Active Release Technique Research Articles

Comparison of Hold-Relax Technique and Active Release Technique in Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Background: One of the common shoulder joint dysfunction is shoulder impingement syndrome, which produces pain in the joint and reduces overhead elevation movement. It represents the third most frequent disease of the musculoskeletal system. The study's objective was to compare the hold-relax technique and active release technique (ART) among people with shoulder impingement syndrome.Methodology: The study design is an experimental study. Patients diagnosed with Shoulder impingement syndrome were selected for this study. The study was conducted at the Outpatient physiotherapy department, ACS Medical College and Hospital, Chennai. A total of 30 subjects with age groups between 40 and 60 years were selected for the study. Simple Random Sampling method used to divide the samples into two equal groups (15) by lottery method. The total duration of the study was four weeks, with four sessions a week. Outcome measures of the study were pain, range of motion, and shoulder function. And measurement tools used were Goniometer, VAS, and SPADI to collect data for this study.Result: The comparative study between group A and group B shows a significant difference in pain effectiveness, external rotation ROM and function with a p-value >0.0001, and no significant difference in the effectiveness of abduction ROM with a p-value >0.1217 among patient with shoulder impingement syndrome.Conclusion: The study concluded that the active release technique is more effective than the hold-relax technique on pain, abduction ROM, external rotation ROM and shoulder function among patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.

Effectiveness of Active Release Technique verses Conventional Physiotherapy in Management of Upper Cross Syndrome

Background: In upper cross syndrome (UCS), weaker neck flexors, anterior and middle serratus and lowertrapezius along with rhomboids usually develop, and tightness of the levator scapulae, pectoralis major andupper trapezius are biomechanically adapted. Active Release Technique (ART) helps to reduce discomfortand improve the range of movement. Also, Active Release Technique (ART) is a manual procedure which isalso being used for other soft tissue rehabilitation as well as for the management of the scar tissues. UCS andneck pain is common with uncomfortable job postures as well as in stress and anxiety, due to which muscledysfunction starts which can further followed by altered posture around the neck.Aim and Objective: To evaluate the effects of Active Release Technique verses conventional physiotherapyin management of upper cross syndrome physiotherapy.Materials and Method: 35 patients will be grouped in two groups. Both groups will be treated for sixsessions. Group A will be treated with active release technique and static stretching along with hydrocollatorpack. The patients coming under Group B, conventional physiotherapy would be given which include uppertrapezoid stretching, levator scapulae and pectoralis major as well as rhomboid strengthening, deep neckflexors, lower trapezius along with the hydrocollator pack.Result: The parameters of outcome measures in interval of pre and post treatment will be analysed using thestatistical test namely students paired T test.Conclusion: Based on the previous data of ART we assume it will be beneficial in relieving the symptomsinvolved in UCS.

A Study to Compare the Effect of Active Release Technique and Myofascial Release Technique on Pain, Grip Strength & Functional Performance in Subjects with Lateral Epicondylitis

Background of the Study: Lateral epicondylitis is one of the most common musculoskeletal conditionoccurring due to repetitive movements. Active release technique and myofascial release technique is used toreduce pain, improve grip strength and functional performance in subjects with lateral epicondylitis .Methods: Patients in Group A received Active Release Technique (ART) along with ultrasound.Patients in Group B received Myofascial Release Technique (MFR) along with ultrasound. For a treatmentperiod of about 30- 40min in each session for regular period of 2 to 3 for a weekOutcome Measures : Visual analogue scale, hand dynamometer, Patient rated tennis elbow evaluation scoreResults : Myofascial Release Technique was slightly more effective in improving grip strength, reducingpain & disability when compared to Active Release TechniqueConclusion: Active Release Technique and Myofascial Release Technique both along with ultrasound areeffective in patients with Lateral Epicondylitis. Myofascial Release Technique demonstrated slight betteroutcomes than Active Release Technique in the management of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis.

