This study examined the development of school performance-related beliefs and their link with actual academic performance in Moscow children (Grades 2-6, N=55l) using the Control, Agency and Means-Ends Interview (CAMI). Results revealed much intercultural convergence with Western samples, coupled with context-specific variations. Similarities involved (a) the CAMI factor structure, (b) the correlational nexus between beliefs and performance, (c) the developmental trends, and (d) the configuration of means-ends beliefs. Differences involved beliefs about teachers and ability, and gender differences, favoring girls, in the agency and control beliefs. In general, Moscow children displayed a Westernlike view of the causes of school performance and of themselves as being agentic and capable of personal control over their performance outcomes. When considering the development of self-related cognition, such as self-ascribed potential for academic achievement (e.g., self-efficacy and control beliefs), one could easily suggest that major differences should exist between children schooled in Western versus non-Western societies. These societies are thought to be characterized by substantially different views of the self, associated, for instance, with predominantly individualistic versus predominantly collectivistic orientations, respectively (Berman, 1990; Hofstede, 1991; Meyer, 1988; Triandis, 1989). By assuming, however, profound differences between Western and non-Western views of the self (e.g., by ascribing the self-efficacious, internally controlled individual to the standards of Western societies only), we may be underestimati ng possible similarities in certain domains, such as schooling. The issue is far from being fully examined in empirical studies. We do not know, for example, how much children from different sociocultural contexts diverge, if at all, in their beliefs related to school performance.
Read full abstract