Access Barriers Research Articles

Opioid access barriers for cancer pain relief in Vietnam: A qualitative study.

154 Background: Although the World Health Organization designates opioids as an essential medication and recommends them as the cornerstone for managing moderate to severe cancer pain, their accessibility is severely restricted, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Despite Vietnam's early endeavors in the advancement of palliative care, including a revised opioid prescription policy in 2008, opioid use for cancer pain remains suboptimal, with oral morphine available only in a few major hospitals. To inform comprehensive strategies for improving opioid access, this study aims to explore the views of healthcare providers, regulators, cancer patients, and caregivers in Vietnam on the barriers to safely accessing opioids for cancer pain management. Methods: We conducted a qualitative, descriptive study and recruited five healthcare providers, six cancer patients and caregivers, and six regulators (i.e., policymakers in the Ministry of Health, heads or deputy heads of pharmacy, oncology, or palliative care departments) across Vietnam via purposeful sampling technique. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, and the audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and subjected to inductive content analysis using a Framework Method. Results: Five categories of barriers were identified: 1) Patient-related barriers (fear of addiction and other side effects, morphine's association with impending death, negative administration experiences, religious beliefs); 2) Professional-related barriers (knowledge and experience deficit, fear of addiction and other side effects, concerns about opioid diversion and associated liabilities, lack of guidance, education, and training); 3) Medicine-related barriers (limited oral morphine availability, limited domestic pharmaceutical manufacturers and suppliers, supply interruptions, poor variety of opioid types and formulations, difficulties accessing parenteral opioids); 4) Services delivery barriers (scarce palliative and home care services); 5) Regulatory barriers (lack of information on opioid distribution channels, difficulties obtaining confirmation letters for patients' opioid usage needs, overly strict regulation enforcement). Conclusions: Barriers to opioid access for cancer pain control in Vietnam are multifactorial and mutually reinforcing, necessitating interdisciplinary solutions to overcome them. This approach should involve enhancing education about the appropriate use and management of opioids, along with current opioid policies for patients, communities, healthcare providers, and regulators; enacting and implementing policies mandating oral morphine availability at local health facilities; expanding palliative care services; utilizing telemedicine; and establishing an electronic opioid prescription monitoring system.

Barriers and facilitators of access to maternity care for African-born women living in Australia: a meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence

BackgroundAdverse perinatal health outcomes are notably high among African-born women living in Australia. This problem is partly attributed to their lower engagement in maternity care services as compared to Australian-born women. Various barriers might limit African-born women’s access to and use of services; however, these barriers are not well documented. Therefore, this review aimed to synthesise current qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators of access to maternity care for African-born women living in Australia.MethodsThe search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, and Maternity and Infant Care databases on 16 April 2023. All articles retrieved were meticulously screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers with any disagreements resolved through discussion. The quality of the included articles was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Studies were screened in Covidence and analysed in NVivo. The findings were organised and presented using Levesque’s framework of healthcare access.ResultsOut of 558 identified papers, 11 studies comprising a total of 472 participants met the eligibility criteria. The review highlighted provider-side barriers such as shortage of information, unmet cultural needs, long waiting times, low engagement of women in care, discrimination, and lack of continuity of care. User-side barriers identified include communication issues, difficulty navigating the health system, and lack of trustful relationships with healthcare providers. In contrast, the review pinpointed provider-side facilitators including positive staff attitudes, service availability, and the proximity of facilities to residential homes, while user-side facilitators such as cultural assimilation and feeling valued by healthcare providers were noted.ConclusionsThis review identified barriers and facilitators of access to maternity care for African-born women living in Australia. Empirical evidence that would inform potential changes to policy and practice to address African-born women’s unique health needs was highlighted. Designing and implementing a culturally safe service delivery model could remove the identified access barriers and improve African-born women’s engagement in maternity care. Moreover, reinforcing factors associated with positive healthcare experiences is essential for improving maternity care access for this priority population.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42023405458.

Excited-State Intramolecular Proton Transfer toward Conical Intersections in Indigo, Epindolidione, and Indirubin.

