Abstract Background: The serine/threonine kinase STK11/LKB1 is the second most commonly altered tumor suppressor in NSCLC. Non-functional mutations or loss of LKB1 expression occur more frequently in NSCLC than other alterations; however, there are currently no effective treatment strategies for this subset of tumors. KRAS-mutant LKB1 deficient NSCLC tumors often also have alterations in KEAP1 or NRF2 gene, which activate the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway known to be involved in antioxidant response. Inhibitors of ATM and ATR, two key proteins in the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, are currently undergoing clinical testing but there are no validated biomarkers established for identifying which subgroups of patients are more likely to benefit from treatment. Here we have identified that alterations of LKB1, and the KEAP1/NRF2 pathway, are associated with enhanced response to ATM and ATR inhibitors (ATMi and ATRi) as well as other inhibitors of the DDR and may be useful biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response. Methods: To investigate the impact of LKB1 loss and KEAP1/NRF2 pathway activation on DDR and replication stress, we first tested replication fork protection in LKB1 deficient cells (KL). DNA fiber assay showed a defect in fork protection in KL cells compared with LKB1 wild type cells (K). Also, RPPA analysis revealed an activation of ATR/Chk1/Cdk1/CyclinB1 axis as well as Wee1 activation in cells harboring LKB1 and/or KEAP1 loss (KL/KLK/KK). Therefore, to evaluate response to DDR inhibitors (DDRi) we analyzed the in vitro activity of ATM, ATR, Wee1 and PARP inhibitors in NSCLC murine cell lines with or without knock out of LKB1 and/or KEAP1. In these cells, the loss of LKB1 and/or KEAP1 significantly sensitized to AZD0156 (ATMi), AZD6738 (ATRi) and AZD1775 (Wee1i) relative to cells with intact LKB1 and KEAP1. Next, we investigated whether the activity of ATR and ATMi in KL, KK or KLK tumor cells could be enhanced by the addition of a PARP inhibitor (olaparib). Although all NSCLC cells were resistant to the PARP inhibitor olaparib when used as a single agent, treatment of LKB1, KEAP1 or LKB1 plus KEAP1 deficient cells with the combination of olaparib plus ATM or ATR inhibitors significantly enhanced the antitumor cell activity of ATM or ATR inhibitors alone in vitro. We confirmed these data in an additional panel of LKB1 deficient NSCLC human cell lines treated with a broad spectrum of ATR and ATM inhibitors. In all human cell lines re-expression of LKB1 clearly reduced the sensitivity to ATR inhibition. LKB1 loss was also associated with sensitivity to PARP and ATM inhibitors, although these effects seemed to be less significant compared with ATR inhibitors. Interestingly, in vivo experiments performed in K, KL and KLK syngeneic models as well as PDX models showed greater response to ATRi and Wee1i monotherapy only in KLK but not in K or KL tumor models. Conclussions: Tumors with LKB1 deficiency or KEAP/NRF2 mutations are typically resistant to standard chemotherapy drugs and immunotherapy. Our data indicate that LKB1 and KEAP1/NRF2 loss significantly enhance the sensitivity to ATR, ATM and Wee1 inhibitors in vitro while only ATR and Wee1 inhibitor show significant tumor growth impairment in syngeneic and PDX KLK models. Thus, we have identified that NSCLC tumors bearing STK11 and KEAP1/NRF2 mutations are highly sensitive to DDR inhibitors and that genes may serve as biomarkers for selecting appropriate patients for treatment alone or in combination, such as PARPi, chemo or immunotherapy. Citation Format: Ana Galan-Cobo, Marlese Pisegna, Kavya Ramkumar, Alissa Poteete, Sungnam Cho, Fahao Zhang, You-Hong Fan, Qi Wang, Lixia Diao, Katharina Schlacher, Jing Wang, Lauren A Byers, John V. Heymcach. LKB1 deficiency and KEAP1/NRF2 pathway alterations as biomarkers of response for ATR and ATM inhibitors and other inhibitors of DNA damage response (DDR) in NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2019 Oct 26-30; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2019;18(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A096. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.TARG-19-A096