Active RecA Research Articles

The effects of mCI inhibition on RecA activity

In E. coli, Recombinase A (RecA) is involved in the SOS response of DNA repair. RecA serves as the activator for the SOS response by cleaving the repressor LexA. The protein mCI is an inhibitor based on the bacteriophage □ repressor CI. mCI has been shown to bind to the helical groove of active RecA filaments which are formed after the cleavage of LexA. It is predicted that this binding results in the inhibition of RecA activity. Two types of in vitro experiments were carried out to test the effects of mCI on the overall catalytic activity of RecA. In the strand exchange assays, it was observed that mCI's inhibition on RecA was dependent on concentration and timing. The mCI protein blocked the initiation of strand exchange, but had relatively small effects once strand exchange was underway. In addition, mCI affected RecA‐mediated ATP hydrolysis. The implications of these results will be discussed.This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Blocking the RecA activity and SOS-response in bacteria with a short α-helical peptide.

The RecX protein, a very active natural RecA protein inhibitor, can completely disassemble RecA filaments at nanomolar concentrations that are two to three orders of magnitude lower than that of RecA protein. Based on the structure of RecX protein complex with the presynaptic RecA filament, we designed a short first in class α-helical peptide that both inhibits RecA protein activities in vitro and blocks the bacterial SOS-response in vivo. The peptide was designed using SEQOPT, a novel method for global sequence optimization of protein α-helices. SEQOPT produces artificial peptide sequences containing only 20 natural amino acids with the maximum possible conformational stability at a given pH, ionic strength, temperature, peptide solubility. It also accounts for restrictions due to known amino acid residues involved in stabilization of protein complexes under consideration. The results indicate that a few key intermolecular interactions inside the RecA protein presynaptic complex are enough to reproduce the main features of the RecX protein mechanism of action. Since the SOS-response provides a major mechanism of bacterial adaptation to antibiotics, these results open new ways for the development of antibiotic co-therapy that would not cause bacterial resistance.

Bacillus subtilis RecA with DprA-SsbA antagonizes RecX function during natural transformation.

Bacillus subtilis DprA and RecX proteins, which interact with RecA, are crucial for efficient chromosomal and plasmid transformation. We showed that RecA, in the rATP·Mg2+ bound form (RecA·ATP), could not compete with RecX, SsbA or SsbB for assembly onto single-stranded (ss)DNA, but RecA·dATP partially displaced these proteins from ssDNA. RecX promoted reversible depolymerization of preformed RecA·ATP filaments. The two-component DprA–SsbA mediator reversed the RecX negative effect on RecA filament extension, but not DprA or DprA and SsbB. In the presence of DprA–SsbA, RecX added prior to RecA·ATP inhibited DNA strand exchange, but this inhibition was reversed when RecX was added after RecA. We propose that RecA nucleation is more sensitive to RecX action than is RecA filament growth. DprA–SsbA facilitates formation of an active RecA filament that directly antagonizes the inhibitory effects of RecX. RecX and DprA enable chromosomal transformation by altering RecA filament dynamics. DprA–SsbA and RecX proteins constitute a new regulatory network of RecA function. DprA–SsbA contributes to the formation of an active RecA filament and directly antagonizes the inhibitory effects of RecX during natural transformation.

Molecular Mechanism Underlying ATP-Induced Conformational Changes in the Nucleoprotein Filament of Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA.

RecA plays a central role in bacterial DNA repair, homologous recombination, and restoration of stalled replication forks by virtue of its active extended nucleoprotein filament. Binding of ATP and its subsequent recognition by the carboxamide group of a highly conserved glutamine (Gln196 in MsRecA) have been implicated in the formation of active RecA nucleoprotein filaments. Although the mechanism of ATP-dependent structural transitions in RecA has been proposed on the basis of low-resolution electron microscopic reconstructions, the precise sequence of events that constitute these transitions is poorly understood. On the basis of biochemical and crystallographic analyses of MsRecA variants carrying mutations in highly conserved Gln196 and Arg198 residues, we propose that the disposition of the interprotomer interface is the structural basis of allosteric activation of RecA. Furthermore, this study accounts for the contributions of several conserved amino acids to ATP hydrolysis and to the transition from collapsed to extended filament forms in Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA (MsRecA). In addition to their role in the inactive compressed state, the study reveals a role for Gln196 and Arg198 along with Phe219 in ATP hydrolysis in the active extended nucleoprotein filament. Finally, our data suggest that the primary, but not secondary, nucleotide binding site in MsRecA isomerizes into the ATP binding site present in the extended nucleoprotein filament.