Indigo exhibits a high degree of photostability, experimentally supported by observations such as quenching of fluorescence and an exceptionally short excited-state lifetime. Epindolidione, a structural isomer of indigo, is highly fluorescent in contrast to indigo, while indirubin, another structural isomer, exhibits weak fluorescence similar to that of indigo. To elucidate the origin of the difference in photophysical and photochemical behavior, potential energy profiles of the excited-state intramolecular proton transfer in indigo, epindolidione, and indirubin are computationally studied by quantum chemical calculations using the TDDFT and extended MS-CASPT2 (XMS-CASPT2) methods. As a result, it is found that indigo and indirubin exhibit little energy barrier for the single proton transfer (SPT) in the S1(ππ*) state from the diketo to keto-enol form and low energy of the S1/S0 conical intersection (CI) in the latter form with a planar molecular structure. Epindolidione, on the other hand, exhibits much higher barriers for SPT and access to CI. These results suggest that the excited-state SPT and subsequent nonradiative deactivation via CI are more likely to occur in indigo and indirubin than in epindolidione, which is consistent with the experimental observations described above. For indigo and epindolidione, the deactivation channels via the second SPT from the keto-enol to dienol form are also compared.

No test medical abortion - a review of the evidence on selective use of preabortion testing.

The last decade has seen a cascade of different telemedicine models for medical abortion (MA) being tested and implemented. Among these service delivery models is the 'no-test' MA model, in which care is provided remotely and eligibility for the MA is based on history alone. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence for no-test MA. The evidence base for no-test MA relies heavily on cohort and noncomparative studies predominantly from high resource settings. Recent findings indicate that no-test MA is safe, effective, and highly acceptable. Diagnoses of ectopic pregnancy and underestimation of gestational age were rare. Identified advantages included shortening time to access MA and mitigating access barriers such as cost, and geographical barriers. Abortion seekers valued omitting the ultrasound citing reasons such as privacy concerns, costs, more flexibility, and control. The impacts of no-test MA on unscheduled postabortion contacts and visits and on contraceptive use were unclear due to limited evidence. No-test MA can be provided to complement other care pathways including those with some or no in-person care. Further research is needed to allow for widespread adoption of no-test MA and scale-up in a variety of contexts, including low-resource settings.

Emergency department visits as a potential opportunity to promote primary care attachment and modify utilization patterns – results of a pilot study in Berlin, Germany

BackgroundUtilization by low acuity patients contributes to emergency department (ED) crowding. Both knowledge deficits about adequate care levels and access barriers in primary care are important promoters of such presentations. Concurrently, not having a general practitioner (GP) increases the likelihood of low-acuity ED utilization. This pilot study thus investigated feasibility, acceptance, and potential effects of an ED-delivered intervention for low-acuity patients with no regular primary care provider, consisting of an educational leaflet on acute care options and an optional GP appointment scheduling service.MethodsLow-acuity ED consulters not attached to a GP were given an information leaflet about alternative care offers for acute health problems and offered optional personal appointment scheduling at a local GP practice. Patients were surveyed on demographics, medical characteristics, health care utilization, valuation of the intervention, and reasons for not being attached to a GP and visiting the ED. A follow-up survey was conducted after twelve months. Trends in health and health care utilization were evaluated.ResultsBetween December 2020 and April 2022, n = 160 patients were enrolled, n = 114 were followed up. The study population was characterized by young age (mean 30.6 years) and predominantly good general health. Besides good health, personal mobility was a central reason for not being attached to a GP, but general preference for specialists and bad experiences with primary care were also mentioned. Most frequently stated motives for the ED consultation were subjective distress and anxiety, a belief in the superiority of the hospital, and access problems in primary care. The interventional offers were favorably valued, 52.5% (n = 84) accepted the GP appointment scheduling service offer. At follow-up, GP utilization had significantly increased, while there were no significant changes regarding utilization of other providers, including ED. An additional practice survey showed a 63.0% take-up rate for the appointment service.ConclusionsWith this pilot study, we were able to show that a personalized appointment scheduling service seems to be a promising approach to promote GP attachment and increase primary care utilization in patients without a regular GP in a highly urbanized setting. Further larger-scale studies are needed to investigate potential quantitative effects on ED visits.Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023480); date 2020/11/27.

