AcrySof SA60AT Intraocular Lens Research Articles

Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity: AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive versus AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lenses

To compare the visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in eyes with the AcrySof ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon) and eyes with the monofocal AcrySof SA60AT IOL. Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Ophthalmology, Rome, and private clinical practice, Rome, Italy. One hundred eyes had phacoemulsification cataract extraction and implantation of a ReSTOR multifocal IOL in the capsular bag. Inclusion criteria were corneal astigmatism less than 1.5 diopters (D), myopia less than 4.0 D, and no associated ocular disease. A complete ophthalmic examination, including uncorrected visual acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity, was performed 6 months postoperatively. Results were compared with those in 40 eyes with the AcrySof monofocal IOL single-piece IOL. In the multifocal group, 90 eyes (90%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better (logMAR<0.10) and an uncorrected near visual acuity at 35 cm of J3 or better (logMAR 0.14). The multifocal group and monofocal group had similar distance uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities; however, the multifocal group had significantly better near uncorrected acuity. The mean contrast sensitivity values were 18.28 dB (static program) and 17.95 dB (dynamic program) in the multifocal group and 19.18 dB (static program) and 21.2 dB (dynamic program) in the monofocal group. The ReSTOR multifocal IOL provided a satisfactory full range of vision; 92% of the patients achieved total spectacle independence. Contrast sensitivity was lower than with the SA60AT monofocal IOL.

Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: Prospective randomized masked clinical trial

To evaluate contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of an AcrySof IQ Natural SN60WF aspherical intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories). Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. One hundred twenty consecutive patients who had phacoemulsification in a prospective triple-masked trial were randomized to receive an AcrySof SA60AT IOL (40 eyes), AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL (40 eyes), or AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL (40 eyes). At 3 months, contrast sensitivity was measured using the CSV-1000E contrast sensitivity chart test face (Vector Vision) at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degrees (cpd) under photopic conditions (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic conditions (2.7 cd/m(2)) with 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm fixed central apertures, with and without glare. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used and a pair-wise comparison performed. The main outcome measure was the difference in contrast sensitivity between IOLs at each spatial frequency. The best corrected visual acuity was similar between the 3 IOL groups (P = .6). The AcrySof IQ group had significantly higher contrast sensitivity at 18 cpd under photopic conditions (P = .008); at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd during mesopic testing with a 4.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .011, P = .007, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .003, P = .006, P = .005, and P = .004, respectively); and at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing with a 6.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .006, P = .009, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .019, P = .002, P = .01, and P = .017, respectively). Eyes with the AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL had significantly higher contrast sensitivity than eyes with an AcrySof SA60AT or AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing (with and without glare) with 4.0 and 6.0 mm artificial pupil.

Effect of a yellow intraocular lens on scotopic vision, glare disability, and blue color perception

To compare the photopic and scotopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare as well as blue color perception between eyes with an AcrySof SN60AT Natural intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and eyes with a conventional AcrySof SA60AT IOL. Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey. Right eyes of 38 patients with an AcrySof Natural IOL and right eyes of 38 age-matched patients with a conventional AcrySof SA60AT IOL were included in a study. Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Functional Acuity Contrast Test under photopic conditions. Scotopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare was measured using the Mesotest II (Oculus GmbH). Blue-green color vision was evaluated with the Moreland equation of the HMC Anomaloskop MR (Oculus GmbH). The mean age of patients was 66.6 years +/- 8.2 (SD) in the Natural IOL group and 66.4 +/- 8.0 years in the conventional IOL group. There was no statistically significant difference in photopic contrast sensitivity, scotopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare, or disability glare between the 2 groups (P>.05). Photopic and scotopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare significantly decreased with age in both groups (P<.01). There was no statistically significant difference in anomaloscope scores between the 2 groups (P>.05). The Moreland middle match point showed a significant shift toward blue with age in both groups (P<.01). The AcrySof SN60AT Natural IOL provided contrast sensitivity under photopic and scotopic conditions (with and without glare) and blue color perception comparable that obtained with the AcrySof SA60AT IOL. Scotopic vision and blue color discrimination decreased with age with both IOLs.

Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification

To compare the surgical trauma after microincision phacoemulsification and small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification after implantation of conventional, foldable, hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs). Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. A prospective investigator-masked case series comprised patients with bilateral cataract who had cataract surgery on the same day. Thirty-three patients (66 eyes) were randomized. Microincision cataract surgery (MICS) was performed through 2, 1.4 mm clear corneal incisions (CCIs) using bimanual sleeveless phacoemulsification (cool phaco) in 1 eye. Small-incision cataract surgery (SICS) was performed on the other eye through a 3.2 mm CCI. In all cases, an AcrySof SA60AT IOL was inserted, in the MICS group after the CCI was enlarged. Laser flare photometry, specular microscopy, corneal endothelial cell density, and pachymetry were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Intraindividual comparison and statistical analyses were performed. There were no relevant clinical differences or perioperative complications in either group. There were no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative anterior chamber flare or endothelial cell loss. On the first postoperative day, the MICS group had statistically significantly increased corneal swelling (P = .008). Postoperatively, the mean endothelial cell density loss was higher in the MICS group (6.2%) than in the SICS group (3.10%); however, the difference between groups was not significant (P = .08) Microincision cataract surgery was a safe and reproducible technique. The postoperative results in the MICS group were comparable to those in the SICS group.