Non-Invasive Treatment for Adhesive Capsulitis Not Helped by Physical Therapy: A Case Study in Manipulative Medicine

This case documents the treatment of a middle-aged woman with chronic, unresponsive adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) using manipulation, active release therapy, and electronic acupuncture. She had not responded to typical physical therapy but did respond to active release therapy along with adjunctive manipulation and acupuncture. In our course of treatment we wanted to see if we could significantly improve pain-free range of motion and normal; function without using invasive treatments like surgery and manipulation under anesthesia. Over a course of five weeks, using a soft tissue manipulation technique known as active release technique along with electrified acupuncture and home exercises, we were able to increase her range of motion to near normal and her function to normal. She was not forced to miss any work because of the treatment and can now do all the things she needs to do for work.

Effects of Active Release Technique on Pain, Oswestry Disability Index and Pelvic Asymmetry in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Effects of Active Release Technique on Pain, Oswestry Disability Index and Pelvic Asymmetry in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Meralgia Paresthetica in Pregnancy.

Carpal tunnel syndrome and meralgia paresthetica are 2 common neuropathies complicating pregnancy. Each of these causes significant discomfort but can be diagnosed and treated safely during pregnancy. This article outlines the existing literature diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and meralgia paresthetica, specifically looking at the implications during pregnancy. The aim is to provide a reference for physicians diagnosing and treating neuropathies in pregnant patients. Existing literature on neuropathies during pregnancy, clinical presentation, and treatment options for both carpal tunnel syndrome and meralgia paresthetica was reviewed through a MEDLINE and PubMed search. Referenced articles were reviewed and used as primary source materials as appropriate. Carpal tunnel syndrome affects individuals of all ages and sexes but is more prevalent in women, particularly during pregnancy. Meralgia paresthetica can occur in various circumstances but is most commonly associated with prolonged second stage in lithotomy position. Multiple clinical signs and neurologic tests are useful to establish the diagnosis of either neuropathy. Effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome includes wrist splints, steroid and lidocaine injections, and release surgery. Optimal treatment of meralgia paresthetica remains controversial but includes nerve block injections and active release techniques. Neuropathies are common in pregnancy and can result in significant impairment. Accurate diagnosis is possible during pregnancy and can usually be accomplished with bedside neurologic tests. Treatment options can be safely considered during pregnancy and can result in symptomatic improvement and reduction in chronic symptoms.

To study the variability in intensity of muscle soreness by the change in direction of application of myokinetic active release

Introduction: Studies have identified that muscle imbalance is seen often. Muscle that is shortened over a long time results in tightness. This can be treated by modalities, postural modifications and releases. Deep releases cause myogenic condition that is muscles soreness. Due to forceful pressure taut bands break, that causes adhesions and inflammation in muscle which produces pain and reduces Range of Motion (ROM) of joint. In this study we used myokinetic active releases. Active Release Technique (ART) helps to alleviate pain and tightness and has shown improvement in increased flexibility and ROM immediately after the treatment. Objective: This study is aimed to determine effect of change in direction of ART on experimentally induced muscle soreness. Materials and Methods: Individuals with chronic neck pain, specifically due to trapezius muscle tightness were selected by random sampling and divided into Group A and B. Each group consisted of 20 patients. Neck range of motion (ROM) was measured with goniometer and Intensity of pain was scored with visual analogue scale (VAS) for both groups. Group A was treated with myokinetic active release towards the painful area and group B was treated with Myokinetic active release opposite to the painful area for 3 consecutive days. Results: Reduction in pain in Group A was statistically significant at p Conclusion: The study concluded that both methods result in increase of ROM, but only release given towards the painful area produces less muscle soreness and pain after intervention. Keywords: Fascia, Muscle imbalance, Muscle tightness, Muscle soreness, Active release technique.