Challenges associated with follow-up care after implementation of an HPV screen-and-treat program with ablative therapy for cervical cancer prevention

BackgroundCervical cancer is a preventable cancer; however, decreasing its prevalence requires early detection and treatment strategies that reduce rates of loss to follow-up. This study explores factors associated with loss to follow-up among HPV-positive women after implementation of a new HPV-based screen-and-treat approach for cervical cancer prevention in Iquitos, Peru.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with “obstetras” (i.e., midwives) (n = 15) working in cervical cancer prevention and women (n = 24) who were recorded as lost to follow-up after positive HPV results. We used the Health Care Access Barriers Model to guide analyses. We utilized manifest content analysis to describe barriers to follow-up according to the obstetras and thematic analysis to report themes from the women’s perspectives. We also report the steps and time taken to contact women.ResultsWe found an incomplete and fragmented patient monitoring system. This incomplete system, in conjunction with challenges in contacting some of the women, led to structural barriers for the obstetras when attempting to deliver positive results. Women in this study expressed a desire to receive treatment, however, faced cognitive barriers including a lack of understanding about HPV results and treatment procedures, fear or anxiety about HPV or treatment, and confusion about the follow-up process. Women also reported having important work matters as a barrier and reported frequently using natural medicine. Reported financial barriers were minimal.ConclusionThis study highlights the barriers to follow-up after implementation of a primary-level HPV-based screen-and-treat approach. While some barriers that have previously been associated with loss to follow-up were not as prominently observed in this study (e.g., financial), we emphasize the need for screen-and-treat programs to focus on strategies that can address incomplete registry systems, structural challenges in results delivery, cognitive barriers in understanding results and treatment, and work-related barriers.

Exploring T-Cell Immunity to Hepatitis C Virus: Insights from Different Vaccine and Antigen Presentation Strategies.

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is responsible for approximately 50 million infections worldwide. Effective drug treatments while available face access barriers, and vaccine development is hampered by viral hypervariability and immune evasion mechanisms. The CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses targeting HCV non-structural (NS) proteins have shown a role in the viral clearance. In this paper, we reviewed the studies exploring the relationship between HCV structural and NS proteins and their effects in contributing to the elicitation of an effective T-cell immune response. The use of different vaccine platforms, such as viral vectors and virus-like particles, underscores their versability and efficacy for vaccine development. Diverse HCV antigens demonstrated immunogenicity, eliciting a robust immune response, positioning them as promising vaccine candidates for protein/peptide-, DNA-, or RNA-based vaccines. Moreover, adjuvant selection plays a pivotal role in modulating the immune response. This review emphasizes the importance of HCV proteins and vaccination strategies in vaccine development. In particular, the NS proteins are the main focus, given their pivotal role in T-cell-mediated immunity and their sequence conservation, making them valuable vaccine targets.

Motivators and Barriers to COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions Across U.S. County-Level Barriers in the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index.

County-level barriers (sociodemographic barriers, limited healthcare system resources, healthcare accessibility barriers, irregular healthcare seeking behaviors, low vaccination history) may impact individuals' reasons for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. This study linked data from REACH-US (Race-Related Experiences Associated with COVID-19 and Health in the United States), a nationally representative, online survey of 5475 adults living in the U.S (January-March 2021) to county-level barriers in the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index. County-level vaccination barriers were measured using the COVID-19 Vaccine Coverage Index. Participants reported why they would or would not receive the COVID-19 vaccine in an open-ended item and their responses were coded using thematic analysis. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests assessed whether reasons for COVID-19 vaccination intentions varied by county-level barriers and whether these distributions varied across racial/ethnic groups. Thematic analysis revealed twelve themes in participants' reasons why they would or would not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Themes of societal responsibility (9.8% versus 7.7%), desire to return to normal (8.1% versus 4.7%), and trust in science/healthcare/government (7.7% versus 5.1%) were more frequently reported in counties with low/medium barriers (versus high/very high) (p-values < 0.05). Concerns of COVID-19 vaccine side effects/safety/development (25.3% versus 27.9%) and concerns of access/costs/availability/convenience (1.9% versus 3.6%) were less frequently reported in counties with low/medium barriers (versushigh/very high) (p-values < 0.05). Trends in the prevalence of these themes varied across racial/ethnic groups (p-values < 0.05). Future pandemic responses should consider potential ways county-level barriers shape reasons for COVID-19 vaccination.

