Acetabular Morphology Research Articles

The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting.

Imaging assessment for the clinical management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is controversial because of a paucity of evidence-based guidance and notable variability among practitioners. Hence, expert consensus is needed because standardised imaging assessment is critical for clinical practice and research. We aimed to establish expert-based statements on FAI imaging by using formal methods of consensus building. The Delphi method was used to formally derive consensus among 30 panel members from 13 countries. Forty-four questions were agreed upon, and relevant seminal literature was circulated and classified in major topics to produce answering statements. The level of evidence was noted for all statements, and panel members were asked to score their level of agreement (0-10). This is the second part of a three-part consensus series and focuses on 'General issues' and 'Parameters and reporting'. Forty-seven statements were generated and group consensus was reached for 45. Twenty-five statements pertaining to 'General issues' (9 addressing diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and postoperative imaging) and 'Parameters and reporting' (16 addressing femoral/acetabular parameters) were produced. The available evidence was reviewed critically, recommended criteria for diagnostic imaging highlighted, and the roles/values of different imaging parameters assessed. Radiographic evaluation (AP pelvis and a Dunn 45° view) is the cornerstone of hip-imaging assessment and the minimum imaging study that should be performed when evaluating adult patients for FAI. In most cases, cross-sectional imaging is warranted because MRI is the 'gold standard' imaging modality for the comprehensive evaluation, differential diagnosis assessment, and FAI surgical planning. • Diagnostic imaging for FAI is not standardised due to scarce evidence-based guidance on which imaging modalities and diagnostic criteria/parameters should be used. • Radiographic evaluation is the cornerstone of hip assessment and the minimum study that should be performed when assessing suspected FAI. Cross-sectional imaging is justified in most cases because MRI is the 'gold standard' modality for comprehensive FAI evaluation. • For acetabular morphology, coverage (Wiberg's angle and acetabular index) and version (crossover, posterior wall, and ischial spine signs) should be assessed routinely. On the femoral side, the head-neck junction morphology (α° and offset), neck morphology (NSA), and torsion should be assessed.

Does the Rule of Thirds Adequately Detect Deficient and Excessive Acetabular Coverage?

Assessment of AP acetabular coverage is crucial for choosing the right surgery indication and for obtaining a good outcome after hip-preserving surgery. The quantification of anterior and posterior coverage is challenging and requires either other conventional projections, CT, MRI, or special measurement software, which is cumbersome, not widely available and implies additional radiation. We introduce the "rule of thirds" as a promising alternative to provide a more applicable and easy method to detect an excessive or deficient AP coverage. This method attributes the intersection point of the anterior (posterior) wall to thirds of the femoral head radius (diameter), the medial third suggesting deficient and the lateral third excessive coverage. What is the validity (area under the curve [AUC], sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios [LR(+)/LR(-)], positive/negative predictive values [PPV, NPV]) for the rule of thirds to detect (1) excessive and (2) deficient anterior and posterior coverages compared with previously established radiographic values of under-/overcoverage using Hip2Norm as the gold standard? We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients between 2003 and 2015 from our institutional database who were referred to our hospital for hip pain and were potentially eligible for joint-preserving hip surgery. We divided the study group into six specific subgroups based on the respective acetabular pathomorphology to cover the entire range of anterior and posterior femoral coverage (dysplasia, overcoverage, severe overcoverage, excessive acetabular anteversion, acetabular retroversion, total acetabular retroversion). From this patient cohort, 161 hips were randomly selected for analysis. Anterior and posterior coverage was determined with Hip2Norm, a validated computer software program for evaluating acetabular morphology. The anterior and posterior wall indices were measured on standardized AP pelvis radiographs, and the rule of thirds was applied by one observer. The detection of excessive anterior and posterior acetabular wall using the rule of thirds revealed an AUC of 0.945 and 0.933, respectively. Also the detection of a deficient anterior and posterior acetabular wall by applying the rule of thirds revealed an AUC of 0.962 and 0.876, respectively. For both excessive and deficient anterior and posterior acetabular coverage, we found high specificities and PPVs but low sensitivities and NPVs. We found a high probability for an excessive (deficient) acetabular wall when this intersection point lies in the lateral (medial) third, which would qualify for surgical correction. On the other hand, if this point is not in the lateral (medial) third, an excessive (deficient) acetabular wall cannot be categorically excluded. Thus, the rule of thirds is very specific but not as sensitive as we had expected. Level II, diagnostic study.

