Vascular Access Site Complications Research Articles

First experiences with protected VT ablation using surgical Impella 5.5

Abstract Introduction Ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is still challenging due to the complex substrate of the underlying heart disease. Depending on specific risk factors acute hemodynamic decompensation during or after VT ablation procedures may occur and hemodynamic support may be required. Protected VA ablation with different devices has been evaluated but associated complications like bleeding, vascular closure or weaning from the device have been restrictive. We present data on a dedicated approach to patients with anticipated hemodynamic deterioration using preventive surgical Impella support. Method 5 patients (2 female) underwent protected VT ablation under our standardized protocol. Indication for Impella support was severely impaired left ventricular function and multiple medical therapy refractory ventricular arrhythmias. 4 patients had conventional VT ablation before. Mean age was 66,8 years, mean CHADSVASC 4,4, 1 patient with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP), 1 with hypertrophic non-obstructive CMP, 3 patients with ischemic CMP. Mean EF was 20%, mean mixed venous saturation was 36 %, mean PAINESD score 27. In all patients a 5.5. Impella was implanted surgically 1 day before planned VT ablation via the right subclavian artery. VT ablation procedure started with substrate mapping, VT induction and activation mapping of the inducible VT to identify the critical VT isthmus. Ablation was directed to dissection of the critical isthmus of inducible VAs and elimination of all late potentials within low voltage areas. The Impella device was explanted after weaning off the hemodynamic support. Results Implantation of Impella 5.5 was successfully performed in all patients in general anesthesia without any complication via surgical approach. Specifically, no access site vascular complications were noted. In 4 patients the VT ablation procedure was performed in analgosedation, 1 patient in GA as this patient was intubated due to recurrent VA requiring defibrillation. Mean procedure time was 125 min, radiation time 1,3 min, inducible VTs 1,3 , median 2 morphologies. In all patients all inducible VTs could be eliminated, in 1 patient polymorphic VA was still inducible at the end of the procedure. Impella was explanted after mean 5,2 days (3-11 days). No complications occurred. All patients were discharged alive on heart failure medication and in 2 patients with amiodaron. At a mean follow up of 3.5 months, all patients are alive without VA recurrence and heart failure decompensation. Conclusion Surgical Impella implantation for protected VT ablation in severe heart failure patients is feasible and allows for effective VT mapping and ablation. Access site safety and protection for heart failure decompensation in addition to the possibility of individually mobilisation and weaning after the procedure make this protocol an attractive option. Prospective evaluation of standardized indication is needed.

Very high-power short duration ablation metrics predictors of successful pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract Background Previous studies have shown that very high-power short duration (vHPSD) is a safe ablation modality, with similar rate of first pass isolation (FPI) but faster ablation times compared to standard CLOSE protocol guided ablation. While CLOSE protocol uses ablation index to guide energy titration no such index exists for vHPSD ablations yet. Purpose Our aim was to evaluate ablation metrics as predictors of FPI in atrial fibrillation ablation (AF) using vHPSD ablation modality. Methods In a single centre retrospective analysis, we analysed consecutive patients treated for paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) with PVI using vHPSD ablation from May 2021 to January 2023. We excluded patients with previous PVI procedures. The analysis was done via a cloud-based commercially available ablation analysis tool CARTONET. We analysed catheter stability, average contact force, absolute impedance drop, number of ablations and cumulative ablation time in relation to first pass isolation (FAAVI – first attempt all veins isolated). Results This is the first larger data study to evaluate ablation metrics in vHPSD using commercially available CARTONET (Figure 1). Based on the inclusion criteria 150 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics and procedural metrics are presented in Figure 2 - Table. We observed a numerical trend towards higher FAAVI rate with increasing patients number (p=0.10). Complication rate was low (1 pericardial effusion requiring drainage and 1 vascular access site complication). Ablation metrics analysis yielded statistical differences between FAAVI and no FAAVI groups (Figure 2 - Table). Multivariate analysis identified average contact force (odds ratio (OR) 1.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.999-1.003; p=0.047) and catheter stability (OR 0.985; 95% CI: 0.973-0.997; p=0.019) to be independent predictors of FAAVI. Additionally, number of applications (OR 1.000; 95% CI: 0.999-1.000; p=0.042) and total ablation time (OR 0.995; 95% CI: 0.991-0.999; p=0.021) were also independent predictors of FAAVI, possibly indicating larger vein and/or ablation circumferent line to be predictive of no FAAVI. Catheter stability of less than 1.16mm (AUC 0.61; p=0.015) was shown to be discriminative of FAAVI, however discrimination value was poor. Average contact force was not discriminative of FAAVI (AUC 0.58; p=0.105) in our patient cohort. Conclusion Average contact force and catheter stability were predictive of first pass isolation, however only catheter stability was discriminative of FAAVI. Larger data with standardised ablation protocol (interlesion distance) and wider range of ablation metrics is needed to corroborate and further build on these early findings.

Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions: the international, multicentre, randomised ULTRACOLOR Trial.

Transfemoral access is often used when large-bore guide catheters are required for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, especially when large-bore transradial access is contraindicated. Whether the risk of access site complications for these procedures may be reduced by ultrasound-guided puncture is unclear. We aimed to show the superiority of ultrasound-guided femoral puncture compared to fluoroscopy-guided access in large-bore complex PCI with regard to access site-related Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2, 3 or 5 bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention during hospitalisation. The ULTRACOLOR Trial is an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial investigating whether ultrasound-guided large-bore femoral access reduces clinically relevant access site complications compared to fluoroscopy-guided large-bore femoral access in PCI of complex coronary lesions. A total of 544 patients undergoing complex PCI mandating large-bore (≥7 Fr) transfemoral access were randomised at 10 European centres (median age 71; 76% male). Of these patients, 68% required PCI of a chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was met in 18.9% of PCI with fluoroscopy-guided access and 15.7% of PCI with ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). First-pass puncture success was 92% for ultrasound-guided access versus 85% for fluoroscopy-guided access (p=0.02). The median time in the catheterisation laboratory was 102 minutes versus 105 minutes (p=0.43), and the major adverse cardiovascular event rate at 1 month was 4.1% for fluoroscopy-guided access and 2.6% for ultrasound-guided access (p=0.32). As compared to fluoroscopy-guided access, the routine use of ultrasound-guided access for large-bore transfemoral complex PCI did not significantly reduce clinically relevant bleeding or vascular access site complications. A significantly higher first-pass puncture success rate was demonstrated for ultrasound-guided access. gov identifier: NCT04837404.

Renal angiomyolipoma selective arterial embolization: Australian tertiary centre experience over 10 years.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the patient selection methods, treatment outcomes, complications, clinical and radiological follow-up after renal angiomyolipoma (AML) treatment with selective arterial embolization (SAE) in an Australian metropolitan tertiary centre. This study presents a retrospective single-centre review of patients' medical records who underwent SAE for renal AML during the period of 1st January 2012 and 1st January 2023. A total of 32 SAE procedures for renal AML occurred during the study period. Three episodes were classified as emergency cases [9.38%] and the remaining 29 were treated electively. Mean AML size pre-treatment was 69.45 mm (range = 33-177; SD = 31.69). All AMLs demonstrated hyper-vascularity on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging (arterial-phase enhancement characteristics and/or prominent tortuous feeding vessels) [n = 32; 100%] or an intralesional aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm [n = 12; 42.85%]. Periprocedural complications [n = 3; 9.38%] included: one intralesional haemorrhage after embolization, one vascular access site complication, and one lipiduria-associated urinary tract infection. No patients suffered a life-threatening complication, non-target embolization, deterioration in renal function or death following SAE. Re-treatment with SAE was performed in only three patients [10.71%]. Hospital mean length of stay was 1.58 days. Median durations of clinical and radiological follow-up post-treatment were 493 days (range = 104-1645) and 501 days (range = 35-1774), respectively. Follow-up imaging revealed AML total size reduction in all cases [mean = -17.17 mm; -26.51%] and 50% had obliteration of lesion hyper-vascularity after one episode of SAE. Outpatient clinical follow-up signifies that none of the patients included in the study have re-presented with lesion haemorrhage after successful SAE. In this study, renal AMLs were treated safely with a high degree of success by using SAE, and there were very low rates of periprocedural complications. Follow-up of patients after SAE treatment of renal AML should include both radiological (assessment for reduction in lesion vascularity and size) and clinical review in an outpatient clinic setting (either by an interventional radiologist or urologist).