Assessment of treatment needs, barriers, and self-perception regarding oral health among female university students: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe study aimed to compare the self-perceived oral health status measured through a self-administered questionnaire with clinically determined oral health status measured by decayed-missing-filled teeth (DMFT) and community periodontal index of treatment need (CPITN) indices in university going females. In addition, access barriers to treatment related to oral healthcare were also determined.MethodsA 3-month analytical cross-sectional study was designed for consenting university going females (aged 18–22 years) in Islamabad, Pakistan. The self-perceived oral health was recorded through a questionnaire requesting information regarding socio-demographics, self-perception of oral health, frequency of dental visits and barriers to seeking oral health. Seven independent examiners performed intraoral clinical examination and assessed the oral health status using globally standardized oral health assessment indices (DMFT and CPITN).ResultsA total of 400 students were included in the final sample. The study revealed a significant disparity between self-perceived oral health and clinical assessment. Although perceived oral health was considered “good” by 80.0% of the respondents, clinical examination revealed moderate DMFT scores (mean 2.95 ± 1.41) and periodontal disease requiring treatment in 89.5% of the individuals. The most common barriers in seeking dental care were lack of knowledge, dental phobia, affordability issue and false self-perception.ConclusionThe present study demonstrated a notable discrepancy between self-perception of oral health and clinically assessed oral health. These results emphasize the importance of focused educational programs and community outreach programs, especially directed towards this demographic. Prioritizing such initiatives will help individuals to recognize their actual oral health condition thus encouraging positive oral health behaviors and outcomes.

The Need for Culturally Tailored CKD Education in Older Latino Patients and Their Families

Older Latino adults (65+) comprise the fastest growing minoritized group among the older population in the US and experience a disproportionate burden of kidney failure as well as disparities in kidney care compared to non-Hispanic White individuals. Despite significant need and barriers uniquely faced by this population, few educational resources or decision aids are available to meet the language and cultural needs of Latino patients. Decision aids are designed to improve knowledge and empower individuals to engage in shared decision-making and have been shown to improve decisional quality and goal-concordant care among older patients with CKD. In this commentary, we examine the barriers faced by older Latino people with CKD who must make dialysis initiation decisions. We conclude that there is a need for culturally concordant decision aids tailored for older Latino patients with CKD to overcome barriers in access to care and improve patient-centered care for older Latino CKD patients.

Examining outpatient occupational therapy utilization among children and youth with special health care needs in South Carolina: A structural equation model of individual- and community-level factors

BackgroundChildren and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) comprise 23 % of the pediatric population in South Carolina (SC), compared to state prevalences of 13.6 %–24 % nationwide. While occupational therapy (OT) is critical to maximizing CYSHCN's participation in daily activities, there are significant disparities in rehabilitation access in the Southeast region. ObjectiveThis study examines associations between patient-and community-level factors and outpatient OT utilization. MethodsThis study analyzes OT utilization data among CYSHCN (N = 1913) in a health system in SC from 07/01/2022-06/31/2023, merged with Child Opportunity Index 2.0 zip-code level social drivers of health (SDOH) data. SDOH are non-medical factors that affect individual's long-term health, with estimates ranging from “very low” to “very high” opportunity. Structural equation modeling was conducted to understand complex associations between observed and latent variables in a real-world context. ResultsCYSHCN were diagnosed with congenital (40.77 %), developmental (37.87 %), and neurological/neuromuscular conditions (21.36 %). CYSHCN who were non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic and were hospitalized were associated with living in lower opportunity areas. CYSHCN with private or military/other insurance/self-pay were associated with living in higher opportunity areas than Medicaid-insured CYSHCN. CYSHCN who were female and ≥12 years demonstrated lower OT utilization. CYSHCN who participated in speech and/or physical therapy demonstrated higher OT utilization. OT utilization increased with each increase in SDOH. ConclusionWith these findings, healthcare providers may consider accessibility barriers, including transportation, when referring CYSHCN to OT services. Further research is needed to examine the impact of household-level SDOH on OT access across SC.

Qualitative Study Guiding the Design of a Person-Centered Shared Medical Appointment Model to Optimize Diabetes Care Delivery.

The purpose of the study was to explore the shared medical appointment model (SMA) with youth with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and their caregivers to identify health education needs, access barriers, and recommendations for intervention design. Patient and caregiver focus group interviews were conducted in English and Spanish to address these objectives: (1) identify barriers to participation in group sessions, (2) identify barriers to diabetes self-management, and (3) prioritize preference for SMA themes. Qualitative analysis identified strategies for patient recruitment and engagement and recommendations for curriculum design of a future SMA model for youth with T2DM. Both adolescents and caregivers supported the development of an SMA model. Adolescents expressed concerns of initial discomfort and nervousness, whereas young adults described stigma as the main barrier to joining a group. Patients emphasized the importance of prioritizing youth comfort and families' convenience. Early adolescents and young adults preferred autonomy in the choice to join a group, whereas mid adolescents and caregivers preferred that the caregivers make that decision. Participants recommended nine topics regarding barriers to diabetes care. The topics that received the most enthusiasm were nutrition, exercise, navigating peer interactions, and stress management. Youth with T2DM and their caregivers perceived many benefits of an SMA model and provided feedback to guide the development of a health education curriculum that could be integrated into an SMA clinic.