Posterior capsule opacification after extra capsular cataract extraction in Indian rural population: Foldable acrylic vs poly (methyl-methacrylate) intraocular lenses a randomized clinical trial

To compare the performance of single-piece acrylic vspoly (methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses (IOL) on the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after conventional extra capsular cataract extraction (ECCE). One hundred and eighty-two eyes of 91 patients with bilateral senile cataract undergoing ECCE were prospectively randomized to receive a single-piece Alcon AcrySof SA60AT IOL or a single-piece EPOCH polymethylmethacrylate IOL in the first eye to have surgery. At 1, 6 and 12 months post-operative follow-up, digital retro illumination images of the posterior capsule were taken for PCO assessment semi-objectively using PCO (POCO automated analysis software) system. Relationship of anterior capsule contact (total off and partial cover) on optic for PCO was analyzed. The AcrySof IOL was associated with less PCO than EPOCH lens at 6 months (10.01+/-8.75% vs 32.26+/-27.44%; P<0.001) and 1-year (11.65+/-10.55% vs 38.38+/-29.62%; P<0.001) follow-up. The EPOCH IOL showed a remarkably significant difference on development of PCO with anterior capsule overlap on IOL optic (total off and part on) 1 year (P<0.039), whereas no such difference was observed with the AcrySof IOL (P=0.197). The AcrySof IOL led to significantly less PCO than the EPOCH IOL post-operatively after extracapsular cataract extraction.

Irregularities on the surface of single-piece AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses

To report a case series of what initially appeared to be macroscopic biomaterial deposits and irregularities on the surface of AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses (IOLs) (Alcon Inc.) Department of Ophthalmology and Somerset Hospital, Taunton, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; and Intraocular Implant Unit, Sydney Eye Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Twelve AcrySof SA60AT IOLs were initially thought to have irregularities on their surfaces when examined under the operating microscope before implantation in the capsular bag during cataract surgery. The IOLs were sent for further analysis, including gross examination and light and scanning electron microscopy, to John A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, and to Alcon Laboratories, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom. Light microscopy revealed the presence of irregular fine lesions on the IOLs' optics and haptics. The lesions consisted of elevations and depressions of the IOL surface that were present on both the anterior and the posterior surfaces of the IOLs. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the presence of physical/mechanical damage to the IOLs, which was thought to originate from the packaging. The manufacturer believed this to have resulted from compression of the IOL between the container and its cover. Implantation of an imperfect IOL remains a potentially serious occurrence. Faults still occur in modern IOLs, and some defects can be detected by examining the IOL under the operating microscope before implantation into the eye.

Visual performance: Comparison of foldable intraocular lenses

To compare best distance visual acuity, color perception, and contrast sensitivity between eyes with an AcrySof Natural intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and fellow eye with an AcrySof IOL and to compare results in the IOL groups to those in normal, similarly aged patients with clear phakic eyes. Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati, India. This prospective randomized parallel group single-center patient-masked examiner-masked study comprised 26 eyes of 13 healthy patients with bilateral age-related cataract. All patients had cataract surgery by phacoemulsification in both eyes; 1 eye received an AcrySof Natural IOL (SN60AT) and the fellow eye, an AcrySof (SA60AT) IOL. Final postoperative examination was performed at the end of 18 months. In addition to other findings, visual acuity, color perception, and contrast sensitivity were recorded. A group of normal, similarly aged phakic individuals with clear lenses was examined for contrast sensitivity. The records thus obtained were analyzed statistically. The AcrySof and AcrySof Natural IOL groups had a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity and color perception in comparison to preoperative status, and this was maintained until the last postoperative follow-up at 18 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the findings between the 2 IOL groups. The AcrySof and the AcrySof Natural IOL groups showed significant improvement in contrast sensitivity from the preoperative to the postoperative period (both P < .001). However, the AcrySof Natural IOL group was better than the AcrySof IOL group when each group was compared separately to similarly aged phakic individuals with clear lenses. Pseudophakia following AcrySof Natural SN60AT and AcrySof SA60AT IOL implantation led to equivalent visual acuity and color perception. But the contrast sensitivity in the AcrySof Natural group was better and near normal in reference to a healthy, age-matched control group.