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Nonhome Discharge Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Multicenter Australian Experience—The NHD TAVI Study

Patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) commonly experience nonhome discharge (NHD), a phenomenon associated with increased health care expenditure and possibly poorer outcomes. Despite its clinical relevance in TAVI, the incidence and predictors of NHD and its impact on the quality of life remain poorly characterized. Also unknown is the proportion of patients who undergo TAVI that require long-term residential care after initial NHD. Therefore, we aimed to address these questions using a large, multicenter Australian cohort. A total of 2,229 patients who underwent TAVI from 2010 to 2023 included in the Alfred-Cabrini-Epworth TAVI Registry were analyzed. The median age was 82 (interquartile range 78 to 86) years and 41% were women. A total of 257 patients (12%) were not discharged home after TAVI, with the incidence falling over time (R2 = 0.636, p <0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model for NHD prediction was developed with excellent calibration and discrimination (C-statistic = 0.835). The independent predictors of NHD were postprocedural stroke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.05), procedure at a private hospital (aOR 3.01), living alone (aOR 2.35), vascular access site complications (aOR 2.09), frailty (aOR 1.89), age >80 years (aOR 1.82), hypoalbuminemia (aOR 1.76), New York Heart Association III to IV (aOR 1.74), and hospital length of stay (aOR 1.13) (all p <0.05). NHD was not associated with mortality at 30 days and <1% of all patients required longer-term residential care. In conclusion, although common after TAVI, NHD does not predict short-term mortality, most patients successfully return home within 30 days, and when used appropriately, NHD may serve as a brief and effective method of optimizing functional status without compromising long-term independence.

Ten-Year Experience with Endomyocardial Biopsy after Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: Comparison between Trans-Jugular and Trans-Femoral Approach.

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is considered the gold standard for monitoring allograft rejection after heart transplantation. EMB is an invasive procedure that may be performed via a trans-jugular or a trans-femoral approach with a complication rate reported as less than 6%. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complication rate after EMBs in heart recipients and to compare the results of EMBs performed via a trans-jugular or a trans-femoral approach. Medical records of heart recipients undergoing EMBs between January 2012 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. EMB-related complications were classified as major (death, pericardial effusion, hemopericardium, cardiac tamponade requiring a pericardiocentesis or an urgent cardiac surgery, ventricular arrythmias, permanent atrio-ventricular block requiring permanent pacing, hemothorax, pneumothorax and retroperitoneal bleeding) and minor (de novo tricuspid regurgitation, arrhythmias, coronary artery fistula, vascular access site complications). A total of 1698 EMBs were performed during the study period at our institution in 212 heart recipients. There were 927 (55%) EMBs performed through a trans-jugular approach (TJ group) and 771 (45%) EMBs performed through a trans-femoral approach (TF group). A total of 60 (3.5%) complications were recorded, including nine (0.5%) major complications (six cardiac tamponades, two pneumothorax and one retroperitoneal bleeding) and 51 (3%) minor complications (seven coronary fistulae, five de novo tricuspid regurgitation, four supraventricular arrythmias and thirty-five vascular access site complications). No difference was found in total (38 [4%] vs. 22 [3%]; p = 0.16) and major (6 [1%} vs. 3 [0.4%]; p = 0.65) complications (32 [3%] vs. 19 [2%]; p = 0.23) between the TJ group and the TF group. No difference was found in male sex, age at time of EMB and time from HT between complicated and not complicated EMBs. EMBs represent a safe procedure with a low risk of complications. In our experience, EMBs performed via a trans-jugular approach are as safe as the trans-femoral approach.