Inadequate insurance coverage for overweight/obesity management.

To discuss the social, psychological, and access barriers that inhibit weight loss, and to propose steps and initiatives for addressing the growing obesity epidemic. Narrative review of the obesity epidemic in the US and associated racial/ethnic and socioeconomicdisparities. An internet search of relevant studies and government reports was conducted. Obesity is a significant health crisis affecting more than 123 million adults and children/adolescents in the US. An estimated 1 in 5 deaths in Black and White individuals aged 40 to 85 years in the US is attributable to obesity. Obesity puts individuals at elevated risk for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, gastrointestinal disorders, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cancer, respiratory ailments, dementia/Alzheimer disease, and other disorders. In the US, significantly more Black (49.9%) and Hispanic (45.6%) individuals are affected by obesity than White (41.4%) and Asian (16.1%) individuals. Health care costs for obesity account for more than $260billion of annual US health care spending-more than 50% greater in excess annual medical costs per person than individuals with normal weight. Addressing the obesity epidemic will require a multifaceted approach that focuses on prevention, treatment, and reducing the impact of stigma. Continued advocacy and education efforts are necessary to make progress and improve the health and well-being of individuals affected by obesity.

Supermarket Opening in an Urban, Low-Income Community Was Not Found to Be Associated With Improvements in Dietary Outcomes for Most Residents in the First Year

BackgroundLimited access to healthy foods in low-income, racial and ethnic minority communities has been proposed as a critical factor contributing to health disparities. One policy option for improving access is to introduce supermarkets in low-income communities, but evidence increasingly points to null effects. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine whether the introduction of a new supermarket in a public housing community, and proximity to it, were associated with improvements in residents’ dietary outcomes. It also explored whether these associations may be moderated by access and cost barriers to eating healthy at baseline. DesignA cohort of public housing residents were recruited from Jordan Downs, where the new supermarket was introduced, and from 2 comparison sites. Longitudinal data on outcomes and exposures were collected at baseline (2018-2019) and follow-up (2020-2021). Quasi-experimental variation in residents’ distance to the new supermarket was used to examine whether proximity to the supermarket was associated with dietary improvements. Participants/settingParticipants included 557 adult residents from 3 public housing sites in Watts, Los Angeles, CA. InterventionThe intervention is the opening of a new supermarket in the Jordan Downs community. The primary exposure measure is an indicator for whether residents lived in Jordan Downs vs in the comparison sites. The secondary exposure measure is residents’ driving distance to the new supermarket. Main outcome measuresSelf-reports of daily consumption of whole grains, dairy, fruits and vegetables, added sugar, red meat, processed meat, and overall healthiness of diet were obtained from surveys administered at baseline and follow-up. Statistical analyses performedDescriptive analyses examined households’ grocery shopping patterns after the new supermarket’s introduction. Analysis of covariance linear regressions models estimated the association between residents’ dietary outcomes at follow-up and the exposure measures, conditional on dietary outcomes at baseline and other covariates. ResultsProximity to the new supermarket was associated with a significantly higher probability of shopping there, particularly for households that reported an access or cost barrier at baseline. Overall, there were no statistically significant or practically meaningful differences observed in dietary outcomes between Jordan Downs residents and those in comparison sites, or between residents who lived at varying distances from the supermarket. Exploratory moderation analyses suggested some meaningful dietary benefits for those who had a frequent access barrier at baseline, but not for those without such a barrier, but there was mostly no evidence of moderation by price barrier at baseline. ConclusionsSupermarket opening in an urban, low-income, and racial and ethnic minority community was not found to be associated with improvements in dietary outcomes for most residents in the first year after its opening. Improving dietary outcomes in such communities may require a broader and nuanced approach that addresses varied barriers faced by residents.

