The authors have presented an impressive review of their 2--year experience with managing acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Of 13 patients (out of 165 diagnosed with PE during the study period) with massive or submassive embolism, the majority diagnosed by computed-tomographic angiography (CTA), using an aggressive approach with cardiopulmonary bypass in all cases there was only one mortality (survival of 92%). Of 9 survivors who were evaluated, only 2 (14%) in short-term follow-up had evidence of persistent pulmonary hypertension. Although we do not have details regarding the patients who did not undergo operative intervention, these remarkable results nevertheless reflect clinical expertise and patient selection. The management and outcome of PE is inextricably linked with presentation, primary mode of diagnosis, and hemodynamic stability. In those patients who are intubated (such as those that occur intraoperatively), an acute drop in end-tidal CO2 may prompt the diagnosis. A quick transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrating acute right ventricular dilation will further support the diagnosis, as well as prompt aggressive intervention, even if there has been no hemodynamic compromise. More commonly, patients present to the ER or acutely on the ward. CTA has been advocated as being particularly useful in making the diagnosis in patients who have multiple potential etiologies for acute hypoxia (with or without hemodynamic changes). At this point in time, however, this has not been universally accepted as the equivalent of angiography. As the authors point out, pulmonary angiography can serve for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Interventional approaches are not without risk, including precipitating cardiac arrest and if clot fragmentation rather than extraction is used, which would simply cause distal embolization with persistent acute or chronic pulmonary hypertension remaining, even if thrombolysis is added. In practice, of the patients not in frank shock, those that undergo CTA with demonstration of accessible central clot and acute cor pulmonale will tend to be taken directly to the OR, while those diagnosed by angiography will undergo interventional approaches. These issues are multipled when the patient presents in shock or arrest. Occasionally closed or open cardiac massages will break up the central clot, allowing some restoration of perfusion. This implies that a bulk of the thrombus will have fragmented, probably migrated distally, making operative extraction difficult or impossible. Unless the arrest occurred in the operating room or transesophageal echo demonstrates central clot, we would favor interventional approaches in this setting. The ideal situation would be to establish percutaneous bypass, thus buying time to consider all options. Even more ideally, institutions would have multipurpose suites capable of both angiography and operative procedures. Because of the acuity of the situation, and the need to rapidly make a treatment plan, cardiothoracic surgery should be immediately involved whenever the possibility of PE exists. Only a cardiothoracic surgeon can rapidly sort out all options, given the clinical scenario and the individual institution's capabilities.
Read full abstract