Activity Of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Research Articles

Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the treatment of choice for most patients with atrial fibrillation and/or noncancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Although routine monitoring of these agents is not required, assessment of anticoagulant effect may be desirable in special situations. The objective of this review was to summarize systematically evidence regarding laboratory assessment of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting relationships between drug levels and coagulation assay results. We identified 109 eligible studies: 35 for dabigatran, 50 for rivaroxaban, 11 for apixaban, and 13 for edoxaban. The performance of standard anticoagulation tests varied across DOACs and reagents; most assays, showed insufficient correlation to provide a reliable assessment of DOAC effects. Dilute thrombin time (TT) assays demonstrated linear correlation (r2= 0.67-0.99) across a range of expected concentrations of dabigatran, as did ecarin-based assays. Calibrated anti-Xa assays demonstrated linear correlation (r2= 0.78-1.00) across a wide range of concentrations for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. An ideal test, offering both accuracy and precision for measurement of any DOAC is not widely available. We recommend a dilute TT or ecarin-based assay for assessment of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran and anti-Xa assays with drug-specific calibrators for direct Xa inhibitors. In the absence of these tests, TT orAPTT is recommended over PT/INR for assessment of dabigatran, and PT/INR is recommended over APTT for detection of factor Xa inhibitors. Time since last dose, the presence or absence of druginteractions, and renal and hepatic function should impact clinical estimates of anticoagulant effectin a patient for whom laboratory test results are not available.

Prothrombin Time Tests for the Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Their Evaluation as Indicators of the Reversal Effect.

The prompt assessment and the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are urgent matters in the emergency care setting. Thus, we planned to elucidate the adequate prothrombin time (PT) test for the evaluation of the anticoagulant effects of various DOACs. The anticoagulant effects of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were measured with 3 PT tests (Triniclot PT Excel S, Neoplastin R, and Thromborel S). Human plasma was spiked with each DOAC at a range of 0 to 1000 ng/mL, and the PT was measured using each PT test. In another series, the reversal effect of either 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) or activated PCC (aPCC) was evaluated with each PT test. All PT reagents correlated with the concentrations of each DOAC, however, the reactivity was considerably different between the DOACs and the PT tests. A prolonged PT with DOACs was reversed both by PCC and aPCC in a dose-dependent manner; however, Triniclot PT Excel S showed reprolongation of the PT with a higher dose of PCC. The proper choice of PT test is necessary for the assessments of the anticoagulant activity of DOACs. It is also important to understand the different characteristics of each PT test for the assessment of the reversal effects of PCC.

Determination of Direct Oral Anticoagulants from Human Serum Samples

Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban are direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) inhibiting thrombin or factor Xa and effectively preventing thromboembolic complications using fixed doses without need for laboratory-guided dose adjustment. Plasma samples are needed to determine the actual concentration or activity of DOACs, which may be required for special patient populations such as those with acute deterioration of renal function due to any disease, before surgical interventions, during bleeding or thrombotic episodes while on therapy with DOACs, the elderly and youngest populations, unexpected pregnancy, suspicion of overdose and toxication, and to control adherence to therapy. Serum samples have several advantages over plasma samples such as no need of sampling with a specific coagulation tube, reduced pre-analytical errors, and longer storage stability. Determination of rivaroxaban and apixaban from serum samples of patients on treatment performed well and better than samples of patients treated with dabigatran compared with plasma samples. Specific adaption to automated coagulation platforms may improve the performance of the assays from serum samples.