Abstract BACKGROUND The diffuse growth pattern of glioblastoma is one of the main challenges for accurate treatment planning. Computational tumor growth modeling has emerged as a promising tool to guide personalized therapy by estimating the tumor cell density in the whole brain. Here, we performed biological and clinical validation of a novel growth model, aiming to close the gap between the experimental state and clinical implementation. METHODS 124 patients from The Cancer Genome Archive (TCGA) and 397 patients from the UCSF Glioma Dataset were assessed for significant correlations between clinical data, genetic pathway activation maps (generated with PARADIGM; TCGA only), and infiltration (Dw) as well as proliferation (ρ) parameters stemming from a Fisher-Kolmogorov growth model that is adjusted to the patient’s anatomy using deep learning. To further evaluate clinical potential, we performed the same growth modeling on preoperative MRI data from 30 patients of our institution and compared model-derived tumor volumes (that serve as alternative clinical target volumes) and recurrence coverage with standard radiotherapy plans. RESULTS The parameter ratio Dw/ρ (p < 0.05 in TCGA) as well as the simulated tumor volume (0.5 tumor cell density) (p < 0.05 in TCGA/UCSF) were significantly inversely correlated with overall survival. We found a significant correlation between 11 proliferation pathways and the estimated proliferation parameter ρ, proving its biological plausibility. Depending on the cutoff value for tumor cell density, we observed significant improvement of recurrence coverage without significantly increased total radiation volume utilizing model-derived target volumes instead of standard radiation plans. More precisely, a cutoff value of 0.5 tumor cell density yielded the best results here. CONCLUSIONS Identifying a significant correlation between computed growth parameters, and clinical and biological data, we highlight the potential of tumor growth modeling for individualized therapy of glioblastoma. This might improve accuracy of radiation planning in the near future.
Read full abstract