Hand-foot Syndrome Research Articles

Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization With Sorafenib for Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Certain patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus could benefit from surgical resection, and postoperative adjuvant therapy may lower the incidence of tumor recurrence. To compare the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization vs sorafenib alone as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted in 5 hospitals in China. A total of 158 patients were enrolled and randomized from October 2019 to March 2022, with a median follow-up of 28.4 months. Portal vein tumor thrombus was graded by the Cheng classification. Eligible patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with Cheng grade I to III portal vein tumor thrombus (ie, involving segmental or sectoral branches, right- or left-side branch, or main trunk of portal vein) were included. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib or sorafenib alone as postoperative adjuvant therapy. Sorafenib treatment was started within 3 days after randomization, with an initial dose of 400 mg orally twice a day. In the transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group, transarterial chemoembolization was performed 1 day after the first administration of sorafenib. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was assessed in patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Of 158 patients included, the median (IQR) age was 54 (43-61) years, and 140 (88.6%) patients were male. The median (IQR) recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in the transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group (16.8 [12.0-NA] vs 12.6 [7.8-18.1] months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.83; P = .002). The median (IQR) overall survival was also significantly longer with transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib than with sorafenib alone (30.4 [20.6-NA] vs 22.5 [15.4-NA] months; HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.91; P = .02). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (23 of 79 patients in the transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group [29.1%] vs 24 of 79 patients in the sorafenib alone group [30.4%]). There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. The transarterial chemoembolization with sorafenib group did not show additional toxicity compared with the sorafenib monotherapy group. In this study, the combination of sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization as postoperative adjuvant therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than sorafenib alone and was well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04143191.

Photobiomodulation in the treatment of palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia: a randomised controlled clinical study protocol

IntroductionHand–foot syndrome, also known as palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE), is a complication caused by chemotherapy. Clinically, it manifests as erythema and oedema on the palms of the hands and feet, dry...

Palmoplantar Erythrodysesthesia: An Unusual Side Effect of Lenvatinib

Palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia also known as hand-foot syndrome is an intense, painful erythema of the palms and soles due to chemotherapeutic drugs. The most commonly implicated drugs are multi-kinase inhibitors such as sorafenib, sunitinib, doxorubicin, cytarabine, and docetaxel. The most effective management is withdrawal or reduction of drugs. Oral and topical corticosteroids and dimethyl sulfoxide are other treatment options. A 67-year-old male patient of hepatocellular carcinoma taking tablet lenvatinib presented with multiple tender erythematous plaques and patches over the bilateral palms and dorsum of the fingers after 1 month of initiation of therapy. The patient was successfully treated with dose reduction of lenvatinib and topical corticosteroids and is maintained on medium potency corticosteroid.

Analysis of efficacy and safety for the combination of regorafenib and PD-1 inhibitor in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A real-world clinical study

Background and aimsHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prevalent and deadly disease with limited treatment options. Regorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in HCC treatment but faces limitations as a monotherapy. Combining regorafenib with PD-1 inhibitor may improve efficacy and survival outcomes for patients. This retrospective analysis was conducted to explore its efficacy and safety, providing reference experience for better application of this combination therapy. MethodsThis retrospective single-center study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining regorafenib with PD-1 blockade for patients with HCC. Efficacy was evaluated according to the RECIST 1.1 evaluation criteria. Safety was assessed using CTCAE 4.0. Data was analyzed to compare survival status in different subgroups. ResultsGenerally, there were 76 patients with HCC elected to receive the regorafenib plus PD-1 blockade treatment during the study period. The objective response rate was 21.1% (n = 16), and the disease control rate was 56.6% (n = 43). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months, and median overall survival had not yet been reached. All patients suffered of at least 1 adverse event. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 31.6% of patients (n = 24), with the most common being hand-foot syndrome, decreased appetite, and abdominal distension. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in PFS based on cirrhosis status or previous treatment lines. ConclusionWith manageable safety, regorafenib combined PD-1 inhibitor could bring survival benefits for advanced HCC who have received systemic treatment. Further, the Cox analysis showed that HBV infection, metastasis, etc. did not have significant effects on the survival benefits.

