Recent developments in side‐scan sonar technology have increased the potential for fundamental changes in our understanding of ocean basins. Developed in the late 1960s, “side looking” sonars have been widely used for the last two decades to obtain qualitative estimates of the acoustic properties of the materials of the seafloor. Modern developments in the ability to obtain spatially correct digital data from side‐scan sonar systems have resulted in images that can be subsequently processed, enhanced, and quantified. With appropriate processing, these acoustic images can be made to resemble easily recognizable optical photographs. Any geological interpretation of these images requires an understanding of the inherent limitations of the data acquisition system. When imagery is collected, these limitations are largely centered on the concept of resolution. In side‐scan sonar images, there are several different types of resolution, including along‐ and across‐track resolution, display resolution, and absolute instrumental resolution. All of these parameters play a critical role in our ability to calibrate and ultimately to interpret the new pictures of the ocean floor. Acoustic image processing is a new application of an old and well‐established technique. Digital optical images have benefited from several decades of development in processing techniques. These relatively sophisticated techniques have been applied to photographic images from satellites and spacecraft, images which are “noisy” and difficult to obtain but extremely valuable. Side‐scan sonar systems, on the other hand, have only recently been able to produce spatially correct, digital images of the seafloor. The application of digital signal‐processing techniques to side‐scan sonar data will now allow us to quantify what had been previously very subjective and qualitative interpretations of images of the seafloor. The goal of all this processing of acoustic images remains clear: the development of an interpretable map of the geology of the seafloor.