No Correlation Between Depth of Acetabuloplasty or Postoperative Lateral Center-Edge Angle on Midterm Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy With Acetabuloplasty and Labral Repair

Background: The treatment of pincer deformity in hip arthroscopy remains controversial, with some authors advocating that over resection may risk early joint deterioration. The role of acetabular resection depth and postoperative acetabular morphology on postoperative outcomes has yet to be defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study measures the influence of acetabular resection depth and postoperative lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) on minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs), revision rates, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty using a single surgeon’s prospective database. We hypothesized that patients with acetabular resections >10°, as measured by LCEA, or patients with postoperative LCEA outside the normal range of 25° to 35° would have lower PROs, higher revision rates, and higher conversion to total hip arthroplasty at midterm follow-up. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 192 patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with acetabuloplasty and labral repair by a single surgeon with a minimum 5-year follow-up met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative LCEAs were measured on supine anteroposterior radiographs, and patients were divided into cohorts based on LCEA and acetabular resection depth. Cohorts for postoperative LCEA were <20° (dysplasia), 20° to 25° (borderline dysplasia), 25° to 35° (normal), and >35° (borderline overcoverage). Cohorts for acetabular resection depth were <5°, 5° to 10°, and >10° difference from preoperative to postoperative LCEA. Outcome measures included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score, satisfaction scores, revision rates, and conversion to arthroplasty rates. Results: Patients significantly improved in all outcome score measures at final follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in PRO scores or conversion to total hip arthroplasty between any cohorts in the postoperative LCEA group. There were more revisions in the 25° to 35° cohort than the other cohorts (P = .02). The 5-10° resection depth cohort demonstrated a higher postoperative WOMAC score (P = .03), but otherwise no statistically significant differences were seen between resection depth cohorts in the remaining postoperative outcomes scores, revision rates, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty rates. Conclusion: Patients with postoperative LCEA values outside the normal reference range and with large resections perform similar to those with normal postoperative LCEA values and smaller resections at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

A minimally invasive periacetabular osteotomy technique: minimizing intraoperative risks.

The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an extensive surgical procedure associated with potential risk to the adjacent neurovascular structures. A steep learning curve exists, with surgeon experience an important factor in outcome. Little detail exists of the osteotomies themselves, and how to make them safe and reproducible. This article describes our PAO technique with emphasis on specific safety steps. When performing the posterior column cut, migration of the osteotome beyond the lateral pelvis may lead to damage of the sciatic nerve. The safety features detailed include novel measurement of the posterior column width and the use of specific-width osteotomes to complete this osteotomy. To plan the cut, several computerized tomography-based measurements are taken starting just above the greater sciatic notch and continuing down to the inferior part of the acetabulum. The angle of this cut is determined by acetabular morphology and the width of the posterior column. These posterior column width measurements will determine the width of the osteotomes used to perform the cut with little risk that an osteotome will penetrate too far on the lateral side of the pelvis. To ensure the lateral cortex has been cut completely proximally, an osteotome with pre-measured depths may be used from a medial to a direct lateral trajectory. The senior author has been performing this modified approach since 2010 (n = 530 PAOs) and has witnessed no vascular injuries and no nerve injuries aside from minor lateral femoral cutaneous nerve issues. Utilization of these techniques has prevented any major nerve injury without the need for intraoperative electromyography.