Contrast-free left atrial appendage occlusion in patients using the LAMBRE™ device

BackgroundAdvances in imaging have led to procedural optimization of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Contrast-free approaches, guided merely by echocardiography, have been established, however data on this topic remains scarce. In this analysis, we assessed contrast-free procedural results with the LAMBRE LAAC device. MethodsThe multicenter retrospective BoBoMa (Bonn/Bordeaux/Mainz)-Registry included a total of 118 patients that underwent LAAC with LAMBRE devices omitting contrast-dye. Baseline and echocardiographic characteristics as well as intra- and postprocedural complications and outcomes were assessed. ResultsPatients were at a mean age of 77.5 ± 7.5 years with high thromboembolic and bleeding risk (CHADS-VASc-score 4.6 ± 1.4, HAS-BLED-score 3.7 ± 1.0, respectively). Renal function was impaired with a mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 50 ± 22 ml/min. Mean procedural time was 47.2 ± 37.5 minutes with a mean radiation dose of 4.75 ± 5.25 Gy*cm2. Device success, defined as proper deployment in a correct position, was achieved in 97.5% (115/118) of cases with repositioning of the occluder in 7.6% (9/118) and resizing in 3.4% (4/118) of cases. No relevant peri-device leakage (>3 mm) was observed with 42% of occluders being implanted in an ostial position. Periprocedural complications occurred in 6.8% (8/118) of cases, including two cases of device embolization and one case of clinically-relevant pericardial effusion requiring surgical intervention. Other complications included pericardial effusion (2.5%, 3/118) and vascular access site complications (1.7%, 2/118). ConclusionEchocardiography-guided contrast-free LAAC using the LAMBRE device is safe and feasible. Further prospective studies including the direct comparison of devices as well as imaging techniques are warranted in contrast-free LAAC.

Intravascular Lithotripsy-Assisted Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Severe Iliofemoral Calcifications: Expanding Transfemoral Indications.

(1) Background: Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for most patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Intravascular lithotripsy may facilitate transfemoral TAVI (IVL-TAVI) even in patients with severely calcified iliofemoral disease. We assessed technical aspects and clinical outcomes of this novel approach compared to alternative transaxillary access (TAX-TAVI). (2) Methods: IVL-TAVI was performed for severe iliofemoral calcifications precluding standard transfemoral access in 30 patients from 2019 to 2022 at a single academic heart center. IVL was performed as part of the TAVI procedure in all cases. Results were compared to a control group of 44 TAX-TAVI procedures performed for the same indication from 2016 to 2021. The safety outcome was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, access-related bleeding ≥ type 2 within 24 h and major vascular access site complications at 30 days. The efficacy outcome was defined as a technical success according to VARC-3. (3) Results: Median age was 78.2 [74.3, 82.6] years, 45.9% were female and mean STS-PROM was 3.6% [2.3, 6.0]. Iliofemoral calcifications were more severe in the IVL-TAVI vs. TAX-TAVI groups (lesion length: 63.0 mm [48.6, 80.3] vs. 48.5 mm [33.1, 68.8]; p = 0.043, severe calcification at target lesion: 90.0% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.047, and median arc calcification 360.0° [297.5, 360.0] vs. 360.0° [180.0, 360.0]; p = 0.033). Technical success was achieved in 93.3% vs. 81.8% (p = 0.187) in IVL- and TAX-TAVI and the safety outcome occurred in 10.0% vs. 31.8% in IVL- and TAX-TAVI (p = 0.047), respectively. (4) Conclusions: IVL-assisted transfemoral TAVI was feasible and safe with favorable outcomes compared to TAX-TAVI. IVL may further expand the number of patients eligible for transfemoral TAVI and may help overcome limitations of an alternative access.

