs. 44% (95% CI, 38-50%; P=0.007; Figure), respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 14% (95% CI, 10-18%) vs. 13% (95% CI, 8-18%; P=0.62) and the 5-year cumulative incidence of death without relapse for both groups was 28%, respectively (P=0.59). Remarkably, 5-year OS was similar, being 63% (95% CI, 59-67%) for the ATG group vs. 62% (95% CI, 58-68%) for the non-ATG group (P=0.56). Multivariable modelling for GRFS (adjusting for donor type, performance status, conditioning intensity, and DIPSS categories) showed an independent significant reduction in risk for GvHD or relapse in the ATG group (HR=0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.91; P=0.007). Propensity score matching of 150 pairs confirmed the significant effect of ATG on GRFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P=0.03). No differences between the two groups were identified for secondary endpoints of relapse, non-relapse mortality, and overall survival. Conclusion The use of ATG as GvHD prophylaxis in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing HSCT resulted in significantly reduced GRFS. This effect was mainly driven by a significant reduction in acute GvHD.

Addition of Myeloablative Doses of Total Marrow Irradiation (TMI) to Myeloablative Fludarabine/Busulfan Conditioning for Allogeneic HSCT in Patients with High-Risk AML, CML, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Phase II Clinical Trial

In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for high-risk myeloid disorders, the intensity of the conditioning regimen correlates with the risk of relapse, but its benefit may be offset by its risk of toxicity. The addition of increasing doses of TMI to myeloablative conditioning was previously shown to have acceptable toxicity in a phase I trial by our group (PMID 25234438), but the efficacy of this strategy remains uncertain. From 2017 to 2023, 31 patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n=20) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS, n=5), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n=3) in accelerated phase or blast crisis, were enrolled into a prospective phase II clinical trial of allogeneic HSCT using myeloablative TMI at 9Gy in combination with standard myeloablative fludarabine (160 mg/m2) and targeted IV busulfan (daily exposure of AUC 4800 μM*min over 3 hours) (FluBu4) chemotherapy. TMI was delivered by using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at 1.5Gy twice per day for 3 days for a total of 9Gy. The primary objective of the trial was to achieve &amp;gt;50% Disease-Free Survival (DFS) at 1 year. Here, we report the results on 28 patients who received the TMI-based transplant, whereas among the remaining 3, 1 had not started the conditioning yet and 2 became ineligible due to progression of disease and deterioration of performance status, respectively. The study included patients with matched related donors (MRD, n=9) receiving TMI/FluBu4 as a preparative regimen and patients with matched unrelated (MUD, n=13) or 1-antigen mismatched unrelated (MMUD, n=6) donors receiving conditioning with TMI/FluBu4 + rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was with methotrexate and tacrolimus, and palifermin was used to prevent severe mucositis. Patients' gender ratio was 16 female/12 male; race was Caucasian in 17 patients, African American in 4, Latino in 7; and median age was 53 years (range: 20-68). The median HCT-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) was 3 (range: 0-7). All 20 AML patients were at high risk of relapse because of adverse cytogenetic or molecular profile at diagnosis (n=13), or in second complete remission (CR2) (n=2), or with active disease at the time of transplant (n=5). All patients received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) (median CD34+ cell dose: 8.5 x 10 6/kg, range: 2.4-19.9) and fully engrafted. The median time to absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and platelet engraftment was 14 (range: day 9-22) and 15 (range: day 9-43) days, respectively. Grade 3-4 extramedullary toxicities were: mucositis in 57% (n=16), nausea/vomiting in 11% (n=3) and diarrhea in 7% (n=2) of the patients. Acute GVHD grade III-IV was seen in 3 patients (10%). Moderate/severe chronic GVHD was observed in 10 patients (36%). With a median follow-up of 1315 days (range: 158-1925 days) for patients alive, the overall 1 year and current overall survival were 73% and 64%, respectively. GVHD-Free Relapse-Free Survival (GRFS) at 1-year was 54%. Of 5 AML patients transplanted with active disease, 3 were alive and in remission at 1 year and at current date, while 2 died of relapsed disease. Of 28 patients in the study, 6 relapsed/progressed (21%) and 5 of them died of the disease (18%); whereas 5 patients (18%) died of transplant-related mortality (TRM) (2 deaths from septic shock, 1 from disseminated toxoplasmosis, 1 from idiopathic pneumonia and 1 from unknown causes). Kaplan Meyer curves for Overall Survival (OS) and DFS are shown in Figure 1 and 2, respectively. Addition of myeloablative TMI at 9Gy to standard myeloablative targeted FluBu4 was well tolerated and achieved very encouraging results in a group of patients with myeloid malignancies at high risk of relapse (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03121014).

