.. has been and is still [Adrian (1)] dominated by certain concepts which have proved so convenient that they have come to be accepted without serious question by the majority of physiologists and by many psychologists. These concepts are Muller's so-called of specific nervous energies, and von Frey's extrapolation of this law into the theory of punctate representation of primary sensory modalities. In other words, it is commonly accepted that there are mo;phologically specific pai n, warmth, cold, and touch nerve end ings, specific nerve fibres, and specific nerve pathways. It is for this reason that so much emphasis has been laid on the analysis of somesthesis and the chemical senses in terms of the activity of single nerve fibres, which has resulted in reviews that consist of collat ions of literature reporting the results of e1ectrophysiolog ical experiments. Recent anatomical and psycho-physio logical work, however, has seri ously challenged the validity of Muller's law and von Frey's theory with re gard to cutaneous sensibility, and has made it necessary to re-examine all the experimental observations on the sensory nervous system from a wholly different point of view. This revieJ.V will, therefore, take a somewhat unconventional form. In the first place, we shall examine and collate the evidence which seeks to refute the accepted concepts and then, in the light of these new observations, ex amine some of the literature in the field of somesthesis which has appeared in the course of the past year. The literature on the chemical senses was ably reviewed in Volume 5 of the Annual Review of Psychology and for this reason has been dealt with less exhaustively on this occasion. The review is intended to be provocative and critical, and necessarily reflects the author's personal opinion of the evidence before him. SOMESTHESIS Recent observations on the mechanism of cutaneous sensibility.- The state ments which follow are based on a series of publications by Weddell and his co-workers (2 to 21) , some of which appeared before 1953. Reference should be made to all of these publications if exhau stive examination of the evi dence is desired. Neurohistologica l