Three-dimensional Analysis of Acetabular Morphology and Orientation in Patients With Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Previous studies analyzing the acetabuli in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) have not definitively addressed the relationship between SCFE and acetabular shape. Femoral head overcoverage and acetabular version are thought to contribute to SCFE. The purpose of this study was to determine the acetabular morphology and orientation in hips with SCFE and compare them with normally developing children. Pelvic computed tomography (CT) images of patients with SCFE were compared with pelvic CTs of patients without orthopedic abnormalities (normal controls). Three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions were created from each CT examination. Custom software uniformly aligned the pelvis then determined acetabular measures from the reconstructions including acetabular version, acetabular tilt, articular surface area, and acetabular coverage angle measured in a radial manner dividing the acetabulum into octants. Two-hundred forty-four hips were included (53 SCFE, 31 unaffected contralateral hips in patients with SCFE, and 160 controls). The acetabular version was similar among SCFE hips, unaffected contralateral hips, and normal controls (P=0.48). Control hips had higher acetabular tilt than SCFE-affected hips (P=0.01) and unaffected contralateral hips (P=0.04). The acetabular surface area was higher in SCFE-affected hips compared with controls (P<0.05). SCFE-affected hips and the unaffected contralateral hips in patients with SCFE had increased acetabular coverage compared with controls in all 5 acetabular octants. Contrary to some previous studies, the authors did not find the acetabulum to be retroverted in patients with SCFE compared with controls. Both affected and unaffected hips of patients with SCFE have decreased acetabular tilt. Acetabular surface area is higher in hips with SCFE compared with normal controls, and both the SCFE-affected hips and unaffected hips had increased acetabular coverage compared with controls in all 5 octants of the acetabulum. The shared morphology of affected and unaffected hips in patients with SCFE suggests that their acetabular anatomy may predispose them to slip. Level III.

Sex differences in reference values of hip acetabular measurements using computed tomography in Japanese adults and the effect of aging on the measurement parameters

BackgroundIt is very important to understand the acetabular morphology of the normal hip joint to assist in diagnosis and surgical planning of hip disorders. The purpose of the present study was to obtain gender-based reference values for the acetabular measurements of a normal hip using computed tomography data and investigate the effect of aging on the measurement values. MethodsWe measured acetabular parameters (center-edge angle, Sharp angle, vertical center anterior angle, acetabular anteversion) on computed tomography corrected for changing the obliquity, rotation, and tilt of the pelvis. We performed measurements in 245 patients (490 joints; 120 men [240 joints] and 125 women [250 joints]). The mean age was 64.7 ± 14.3 (31–88) years for men and 63.2 ± 15.2 (30–88) years for women. ResultsIn men and women, the mean center-edge angle was 31.8° ± 6.4° and 30.6° ± 6.5°, the mean Sharp angle was 38.6° ± 3.2° and 40.6° ± 3.8°, the mean vertical center anterior angle was 44.3° ± 7.9° and 40.0° ± 8.5°, and the mean acetabular anteversion angle was 14.3° ± 5.2° and 18.8° ± 5.4°, respectively. All differences were statistically significant. The center-edge angle increased with age in women; however, such an effect was not observed in men. The other measurements showed a similar trend, such as larger vertical center anterior angle and smaller Sharp and acetabular anteversion angles, with aging in both men and women. ConclusionsWe used computed tomography data to quantitatively assess the coverage and shape of the acetabulum in adult Japanese subjects and obtain the estimated reference ranges by gender. The results also proved that the measurements changed with aging in both sexes. These facts must be taken into account during the diagnosis of hip disease and planning of surgery.

Risk factors for dislocation after bipolar hemiarthroplasty: a retrospective case\u2013control study of patients with CT data

PurposeBipolar hemiarthroplasty has been shown to have a lower rate of dislocation than total hip arthroplasty. However, as the influencing risk factors for bipolar hemiarthroplasty dislocation remain unclear, we aimed to analyse patient and surgeon-specific influencing risk factors for bipolar hemiarthroplasty dislocation.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed patients who were operated between 2012 and 2018 and had dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty and matched them to patients without a dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty, operated between 2018 and 2019. The study was limited to patients who received either a pre- or postoperative pelvic computed tomography. Besides demographic, morphologic, and physiologic data, we analysed duration of surgery; ASA score; Charlson Comorbidity Index; Almelo Hip Fracture Score; Parker Score; and acetabular morphology angles including acetabular anteversion angle, posterior acetabular sector angle, posterior wall angle, and acetabular roofing.ResultsWe included nine patients with a dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty and 30 with a non-dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Patient-specific factors prompting a higher risk for dislocated bipolar hemiarthroplasty were longer duration of surgery (min) (115 ± 50 vs. 80 ± 27, p = 0.01); dementia (56% vs. 13%, p < 0.01); smaller posterior acetabular sector angle (°) (96 ± 6 vs. 109 ± 10, p < 0.01); and smaller posterior wall angle (°) (67 ± 6 vs. 77 ± 10, p = 0.02).ConclusionDementia and insufficient posterior wall angle were associated with higher risk of dislocation in bipolar hemiarthroplasty

CT Based Analysis of Acetabular Morphology in Northern Indian Population: A Retrospective Study.

