Activation Of Primary Sensorimotor Cortex Research Articles

Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study.

We examined the dynamic involvement of different brain regions in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning using PET. In a serial reaction time task, subjects pressed each of four buttons with a different finger of the right hand in response to a visually presented number. Test sessions consisted of 10 cycles of the same 10-item sequence. The effects of explicit and implicit learning were assessed separately using a different behavioural parameter for each type of learning: correct recall of the test sequence for explicit learning and improvement of reaction time before the successful recall of any component of the test sequence for implicit learning. Regional cerebral blood flow was measured repeatedly during the task, and a parametric analysis was performed to identify brain regions in which activity was significantly correlated with subjects' performances: i.e. with correct recall of the test sequence or with reaction time. Explicit learning, shown as a positive correlation with the correct recall of the sequence, was associated with increased activity in the posterior parietal cortex, precuneus and premotor cortex bilaterally, also in the supplementary motor area (SMA) predominantly in the left anterior part, left thalamus, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In contrast, the reaction time showed a different pattern of correlation during different learning phases. During the implicit learning phase, when the subjects were not aware of the sequence, improvement of the reaction time was associated with increased activity in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1). During the explicit learning phase, the reaction time was significantly correlated with activity in a part of the frontoparietal network. During the post-learning phase, when the subjects achieved all components of the sequence explicitly, the reaction time was correlated with the activity in the ipsilateral SM1 and posterior part of the SMA. These results show that different sets of cortical regions are dynamically involved in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning.

FMRI Studies of the Supplementary Motor Area and the Premotor Cortex

Brain activation patterns associated with three motor tasks, differing in the mode of movement selection, were studied in seven right-handed subjects, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The tasks consisted of sequences of finger movements in which the next finger was selected (i) according to a fixed sequence (FIX), (ii) in response to an external sensory cue (RAND), or (iii) on the basis of free, internal selection (SELF). Periods of hand relaxation (REST) alternating with the tasks served as a control. Functional maps resulting from comparison of the motor tasks with REST reveal activation in primary sensorimotor cortex, medial and lateral premotor areas, cingulate cortex, and parietal cortex. The task activation level, defined as the percentage MR signal increase for each task relative to REST, and the differential activation, defined as the percentage MR signal increase for RAND and SELF relative to FIX, were calculated in each area. All areas showed a higher activation level for RAND and SELF than for FIX. A significant difference in activation level or differential activation between SELF and RAND was found in the posterior part of the superior frontal sulcus, in a part of the premotor cortex on the lateral brain surface, in the anterior cingulate motor cortex, and in the posterior part of the superior parietal cortex. The high-resolution and single-subject approach, provided by fMRI, allowed the distinguishing of multiple foci in medial frontal areas, premotor cortex, and parietal cortex, reflecting the functional heterogeneity of these areas suggested by previous studies.

