Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common infectious diseases and one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is defined as an acute lower airway infection, caused by viruses, fungi or bacteria, which develops in patients not exposed to hospital settings or health facilities. Therefore, the choice of initial antibiotic therapy is pivotal to achieve early response and possibly early discharge, and thus reducing hospital expenditure. Considering this scenario were developed a cost–consequence for ceftaroline fosamil in the perspective of Brazilian private healthcare system (BPHS). A decision tree model simulates a hypothetical cohort of 100 adult patients hospitalized to treat moderate to severe CAP, comparing two arms: the first consider ceftaroline fosamil while the second consider alternatives classically recommended for CAP by the Brazilian Society of Pulmonology and Tisiology - ceftriaxone and levofloxacin. The model results consider the transitions of those patients depending on the clinical response to the initial therapy. Where also measured all direct costs according with the consequences of the treatments in the perspective of BPHS. The analysis demonstrated that the use of ceftaroline fosamil as initial antibiotic treatment versus the comparators for CAP treatment may represent a significant reduction in total treatment cost, mainly due to the reduction in length of stay. It is important to note that this cost reduction was sufficient to offset the higher cost of acquiring ceftaroline fosamil as the initial antibiotic therapy. Cost-savings ranged from BRL 174,675 when compared to ceftriaxone, to BRL 5720,221 when compared to levofloxacin. Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated potential as an initial antibiotic therapy when compared to alternative therapies for patients with moderate to severe CAP, as it can result in an increase in early response and a decrease in total costs for the BPHS.