The acetabular morphology has shown to differ among different regions of the world. Multiplanar evaluation by computed tomography (CT) scan is the key to assess acetabular depth, version, and inclination at the same time which have been rarely explored before in the Indian population. We present an anthropometric study of the native acetabulum by CT based coronal, sagittal, and axial parameters in the Northern Indian population. The acetabular anteversion (AA), acetabular angle of sharp (AAS), sagittal acetabular angle (SAA), lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular depth (AD), acetabular horizontal offset (AHO), extrusion index (EI) and acetabular depth ratio (ADR) was measured in CT scans of 122 patients (244 hips) without any bony pathologies. LCEA < 20°, ADR < 250, AD < 9mm, AAS > 43°, and EI ≥ 25% were taken as criteria for dysplastic acetabulum. There were 62 males and 60 females included in the study with a mean age of 63.8 ± 17.2years (21-98years). In this study, females were having significantly lower ADR (p = 0.002) and higher EI (p = 0.01) than males. The prevalence of dysplasia was 3.2% according to LCEA and 1.6% while combining all of the criteria. There are prominent differences in acetabular depth in the Indian population compared with the population of Western countries or other parts of Asia. Females were shown to have shallower acetabulum than males. The comparative analysis of radiographic parameters obtained from our study with the data available on different country-based studies can help better understanding the acetabular morphology of Indian as well as the worldwide population. Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Should we employ preoperative templating in hip hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture? A nested case-control study.

Dislocation following hip hemiarthroplasty is a serious complication. It remains unclear if acetabular morphology is associated with a higher risk of dislocation. The aim of our study was to investigate whether there are differences in hip morphology radiological parameters between patients who have suffered a dislocation episode, and those who have not suffered a dislocation. Between January 2015 and December 2018, a nested case-control study was performed. From 707 patients who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty because of femoral neck fracture, 50 patients (50 hips) suffered an episode of dislocation. They were randomly matched with 94 patients (100 hips) without dislocation (ratio 1:2). Clinical data regarding demographics, medical comorbidities and surgical and radiological parameters were studied. Statistically significantly smaller lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) and femoral offset (FO) and greater Tönnis angle were found in the dislocation group. No differences in acetabular angle were seen. Neurological impairment prevalence was statistically significantly higher in patients who suffered a dislocation (60% vs. 44%, p = 0.011). The current study suggests that a smaller LCEA and FO, a greater TA, and neurological impairment could be related to a higher risk of hip hemiarthroplasty dislocation after femoral neck fracture in the elderly. We consider that preoperative templating could be helpful in identifying abnormal parameters and carefully planning surgery could lead to changes in treatment strategy, such as choosing a dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty.

Automatic Characterization of Pelvic and Sacral Measures from 200 Subjects.

An understanding of pelvic and acetabular morphology and orientation is required for accurate surgical reconstruction of the hip and spine, as well for component placement in a total hip arthroplasty. Our objectives were to develop an automated system for measuring pelvic and sacral orientations utilizing computed tomographic (CT) scans and to characterize these measures across 200 asymptomatic subjects. An automated feature recognition algorithm was created to identify acetabular and pelvic orientation across 200 scans generated for non-musculoskeletal conditions. Three-dimensional models were generated from CT data to serve as inputs to the algorithm. Acetabular orientation was defined by comparing a plane fit to the acetabular rim with the anterior pelvic plane. Pelvic inclination, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were defined as the angles between landmarks identified across the pelvis: pubic tubercles, acetabular center, left and right anterior superior iliac spines, and sacral plate. The mean sacral slope was 36.49°, the mean pelvic tilt was 15.60°, and the mean pelvic incidence was 52.05°. The mean sacropubic angle was 32.48° and the mean pelvic-Lewinnek angle was 8.93°. Significant differences between male and female subjects were observed in the sacral slope (mean difference, 4.72°; p < 0.05), pelvic tilt α (mean difference, 4.17°; p < 0.05), pelvic tilt γ (mean difference, 3.06°; p < 0.05), and the pelvic-Lewinnek angle (mean difference, 1.76°; p < 0.05). The comparison of acetabular orientation measures with those in a prior study of the same cohort yielded intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) all above 0.97. The validation of sacral orientation via manual measurement also yielded ICC values all at or above 0.97. Our algorithm showed a high degree of consistency in acetabular orientation measures with respect to a prior study of the same cohort. The measures of pelvic orientation were found to be accurate and reliable when compared with manual measurements of the same data set. All measurements of pelvic orientation were consistent with the means reported in the literature. An accurate and reproducible, automated technique for determining pelvic and acetabular orientation provides a way to characterize these measures as an aid in clinical diagnosis and preoperative planning.

Efficacy and Economics of Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Hip arthroscopy has emerged as a highly popular and minimally invasive treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears by correcting the femoral and acetabular morphology and addressing the chondrolabral pathology. It has been reported to lead to significant improvements of patient-reported outcomes with minimal complications at short-term, mid-term, and long-term follow-up in addition to having low rates of secondary surgeries. As a result, rates of hip arthroscopy have increased dramatically, both in the United States and worldwide. Albeit these favorable outcomes of hip arthroscopy have been well-established, its cost-effectiveness has not yet been as well defined. However, even in the scenario of limited resources of today’s health care, new data has shown that this procedure is truly cost-effective.

Assessment of three-dimensional acetabular coverage angles.

The purpose of this article is to report the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a computerized objective technique to quantify patient-specific acetabular morphology. We describe the use of and provide the software code for a technique to better define the location and magnitude of acetabular pathology. We have developed software code that allows the end user to obtain detailed measurements of the acetabulum using traditional computed tomography data. We provide the code and detailed instructions on how to use it in this article. The methodology was validated by having an unbiased observer (that was not involved in this project but has been trained in this software measurement methodology) to perform the entire acquisition, reconstruction and analysis procedure and compare their measurements to the measurements of one of the authors. The author then repeated the procedure 2 months later to determine intra-observer reliability. Inter- and intra-observer reliability for version, tilt, surface area and total acetabular coverage angles ranged from an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.805 to 0.997. The method provided in this manuscript gives a reproducible objective assessment of three-dimensional (3D) acetabular morphology that can be used to assist in the diagnosis of hip pathology and to compare the morphological parameters of subjects with and without hip pathology. It allows a surgeon to understand the 3D shape of each individual’s acetabulum, share these findings with patients and their parents to demonstrate the magnitude and location of the clinical abnormality and perform patient-specific surgical corrections to optimize the shape and coverage of the hip.

A longitudinal study for the prediction of the mature acetabular morphology using childhood magnetic resonance imaging

BackgroundAlthough acetabular dysplasia is a common etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip regardless of the history of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), whether or not corrective surgeries are beneficial for the childhood asymptomatic acetabular dysplasia remains controversial due to a lack of evidence. We conducted a longitudinal study to compare the cartilaginous morphology on childhood magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the mature hip morphology of the same patient and to assess the predictive indicators for future acetabular dysplasia. MethodsA total of 92 unaffected hips (47 unilateral DDH and 45 unilateral Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease) were reviewed for X-ray and MRI findings on childhood (mean age: 6.0 years) and X-ray findings from a skeletally mature age with a mean follow-up period of 15.1 years. The following parameters were measured and compared: the immature-acetabular index (AI) and center edge angle (CE) on immature X-ray; the cartilage- and bone- AI, CE, Sharp and acetabular head index (AHI) on childhood MRI; and the mature-acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), CE, Sharp and AHI on skeletally mature X-ray. The prognostic factors on childhood MRI for acetabular dysplasia, defined by a CE of <20° on skeletally mature X-ray were also assessed. ResultsPositive correlations were shown between the cartilage-AI and mature-ARO (7.6°/6.3°; r = 0.44), the cartilage-CE and mature-CE (27.8°/28.0°; r = 0.62), the cartilage-Sharp and mature-Sharp (44.4°/41.8°; r = 0.52) and the cartilage-AHI and mature-AHI (78.7%/80.3%; r = 0.46). A multivariate analysis indicated cartilage-CE to be an independent predictor for acetabular dysplasia with a cut-off value of 22°. Children with a cartilage-CE <22° developed more frequently acetabular dysplasia compared to the others (52.4% vs. 1.4%). ConclusionsChildhood MRI findings are useful for the prediction of acetabular dysplasia without a DDH history. Children with a cartilage-CE ≥23° are likely to achieve a non-dysplastic hip without the need for surgical intervention.

Is the Acetabulum Retroverted in SCFE? A Study of Acetabular Morphology in Indian Children with SCFE.

Acetabular morphology has always been an area of interest in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Acetabular retroversion in SCFE is proposed as a pre-disposing factor and also can predispose the hip to pincer impingement. But there is controversial data in literature regarding the acetabular morphology. All available data are from the West and we present the first study on acetabular morphology in Indian children with SCFE. CT scans of 29 patients with SCFE were collected from our database and anteversion was measured as described by Dandachli et al. Lateral central edge angle (LCEA) was measured in the standard AP radiographs of the pelvis. There were 20 boys and 9 girls with a mean age of 13.5. Seven patients had right side SCFE, eighteen had left side SCFE, and four had bilateral involvement. Measurements were done in 33 affected hips and compared with 25 normal hips. The mean AVsup and AVcen of affected hips were 6.59° and 13.51°, respectively, and that in normal hips were 8.36° and 14.04° (p > 0.05). The mean LCEA was 23.05° on the affected hips and 25.45° on the normal hips (p > 0.05). The AVsup showed retroversion in 24.24% (8/33) of the affected hips and 20% (5/25) of the normal hips. Though the mean version was less in SCFE hips, it was not statistically significant. Our study documents that 25% of hips with SCFE had acetabular retroversion. However, this was not significantly high compared to the contralateral hips.

Lateral Center-Edge Angle Is Not Predictive of Acetabular Articular Cartilage Surface Area: Anatomic Variation of the Lunate Fossa

Background: Surgical treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and dysplasia requires careful characterization of acetabular morphology. The lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) is often used to assess lateral acetabular anatomy. Previous work has questioned the LCEA as a surrogate for acetabular contact/articular cartilage surface area because of the variable morphology of the lunate fossa. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that weightbearing articular cartilage of the acetabulum would poorly correlate with LCEA secondary to significant variation in the size of the lunate fossa. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with 3D CT imaging undergoing either hip arthroscopy or periacetabular osteotomy for FAI or symptomatic hip instability were retrospectively identified. The LCEA and femoral head diameter were measured on an anteroposterior pelvis radiograph. Patients were grouped according to their lateral acetabular coverage as undercoverage (LCEA, <25°), normal coverage (LCEA, 25°-40°), or overcoverage (LCEA, >40°). Patients were randomly identified until each group contained 20 patients. The articular surface area was measured from preoperative 3D CT data. Linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between articular surface area and LCEA. Continuous and categorical data were analyzed utilizing analysis of variance and chi-square analysis. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: No difference in age (P = .52), body mass index (BMI) (P = .75), or femoral head diameter (P = .66) was noted between groups. A significant difference in articular surface area was observed between patients with undercoverage and those with overcoverage (20.4 cm2 vs 24.5 cm2; P = .01). No significant difference was identified between the undercoverage and normal groups (20.4 cm2 vs 23.3 cm2; P = .09) or the normal and overcoverage groups (23.3 cm2 vs 24.5 cm2; P = .63). A moderate positive correlation was observed between LCEA and articular surface area across all patients (r = 0.38; P = .002) but not when patients with undercoverage were excluded (r = 0.02; P = .88). Significant variation in surface area was observed within each group such that no patient in any group was outside of 2 SDs of the means of the other groups. When patients were categorized into quartiles established by the articular surface area for the entire population, 40% of patients with overcoverage were observed in the first or second quartile (lower area). Conclusion: Lateral acetabular undercoverage based on the LCEA (<25°) correlates with decreased acetabular surface area. Normal or increased acetabular coverage (LCEA, >25°), however, is not predictive of increased, normal, or decreased acetabular surface area.

Larger Acetabular Labrum Is Associated With Hip Dysplasia, Joint Incongruence, and Clinical Symptoms

To evaluate the association of labral length with acetabular morphology and clinical symptoms. Patients treated at our hip joint clinic between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Our sample included patients who received a diagnosis of one or more of the following: hip labral tear, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), and developmental dysplasia of the hip. Patients with osteoarthritis and/or osteonecrosis were excluded. Bilateral labral length was measured as the distance from the acetabular rim to the edge of the labrum at the level of the central coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan cross-referenced to the axial plane (3- to 9-o'clock position). The lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and acetabular roof obliquity (ARO) were evaluated with plain radiographs. An LCEA of 25° or less was defined as developmental dysplasia of the hip, whereas a positive crossover sign in the presence of an LCEA of 30° or greater, an LCEA greater than 40°, or acetabular inclination lower 0° was defined as pincer FAI. An alpha angle greater than 50° or head-neck offset lower 8 mm was considered cam FAI. The severity of hip symptoms was evaluated bilaterally using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association pain scale, on which hips scoring full points (i.e., a perfect score) were defined as asymptomatic whereas hips with all other scores were considered symptomatic. We used simple linear regression to examine the correlations of labral length with the LCEA and ARO. Labral length was also compared according to patient hip symptom status using the Mann-Whitney U test. The study included 102 patients (14 with bilateral symptoms and 88 with unilateral symptoms). Labral length was strongly correlated with the LCEA (r= -0.612, P < .001) and ARO (r= 0.635, P < .001). Additionally, patients with symptomatic hips had significantly larger labra (9.5 ± 3.0 mm) than those with asymptomatic hips (7.9 ± 2.1 mm, P= .004). Acetabular labral length is significantly greater in dysplastic, irregularly congruent, symptomatic hips. Level Ⅳ, retrospective cross-sectional study.

Contralateral slip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis is associated with acetabular retroversion but not increased acetabular depth and overcoverage.

Overcoverage of the femoral head by the acetabulum, increased acetabular depth and retroversion have been associated with the etiology of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). However, limited evidence exists about the impact of the acetabular morphology on the development of a contralateral slip following an initial presentation of unilateral SCFE. We aimed to investigate whether acetabular overcoverage as assessed by an increased lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and low Tönnis angle, increased acetabular depth assessed by the acetabular depth-width ratio (ADR) and the presence of coxa profunda; and acetabular retroversion assessed by the presence of the crossover sign were associated with a contralateral slip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE. We evaluated 250 patients with initial diagnosis of unilateral SCFE (average age, 12.5 ± 1.7 years), who had not undergone prophylactic fixation on the contralateral hip for a median follow-up of 49 months (interquartile range: 25-76 months). Endpoints were the development of a contralateral slip (70 patients, 28%) or skeletal maturity assessed by complete closure of the proximal femoral growth plate (180 patients, 72%). We measured the LCEA, Tönnis angle, ADR, and the coxa profunda sign on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. The crossover sign was assessed in 208 hips who had a secondary ossification center in the posterior acetabular rim. For each additional degree of LCEA, the odds of contralateral slip decreased 8% [odds ratio = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.87-0.98; P = 0.009]. Tönnis angle (P = 0.11), ADR (P = 0.20) and coxa profunda (p = 0.37) had no association with a contralateral slip. The presence of crossover sign increased two and half times the odds for a contralateral slip (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.12-5.64; P = 0.03). Acetabular retroversion, but not acetabular overcoverage or increased acetabular depth, was associated with contralateral SCFE development in patients with unilateral SCFE. Level of evidence: prognostic level II.

Labral tears with axial plane disorders.

Objectives This study aims to determine if there is an axial plane coverage insufficiency in patients with symptomatic labral tears compared to the contralateral asymptomatic side and healthy control subjects.Patients and methods This retrospective study was conducted between December 2017 and January 2019. Thirty patients (21 males, 9 females; mean age 28 years; range, 20 to 36 years) operated due to unilateral symptomatic acetabular labral tears secondary to femoroacetabular impingement were evaluated. Twenty asymptomatic patients (13 males, 7 females; mean age 27±9 years; range, 19 to 36 years) were included in the control group. The relationship between acetabular morphology and labral tear was investigated with the comparison of unilateral symptomatic hips with contralateral asymptomatic hips and the control group by using radiological parameters on plain radiographs and computed tomography.Results When the patient group symptomatic side was compared to the control group, acetabular anteversion angle (A A A) and alpha (a) angle were higher, while posterior acetabular sector angle and horizontal acetabular sector angle were lower. When the asymptomatic side was compared to the control group, AAA was higher in the patient group. There was no difference between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides in the patient group; the symptomatic side yielded a higher α angle.ConclusionPosterior axial plane coverage deficiency in combination with cam deformity (increased a angle) seems to play a role in the pathogenesis of symptomatic acetabular labral tears, even creating a side-to-side difference in some individuals.