Access site complications in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

BackgroundPercutaneous access and use of vascular closure devices facilitate thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures during local anesthesia and allow immediate detection of signs of spinal ischemia. However, the very large bore access (usually ≥22F sheath) associated with TEVAR increases the risk of vascular complications. In this study, we sought to define the safety and feasibility of two percutaneous femoral artery closure devices during TEVAR, in terms of access site vascular complications and major, life-threatening, or fatal bleeding (≥major) within 48 hours. Access site vascular complications were defined as technical failure of vascular closure or later formation of pseudoaneurysm. MethodsFrom March 2010 to December 2022, 199 transfemoral TEVAR were performed at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland. We retrospectively categorized these into three groups, based on surgeon preference for the access technique and femoral artery closure method: (1) surgical cut-down and vessel closure, n = 85 (42.7%), (2) percutaneous access and vascular closure with suture-based ProGlide, n = 56 (28.1%), or (3) percutaneous access and vascular closure with ultrasound-guided plug-based MANTA, n = 58 (29.1%). The primary outcome measure was technical success of vascular closure and access site vascular complications during index hospitalization. Secondary outcome measures were ≥major bleeding, early mortality, and hospital stay. ResultsThe technical success rate was 97.6% vs 91.1% vs 93.1% for surgical cut-down, ProGlide, and MANTA, respectively (P = .213). The rate of access site vascular complication was 3.5% vs 8.9% vs 10.3%, respectively (P = .290), with two pseudoaneurysms detected postoperatively and conservatively managed in the MANTA group. The vascular closure method was not associated with increased risk of ≥major bleeding, early mortality, or hospital stay on univariate analysis. Predictors for ≥major bleeding after TEVAR in multivariable analysis were urgent procedure (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-5.5; P = .003) and simultaneous aortic branch revascularization (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-5.4; P = .008). ConclusionsIn this study, the technical success rates of the percutaneous techniques demonstrated their feasibility during TEVAR. However, the number of access site complications for percutaneous techniques was higher compared with open approach, although the difference was not statistically significant. In the lack of evidence, the safety of the new MANTA plug-based vascular closure for TEVAR warrants further investigation.

Population rates and contemporary outcomes of atrial fibrillation ablation among older adults: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) increasingly recommended as first-line therapy. Limited data suggest increasing use of PVI as well as increasing rates of post-PVI complications, but contemporary real-world outcomes among older adults remain unclear. Purpose To evaluate patient characteristics, population rates and 30-day clinical outcomes for PVI in a nationwide sample of adults aged &amp;gt;65 in the United States. Methods First-time PVIs were identified among US Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using CPT procedural codes, and comorbidities were ascertained using ICD-10 diagnosis codes associated with each procedural claim. Study outcomes included rates of PVI use, procedural complications, all-cause re-hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Results From January 2017 through December 2020, 156,601 patients underwent first-time PVI performed by 2,791 unique operators. The mean patient age was 72.5 ± 5.2 years, 42.6% were female and the majority (92.7%) Caucasian. The rate of PVI increased from 2.48 per 100,000 beneficiaries in the first quarter of 2017 (performed by 2,113 operators) to 3.01 per 100,000 beneficiaries in the last quarter of 2020 (performed by 2,415 operators) – a 4.8% relative increase per year (p=0.02). This growth was driven primarily by outpatient elective procedures, which represented the majority (85.0%) of all PVIs. Concurrent with this increase in PVI use, there was a significant decrease in complication rates (3.9% in 2017 vs 3.1% in 2020, p&amp;lt;.0001) and re-hospitalizations (8.8% vs 7.1%, p&amp;lt;0.001) at 30 days, with no significant change in mortality at 30 days (0.36% vs 0.40%, p=0.38). Bleeding was the most common peri-procedural complication (1.4%), followed by pericardial effusion requiring intervention (1.2%) and access site vascular complications (0.55%). Conclusions This large nationwide cohort study shows that the use of PVI has steadily increased in contemporary clinical practice. Despite the widespread adoption of this procedure by a growing number of operators, cumulative complication and re-hospitalization rates at 30 days have decreased over time, with stable and very low rates of short-term mortality – even among older patients, who are ordinarily considered to be at higher risk. These findings contrast with those from previously published studies of non-representative cohorts. Results from our study should reassure both patients and providers on the overall safety of PVI as an increasingly common first-line procedure for rhythm control. Forthcoming analyses will be finalized by the time of presentation to evaluate whether hospital and operator volume further influence procedural outcomes.Central Figure: PVI Trends and Outcomes