Eccentric Training Versus Active Release Technique On Quadriceps In Patients With Dynamic Hip Screw

Eccentric Training Versus Active Release Technique On Quadriceps In Patients With Dynamic Hip Screw

Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Therapy and Active Release Technique in Young Adults with Piriformis Tightness

Aim: To compare the immediate effects between Neuromuscular therapy, Active release technique and Stretching among the individuals with piriformis tightness. Method: A total of 42 male subjects between the age group 18-25 years with piriformis tightness were equally allocated to receive Neuromuscular therapy (Group A), Active release technique (Group B) and Stretching as conventional management (Group C). Outcome assessment for piriformis tightness included Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain measurement, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Hip internal rotation ROM (range of motion). Result: All the interventions significantly improved VAS, ODI and Hip IR ROM immediately post treatment within groups whereas the inter group analysis showed significant difference in Hip IR ROM between groups but no significant difference was found in VAS and ODI. Conclusion: Neuromuscular therapy and Active release technique both were effective than Stretching, but the mean difference of Neuromuscular therapy is superior in treatment of piriformis tightness followed by Active release technique and Stretching respectively.

Effectiveness of Active Release Technique Versus Myofacial Release Technique on Patients with Plantar Faciitis: A Comparitive Study

Background: Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common causes of heel pain. The pain and discomfort associated with this disorder affect physical mobility and function dramatically. There are various conservative treatment strategies known to enhance symptoms of the condition including ice, heat, taping, electrical modalities, night splints, orthotics, stretching and strengthening. In addition, there are a number of soft tissue techniques such as Myofascial Release Technique (MFR) and Active Release Technique (ART) that may be effective in Plantar Fasciitis. Objective: To find out and compare the effectiveness of Active Release Technique versus Myofascial Release Technique on pain and functional performance in patients with plantar fasciitis. Methodology: Thirty patients who met the selection criteria were chosen for the study after receiving their informed consent. Participants were assigned randomly into two groups (Group A and Group B). Group A received the ART, whereas Group B received the MFR technique. Both groups jointly received ultrasound therapy and plantar fascia stretching exercise. The assessment of Numerical Pain Ratting Scale (NPRS) and Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) is made before and after the six day treatment schedule. Result: Statistically significant improvements in NPRS (Z=3.44, P=0.001) and PSFS (t=10.2, P=0.001) were observed in group A patients. Statistically significant improvements in NPRS (Z=3.44, P=0.001) and PSFS (t=9.4, P=0.001) were noted in group B patients. When comparing group A and group B, NPRS (Z=2.59, P=0.009) showed significant differences between two groups and PSFS (t=1.92, P=0.06) was insignificant. Conclusion: The study concluded that both the Active release technique and the Myofascial release technique are effective in reducing pain and improving functional performance in patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the pain reduction in the Active release technique group is significantly higher than in the Myofacial release technique group, but the functional performance shows similar effects in both groups

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Treatment Options for Pain: Literature Review

This literature review assesses the short and long term effectiveness for chronic pain management of single modality treatment approaches such as opioid use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, massage therapy, manual therapy (soft tissue mobilization), instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization, myofascial release, acupuncture, soft tissue release, dry needle, trigger point injection, joint manipulation/joint mobilization, active release technique, strain counter strain, craniosacral therapy, stretching/exercise, McKenzie method, and kinesio taping in comparison to treatment methods that follow the biopsychosocial model such as the multidisciplinary approach, cognitive behavioral rehabilitation and Advanced Soft Tissue Release.

Immediate Effect of Active Release Technique (ART) and Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization (DSTM) on Hamstring Tightness in Young Adults

Immediate Effect of Active Release Technique (ART) and Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization (DSTM) on Hamstring Tightness in Young Adults

Effect of muscle energy technique and active release technique on hip internal and external rotation range of motion and strength in competitive football players: A randomized clinical trial

Effect of muscle energy technique and active release technique on hip internal and external rotation range of motion and strength in competitive football players: A randomized clinical trial

Comparison between effectiveness of active release technique and capsular stretch along with conventional therapy in the management of frozen shoulder

Comparison between effectiveness of active release technique and capsular stretch along with conventional therapy in the management of frozen shoulder

Comparative Study of Active Release Technique and Myofascial Release Technique in Treatment of Patients with Upper Trapezius Spasm

Comparative Study of Active Release Technique and Myofascial Release Technique in Treatment of Patients with Upper Trapezius Spasm

To compare the effectiveness of active release technique and conventional physical therapy in the, management of upper cross syndrome

To compare the effectiveness of active release technique and conventional physical therapy in the, management of upper cross syndrome