AcrySof Natural SN60AT versus AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lens in patients with color vision defects

To determine whether implantation of the AcrySof Natural intraocular lens (IOL) worsened the severity of existing color deficit in congenital partial red-green color deficient individuals (CPRG). A prospective controlled randomized double-masked analysis of 30 consecutive patients with CPRG defect and bilateral cataracts received a Natural IOL (test group) in 1 eye and a single-piece AcrySof IOL (control group) in the other eye. Patients were tested unilaterally to detect CPRG defect using Ishihara pseudoisochromatic plates and the Farnsworth D-15 test. Plates 1 to 21 measured the Ishihara error score; plates 22 to 25 indicated severity of defect based on clarity of both numerals as partial mild/moderate (both visible), partial severe defect (only 1 visible). The D-15 test is based on number of diametrical crossings on the circular diagram; severity is graded as mild (1 crossing), moderate (2 crossings), or severe (>2 crossings). Tests were performed before and after IOL implantation at 1, 3, and 6 months. At mean follow-up of 6.13 months +/- 1.2 (SD), analysis of variance test judged the difference in error scores and cross tabulation represented change in number of diametrical crossings. The mean age was 62.3 +/- 8.5 years. All patients were men. Before IOL implantation, all patients had moderate CPRG defect on both tests. The Ishihara error score in the test and control groups did not reveal statistically significant differences (P = .505 and P = .119, respectively). With D-15, none of the patients in the test or control group showed >2 crossings. The implantation of AcrySof Natural IOL did not worsen the preexisting severity of color defect in CPRG individuals.

Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study

To evaluate best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity in pseudophakic patients implanted either with the aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) designed to correct for corneal spherical aberration or with a conventional IOL. Three surgical centers participated this prospective randomized masked comparative study. Thirty eyes of 30 patients after aspheric lens implantation (Pfizer/Pharmacia Tecnis Z9000) were compared with 30 eyes of 30 age-matched patients after conventional lens implantation (Alcon AcrySof SA60AT). Two to three months after surgery, best spectacle corrected distance visual acuity was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Contrast sensitivity was measured by sinusoidal grating charts for distance at photopic (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic (6 cd/m(2)) luminance level with optical correction in place. Tested spatial frequencies were 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). The mean BCVA was -0.053 +/- 0.044 logMAR in eyes with the aspheric Tecnis IOL and 0.006 +/- 0.059 logMAR in eyes with the conventional AcrySof IOL (P=.0001). Eyes with the aspheric IOL showed better contrast sensitivity at spatial frequencies of 3 cpd (P<.05) and 6, 12, and 18 cpd (P<.01) in photopic and in mesopic conditions. Peak improvement occurred at 18 cpd and was 36% (0.29 log units) in photopic and 54% (0.27 log units) in mesopic conditions. The aspheric Tecnis IOL yielded better BCVA and better distance contrast sensitivity than the conventional IOL. The differences were clinically significant for higher spatial frequencies. The results give some suggestions for further studies.

Influencia de la aberración esférica en la función visual tras cirugía de catarata: ensayo prospectivo aleatorio

We compare the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity obtained with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens (Tecnis Z9000) with the contrast sensitivity and visual acuity obtained with a standard acrylic foldable intraocular lens (Acrysof SA60 AT). In this prospective trial, 64 patients presenting for cataract surgery were randomized to receive in both eyes either the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens or the the Acrysof SA60AT intraocular lens: 32 Tecnis Z9000 and 32 Acrysof SA60AT. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were monocular and binocularly tested in all of them preoperatively and three months after surgery. The Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens provided statistically significantly better monocular (Tecnis group: 0.85; Acrysof group: 0.78; p < 0.01) and binocular (Tecnis group: 0.95; Acrysof group: 0.86; p < 0.02) visual acuity. The contrast sensitivity mean was also greater in Tecnis group in monocular and binocular conditions, but without statistical signification. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery improved in both groups. But monocular and binocular visual acuity was statistically significantly better only in Tecnis group. The contrast sensitivity mean values were greater in Tecnis group but without statistically significant differences.

Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses

Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable IOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all IOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece IOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT IOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL designs.

388 The evaluation of early regional recurrence using clinical examination and ultrasonography of the axilla after omitting axillary clearance in patients with tumour negative sentinel nodes

To measure intraocular straylight (as a measure of glare) after cataract surgery and implantation of an AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 multifocal or AcrySof SA60AT monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) (both Alcon Laboratories).University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht; Isala Clinics, Zwolle; Netherlands Institute for Neurosciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.In a prospective open observational case series, a newly developed straylight meter was used to objectively measure straylight 6 months postoperatively in 66 eyes with a diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 IOL (multifocal group) and 40 eyes with a monofocal AcrySof SA60AT IOL (monofocal group). A comparison of straylight levels in an age-matched population without cataract (control group) was performed.The straylight level was 1.20 log units ± 0.16 (SD) in the multifocal group and 1.10 ± 0.19 log units in the monofocal group. When the difference in mean level of straylight was adjusted for age, mean straylight levels were 0.078 log units lower in the monofocal group than in the multifocal group (P = .026). Straylight levels in both pseudophakic groups were lower than in the control group without cataract (P<.0001).Levels of intraocular straylight log(s) were significantly lower for both types of IOL than in age-matched subjects from the normal population. The mean level of intraocular straylight 6 months postoperatively was higher in patients with an AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3 IOL than in patients with a monofocal AcrySof SA60AT IOL. Implantation of the former IOL would therefore result in a smaller gain in contrast sensitivity and a smaller reduction in glare and halos than implantation of the latter IOL.