Loop L1 governs the DNA-binding specificity and order for RecA-catalyzed reactions in homologous recombination and DNA repair.

In all organisms, RecA-family recombinases catalyze homologous joint formation in homologous genetic recombination, which is essential for genome stability and diversification. In homologous joint formation, ATP-bound RecA/Rad51-recombinases first bind single-stranded DNA at its primary site and then interact with double-stranded DNA at another site. The underlying reason and the regulatory mechanism for this conserved binding order remain unknown. A comparison of the loop L1 structures in a DNA-free RecA crystal that we originally determined and in the reported DNA-bound active RecA crystals suggested that the aspartate at position 161 in loop L1 in DNA-free RecA prevented double-stranded, but not single-stranded, DNA-binding to the primary site. This was confirmed by the effects of the Ala-replacement of Asp-161 (D161A), analyzed directly by gel-mobility shift assays and indirectly by DNA-dependent ATPase activity and SOS repressor cleavage. When RecA/Rad51-recombinases interact with double-stranded DNA before single-stranded DNA, homologous joint-formation is suppressed, likely by forming a dead-end product. We found that the D161A-replacement reduced this suppression, probably by allowing double-stranded DNA to bind preferentially and reversibly to the primary site. Thus, Asp-161 in the flexible loop L1 of wild-type RecA determines the preference for single-stranded DNA-binding to the primary site and regulates the DNA-binding order in RecA-catalyzed recombinase reactions.

Enhancing Directed Double Strand Breaks with the Ref and RecA Protein

The Ref protein derived from bacteriophage P1 enhances RecA dependent DNA recombination via an unusual mechanism in vivo. Ref, acting in concert with the RecA protein, is a universal restriction enzyme that promotes DNA cleavage at any desired sequence in vitro. Ref is a RecA dependent nuclease that only cleaves DNA in the presence of an active RecA filament. More interestingly, DNA cleavage can be restricted to the sequence within a D‐loop formed by RecA‐mediated homologous pairing. The mechanism of such a remarkable reaction is still unknown and the yield of the double strand DNA (dsDNA) break is relatively low. Briefly, in this in vitro assay, a RecA filament is first formed on an oligonucleotide. Once the RecA filament is active, ldsDNA and Ref are added to catalyze the cleavage of dsDNA within the D‐loop. I report that a relatively high pH (pH 8.9), the use of RecA variants such as RecA E38K, and a high magnesium concentration (15 mM), can significantly enhance the reaction. The targeted DNA cleavage reaction is dependent on variables that contribute to the stability of D‐loops and RecA filaments. Optimization of the reaction could possibly yield a new method for gene‐function analysis, gene therapy, and construction of artificial chromosomes. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM32335, to MMC), a Hilldale Undergraduate Research Fellowship, and a Mary Shine Peterson Scholarship.

Separation of Recombination and SOS Response in Escherichia coli RecA Suggests LexA Interaction Sites

RecA plays a key role in homologous recombination, the induction of the DNA damage response through LexA cleavage and the activity of error-prone polymerase in Escherichia coli. RecA interacts with multiple partners to achieve this pleiotropic role, but the structural location and sequence determinants involved in these multiple interactions remain mostly unknown. Here, in a first application to prokaryotes, Evolutionary Trace (ET) analysis identifies clusters of evolutionarily important surface amino acids involved in RecA functions. Some of these clusters match the known ATP binding, DNA binding, and RecA-RecA homo-dimerization sites, but others are novel. Mutation analysis at these sites disrupted either recombination or LexA cleavage. This highlights distinct functional sites specific for recombination and DNA damage response induction. Finally, our analysis reveals a composite site for LexA binding and cleavage, which is formed only on the active RecA filament. These new sites can provide new drug targets to modulate one or more RecA functions, with the potential to address the problem of evolution of antibiotic resistance at its root.

Changes in the tension in dsDNA alter the conformation of RecA bound to dsDNA–RecA filaments

The RecA protein is an ATPase that mediates recombination via strand exchange. In strand exchange a single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) bound to RecA binding site I in a RecA/ssDNA filament pairs with one strand of a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and forms heteroduplex dsDNA in site I if homology is encountered. Long sequences are exchanged in a dynamic process in which initially unbound dsDNA binds to the leading end of a RecA/ssDNA filament, while heteroduplex dsDNA unbinds from the lagging end via ATP hydrolysis. ATP hydrolysis is required to convert the active RecA conformation, which cannot unbind, to the inactive conformation, which can unbind. If dsDNA extension due to RecA binding increases the dsDNA tension, then RecA unbinding must decrease tension. We show that in the presence of ATP hydrolysis decreases in tension induce decreases in length whereas in the absence of hydrolysis, changes in tension have no systematic effect. These results suggest that decreases in force enhance dissociation by promoting transitions from the active to the inactive RecA conformation. In contrast, increases in tension reduce dissociation. Thus, the changes in tension inherent to strand exchange may couple with ATP hydrolysis to increase the directionality and stringency of strand exchange.

Interconversion between bound and free conformations of LexA orchestrates the bacterial SOS response

The bacterial SOS response is essential for the maintenance of genomes, and also modulates antibiotic resistance and controls multidrug tolerance in subpopulations of cells known as persisters. In Escherichia coli, the SOS system is controlled by the interplay of the dimeric LexA transcriptional repressor with an inducer, the active RecA filament, which forms at sites of DNA damage and activates LexA for self-cleavage. Our aim was to understand how RecA filament formation at any chromosomal location can induce the SOS system, which could explain the mechanism for precise timing of induction of SOS genes. Here, we show that stimulated self-cleavage of the LexA repressor is prevented by binding to specific DNA operator targets. Distance measurements using pulse electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy reveal that in unbound LexA, the DNA-binding domains sample different conformations. One of these conformations is captured when LexA is bound to operator targets and this precludes interaction by RecA. Hence, the conformational flexibility of unbound LexA is the key element in establishing a co-ordinated SOS response. We show that, while LexA exhibits diverse dissociation rates from operators, it interacts extremely rapidly with DNA target sites. Modulation of LexA activity changes the occurrence of persister cells in bacterial populations.

Two Modes of Binding of DinI to RecA Filament Provide a New Insight into the Regulation of SOS Response by DinI Protein

RecA protein plays a principal role in bacterial SOS response to DNA damage. The induction of the SOS response is well understood and involves the cleavage of the LexA repressor catalyzed by the RecA nucleoprotein filament. In contrast, our understanding of the regulation and termination of the SOS response is much more limited. RecX and DinI are two major regulators of RecA's ability to promote LexA cleavage and strand exchange reaction, and are believed to modulate its activity in ongoing SOS events. DinI's function in the SOS response remains controversial, since its interaction with the RecA filament is concentration dependent and may result in either stabilization or depolymerization of the filament. The 17 C-terminal residues of RecA modulate the interaction between DinI and RecA. We demonstrate that DinI binds to the active RecA filament in two distinct structural modes. In the first mode, DinI binds to the C-terminus of a RecA protomer. In the second mode, DinI resides deeply in the groove of the RecA filament, with its negatively charged C-terminal helix proximal to the L2 loop of RecA. The deletion of the 17 C-terminal residues of RecA favors the second mode of binding. We suggest that the negatively charged C-terminus of RecA prevents DinI from entering the groove and protects the RecA filament from depolymerization. Polymorphic binding of DinI to RecA filaments implies an even more complex role of DinI in the bacterial SOS response.

Nucleotide and DNA-Induced Structural Transitions and the Coupling Between ATP and DNA Binding Sites in RecA

RecA is the prototype of ATPase proteins that mediates homologous DNA recombination. RecA requires ATP to promote the binding of DNA, as both ADP- and nucleotide-free states show low DNA binding affinity. We investigated how ATP binding affects the dynamics of DNA binding Loops, and activates RecA by the interactions between β-/γ-phosphate and Walker A and Walker B motifs, as well as through the contacts made between the C-terminal and the central domains within the protein. DNA binding results in the formation of the extended, active conformation of the RecA filament, which catalyzes strand exchange. We have performed a set of molecular dynamics simulations on the active RecA, with ATP/ADP/nucleotide-free bound, to investigate the conformational transitions between the active and inactive states. Our simulations have revealed that the structural changes upon ATP binding are confined to small motifs, while the conformational changes upon DNA binding involve larger scale rearrangement of the protein, namely the rotation of monomers with respect to each other. The results suggest that ATP binding stabilizes the L1 and L2 DNA binding loops, mediated through specific residues located between the ATP and DNA binding sites that sense the presence of γ-phosphate. Furthermore, DNA binding leads to monomer rotations to form the extended conformation by affecting the interfaces of the adjacent monomers with the help of the bound nucleotide. Based on these simulations, we propose that the ATP and DNA binding enhance the binding of each other by an allosteric mechanism mediated by a series of residues between the ATP and DNA binding sites.

Defective Dissociation of a “Slow” RecA Mutant Protein Imparts an Escherichia coli Growth Defect

The RecA and some related proteins possess a simple motif, called (KR)X(KR), that (in RecA) consists of two lysine residues at positions 248 and 250 at the subunit-subunit interface. This study and previous work implicate this RecA motif in the following: (a) catalyzing ATP hydrolysis in trans,(b) coordinating the ATP hydrolytic cycles of adjacent subunits, (c) governing the rate of ATP hydrolysis, and (d) coupling the ATP hydrolysis to work (in this case DNA strand exchange). The conservative K250R mutation leaves RecA nucleoprotein filament formation largely intact. However, ATP hydrolysis is slowed to less than 15% of the wild-type rate. DNA strand exchange is also slowed commensurate with the rate of ATP hydrolysis. The results reinforce the idea of a tight coupling between ATP hydrolysis and DNA strand exchange. When a plasmid-borne RecA K250R protein is expressed in a cell otherwise lacking RecA protein, the growth of the cells is severely curtailed. The slow growth defect is alleviated in cells lacking RecFOR function, suggesting that the defect reflects loading of RecA at stalled replication forks. Suppressors occur as recA gene alterations, and their properties indicate that limited dissociation by RecA K250R confers the slow growth phenotype. Overall, the results suggest that recombinational DNA repair is a common occurrence in cells. RecA protein plays a sufficiently intimate role in the bacterial cell cycle that its properties can limit the growth rate of a bacterial culture.

RecA

RecA

Snapshots of RecA Protein Involving Movement of the C-domain and Different Conformations of the DNA-binding Loops: Crystallographic and Comparative Analysis of 11 Structures of Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA

Mycobacterium smegmatis RecA and its nucleotide complexes crystallize in three different, but closely related, forms characterized by specific ranges of unit cell dimensions. The six crystals reported here and five reported earlier, all grown under the same or very similar conditions, belong to these three forms, all in space group P61. They include one obtained by reducing relative humidity around the crystal. In all crystals, RecA monomers form filaments around a 61 screw axis. Thus, the c-dimension of the crystal corresponds to the pitch of the RecA filament. As reported for Escherichia coli RecA, the variation in the pitch among the three forms correlates well with the motion of the C-terminal domain of the RecA monomers with respect to the main domain. The domain motion is compatible with formation of inactive as well as active RecA filaments involving monomers with a fully ordered C domain. It does not appear to influence the movement upon nucleotide-binding of the switch residue, which is believed to provide the trigger for transmitting the effect of nucleotide binding to the DNA-binding region. Interestingly, partial dehydration of the crystal results in the movement of the residue similar to that caused by nucleotide binding. The ordering of the DNA-binding loops, which present ensembles of conformations, is also unaffected by domain motion. The conformation of loop L2 appears to depend upon nucleotide binding, presumably on account of the movement of the switch residue that forms part of the loop. The conformations of loops L1 and L2 are correlated and have implications for intermolecular communications within the RecA filament. The structures resulting from different orientations of the C domain and different conformations of the DNA-binding loops appear to represent snapshots of the RecA at different phases of activity, and provide insights into the mechanism of action of RecA.

RecA can stimulate the relaxation activity of topoisomerase I: Molecular basis of topoisomerase-mediated genome-wide transcriptional responses in Escherichia coli

The superhelicity of the chromosome, which is controlled by DNA topoisomerases, modulates global gene expression. Investigations of transcriptional responses to the modulation of gyrase function have identified two types of topoisomerase-mediated transcriptional responses: (i) steady-state changes elicited by a mutation in gyrase, such as the D82G mutation in GyrA, and (ii) dynamic changes elicited by the inhibition of gyrase. We hypothesize that the steady-state effects are due to the changes in biochemical properties of gyrase, whereas the dynamic effects are due to an imbalance between supercoiling and relaxation activities, which appears to be influenced by the RecA activity. Herein, we present biochemical evidence for hypothesized mechanisms. GyrA D82G gyrase exhibits a reduced supercoiling activity. The RecA protein can influence the balance between supercoiling and relaxation activities either by interfering with the activity of DNA gyrase or by facilitating the relaxation reaction. RecA has no effect on the supercoiling activity of gyrase but stimulates the relaxation activity of topoisomerase I. This stimulation is specific and requires formation of an active RecA filament. These results suggest that the functional interaction between RecA and topoisomerase I is responsible for RecA-mediated modulation of the relaxation-dependent transcriptional activity of the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Conformationally Selective Binding of Nucleotide Analogues to Escherichia coli RecA: A Ligand-Based Analysis of the RecA ATP Binding Site

The roles of the RecA protein in the survival of bacteria and the evolution of resistance to antibiotics make it an attractive target for inhibition by small molecules. The activity of RecA is dependent on the formation of a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA that hydrolyzes ATP. We probed the nucleotide binding site of the active RecA protein using modified nucleotide triphosphates to discern key structural elements of the nucleotide and of the binding site that result in the activation of RecA for NTP hydrolysis. Our results show that the RecA-catalyzed hydrolysis of a given nucleotide triphosphate or analogue thereof is exquisitely sensitive to certain structural elements of both the base and ribose moieties. Furthermore, our ligand-based approach to probing the RecA ATP binding site indicated that the binding of nucleotides by RecA was found to be conformationally selective. Using a binding screen that can be readily adapted to high-throughput techniques, we were able to segregate nucleotides that interact with RecA into two classes: (1) NTPs that preferentially bind the active nucleoprotein filament conformation and either serve as substrates for or competitively inhibit hydrolysis and (2) nonsubstrate NTPs that preferentially bind the inactive RecA conformation and facilitate dissociation of the RecA-DNA species. These results are discussed in the context of a recent structural model for the active RecA nucleoprotein filament and provide us with important information for the design of potent, conformationally selective modulators of RecA activities.

Cloning and characterization of the recA of Paracoccus denitrificans and construction of a recA-deficient mutant.

The recA gene of Paracoccus denitrificans has been isolated from a genomic library by hybridization with the Rhodobacter sphaeroides recA gene. Its complete nucleotide sequence consists of 1071 bp encoding a polypeptide of 356 amino acids. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the P. denitrificans recA gene revealed the closest identities with the R. sphaeroides and the Rhodobacter capsulatus recA genes. Nevertheless, and surprisingly, recA genes of these two phototrophic bacteria are not DNA damage-inducible when introduced into P. denitrificans cells, whereas recA genes of both P. denitrificans and Rhizobium etli are. These results suggest that the promoters of P. denitrificans and R. etli recA genes have a similar regulatory sequence. A recA-defective mutant of P. denitrificans has also been constructed by replacement of the active recA gene by an in vitro inactivated gene copy.

Complexes of RecA with LexA and RecX Differentiate Between Active and Inactive RecA Nucleoprotein Filaments

The bacterial RecA protein has been the dominant model system for understanding homologous genetic recombination. Although a crystal structure of RecA was solved ten years ago, we still do not have a detailed understanding of how the helical filament formed by RecA on DNA catalyzes the recognition of homology and the exchange of strands between two DNA molecules. Recent structural and spectroscopic studies have suggested that subunits in the helical filament formed in the RecA crystal are rotated when compared to the active RecA-ATP-DNA filament. We examine RecA-DNA-ATP filaments complexed with LexA and RecX to shed more light on the active RecA filament. The LexA repressor and RecX, an inhibitor of RecA, both bind within the deep helical groove of the RecA filament. Residues on RecA that interact with LexA cannot be explained by the crystal filament, but can be properly positioned in an existing model for the active filament. We show that the strand exchange activity of RecA, which can be inhibited when RecX is present at very low stoichiometry, is due to RecX forming a block across the deep helical groove of the RecA filament, where strand exchange occurs. It has previously been shown that changes in the nucleotide bound to RecA are associated with large motions of RecA's C-terminal domain. Since RecX binds from the C-terminal domain of one subunit to the nucleotide-binding core of another subunit, a stabilization of RecA's C-terminal domain by RecX can likely explain the inhibition of RecA's ATPase activity by RecX.

Physical interactions between DinI and RecA nucleoprotein filament for the regulation of SOS mutagenesis.

The Escherichia coli dinI gene is one of the LexA-regulated genes, which are induced upon DNA damage. Its overexpression conferred severe UV sensitivity on wild-type cells and resulted in the inhibition of LexA and UmuD processing, reactions that are normally dependent on activated RecA in a complex with single-stranded (ss)DNA. Here, we study the mechanism by which DinI inhibits the activities of RecA. While DinI neither binds to ssDNA nor prevents the formation of RecA nucleoprotein filament, it binds to active RecA filament, thereby inhibiting its coprotease activity but not the ATPase activity. Furthermore, even under in vitro conditions where UmuD cleavage dependent on RecA-ssDNA-adeno sine-5'-(3-thiotriphosphate) is blocked in the presence of DinI, LexA is cleaved normally. This result, taken together with electron microscopy observations and linear dichroism measurements, indicates that the ternary complex remains intact in the presence of DinI, and that the affinity to the RecA filament decreases in the order LexA, DinI and UmuD. DinI is thus suited to modulating UmuD processing so as to limit SOS mutagenesis.

Mutations in the N-terminal region of RecA that disrupt the stability of free protein oligomers but not RecA-DNA complexes

We have introduced targeted mutations in two areas that make up part of the RecA subunit interface. In the RecA crystal structure, cross-subunit interactions are observed between the Lys6 and Asp139 side-chains, and between the Arg28 and Asn113 side-chains. Unexpectedly, we find that mutations at Lys6 and Arg28 impose severe defects on the oligomeric stability of free RecA protein, whereas mutations at Asn113 or Asp139 do not. However, Lys6 and Arg28 mutant proteins showed an apparent normal formation of RecA-DNA complexes. These results suggest that cross-subunit contacts in this region of the protein are different for free RecA protein filaments versus RecA-DNA nucleoprotein filaments. Mutant proteins with substitutions at either Lys6 or Arg28 show partial inhibition of DNA strand exchange activity, yet the mechanistic reasons for this inhibition appear to be distinct. Although Lys6 and Arg28 appear to be more important to the stability of free RecA protein, as opposed to the stability of the catalytically active nucleoprotein filament, our results support the idea that the cross-subunit interactions made by each residue play an important role in optimizing the catalytic organization of the active RecA oligomer.