Visuomotor Transformations for Reaching to Memorized Targets: A PET Study

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to identify cortical and subcortical regions involved in the control of reaching to visual targets. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured in eight healthy subjects using H215O PET during the performance of three different tasks. All tasks required central fixation while a 400-ms target was flashed every 5 s at a random location around a virtual circle centered on the fixation target. Additional instructions differed according to the task: (i)visual detectionof the target without overt responses; (ii)immediate pointingto the most recent target in the sequence, and (iii)pointing to the previoustarget in the sequence. By design, the two motor tasks differed in the cognitive processing required. In each trial ofimmediate pointing,the spatial location of only the most recent target needed to be processed. In each trial ofpointing to the previous,instead, while the most recent target was stored in memory for the movement of the next trial, the previous target had to be retrieved from memory to direct the current movement. Limb trajectories were comparable between the two motor tasks in terms of most spatiotemporal parameters examined. Significant rCBF increases were identified using analysis of covariance andtstatistics. Compared withvisual detectionthere was activation of primary sensorimotor cortex, ventrolateral precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus in the opercular region, supramarginal gyrus, and middle occipital gyrus, all these sites in the hemisphere (left) contralateral to the moving limb, and cerebellar vermis, during bothimmediate pointingandpointing to the previous.Duringimmediate pointingthere was additional activation of left inferior parietal lobule close to the intraparietal sulcus, and when compared withpointing to the previous,dorsolateral prefrontal cortex bilaterally. Duringpointing to the previous,instead, there was additional activation of supplementary motor cortex, anterior and midcingulate, and inferior occipital gyrus in the left hemisphere; superior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus, and posterior hippocampus in the right hemisphere; lingual gyri and cerebellar hemispheres bilaterally; anterior thalamus; and pulvinar. The activation of two partially distinct cerebral networks in these two motor tasks reflects the different nature of signal processing involved. In particular, the specific activation of intraparietal sulcus and prefrontal cortex inimmediate pointingappears characteristic of a network for visuospatial working memory. By contrast, the corticolimbic network engaged inpointing to the previouscould mediate spatial attention and the sequence of encoding, recoding, and decoding of spatial memories required by a dual task with two competing targets.

Activation of ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortex by median nerve stimulation.

We report evidence for activation of ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortex (SMI) after median nerve stimulation recorded with magnetoencephalography (MEG). We measured somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) to median nerve stimulation with a 122-channel helmet-shaped magnetometer in 10 healthy subjects. In five, the magnetic field patterns suggested long-latency activation of the ipsilateral SMI. Source locations found by current dipole fitting corresponded to the SMI hand area, as determined by contralateral stimulation. Further evidence for the origin of the ipsilateral responses in SMI was provided by the suppression of these responses during movement of the contralateral fingers. Sensory input to ipsilateral SMI could play a role in sensorimotor integration of bilateral movements.

A common denominator in Rhesus area 7 neuronal responses suggestive of function

Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to identify cortical and subcortical regions involved in the control of reaching to visual targets. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured in eight healthy subjects using H215O PET during the performance of three different tasks. All tasks required central fixation while a 400-ms target was flashed every 5 s at a random location around a virtual circle centered on the fixation target. Additional instructions differed according to the task: (i)visual detectionof the target without overt responses; (ii)immediate pointingto the most recent target in the sequence, and (iii)pointing to the previoustarget in the sequence. By design, the two motor tasks differed in the cognitive processing required. In each trial ofimmediate pointing,the spatial location of only the most recent target needed to be processed. In each trial ofpointing to the previous,instead, while the most recent target was stored in memory for the movement of the next trial, the previous target had to be retrieved from memory to direct the current movement. Limb trajectories were comparable between the two motor tasks in terms of most spatiotemporal parameters examined. Significant rCBF increases were identified using analysis of covariance andtstatistics. Compared withvisual detectionthere was activation of primary sensorimotor cortex, ventrolateral precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus in the opercular region, supramarginal gyrus, and middle occipital gyrus, all these sites in the hemisphere (left) contralateral to the moving limb, and cerebellar vermis, during bothimmediate pointingandpointing to the previous.Duringimmediate pointingthere was additional activation of left inferior parietal lobule close to the intraparietal sulcus, and when compared withpointing to the previous,dorsolateral prefrontal cortex bilaterally. Duringpointing to the previous,instead, there was additional activation of supplementary motor cortex, anterior and midcingulate, and inferior occipital gyrus in the left hemisphere; superior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus, and posterior hippocampus in the right hemisphere; lingual gyri and cerebellar hemispheres bilaterally; anterior thalamus; and pulvinar. The activation of two partially distinct cerebral networks in these two motor tasks reflects the different nature of signal processing involved. In particular, the specific activation of intraparietal sulcus and prefrontal cortex inimmediate pointingappears characteristic of a network for visuospatial working memory. By contrast, the corticolimbic network engaged inpointing to the previouscould mediate spatial attention and the sequence of encoding, recoding, and decoding of spatial memories required by a dual task with two competing targets.