Current Practices in the Assessment of Voice: A Comparison of Providers Across Different Clinical Settings

ObjectiveTo investigate the current assessment practices of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the United States working with adult clients with voice disorders with regard to the frequency, utility, and confidence in the use of the five elements of a comprehensive voice evaluation, as well as training, access to instrumentation, and the use of published scales. MethodsAn online survey was distributed to SLPs who currently see adults with dysphonia as part of their caseload. Clinicians in a voice-focused setting were compared to those who worked in a general medical setting. ResultsNearly all of the 86 participants reported using published validated scales for patient self-assessment and auditory-perceptual ratings. Most respondents had received training in auditory-perceptual voice assessment, acoustic assessment, and videostroboscopy, but a minority reported training in aerodynamic assessment. The majority of SLPs had access to acoustic equipment but a minority had access to the instrumentation for videostroboscopic or aerodynamic assessment. Auditory-perceptual voice evaluation was the procedure most commonly performed and most highly rated for diagnostic utility. Post-graduate training and access to instrumentation were associated with significantly higher frequency of use and confidence with all three instrumental assessment methods. SLPs in voice-focused settings were more likely to have received training in videostroboscopy and perform or interpret it. SLPs in voice-focused settings were also significantly more likely to have access to equipment for all three instrumental techniques and reported significantly higher confidence in their use. Both groups rated the utility of the different components of a voice evaluation similarly and there were no significant differences between the groups in the use of validated patient questionnaires or auditory-perceptual scales. ConclusionsMost clinicians in our survey reported following practice guidelines when performing comprehensive voice evaluations across settings despite barriers of training and access to instrumentation.

Reprint of: Impact of outpatient pharmacist dispensing in an opioid use disorder clinic

BackgroundMedications for opioid use disorder are effective in reducing opioid deaths, but access can be an issue. Relocating an outpatient pharmacist for weekly buprenorphine dispensing in an outpatient clinic may facilitate coverage for buprenorphine and mitigate access and counseling barriers. ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate whether staffing an outpatient resident pharmacist to dispense in the buprenorphine clinic had a positive impact on (1) mean cost per prescription charged to charity care and (2) basic elements of patient satisfaction with the on-site pharmacist. MethodsPatient demographics, buprenorphine formulation, insurance type, and uncovered costs were abstracted from dispensing records in the 16 weeks before the pharmacist clinic presence and 16 weeks with the pharmacist present. The difference in insurance types across the 2 periods was tested using a chi-square test, and the mean uncovered prescription costs charged to charity care for the 2 periods was compared using an independent-samples t test. A brief survey was administered while the pharmacist was on-site to evaluate satisfaction, which was analyzed with frequencies of “yes” responses and free-text comments. ResultsA total of 38 patients received buprenorphine during both the pre- and postperiods. Once the pharmacist was on-site, more patients used Medicaid or private insurance, decreasing the mean uncovered cost per prescription from $55.00 (SD 68.7) to $36.97 (SD 60.1) (P = 0.002). Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most reporting they were more likely to ask questions, pick up their prescriptions, and take their medicine with the pharmacist in the clinic. ConclusionsThe pharmacist successfully transitioned a portion of prescriptions previously covered by charity care to Medicaid or private insurance. This shift led to a decrease in charity care costs by $2950.20 and a reduction in the average uncovered cost per prescription. The pharmacist’s presence in the clinic seemed to reduce barriers especially related to inconvenience.

What natural therapeutics are Australians using to relieve feelings of anxiousness?

IntroductionFeelings of anxiousness are experienced in the absence of diagnosed anxiety in Australia with prevalence and management of anxiousness not well understood within the population. Anxiety statistics represent the closest statistical comparison to anxiousness affecting 13 % of the Australian population. This figure is estimated to be much higher post pandemic based on global prevalence increasing. MethodsThe overall aim of this research is to identify natural ingestive and lifestyle therapeutics used by Australian adults to address their anxiousness. 115 provided consent. A cross sectional survey of the Australian adult population was conducted. The survey included enquiry about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, concomitant or isolated pharmaceutical use, demographic factors, potential barriers of access to natural therapeutics, types of practitioners commonly sought, exacerbating factors and manifestations of anxiousness. ResultsOne hundred and fifteen (n=115) respondents completed the survey. The survey allowed respondents to select more than one lifestyle option. The survey found that of the natural therapeutic options, 90.32 % (n=84) used lifestyle medicine (deep breathing, time in nature and meditation), 55.9 % (n=52) used herbal medicine (Passionflower, Lemon balm, Withania and St John’s wort) and 53.2 % (n=49) used nutrients (Magnesium, B Vitamins and Theanine and SAMe). The survey identified that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) practitioners were the most common type of practitioner sought for information with naturopaths the preferred CAM practitioners. ConclusionNatural therapeutics as a strategy for managing anxiety has potential therapeutic application for Australian’s experiencing anxiousness, particularly post COVID-19 pandemic. Lifestyle medicine was the most common strategy utilized. There was a significant openness to trialing natural therapies.