Active release technique in hamstrings strain: Rehabilitation and return to play – a case study

Hamstring injuries and its rehabilitation in competitive events such as football targets safe and early return to play. This is because hamstring injuries are more related to prolonged recovery time and high rate of re-injury. In this case study, Zakeer Mundampara, 26-year-old footballer of Chennaiyin FC team (Indian super league tournament), who was rehabilitated for Grade 2 hamstring strain was briefed. To describe the importance of conservative rehabilitation in hamstring injuries and report on player's rehabilitation program and clinical outcome. Zakeer Mundampara was conservatively treated with active release technique for 2 weeks duration. Data collected includes passive knee extension test range of motion and verbal rating score. After 2 weeks of rehabilitation, Zakeer Mundampara had nearly full range of pain-free movement, normal gait and trained to run safely. By the 3rd week, he started to perform all sports specific drills. He was rehabilitated and set fit to play after 4 weeks from the date of injury. Active release technique is effective in hamstring injuries. In this case study, rehabilitation program with an emphasis on active release technique is found to be effective in returning the footballer back to play.

Comparison of Different Theraputic Techinques On Hamstring Flexbility in Normal Adults: Randomizedcontrolled Trial

Background: Hamstring muscles involve a rate of intense musculoskeletal injuries. Hamstring flexibility, shorting, and exhaustion are hazard variables connected with hamstring strain. Enhanced flexibility has for quite some time been viewed as an imperative part in anticipation of musculotendinous strain. Expanding hamstring flexibility can assume a vital part in counteracting lower furthest point injuries. In any case, few research has been performed on the best technique. This study was conducted to correlate the effect of different therapeutic techniques (active release, muscle energy and Mulligan) on increasing hamstring flexibility.Methods: Fifty seven normal healthy male subjects with hamstring tightness were assigned randomly to one of the four study groups: Group (1)13subjects received active release technique. Group (2)15subjects received muscle energy technique. Group (3) 12subjects received Mulligan’s technique. Group (4)17subjects did not get any intercession. Popliteal angle (active knee extension test) and sit-reach flexibility test were measured pre and post the intervention period.Results: MANOVA test for active knee extension test and sit-reach test among the four groups for post intervention values there was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in the post values of AKE with both groups showed significant increases than Group 3. Group 1 versus Group 3: p < 0.0001, CI: 3.5-11.8; Group 2 versus Group 3: p < 0.0001, CI: 4.6-12.8).Conclusion: It can be reasoned that both active release and muscle energy techniques have similar impact in enhancing hamstring flexibility than Mulligan technique in normal male adults.

A comparison of the effect of the active release and muscle energy techniques on the latent trigger points of the upper trapezius

Background/aimThe increasing use of computer in daily life has brought about numerous musculoskeletal problems. Impairments in the head, neck and shoulders are more common compared with the other parts of the body. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two manual treatments in two separate groups, i.e., active release technique (ART) and muscle energy technique (MET) on the latent trigger points (LTrPs) in the upper trapezius muscle. The set criteria in the study included the active range of cervical lateral flexion, pain intensity on the visual analog scale (VAS), and the upper trapezius muscle thickness. Subjects and methodsThis clinical trial study assessed the outcome measures within and between groups before and after the intervention. The target population were 64 (32 males, 32 females) participants who had been selected from among the staff members and the students of a rehabilitation school, and the employees of an engineering company who had LTrPs in their upper trapezius muscle and were from 18 to 50 years old. ResultsThe immediate effects of MET and ART on the patients of each groups with LTrPs in their upper trapezius muscle were increased active range of cervical lateral flexion (P < 0.001), decreased pain intensity on VAS (P < 0.05) and decreased thickness of the upper trapezius muscle (P < 0.01). ConclusionBoth manual techniques of ART and MET reduced the symptoms of LTrPs in the upper trapezius in the two groups equally, neither technique being superior to the other.

A Study to Find the Effectiveness of Active Release Technique and Conventional Physiotherapy in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome

A Study to Find the Effectiveness of Active Release Technique and Conventional Physiotherapy in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome