The diabetes and obesity epidemic is sweeping through our nation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 26 million Americans now have diabetes and 79 million have prediabetes. If current trends continue through 2050, one in three Americans will have diabetes, predominantly attributable to the rise in obesity. When a patient is diagnosed with diabetes, that individual’s lifetime medical costs more than double. The military is not immune from these national trends. The Tobacco, Obesity, and Alcohol (TOBESAHOL) study estimated that obesity/overweight-related illnesses account for $1.1 billion and diabetes accounts for $300 million among TRICARE Prime beneficiaries. Beyond the heavy cost implications, these conditions also have direct impact on military readiness. Although policy changes in recent years have allowed members with diabetes to continue serving on active duty, their ability to participate in operational missions is typically limited. Military population health figures indicate that approximately 1,000 active duty Air Force members have diabetes, and 3,000 have prediabetes. These numbers are the result of an underlying, unhealthy lifestyle among Airmen. The 2010 Air Force Healthy Airman Report (accessible only by military personnel) states that only 54% of Airmen have a healthy weight. Less than 5% of Airmen consume 5 servings of fruits and vegetables daily, far below the nine U.S. Food and Drug Administrationrecommended daily servings. Accordingly, there is a sharp rise in the prevalence of diabetes after retirement when these habits continue without the enforcement of military fitness standards. There are an estimated 49,000 Air Force Medical Service (AFMS) adult beneficiaries with diabetes and well over 100,000 with prediabetes. It is clear that unhealthy lifestyle practices during the active duty years lead to obesity, which ultimately contribute to the increasing rates of diabetes and prediabetes in later years. Given the magnitude of the problem and the reality of limited resources, research is necessary to determine the best methodologies to prevent diabetes and to manage the disease cost effectively. Unfortunately, there has traditionally been limited infrastructure in place to facilitate this research. Military medical researchers are challenged by multiple duties to include deployments, assignment changes, clinical duties, and teaching responsibilities. The current mode of staffing specialty medical departments is based primarily upon clinical productivity and wartime support, rather than research requirements. Therefore, the ability of an active duty clinician to effectively conduct research is limited. In view of these limitations, it is necessary to have a mechanism to organize research priorities, define appropriate research projects, and efficiently utilize available research resources. In recognition of the need for expandedAFMS diabetes and obesity research, the Air Force Surgeon General’s research division (AFMSA/SG9) hosted an initial meeting in 2009 with potential investigators from six Air Force medical centers (Andrews, Keesler, Lackland, Nellis, Travis, and WrightPatterson Air Force Bases). There was great interest among the investigators, and the need for dedicated research staff to assist in building a viable program was identified. In response, AFMSA/SG9 awarded a contract that provided diabetes research coordinators at each of themedical centers for 3 years. In February 2010, the group of investigators and coordinators met to generate the Air Force Diabetes Research Development Document (RDD). The purpose of this document was to establish research priorities relevant to theAir Forcemission, against which future projects would be organized. The priorities included (1) primary prevention of diabetes, (2) technologies to *Endocrinology Flight, 59 Medical Operations Squadron, Lackland AFB, TX. †Medical Education, 99 Medical Group, Nellis AFB, NV. ‡Clinical Investigations Facility, Travis AFB, CA. The views expressed in the article are those of the authors, and do not reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00401
Read full abstract