Abstract 679: TXB-001 is an upgraded conjugated anthracycline that targets tumors with reduced risk of cardiotoxicity, hand-foot syndrome and alopecia

Abstract TXB-001 is a well-optimized N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer-based conjugated pirarubicin (THP) and a novel candidate for developing anticancer drugs. It exhibits tumor-specific accumulation due to the enhanced permeability and retention effects and prolonged circulation time compared with free THP. Its hydrazone bond is dissociated under lower pH conditions, providing selective and rapid release of THP in acidic tumor environments. Therefore, TXB-001 is expected to have high efficacy and low toxicity. Anthracycline anticancer drugs have been widely used for the treatment of several cancers, but their use is limited by several adverse effects (AEs), including cardiotoxicity, which is a life-threatening AE. Furthermore, the maximum lifetime cumulative dose is decided for each anthracycline in clinical use, which leads to discontinuation of the medication. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting AE of DOXIL®, a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin (DOX), and although it is not a life-threatening condition, it significantly deteriorates quality of life (QOL). Alopecia is another common AE, which is relatively noninvasive but adversely affects mental health and reduces QOL. In this study, we confirmed the efficacy of TXB-001 in a mice triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) model and evaluated the cardiotoxicity-, HFS- and alopecia-inducing effects of TXB-001 in mice and rats to compare the severity with existing anthracycline anticancer drugs, including DOXIL®. The pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis in several tissues, including plasma, tumor, heart, skin of the chest, and palmar and plantar areas, was also performed after a single intravenous administration in rodents. As a result, TXB-001 showed an equivalent or greater antitumor effects than other anthracyclines in the TNBC model, and the AEs were scarcely observed. TXB-001 did not decrease left ventricular ejection fraction, with no or little HFS-like changes compared with DOXIL®, which showed significant histopathological changes. TXB-001 also showed weaker alopecia-inducing effects than DOX, DOXIL®, and THP. In the PK analysis, TXB-001 was distributed in the tumor at a higher concentration than in other tissues, except for plasma. Hence, most of the THP, the active ingredient, was released in the tumor. The exposure of the heart in the TXB-001-treated group was one-tenth of that in the DOXIL®-treated group. Moreover, accumulation in the skin, especially in palmar and plantar areas, was observed for DOXIL®, but no accumulation in the skin was observed for TXB-001. This PK profile consistently demonstrated the antitumor activity of TXB-001, without AEs. TXB-001 reduces the chance of dose-limiting and QOL-threatening AEs, and thus, cancer patients can continue treatment, making it a more convenient anticancer drug in clinical use with a wide safety margin. Citation Format: Keiyu Oshida, Mikito Hirakata, Emi Tomikawa, Chizuka Sakai, Masashi Uchida, Rieko Shimozono, Akiko Izawa, Yoko Koga, Tsubasa Okano, Hideki Narumi, Lisa Munakata, Ryo Suzuki, Miki Nonaka, Yasuhito Uezono. TXB-001 is an upgraded conjugated anthracycline that targets tumors with reduced risk of cardiotoxicity, hand-foot syndrome and alopecia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 679.

TXB-001, a newly-developed polymer-conjugated anthracycline: Significantly lower adverse effects in animal models of alopecia and hand-foot syndrome

Anthracycline anti-cancer drugs have been widely used in the treatment of several cancers; however, their use is limited by adverse effects (AEs). Alopecia is a common AE that is minimally invasive, but adversely affects mental health and reduces quality of life (QoL). Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting AE of DOXIL, a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin (DOX). Although it is not a life-threatening condition, HFS affects function and reduces QoL. TXB-001 is a new candidate polymer-conjugated anthracycline anti-cancer drug, and modified and optimized polymerized pirarubicin (THP), known as P-THP, is expected to have low toxicity and high efficacy. The anti-cancer effects of TXB-001 were examined using the 4T1 mouse model. An alopecia mouse model and HFS rat model were used to evaluate the alopecia- and HFS-inducing effects of TXB-001 and compare their severity with existing anthracycline anti-cancer drugs. A pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma as well as chest, palmar, and plantar skin samples after the single intravenous administration of DOXIL and TXB-001 to rats was also performed. The results obtained revealed that TXB-001 exerted similar anti-cancer effects to those of DOXIL in mice, weaker alopecia-inducing effects than DOX, DOXIL, and THP in mice, and no or markedly weaker HFS-like changes than DOXIL, which induced significant histopathological changes. The results of the pharmacokinetic analysis showed the accumulation of DOXIL, but not TXB-001, in skin, particularly palmar and plantar skin samples, and these differences were considered to contribute to their HFS-inducing effects.

