Growth Process Center' Beery contends that the Visual-motor Integration Test can be used to identify learning disability as a result-of a deficit in visual-motor integration (1, 2, 3). In his standardization sample, 28 3-yr.-old suburban children were tested, but none were rural or lower middle-class. In the current investigation, the test was administered individually to 32 girls and 32 boys ranging in age from 3-0 to 3-1 1, who were enrolled full time in an experimental program in an early childhood center. The sample was based on a cross-section of children from a major city in the Midwest. Children were randomly selected by a computer and represented several racial-ethnic groups: 45% white, 30% black, 19% Hispanic (included Puerto Rican, Mexican, Cuban, and other Spanish-surnamed groups), 6% American Indian and Oriental. Represented also were five socio-economic categories: (a) no education and no job, (b) eighth-grade graduate, (c) some high school, (d) high school graduate, and (e) some college, college graduate, Master's degree, and above. Data were recorded for each subject as to sex, age in months at time of testing (boys 43.2 mo., girls 42.2 mo); Beery test raw score (38.3 mo. vs 39.9 mo.. girls). Validity coefficients were calculated using the Pearson product-moment method. A correlation of .41 between chronological age and geometric form reproduction for girls was found; for males r was ,008. When failure of G mo. or more below CA was used as an index on the Beery test to compare achievement of boys and girls, 53% of the boys were below level and 21% of the girls. For 3-yr.-old boys there is no correlation while it appears low for girls. Beery did not provide cut-off points for identifying learning disabilities in 3-yr.-olds, but cut-offs might not be of use since the correlations are low. Finally, in terms of individual or group assessment, the Beery test should be used only as a rough guide with 3-yr.-old children.