Comparison of mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella for patients with cardiogenic shock: a propensity-matched analysis

Abstract Background Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) devices are increasingly used in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) in order to augment cardiac output, stabilize hemodynamics and ensure adequate organ perfusion avoiding or minimizing the detrimental effects of catecholamines to the vasculature. Impella and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) are the main representatives of the available pMCS devices. However, evidence from randomized studies comparing these devices are lacking and optimal choice of the device type in the setting of CS remains unclear. Purpose Our aim was to conduct a head-to-head comparison of Impella with vaECMO in the setting of all-cause cardiogenic shock. Methods Retrospective single center analysis of patients with CS over a 5-year period. Patients were assisted with either Impella 2.5/CP or vaECMO. Patients supported ultimately with both devices were analyzed according to the first device implanted. Primary outcomes were hospital and 6-month survival. Secondary endpoints were complications. Survival outcomes were compared using propensity-matched analysis to account for differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. Patients with ongoing resuscitation without return of spontaneous circulation on admission were excluded. Results A total of 423 patients were included (Impella, n=300 and VA-ECMO, n=123). The main cause of CS was an acute myocardial infarction (372 patients, 87.4% in the Impella group and 83% in the vaECMO group), while 44,7% of the patients were prior resuscitated (39% Impella, 58% vaECMO). Survival rates were similar in both groups (hospital survival: Impella 47.7% and vaECMO 37.3%, p=0.07; 6-month survival Impella 45.7% and vaECMO 35.8%, p=0.07). After adjustment for baseline differences with a propensity scoring matching analysis, survival rates remained comparable between the two device groups (hospital survival: Impella 50.6% and vaECMO 38.6%, p=0.16; 6-month survival Impella 45.8% and vaECMO 38.6%, p=0.43) (Figure 1). Device-associated complications, such as access site bleeding and leg ischemia occurred more frequently in patients with vaECMO (17% versus 7.3%, p=0.004; 17% versus 7.7%, p=0.008). In the subgroup analysis, Impella and VA-ECMO did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences in the survival rates, expect for the group of prior resuscitation, where Impella appeared to be superior than vaECMO (Figure 2). Conclusions In the biggest so far single center analysis, treatment with Impella 2.5/CP or VA-ECMO was associated with similar hospital and 6-month survival rates. Device-related access site vascular complications occurred more frequently in the vaECMO group. A randomized trial is warranted to examine the effects of these devices on outcomes and to determine the optimal device choice in patients with CS.

Vascular access site complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison of open and percutaneous puncture approaches

Vascular access site complications after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison of open and percutaneous puncture approaches

Strategies to Reduce Transfemoral Access Complications inContemporary Interventional Cardiology.

Vascular access-site complications due to transfemoral access (TFA) for cardiac procedures are common as patients receiving femoral access are more complex. Furthermore, TFA-related vascular access-site complications are associated with substantial excess morbidity. An updated narrative review is warranted as technique, technology, and knowledge have rapidly progressed in the last decade. We will review preprocedural (transradial (TRA) first approach and risk factors), procedural (ideal cannulation site, ultrasound (US)-guidance, micropuncture needle, femoral angiography, and sheath size), and post-procedural (vascular closure devices) considerations to reduce vascular access-site complications (Figure 1). The fully referenced version of the manuscript is available in the supplementary materials.

Endovascular Treatment of Visceral Artery Pseudoaneurysms with Ethylene-Vinyl Alcohol (EVOH) Copolymer-Based Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Agents (NALEAs).