A real-world analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for liposomal and conventional doxorubicins

The clinical application of conventional doxorubicin (CDOX) was constrained by its side effects. Liposomal doxorubicin was developed to mitigate these limitations, showing improved toxicity profiles. However, the adverse events associated with liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX have not yet been comprehensively evaluated in clinical settings. The FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected to analyze the adverse events of liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX. Disproportionate analysis and Bayesian analysis were employed to quantify this association. Our analysis incorporated 68,803 adverse event reports related to Doxil/Caelyx, Myocet and CDOX. The relative odds ratios (RORs, 95%CI) for febrile neutropenia associated with CDOX, Doxil/Caelyx, and Myocet were 42.45 (41.44; 43.48), 17.53 (16.02; 19.20), and 34.68 (26.63; 45.15) respectively. For cardiotoxicity, they were 38.87(36.41;41.49), 17.96 (14.10; 22.86), and 37.36 (19.34; 72.17). For Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE), the RORs were 6.16 (5.69; 6.68), 36.13 (32.60; 40.06), and 19.69 (11.59; 33.44). Regarding onset time, significant differences adverse events including neutropenia, PPE, pneumonia and malignant neoplasm progression. This study indicates that clinical monitoring for symptoms of cardiotoxicity of CDOX and Myocet, and PPE and interstitial lung disease of Doxil should be performed. Additionally, the onset time of febrile neutropenia, malignant neoplasm progression, and pneumonia associated with Doxil and Myocet merits particular attention. Continuous surveillance, risk evaluations, and additional comparative studies between liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX were recommended.

Management of cutaneous adverse events caused by antineoplastic therapies: a single-center experience.

Cutaneous adverse events can occur in patients treated with antineoplastic treatments, albeit their incidence has not been defined yet. The clinical presentation of CAEs related to anticancer treatments can vary. The purpose of our study is to characterize skin toxicities during oncological treatments, manage such adverse events to improve patients' quality of life, and ensure therapeutic adherence. We conducted a single-center prospective study which provided the enrollment of all patients referred to the Skin Toxicity Outpatient Clinic for the occurrence of cutaneous adverse events secondary to an ongoing antineoplastic treatment, between July 2021 and June 2023. We analyzed clinical features, and we described our therapeutic approach. Based on the type of drug assumed, chemotherapy-induced skin toxicity in 24 (38.7%) of the 62 evaluated patients, target therapies in 18 (29.0%), CDK4/6 cyclin inhibitors in 12 (19.4%), and immunotherapy in 6 (9.7%), while skin adverse events secondary to hormone therapy were seen in two patients. The most common cutaneous adverse event in our experience was rosaceiform rash of the face, followed by eczematous rash, hand-foot syndrome, and folliculitis. The present study is aimed at describing the variability and heterogeneity of clinical manifestations of different pharmacological classes used in oncological patients, as well as the different pathogenesis of skin damage. Chemotherapy very frequently causes skin toxicities that are often underestimated by clinicians. Their adequate recognition and optimal treatment lead to total recovery and allow better adhesion to chemotherapy.

