Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome Patients Research Articles

Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome in Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: A Single Institution's Experience.

1) Describe the prevalence of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in pediatric patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation deemed to be at increased risk for the disease in our institution, 2) discuss the challenges of testing for acquired von Willebrand syndrome diagnosis, 3) describe the characteristics of the patient population found to have acquired von Willebrand syndrome and their outcomes, and 4) discuss the potential implications of acquired von Willebrand syndrome on bleeding complications. Retrospective chart review. PICU and cardiovascular ICU in a single institution. All PICU and cardiovascular ICU extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients 0-18 years old who underwent screening for acquired von Willebrand syndrome between January 2014 and December 2016. Humate P administration to a small subset of acquired von Willebrand syndrome positive subjects. Laboratory data of identified patients were analyzed. The diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome was made based on decreased ristocetin cofactor activity to von Willebrand factor antigen ratio and/or abnormal multimer analysis. Clinical data were extracted from the chart and through the Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Outcome Registry to describe the demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes of this patient population. In the 2 years, 29 patients had laboratory testing performed for surveillance and in cases of clinical bleeding. Of these, 23 (79%) were positive by criteria. No significant difference in mortality rate was found between patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome versus without. We also did not find a significant difference in the blood product utilization or bleeding complications between patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome versus without. Humate P was administered in 39% of patients (9/23) who were positive for acquired von Willebrand syndrome, but no significant difference was seen in blood product utilization or bleeding complications between acquired von Willebrand syndrome patients receiving Humate P versus those who did not. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome is a common but under recognized disorder in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. The clinical implications of this disorder on bleeding and its potential treatments are still unclear.

Factors related to the development of acquired von Willebrand syndrome in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera

ObjectiveWe characterized acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) among essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients. MethodsA review of patients with ET or PV evaluated for AVWS. ResultsOf 116 patients with ET, 64 (55%) developed AVWS; of 57 with PV, 28 (49%) developed AVWS. Median platelet counts of ET and PV patients who developed AVWS were 920×109/L and 679×109/L, respectively (P=0.01). Of patients who developed AVWS, 69.5% had platelet counts below 1000×109/L. Bleeding was more common in patients with AVWS, among both ET and PV patients (P<0.001). VWF:RCo levels and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio were lower among JAK2 V617F positive- vs. JAK2 V617F negative- ET patients (P=0.02 and P=0.002, respectively); whereas VWF:Ag levels were comparable (P=0.96). ET patients harboring the JAK2 V617F mutation were more likely to develop AVWS than were calreticulin-positive patients (70.3% vs. 45.7%, P=0.02), despite lower platelet counts (median 773 vs. 920×109/L, P=0.05). In multivariable analysis, younger age (P=0.002), platelet count (P<0.001), hemoglobin level (P=0.01) and JAK2 V617F mutation (P=0.01) independently predicted the development of AVWS among ET patients; whereas only platelet count predicted its development among PV patients (P<0.001). ConclusionAmong ET and PV patients, AVWS was common and associated with higher bleeding rates and higher platelet count; nonetheless, most AVWS patients had platelet counts under 1000×109/L. Thus, AVWS screening should be included in routine assessment of ET and PV patients. Among ET patients, JAK2 V617F was a main driver for the development of AVWS.

Factors Related to the Development of Acquired Von Willebrand Syndrome in Patients with Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera

▪Objective: We characterized acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) among essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) patients.Methods: A review of patients with ET or PV evaluated for AVWS.Results: Of 116 patients with ET, 64 (55%) developed AVWS; of 57 with PV, 28 (49%) developed AVWS. Median platelet counts of ET and PV patients who developed AVWS were 920 X 109/L and 679 X 109/L, respectively (P=0.01). Of patients who developed AVWS, 69.5% had platelet counts below 1000 X 109/L. Bleeding was more common in patients with AVWS, among both ET and PV patients (P<0.001). VWF:RCo levels and VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio were lower among JAK2 V617F positive- vs. JAK2 V617F negative- ET patients (P=0.02 and P=0.002, respectively); whereas VWF:Ag levels were comparable (P=0.96). ET patients harboring the JAK2 V617F mutation were more likely to develop AVWS than were calreticulin-positive patients (70.3% vs. 45.7%, P=0.02), despite lower platelet counts (median 773 vs. 920 X 109/l, P=0.05). In multivariable analysis, age (β=0.26, P=0.002), platelet count (β=-0.38, P<0.001), hemoglobin level (β=-0.22, P=0.01) and JAK2 V617F mutation (β=-0.23, P=0.01) independently predicted VWF:RCo, among ET patients; whereas only platelet count predicted VWF:RCo among PV patients (β=-0.49, P<0.001).Conclusion: Among ET and PV patients, AVWS was common and associated with higher bleeding rates and higher platelet count; nonetheless, most AVWS patients had platelet counts under 1000 X 109/L. Thus, AVWS screening should be included in routine assessment of ET and PV patients. Among ET patients, JAK2 V617F was a main driver for the development of AVWS. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A two‐centre comparative evaluation of new automated assays for von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity and antigen

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by a quantitative and/or qualitative deficiency of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). The laboratory diagnosis of VWD is dependent on the measurement of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo). The aim of this study was to undertake a two-centre evaluation of two new automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays systems from Instrumentation Laboratory (Bedford, USA). Using the two new analytical systems that operated with different detection principles: immunoturbidimetric (TOP500 analyser) and chemiluminescent (AcuStar analyser), VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels were determined in samples from 171 healthy normal subjects, 80 VWD patients (16 type 1, 58 type 2 and 6 type 3) and 7 acquired von Willebrand syndrome patients. With commercial lyophilized normal and pathological plasmas VWF: Ag and VWF:RCo assays performed on both analysers exhibited low levels of inter-assay imprecision (AcuStar: CV% range 3.3-6.9; TOP500: CV% range 2.6-6.3). Samples from normal healthy subjects (range: VWF:Ag 44.6-173.9 IU dL(-1) ; VWF:RCo 43.1-191.5 IU dL(-1)) and patients (range: VWF:Ag <0.3-115.1 IU dL(-1) ; VWF:RCo <0.5-57.2 IU dL(-1)) showed a good correlation between the two VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo methods (rs = 0.92 and 0.82 respectively), with only a few inconsistent cases among the patients' samples evaluated. The chemiluminescent assays had a lower limit of detection for both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo compared to immunoturbidimetric tests (0.3 IU dL(-1) vs. 2.2 IU dL(-1) and 0.5 IU dL(-1) vs. 4.4 IU dL(-1) respectively). The TOP500 and AcuStar VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays were precise and compare well between centres, making these systems suitable for the diagnosis of VWD in non-specialized and reference laboratories.

Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Patients With Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare bleeding disorder with laboratory findings similar to those for congenital von Willebrand disease. Unlike the congenital form, AVWS usually occurs in individuals with no personal or family history of bleeding disorders. According to an international registry, AVWS is mainly associated with lymphomyeloproliferative, immunologic, and cardiovascular disorders, as well as with solid tumors and other miscellaneous conditions; however, the prevalence of AVWS in these underlying disorders is still unknown. von Willebrand factor (VWF) is synthesized normally in most AVWS patients, and the low plasma VWF levels are from its accelerated removal from plasma by five different mechanisms, including autoantibodies. Because of the reduced half-life of endogenous-exogenous plasma VWF, bleeding of AVWS cannot be managed with desmopressin or factor VIII/VWF concentrates. Clinical use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in AVWS has been reported since 1988. IVIg is most effective in AVWS with type immunoglobulin (Ig) G monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance and in other cases with IgG autoantibodies. IVIg can correct factor VIII and von Willebrand factor complex activities for about 15–20 days, and repeated injections induce remission of AVWS in these patients. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVIg in AVWS.