Acute Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection Research Articles

The role of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of acute antibody‐mediated kidney rejection

Approximately 10% of renal transplant recipients experience acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) due to alloimmunization against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules and other antigens. While therapeutic apheresis is included in most treatment protocols for acute kidney allograft rejection, these protocols have been derived mainly from single center experience rather than controlled trials. This concise review focuses on the role of therapeutic apheresis in AMR treatment. Two groups have recently reported treating acute AMR using drug-only strategies without therapeutic apheresis in particular situations, namely in clinically less severe cases or in resource-limited situations without testing for donor specific antibodies. A randomized controlled trial, designed to test the efficacy of immunoadsorption apheresis in AMR treatment, was terminated early and suggested a benefit of apheresis. An observational study suggested efficacy of plasmapheresis in acute AMR treatment, but all patients who received plasmapheresis also received rituximab. As new therapeutic modalities are becoming available, therapeutic apheresis continues to play a role in the treatment of acute kidney allograft rejection.

The Pathological Characteristics of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in DA-to-Lewis Rat Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

The category of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not included in the Banff classification of liver transplantation pathology. We investigated the pathology of acute AMR using an orthotopic rat liver transplantation from DA-to-Lewis rats without immunosuppression. We studied liver graft samples at days 5, 7, and 9 to 11, focusing on the pathological characteristics of acute AMR. Progressive acute cellular rejection and AMR led to irreversible graft failure by day 11 ± 2. At day 5 immunoglobulin G (IgG) was deposited on endothelial cells in the portal veins and small arteries. Thereafter, at day 7 to day 11 the IgG deposition expanded on endothelial cells in portal veins and hepatic arteries, epithelial cells in bile ducts, sinusoids and hepatic cells in lobules. Light microscopic studies during the development of acute AMR showed interstitial edema in portal areas with neutrophilic infiltration. Rejecting grafts revealed congestion and/or thrombi in portal veins and hepatic arteries with neutrophil infiltration and fibrinogen deposition, severe degeneration of epithelial cells in bile ducts with periductal edema, intralobular edema, and hemorrhage with neutrophil infiltration and fibrinogen deposition, as well as hepatic cell degeneration and necrosis. In conclusion, acute AMR that developed in liver transplantation was characterized by endothelial cell injuries in microvasculature of portal veins, hepatic arteries, and sinusoids, accompanied by congestion, hemorrhage, thrombus formation, and neutophilic infiltration, as well as by bile duct and hepatic cell degeneration and necrosis.

IL-17 Expression by Tubular Epithelial Cells in Renal Transplant Recipients with Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Acute rejection is still a common complication of kidney transplantation. IL-17 is known to be associated with allograft rejection but the cellular source and the role of this cytokine remains unclear. We investigated IL-17 graft expression in renal transplant recipients with acute antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), acute T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) and acute tubular damage due to calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity (CNI). In acute ABMR, tubular IL-17 protein expression was significantly increased compared to TCMR, where most of the IL-17⁺ cells were CD4⁺ graft infiltrating lymphocytes, IFTA and CNI control groups. The tubular expression of IL-17 in acute ABMR colocalized with JAK2 phosphorylation and peritubular capillaries C4d deposition. In addition, IL-17 tubular expression was directly and significantly correlated with the extension of C4d deposits. In cultured proximal tubular cells, C3a induced IL-17 gene and protein expression along with an increased in JAK2 phosphorylation. The inhibition of JAK2 abolished C3a-induced IL-17 expression. The use of steroids and monoclonal antibodies reduced IL-17 expression, JAK2 phosphorylation and C4d deposition in acute ABMR patients. Our data suggest that tubular cells represent a significant source of IL-17 in ABMR and this event might be mediated by the complement system activation featuring this condition.