Topical Diclofenac for Prevention of Capecitabine-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting side effect of capecitabine. Celecoxib prevents HFS by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) that is upregulated because of the underlying associated inflammation. However, systemic side effects of celecoxib have limited routine prescription. Topical diclofenac inhibits COX-2 locally with minimal risk of systemic adverse events. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the efficacy of topical diclofenac in the prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS. In this single-site phase III randomized double-blind trial, we enrolled patients with breast or GI cancer who were planned to receive capecitabine-based treatment. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive topical diclofenac or placebo gel for 12 weeks or until the development of HFS, whichever occurred earlier. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 HFS (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5), which was compared between the two groups using simple logistic regression. In total, 264 patients were randomly assigned to receive topical diclofenac gel (n = 131) or placebo (n = 133). Grade 2 or 3 HFS was observed in 3.8% of participants in the diclofenac group compared with 15.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.3 to 18.1; P = .003). Grade 1-3 HFS was lower in the diclofenac group than in the placebo group (6.1% v 18.1%; absolute risk difference, 11.9%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 19.6). Capecitabine dose reductions because of HFS were less frequent in the diclofenac group (3.8%) than in the placebo group (13.5%; absolute risk difference, 9.7%; 95% CI, 3.0 to 16.4). Topical diclofenac prevented HFS in patients receiving capecitabine. This trial supports the use of topical diclofenac to prevent capecitabine-associated HFS.

Regorafenib plus nivolumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the phase 2 RENOBATE trial

Regorafenib has anti-tumor activity in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with potential immunomodulatory effects, suggesting that its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor may have clinically meaningful benefits in patients with uHCC. The multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 RENOBATE trial tested regorafenib–nivolumab as front-line treatment for uHCC. Forty-two patients received nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks and regorafenib 80 mg daily (3-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule). The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ORR per RECIST version 1.1 was 31.0%, meeting the primary endpoint. The most common adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (38.1%), alopecia (26.2%) and skin rash (23.8%). Median PFS was 7.38 months. The 1-year OS rate was 80.5%, and the median OS was not reached. Exploratory single-cell RNA sequencing analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed that long-term responders exhibited T cell receptor repertoire diversification, enrichment of genes representing immunotherapy responsiveness in MKI67+ proliferating CD8+ T cells and a higher probability of M1-directed monocyte polarization. Our data support further clinical development of the regorafenib–nivolumab combination as front-line treatment for uHCC and provide preliminary insights on immune biomarkers of response. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04310709.

Phase I trial of apatinib and paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+5-FU/levoleucovorin for treatment-naïve advanced gastric cancer.

Chinese guidelines recommend POF (paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU/levoleucovorin) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Apatinib can augment the antitumor effect of paclitaxel, oxaliplatin, or fluorouracil in preclinical studies of AGC. A phase I clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the anticancer activity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of apatinib plus POF in treatment-naïve patients with AGC and to establish a recommended phase II dose. Participants received escalating doses of daily oral apatinib (250, 375, 500, 625, 750, and 850 mg) plus POF every 2 weeks using a conventional "3 + 3" study design. Among 21 treated patients, one experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 skin ulceration at 850 mg). No MTD was reached. Apatinib 750 mg plus POF was recommended for phase II study. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (33.3%), mucositis (14.3%), and hand-foot syndrome (14.3%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.3, 14.6) and 18.4 months (95% CI: 9.8, 28.2), respectively. Apatinib up to 850 mg coadministered with POF was well tolerated with manageable AEs. The safety and anticancer activity of this regimen warrants its further investigation as first-line treatment for AGC in a larger study.

Optimal duration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with different risk factors for stage II-III colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

The duration of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in high-risk stage II, low-risk stage III, and high-risk stage III colon cancer (CC) patients is controversial. To reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs) without compromising efficacy while improving chemotherapy compliance is crucial. The authors searched Cochrane, Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases for articles from inception to August 8, 2023, the main outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival, chemotherapy completion rates, and AE frequency. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 10332 patients were included. Disease-free survival analysis revealed that only the high-risk stage III CC patients experienced better results with the 6-month FOLFOX regimen when compared with the 3-month regimen [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15-1.51, P <0.0001). Overall survival (OS) analysis revealed that extending the use of FOLFOX and CAPEOX regimens did not provide survival benefits for stage III CC patients (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.9-1.49, and HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.67-1.18, P =0.40). The completion rate of the 3-month oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was significantly higher than that of the 6-month regimen [Relative risk (RR): 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27, P =0.002]. Moreover, the 3-month regimen had significantly lower AE rates than the 6-month regimen (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68, P <0.00001), with differences mainly concentrated in grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.85, P =0.0002), peripheral sensory neuropathy at ≥grade 2 (RR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P <0.00001), and hand-foot syndrome at ≥grade 2 (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.77, P =0.009). The 6-month FOLFOX regimen should only be recommended for high-risk stage III CC, while the 3-month regimen can be recommended for other stages. A 3-month CAPEOX regimen can be recommended for stage II-III CC.