Role of Splenic Irradiation Prior to Transplant for Myelofibrosis: A Global Collaboration

JAK inhibitors and novel agents have shown promising reduction of spleen size in newly diagnosed myelofibrosis. However, not all patients will respond or they eventually progress at some point. Despite hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) being the only curative treatment option to date, splenomegaly prior to HCT remains a particular challenge. On the other hand, numbers of patients eligible for HCT continue to increase worldwide, and thus management of splenomegaly becomes more and more relevant. One approach to reduce spleen size prior to HCT could be splenic irradiation. However, evidence on its role remains scarce. We took advantage of a global collaboration between European, US, and Latin American centers to investigate the role of splenic irradiation as part of the HCT platform for patients with myelofibrosis. Radiation therapy had to be given within 3 months prior to or be part of conditioning therapy for HSCT. Detailed information on irradiation as well as post-HCT safety profiles was collected in addition to usual patient-, disease-, and transplant-related variables. This global collaborative study included 52 patients, of whom 71% had primary myelofibrosis, 17% post polycythemia vera and 12% post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Median age at HCT was 60 years (range, 32-76). Risk category according to DIPSS prior to irradiation was intermediate-1 in 20%, intermediate-2 in 52%, and high in 28%. Driver mutation status was JAK2 in 44%, CALR in 40%, MPL in 4%, and triple negative in 12%. Four patients had portal vein thrombosis before irradiation. Ruxolitinib before irradiation was received by 76% and 4% received fedratinib. Reduced intensity conditioning HCT was received by 73% and 85% were matched related or matched unrelated donor transplants. Median time from irradiation to HCT was 2 weeks (range, 0.9-12 weeks) and median spleen size prior to irradiation was 23 cm (range, 14-35). Spleen size was measured by ultrasound in 70%, CT scan in 20%, and physical examination in 10%. Median total irradiation dose was 7 Gy (range, 3-12), fractionated in a median of 5 administrations (range, 2-12). Splenic irradiation resulted in a significant spleen reduction prior to HCT but was also associated with significant reduction in platelet and leukocyte counts ( Table). Spleen size did not correlate with blood counts prior or after irradiation. Higher platelet count prior to irradiation correlated with higher counts after irradiation (r=0.83; P&amp;lt;0.001). There was no correlation between irradiation dose and post-irradiation hematological toxicities. Only 1 patient had non-hematological adverse events (tumor lysis syndrome). Neutrophil engraftment was achieved by 90% within a median of 18 days after HCT and platelet engraftment was achieved by 81% within a median of 38 days. Median follow-up of the total cohort was 2.7 years and 3-year overall survival was 66% (95% CI, 52-80%; Figure). Non-relapse mortality was 27% (95% CI, 15-39%) and cumulative incidence of relapse was 11% (95% CI, 2-20%; Figure). Incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV and chronic GVHD was 25% and 38%, respectively. Increased spleen size (as continuous variable) prior to irradiation was associated with worse outcome (P=0.05), showing 3-year survival of 73% for spleen ≤25cm vs 42% for &amp;gt;25cm, and non-relapse mortality of 58% vs 14%, respectively (P=0.02). No effect of spleen size after irradiation on outcomes was observed. All 4 patients with portal vein thrombosis died (2-year survival 25%). A multivariable model showed that larger spleen size before irradiation, lower hemoglobin levels, CALR/MPL-unmuated driver mutation genotype, and presence of portal vein thrombosis were significantly associated with worse survival ( Table). This first international and largest study to date on splenic irradiation as part of the HCT algorithm for patients with myelofibrosis and splenomegaly showed a significant impact of spleen size on overall survival and non-relapse mortality, while relapse rates were low. In addition, lower hemoglobin levels and presence of portal vein thrombosis at time of irradiation predicted worse outcomes.

Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PTCY) Compared to ATG in Patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms Allografted with an Unrelated Donor: A Registry Study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Background Prospective randomized trials have reported a benefit for ATG-based GVHD prophylaxis in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) with an unrelated donor (UD). However, the best GVHD prophylaxis has been recently challenged by the use of PTCY, first in haplo-identical transplant and then in HLA mismatched or matched unrelated transplantation. We here present the outcomes of PTCY vs ATG as GVHD prophylaxis in MDS patients from the EBMT registry transplanted with an unrelated donor. Method A total of 969 patients transplanted from 2012 to 2019 in 92 participating centers, receiving either PTCY or ATG, were included in this study. The primary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Competing risks analyses were performed to analyze non-relapse mortality (NRM) with competing event relapse, and acute GvHD grade II-IV, chronic GvHD and neutrophil engraftment with competing events relapse and death. Cox proportional hazards regression with a predefined covariate constellation (age, IPSS-R cytogenetics, donor HLA matching, age, hypomethylating agents (HMA) prior to transplantation, comorbidity score and MDS classification (MDS with or without excess blast, EB) was used to obtain adjusted effect estimates of ATG compared to PTCY for OS and PFS. Results Overall, 214 patients received PTCY and 755 received ATG as GVHD prophylaxis for UD alloHSCT. Patients of the ATG group were older (60.1 year-old [IQR: 50.6-65.2] vs 57.2 year-old [IQR: 46.4-61.1], p=0.008). Disease characteristics were similar in both group: there were a total of 583 MDS with EB at diagnosis, 510 MDS-EB at transplantation, and 207 patients transformed into AML. Among patients with available data for IPSS-R at MDS diagnosis (n=760) 44 (5.8%) were Very Low, 114 (15%) Low, 209 (27.5%) Intermediate, 232 (30.5%) High and 161 (21.2%) Very High. Patients of the PTCY group received more frequently HMA before transplantation (72.4% vs 57.3%, p=0.001) and were preferentially transplanted from an HLA mismatched 9/10 donor (37.9% vs 21.6%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conditioning regimen was more frequently myeloablative in the PTCY group (55.4% vs 38.7%, p&amp;lt;0.001). Neutrophil engraftment at 28 days was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 84%, p&amp;lt;0.001). With a median follow-up of 4.4 (95% CI 4.2 - 4.8) years, five-year OS was 57% (49-64) with PCTY and 49% (95% 46-53%) in ATG group, p=0.127. Five-year cumulative incidence of relapse was similar in both groups (22%, 95%CI 16-29 in PTCY vs 25%, 95%CI 22-28 in ATG; p=0.28). Notably, 5-year PFS was marginally higher for PTCY with 52% (95%CI 44-59) vs 44% (95%CI 40-48) for ATG, p=0.075, whereas 5-year NRM was 26% (95% CI 20-32%) vs 31% (95% CI 27-34) in PTCY and ATG, respectively, p=0.28. Grade II-IV acute GVHD incidence was lower using PTCY (22% [95% CI 17-28%] vs 30% [95% CI 26-33%]), p=0.035 while there was no difference for chronic GVHD (36% (29-43% with PTCY vs 38% (34-41%) in ATG at 5 years). Multivariable analyses confirmed a better OS and PFS for PTCY, with a HR of ATG of 1.34 (95% CI 1.02-1.76), p=0.04, and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.31 (95%CI 1.01-1.69) (Table 1). There was no apparent interaction between GvHD prophylaxis and IPSS-R or HLA matching, suggesting an effect exclusive to the type of GVHD prophylaxis used. Conclusion: This EBMT registry study suggests that MDS patients who received a transplant from an unrelated donor had a better OS and PFS using PTCY compared to ATG. This confirms that PTCY instead of ATG in this setting is a valid option.

Significance of HLA-E and its two NKG2 receptors in development of complications after allogeneic transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells.

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCT) is a procedure commonly used in treatment of various haematological disorders which is associated with significantly improved survival rates. However, one of its drawbacks is the possibility of development of post-transplant complications, including acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) or CMV infection. Various studies suggested that NK cells and their receptors may affect the transplant outcome. In the present study, patients and donors were found to significantly differ in the distribution of the NKG2A rs7301582 genetic variants - recipients carried the C allele more often than their donors (0.975 vs 0.865, p<0.0001). Increased soluble HLA-E (sHLA-E) levels detected in recipients' serum 30 days after transplantation seemed to play a prognostic and protective role. It was observed that recipients with higher sHLA-E levels were less prone to chronic GvHD (11.65 vs 6.33 pg/mL, p=0.033) or more severe acute GvHD grades II-IV (11.07 vs 8.04 pg/mL, p=0.081). Our results also showed an unfavourable role of HLA-E donor-recipient genetic incompatibility in CMV infection development after transplantation (OR=5.92, p=0.014). Frequencies of NK cells (both CD56dim and CD56bright) expressing NKG2C were elevated in recipients who developed CMV, especially 30 and 90 days post-transplantation (p<0.03). Percentages of NKG2C+ NK cells lacking NKG2A expression were also increased in these patients. Moreover, recipients carrying a NKG2C deletion characterized with decreased frequency of NKG2C+ NK cells (p<0.05). Our study confirms the importance of NK cells in the development of post-transplant complications and highlights the effect of HLA-E and NKG2C genetic variants, sHLA-E serum concentration, as well as NKG2C surface expression on transplant outcome.