Eculizumab for the Treatment of De Novo Thrombotic Microangiopathy Post Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation—A Case Report

A 34-year-old female recipient of a simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplant presented 7 days posttransplant with acute renal allograft dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Renal biopsy revealed acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and acute thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Clinical and laboratory manifestations, which had only partly responded to treatment with daily plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin, resolved rapidly and completely to eculizumab (Soliris, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cheshire, Conn), a complement factor C5 antibody. De novo posttransplant TMA is a rare and serious complication that can lead to graft loss in up to one third of cases. This is the first report of successful treatment of de novo TMA with eculizumab, which has previously shown benefit in recurrent atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome as well as in refractory acute AMR. Targeted complement inhibition offers the promise of a safe and effective therapeutic strategy in de novo TMA, especially in light of recent evidence suggesting that genetic mutations in complement regulatory proteins may predispose transplant recipients to this serious disease.

A case of tacrolimus‐associated thrombotic microangiopathy after ABO‐blood‐type‐incompatible renal transplantation

De novo thrombotic microangiopathy(TMA) is most commonly triggered by calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and the prognosis is less severe than with recurrent TMA. However, it is difficult to distinguish de novo TMA from CNI toxicity and acute antibody-mediated rejection(AMR) soon after renal transplantation. We present a case of tacrolimus-associated TMA soon after ABO blood type incompatible renal transplantation that was difficult to differentiate from acute AMR. On day 9 his urine output decreased dramatically and the Scr level increased. His anti-blood type A antibody titer increased to ×16 postopratively and the tacrolimus trough level was higher than in our immunosuppressive regimen. Although we gave priority to anti-AMR treatment, adequate dose adjustment of tacrolimus after tacrolimus nephrotoxicity was diagnosed from graft biopsy could correct allograft dysfunction.

Sensitized renal transplant recipients: current protocols and future directions

The identification of suitable donor kidneys for transplant candidates with high levels of circulating antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major challenge and results in prolonged waiting times for transplantation. Technological advances in antibody characterization have permitted a more comprehensive assessment of anti-HLA antibody activity, as well as providing new insights into the clinical effect of HLA antibody class and specificity. Protocols have been developed that enable successful transplantation in patients with donor-specific antibodies (anti-HLA antibodies reactive against their donors). These protocols provide satisfactory early to intermediate-term allograft survival, and constitute an important advance in transplantation. Nevertheless, acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a significant challenge, occurring in 20-50% of antibody-incompatible kidney transplantations. Although therapy directed toward lowering donor-specific antibody activity seems to be successful in reversing acute AMR, this condition still has an important negative impact on allograft survival. In addition, subclinical AMR seems to complicate a substantial proportion of positive-crossmatch transplantations even in the absence of allograft dysfunction, and may result in chronic histological abnormalities and shortened allograft function. New interventions for preventing acute AMR, such as anti-C5 antibody-mediated complement blockade and proteasome inhibitor-mediated plasma cell depletion, are promising therapeutic avenues currently under investigation.

Mechanism of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Which Anti-A/Anti-B Antibodies are Responsible, Natural or de Novo?

Mechanism of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Which Anti-A/Anti-B Antibodies are Responsible, Natural or de Novo?

Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection After Lung Transplantation

The role of humoral immunity after lung transplantation remains unclear. In this report, we describe the pathologic findings and clinical course of a case of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation. After an uncomplicated early course, a 31-year-old man with cystic fibrosis developed acute graft dysfunction 1 month after bilateral lung transplantation. Lung biopsies showed acute pneumonitis with capillary injury, neutrophilic infiltration and nuclear dust. Immunostaining for C4d demonstrated endothelial cell deposition, and circulating donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies were identified. Despite severe hypoxemic respiratory failure, he responded well to a regimen consisting of methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab therapy. He completely recovered clinically although donor-specific HLA antibodies have remained detectable. The incidence of acute AMR after lung transplantation is unknown, but this case fulfills all of the consensus diagnostic criteria, and we suggest that AMR could be an under-recognized cause of acute graft dysfunction.