Can EOS imaging substitute traditional AP pelvis radiographs? A Comparative study

INTRODUCTION:Young patients followed for hip disorders often require serial imaging and incur significant radiation to the abdomen and pelvis. The EOS imaging system offers a low-radiation alternative. However, consistency with radiographic parameters from conventional radiographs (CR) have not been studied. We evaluated the reliability and validity of EOS imaging in comparison to CR in evaluating acetabular morphology.METHODS:48 hips (27 patients, 66.67% female, 14.4 ± 3.6 years old), indicated for open hip preservation procedure between 2015-2017, which had both EOS imaging and AP pelvis CR taken pre-operatively were examined. Both symptomatic and contralateral hips were measured, excluding hips with prior osteotomies.Three orthopaedic surgeons measured Tonnis angle, lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular depth ratio (ADR), and extrusion index (EI) in both imaging modalities. Images were measured twice, two weeks apart. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate test-retest agreement and inter-modality agreement.RESULTS:Test-retest reliability was excellent for all raters on all tests (ICC range 0.8047 to 0.9714). Inter-rater reliability was also excellent for all measures on both modalities (ICC range 0.8593 to 0.9547). ICC values were consistent across EOS and CR.By Bland-Altman analysis, test-retest agreement was high, with no statistically significant mean differences in any test or modality (p > 0.6) except LCEA measured on EOS images (p = 0.02), which was 1.16° lower.Tonnis angle (p < 0.005) and ADR (p < 0.001) were statistically different from EOS to CR. Bias was also not uni-directional across tests: LCEA and ADR were, on average, higher on CR while Tonnis angle and EI were, on average, higher on EOS images. Reliability between the EOS and CR images was excellent for all raters on all tests (ICC range 0.8402 to 0.9458).DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:LCEA, ADR, EI, and Tonnis angle have consistently high test-retest reliability, test-retest agreement, and inter-observer reliability in both EOS imaging and CR to evaluate acetabular morphology. Inter-modality disagreement was observed between EOS and CR, but the difference was small and likely not clinically significant.When establishing acetabular morphology, these results suggest that EOS may provide an opportunity to minimize radiation exposure for patients followed long-term for hip pathology while maintaining the accuracy of diagnostic measures.Table 1.Reliability between EOS and traditional X-ray modalities for each of three raters, measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).1 Table 2.Agreement between modalities in rater 2 at time point 1 using the Bland-Altman analysis of mean difference. Group means and standard deviation are shown for reference.

Can EOS Imaging Substitute for Conventional Radiography in Measurement of Acetabular Morphology in the Young Dysplastic Hip?

EOS imaging offers a low-radiation alternative to conventional radiography (CR) and has little to no magnification effects. However, it is unclear how radiographic measures may be affected using EOS. The present study aims to determine the reproducibility of measures of acetabular morphology on EOS images as compared with CR, and to directly compare the 2 imaging modalities. A total of 21 consecutive patients (66.7% female; 14.4±4.7 y) indicated for an open hip preservation procedure with both an anterior-posterior pelvis radiograph and EOS image performed preoperatively were included. Three orthopaedic surgeons measured Tönnis angle, lateral center edge angle (LCEA), acetabular depth-width ratio (ADR), and extrusion index (EI). Measurements were performed twice, 2 weeks apart. Reliability between observers and time points was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement between time points and modalities was measured using Bland-Altman analysis. On EOS images, inter-rater reliability was 0.86 for Tönnis angle, 0.86 for LCEA, 0.74 for ADR, and 0.93 for EI. On CR, inter-rater reliability was 0.86 for Tönnis anlge, 0.90 for LCEA, 0.82 for ADR, and 0.84 for EI. In the agreement analysis, biases between imaging modalities were observed. On average, raters measured Tönnis angle and EI higher on EOS images than CR (2.22 degrees, 1.09%, respectively); and LCEA and ADR lower on EOS images than CR (1.54 degrees, 1.14% respectively). Limits of agreement (LOA) between modalities were similar to that of LOA observed in intra-rater analysis. Measures of acetabular morphology performed on EOS images have similarly high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability compared with CR. Measures performed on EOS also have similar intra-rater agreement as compared with CR. Intermodality agreement had similar LOA as intra-rater agreement on either individual imaging modality. Small biases between imaging modalities were detected. Level I-diagnostic study: investigating a diagnostic test.