Background and Objectives: Treatment of visceral artery pseudoaneurysms (VAPs) is always indicated regardless of their diameters, as their risk of rupture is significantly higher than that of visceral artery aneurysms. The invasiveness of surgery and its associated complications have led to a shift in favor of radiological interventions as the initial treatment of choice. However, there are still some unanswered questions on endovascular treatment of VAPs regarding the optimal endovascular technique and the efficacy and safety outcomes. The purpose of this multicenter study was to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endovascular treatment of visceral pseudoaneurysms using Ethylene-Vinyl Alcohol (EVOH) Copolymer-Based Non-Adhesive Liquid Embolic Agents (NALEAs). Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent endovascular embolization with EVOH-based NALEAs for visceral artery pseudoaneurysms between January 2018 and June 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Results: 38 embolizations were performed. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The clinical success rate was high (92.1% overall), with no significant differences between ruptured and unruptured VAPs (p = 0.679). Seven patients (18.4%) experienced procedure-related complications, related to one case of non-target embolization, four splenic abscesses due to end-organ infarction, and two femoral pseudoaneurysms. The rates of procedure-related complications, end-organ infarction, and vascular access-site complications did not significantly differ between ruptured and unruptured VAPs (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Both ruptured and unruptured visceral pseudoaneurysms can be effectively and safely treated with NALEA-based endovascular embolization. We suggest considering the use of NALEAs, particularly in specific clinical cases that highlight their advantages, including patients with coagulopathy, fragile vessels, and embolization targets that are located at a considerable distance from the microcatheter tip and are otherwise difficult to reach.

Safety and Efficacy of the Covered Stent Grafts for Vascular Access Site Complications in Emergent Settings

Safety and Efficacy of the Covered Stent Grafts for Vascular Access Site Complications in Emergent Settings

Vascular Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusions: A State-of-the-Art Review.

The outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention have considerably improved during the last decade with continued emphasis on improving procedural safety. Vascular access site bleeding remains one of the most frequent complications. Several procedural strategies have been implemented to reduce the rate of vascular access site complications. This state-of-the-art review summarizes and describes the current evidence on optimal vascular access strategies for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.

Vascular complications of ProGlide versus Prostar in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures: meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to compare the vascular complications of ProGlide and Prostar in percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Electronic databases were searched in July 2022 for studies that compared the vascular complications of ProGlide and Prostar for percutaneous closure in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The primary outcome was major vascular complications and the secondary outcomes were minor vascular complications, types of access-site vascular complications, device failure, and additional intervention. Estimates of relative effects were pooled to generate ORs and their 95 per cent c.i. using a random-effects model. The risk of bias in non-randomized comparative studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions ('ROBINS-I') tool. Nine studies were identified and a total of 7529 patients were included. Among them, 4144 patients received ProGlide and 3385 received Prostar. The pooled data showed that the risk of major vascular complications was significantly lower with ProGlide versus Prostar (OR 0.50, 95 per cent c.i. 0.32 to 0.78). Regarding the types of vascular complications, vascular trauma was the most common complication and the risk was similar between groups (OR 1.02, 95 per cent c.i. 0.55 to 1.91). ProGlide had a lower risk of bleeding complications (OR 0.46, 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.94), but a higher risk of ischaemia complications (OR 1.90, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 3.27). The risk of device failure was lower in the ProGlide group (OR 0.45, 95 per cent c.i. 0.21 to 0.95). Both groups had a similar risk of having additional interventions for vascular complications (OR 1.02, 95 per cent c.i. 0.75 to 1.39). The use of ProGlide was associated with a lower risk of additional surgical treatments (OR 0.52, 95 per cent c.i. 0.34 to 0.80), but a higher risk of endovascular treatments (OR 2.69, 95 per cent c.i. 1.29 to 5.63). In percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures, ProGlide has superior safety and efficacy when compared with Prostar; it is associated with fewer major vascular complications and device failures. The vascular complications of ProGlide are more likely to be dealt with using endovascular treatments than surgical treatments.