Adverse Events of Cabozantinib as a Potential Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients: Real-World Experience in a Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Cabozantinib, an oral inhibitor targeting MET, AXL, and VEGF receptors, has become a key component of a sequential treatment strategy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). The purpose of this work is to show that effective management of adverse events (AEs) during cabozantinib treatment and achieving a balance between AEs and treatment efficacy is crucial to achieving therapeutic goals. In this retrospective study, involving seventy-one metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients receiving second or subsequent lines of cabozantinib at the Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, we explored the impact of AEs on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). AEs were observed in 92% of patients. Hypothyroidism during treatment was significantly associated with prolonged OS and PFS (HR: 0.31; p < 0.001 and HR: 0.34; p < 0.001, respectively). The occurrence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) was also linked to improved OS (HR: 0.46; p = 0.021). Patients experiencing multiple AEs demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to those with one or no AEs (HR: 0.36; p < 0.001 and HR: 0.30; p < 0.001, respectively). Hypothyroidism and HFS serve as valuable predictive factors during cabozantinib treatment in ccRCC patients, indicating a more favorable prognosis.

Safety Profile and Adverse Event Management for Futibatinib, An Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor: Pooled Safety Analysis of 469 Patients.

Futibatinib, a covalently-binding inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-4 gained approval for the treatment of refractory, advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring an FGFR2 fusion/other rearrangement. An integrated analysis was performed to evaluate safety and provide guidance on the management of futibatinib-associated adverse events (AEs) in patients with unresectable/metastatic tumors, including iCCA. Data from three global phase I or II studies of futibatinib (NCT02052778; JapicCTI-142552) were pooled. AEs were graded per NCI CTCAE v4.03, where applicable. Safety was analyzed for patients receiving any futibatinib starting dose (overall population) and in those receiving the approved starting dose of 20 mg once every day. In total, 469 patients with one of 33 known tumor types were analyzed, including 318 patients who received futibatinib 20 mg every day. AEs of clinical interest (AECI; any grade/grade ≥3) in the overall population included hyperphosphatemia (82%/19%), nail disorders (27%/1%), hepatic AEs (27%/11%), stomatitis (19%/3%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 13%/3%), rash (9%/0%), retinal disorders (8%/0%), and cataract (4%/1%). Median time to onset of grade ≥3 AECIs ranged from 9 days (hyperphosphatemia) to 125 days (cataract). Grade ≥3 hyperphosphatemia, hepatic AEs, PPES, and nail disorders resolved to grade ≤2 within a median of 7, 7, 8, and 28 days, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs were rare (2%), and no treatment-related deaths occurred. AE management included phosphate-lowering medication and dose adjustments. Futibatinib showed a consistent and manageable safety profile across patients with various tumor types. AECIs were mostly reversible with appropriate clinical management.

Influence of genetic polymorphisms in vascular endothelial-related genes on the clinical outcome of axitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT Objective Axitinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Because of the severe adverse events (AEs) associated with axitinib, patients often need dose reductions or discontinue its use, highlighting the need for effective biomarkers to assess efficacy and/or AEs. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the pharmacodynamic action of axitinib and clinical prognosis and AEs in metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients. Methods This study included 80 mRCC patients treated with first-, second-, or third-line axitinib (5 mg orally twice daily). Clinical parameters and genetic polymorphisms were examined in 75 cases (53 males and 22 females). We assessed three SNPs in each of three candidate genes namely, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3), and angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R), all of which are involved in axitinib effects on vascular endothelial function. Results Axitinib-treated patients carrying the ACE deletion allele suffered more frequently from hand-foot syndrome and a deterioration in kidney function (p = .045 and p = 0.005, respectively) whereas those carrying the NOS3 G allele suffered more frequently from proteinuria and multiple AEs (p = .025 and p = 0.036, respectively). Conclusions Our study found that the ACE deletion allele and the NOS3 G allele are associated with increased AEs.

