In Bruce Ackerman and James Fishkin argue for creation of a national holiday, Deliberation Day, in which citizens come together over a two-day period in their local schools and community centers to deliberate over merits of presidential candidates and their platforms (Ackerman and Fishkin 2004). While Ackerman and Fishkin propose that government pay each citizen a $150 stipend for voluntary participation, purpose is not so much to monetarily to reward citizens for showing up as it is to foster an enriched civic culture that would send Shockwaves through America's political infrastructure: If Day succeeded, everything else would change: candidates, media, activists, interest groups, spin doctors, advertisers, pollsters, fund raisers, lobbyists, political parties. All would have no choice but to adapt to a more attentive and informed (3). The task of Day would be to create a new social context in which citizens could become enlightened through public participation. As authors conclude book, We can, through an act of political imagination, create new institutions for redeeming ancient promise of democratic citizenship. Ordinary men and women need not be hapless playthings of powerful. They can and must find new ways to hold their leaders to account, and redeem their dignity as human beings by responsibly shaping their collective destiny (219). Ackerman and Fishkin's proposal is indeed filled with political imagination. I bring their proposal to light not to critique possibilities and limitations of but to understand way in which authors understand the public. At bottom, what polity needs, Ackerman and Fishkin believe, is a public space dedicated to reinvigo-