Impact of Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) minor access site vascular complications in patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 minor access site vascular complications (VCs) in patients who underwent percutaneous transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This single-centre retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TF-TAVI from 2009 to 2021. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early and long-term clinical results between patients with VC and without VC (nVC). A total of 2161 patients were included, of whom 284 (13.1%) experienced access site VC. Propensity score analysis allowed to match 270 patients from the VC group with 727 patients from the nVC group. In the matched cohorts, the VC group showed longer operative times (63.5 vs 50.0 min, P < 0.001), higher operative and in-hospital mortality (2.6% vs 0.7%, P = 0.022; and 6.3% vs 3.2%, P = 0.040, respectively), longer hospital length of stay (8 vs 7 days, P = 0.001) and higher rates of blood transfusion (20.4% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001) and infectious complications (8.9% vs 3.8%, P = 0.003). Overall survival during follow-up was significantly lower in the VC group (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-1.82, P = 0.031) with 5-year survival rates being 58.0% (95% CI 49.5-68.0%) and 70.7% (95% CI 66.2-75.5%) for the VC and nVC groups, respectively. This retrospective study observed that minor access site VCs during percutaneous TF-TAVI can be serious events affecting early and long-term outcomes.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Radial or Femoral Access for Carotid Stenting.

There is agrowing interest in performing coronary artery and neurovascular interventions via the radial artery; however, few studies have examined the outcomes of transradial carotid stenting. Therefore, our study aimed to compare cerebrovascular outcomes and crossover rates in carotid stenting between transradial and traditional transfemoral approaches. Asystematic review was performed by searching three electronic databases from inception to June 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In addition, random effect meta-analysis was used to pool the odds ratios (ORs) for stroke, transient ischemic attack, major adverse cardiac events, death, major vascular access site complications, and procedure crossover rates between the transradial and transfemoral approaches. A total of 6 studies were included involving a total of n = 567transradial and n = 6176transfemoral procedures. The ORs for stroke, transient ischemic attack, and major adverse cardiac events were 1.43 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.72-2.86, I2 = 0), 0.51 (95% CI 0.17-1.54, I2 = 0), and 1.08 (95% CI 0.62-1.86, I2 = 0), respectively. Neither the major vascular access site complication rate (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.32-3.87, I2 = 0) nor crossover rate (OR 3.94, 95% CI 0.62-25.11, I2 = 57%) showed statistically significant differences between the two approaches. The modest quality of the data suggested comparable procedural outcomes between the transradial and transfemoral approaches when performing carotid stenting; however, high level evidence regarding postoperative brain images and risk of stroke in transradial carotid stenting are lacking. Therefore, it is reasonable for interventionists to weigh up the risks of neurological events and potential benefits, including fewer access site complications, before choosing the radial or femoral arteries as access sites. Future large-scale randomized controlled trials are imperative.

Arterial Access Complications Following Percutaneous Femoral Access in 24-Hour Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Survivors

IntroductionWith the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) comes the potential for vascular access site complications (VASCs) and limb ischemic sequelae. We aimed to determine the prevalence of VASC and associated clinical and technical factors. MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis of 24-h survivors undergoing percutaneous REBOA via the femoral artery in the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute care surgery registry between Oct 2013 and Sep 2021 was performed. The primary outcome was VASC, defined as at least one of the following: hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, arterial stenosis, or the use of patch angioplasty for arterial closure. Associated clinical and procedural variables were examined. Data were analyzed using Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney-U tests, and linear regression. ResultsThere were 34 (7%) cases with VASC among 485 meeting inclusion criteria. Hematoma (40%) was the most common, followed by pseudoaneurysm (26%) and patch angioplasty (21%). No differences in demographics or injury/shock severity were noted between cases with and without VASC. The use of ultrasound (US) was protective (VASC, 35% versus no VASC, 51%; P = 0.05). The VASC rate in US cases was 12/242 (5%) versus 22/240 (9.2%) without US. Arterial sheath size >7 Fr was not associated with VASC. US use increased over time (R2 = 0.94, P < 0.001) with a stable rate of VASC (R2 = 0.78, P = 0.61). VASC were associated with limb ischemia (VASC, 15% versus no VASC, 4%; P = 0.006) and arterial bypass procedures (VASC 3% versus no VASC 0%; P < 0.001) but amputation was uncommon (VASC, 3% versus no VASC, 0.4%; P = 0.07). ConclusionsPercutaneous femoral REBOA had a 7% VASC rate which was stable over time. VASC are associated with limb ischemia but need for surgical intervention and/or amputation is rare. The use of US-guided access appears to be protective against VASC and is recommended for use in all percutaneous femoral REBOA procedures.