Relationship Between Adverse Events and Progression-free Survival in Patients Receiving Cabozantinib for Previously Treated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Although the adverse events (AEs) of drugs, such as sunitinib and axitinib, have been shown to predict treatment responses, evidence to support cabozantinib-induced AEs as predictors of responses to treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is limited. Therefore, we herein investigated the relationship between AE profiles and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving cabozantinib for previously treated mRCC. The present study retrospectively analyzed 40 patients receiving cabozantinib for previously treated mRCC between July 2020 and August 2022. PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the impact of several parameters, including cabozantinib-induced AEs, on PFS was investigated by a Cox proportional regression analysis. The median observation period was 15 (2-29) months, during which time 31 patients (77.5%) progressed, with median PFS of 11 months. Thirty-nine patients (97.5%) developed at least one AE. Liver toxicity occurred in 16 patients (40.0%) and hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, and diarrhea in 14 each (17.5%). Only hypertension correlated with longer PFS. A multivariate analysis identified hypertension as an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p=0.049). These results suggest the potential of treatment-induced hypertension as a significant predictor of prolonged PFS in patients receiving cabozantinib for mRCC.

UNICAB: Cabozantinib in locally advanced or metastatic non‐clear cell renal cell carcinoma post immunotherapy or in those unsuitable for immunotherapy (ANZUP 1802).

428 Background: Rare variant non-clear cell renal cell cancer (nccRCC) have diverse biology and therapeutic response. Immune checkpoint immunotherapy (ICI) can benefit some people with nccRCC, but many experience progression. We sought to test cabozantinib (C) in people with nccRCC refractory to, or unsuitable for ICI. Methods: Eligible participants (pts) had advanced/metastatic nccRCC with good ECOG PS (&lt;2) and either prior treatment with ICI or were unsuitable for ICI due to a contraindicating autoimmune disorder. Pts with urothelial or collecting duct tumour were excluded. Eligible pts started C at 60mg per day with dose modifications as required. Clinical cycles were 28 days and radiological assessment occurred 8-weekly for 12 months. Pts could then continue C via an access program. Results: 33 pts with nccRCC were recruited from Mar 2019 to Dec 2022. Recruitment was influenced by the COVID19 pandemic. Two pts were found ineligible (brain metastasis, concurrent CYP3A4 inducer). Pts tumour histology included papillary type 1 (10), chromophobe (7), papillary type 2 (4), Xp11 translocation (3) and other histologies (7). 24 pts had received prior ICI, mostly nivolumab alone (17) or anti-PD1-antibodies in combination with other agents (anti-CTLA4, anti-TIGIT). Median duration of therapy was 9 cycles. 17 pts ceased for unacceptable toxicity or disease progression and 12 pts completed the 12 months of treatment, with 2 remaining on trial treatment at time of analysis. A partial response was seen 7/31 (22%) pts overall, including 7/24 pts with prior ICI and 0/7 pts unsuitable for ICI. Median treatment duration was 7.5 cycles (range 2-12) in pts with prior ICI treatment, and 11 cycles (range 2-12) in pts unsuitable for ICI. 90% of pts required dose reduction, most often due to fatigue, hypertension, diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome, with a mean C dose of 46mg/day. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: C is an active treatment for people with nccRCC previously treated with ICI, with similar toxicity to previous reports in other cancers. Pts unsuitable for ICI may have poorer outcomes for C therapy in nccRCC. Further follow-up will determine duration of response and overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03685448 .

Feasibility and Tolerability of Anlotinib Plus PD-1 Blockades for Patients with Treatment-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study.

Therapeutic regimens are relatively scarce among patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to determine the feasibility and tolerability of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC retrospectively. A total of 68 patients with previously treated metastatic CRC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included in this study retrospectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, therapeutic outcomes and safety profile during administration were collected and briefly analyzed. All subjects were followed up regularly. Therapeutic outcomes, including drug response and prognosis, were presented, and a safety profile was depicted to illustrate the adverse reactions. A total of 68 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included in the final analysis. Best therapeutic response during treatment indicated that partial response was observed in 11 patients, stable disease was noted in 41 patients, and progressive disease was found in 16 patients, producing an objective response rate of 16.2% (95% CI: 8.4%-27.1%) and a disease control rate of 76.5% (95% CI: 64.6%-85.9%). Prognostic analysis suggested that the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 68 patients was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.01-7.59), and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.5 months (95% CI: 9.40-15.60). Of the 11 patients who responded, the median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI: 2.89-10.53). Safety profile during treatment showed that patients experienced adverse reactions regardless of grade, and grade ≥3 adverse reactions were found in 61 patients (89.7%) and 41 patients (60.3%), respectively. Common adverse reactions were hypertension, myelosuppression (including leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia), fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome. Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated encouraging efficacy and acceptable safety profile in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC preliminarily in clinical practice. This conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials.

Toripalimab plus capecitabine in the treatment of patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial

Patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma after receiving definitive treatment have poor prognoses. Although immune checkpoint therapies have achieved breakthroughs for treating recurrent and metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, none of these strategies have been assessed for treating residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In this single-arm, phase 2 trial, we aimed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy and safety of toripalimab (anti-PD1 antibody) plus capecitabine in patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma after definitive treatment (ChiCTR1900023710). Primary endpoint of this trial was the objective response rate assessed according to RECIST (version 1.1). Secondary endpoints included complete response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, safety profile, and treatment compliance. Between June 1, 2020, and May 31, 2021, 23 patients were recruited and received six cycles of toripalimab plus capecitabine every 3 weeks. In efficacy analyses, 13 patients (56.5%) had complete response, and 9 patients (39.1%) had partial response, with an objective response rate of 95.7% (95% CI 78.1-99.9). The trial met its prespecified primary endpoint. In safety analyses, 21 of (91.3%) 23 patients had treatment-related adverse events. The most frequently reported adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (11 patients [47.8%]). The most common grade 3 adverse event was hand-foot syndrome (two patients [8.7%]). No grades 4-5 treatment-related adverse events were recorded. This phase 2 trial shows that combining toripalimab with capecitabine has promising antitumour activity and a manageable safety profile for patients with residual nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Exploring the Impact of Hand-Foot Syndrome on Fingerprint Persistence: A Comprehensive Review

The hand-foot syndrome, also known as Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE), is a dermatological condition associated with certain chemotherapeutic agents. From a forensic perspective, understanding the manifestations of PPE becomes crucial in cases involving drug-related exposures or poisoning. This abstract explores the dermatological aspects of handfoot syndrome, its potential forensic implications, and the importance of recognizing and documenting such findings in medico legal investigations. Additionally, the abstract discusses the relevance of PPE in establishing a link between a specific chemotherapeutic drug and its adverse effects, aiding forensic experts in determining the cause of morbidity or mortality in relevant cases. Hand-Foot Syndrome (HFS), a dermatological condition commonly associated with chemotherapy, presents a unique avenue for forensic investigation. This study endeavors to unravel the forensic implications of HFS, shedding light on its potential significance in post-mortem examinations. Characterized by erythematous and desquamative changes on the palms and soles, HFS has distinct clinical manifestations that may serve as valuable markers in forensic pathology. Our research employs a comprehensive approach, integrating dermatological analysis with forensic perspectives. Through an extensive review of case studies and medical records, we aim to establish a nuanced understanding of HFS patterns and their correlation with diverse forensic scenarios. By identifying and documenting these distinctive dermatological features, forensic professionals can potentially utilize HFS as an additional tool in their investigative arsenal. Furthermore, this study explores the temporal aspects of HFS progression, seeking to determine the reliability of its manifestation timeline in forensic reconstructions. By elucidating the chronological patterns of HFS development, forensic experts may enhance their ability to establish a timeline of events in cases involving suspicious or unexplained deaths. In conclusion, this research contributes to bridging the gap between dermatology and forensic science, offering insights into the forensic relevance of Hand-Foot Syndrome. The findings presented here aim to empower forensic practitioners with an additional layer of diagnostic precision, ultimately aiding in the pursuit of justice and accurate cause-of-death determinations.