Sociodemographic Differences in Nonfinancial Access Barriers to Health Care Among Adults: United States, 2022.

Nonfinancial access barriers to care describe various reasons why adults may delay or not get medical care, beyond cost. This report focuses on five access barriers to care and describes the percentage of U.S. adults who delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because of 1) being too busy with work or other commitments; 2) an appointment not being available when needed; 3) not being able to get to the doctor's office or clinic when open; 4) difficulty finding a doctor, clinic, or hospital that would accept their health insurance; and 5) it taking too long to get to the doctor's office or clinic from their house or work. Data from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey were used to produce estimates of the percentage of adults who delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because of those access barriers to care, overall and by selected sociodemographic characteristics. Among U.S. adults in 2022, 12.5% delayed or did not get medical care in the past 12 months because they were too busy to go to a provider, 10.6% could not find an available appointment when needed, 4.6% were unable to get to a provider when open, 4.4% had difficulty finding a doctor compatible with their health insurance, and 2.4% responded that it takes too long to get to a provider. Percentages varied by sociodemographic characteristics. This study provides nationally representative estimates of selected nonfinancial access barriers to medical care, both overall and for selected sociodemographic groups. Findings suggest that nonfinancial access barriers to care are widespread in the United States, and ongoing monitoring may help to address inequities in access to care.

Transforming Veteran Rehabilitation Care: Learnings from a Remote Digital Approach for Musculoskeletal Pain.

While musculoskeletal pain (MSP) stands as the most prevalent health condition among Veterans, timely and high-quality care is often hindered due to access barriers. Team Red, White & Blue (Team RWB), a nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting a healthier lifestyle among Veterans, aimed to assess innovative approaches to veteran care. This is a single-arm pilot study investigating the feasibility, clinical outcomes, engagement, and satisfaction of a remote multimodal digital care program among Veterans with MSP. The impact of deployment experience on outcomes was explored as a secondary aim. From 75 eligible Veterans, 61 started the program, reporting baseline pain frequently comorbid with mental distress. Program acceptance was suggested by the high completion rate (82%) and engagement levels, alongside high satisfaction (9.5/10, SD 1.0). Significant improvements were reported in all clinical outcomes: pain (1.98 points, 95%CI 0.13; 3.84, p = 0.036); mental distress, with those reporting at least moderate baseline depression ending the program with mild symptoms (8.50 points, 95%CI: 6.49; 10.51, p = 0.012); daily activity impairment (13.33 points, 95%CI 1.31; 25.34, p = 0.030). Deployed Veterans recovered similarly to their counterparts. Overall, the above results underscore the potential of a remote digital intervention to expand Veterans' access to timely MSP care.

A randomized clinical trial testing a health literacy intervention to reduce disparities in access to care among Justice-Impacted Adults (JIA)

BackgroundLow health literacy is costly and observed among justice-impacted adults (JIA), a group that often faces numerous barriers in accessing healthcare and a disproportionate burden of illness. Health literacy interventions for JIA are critically needed to improve healthcare access and related outcomes.MethodsThis manuscript describes the protocol for a longitudinal mixed-methods randomized clinical trial that assesses the effectiveness of a coach-guided health literacy intervention on JIA’s healthcare access. The intervention was previously piloted with justice impacted adults. We will recruit 300 JIA ages 18 + in San Diego, California. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the Treatment Group (i.e., coach-guided intervention providing 12 sessions of individualized health coaching and service navigation over 6 months) or the Control Group (i.e., self-study of the health coaching program, and brief service navigation support). We will quantitatively assess JIA’s healthcare access defined as: use of healthcare, health insurance status, and regular source of care at 6-months as the primary outcomes. Participants will also be surveyed at 12-months. Statistical analyses will incorporate the intent-to-treat (ITT) principle and we will estimate mixed-effects logistic regression for the primary outcomes. We will also conduct qualitative interviews at 6 and 12-months with 40 purposively sampled participants, stratified by study arm, who reported healthcare access barriers at baseline. Interviews will explore participants’ satisfaction with the intervention, healthcare attitudes, self-efficacy for and barriers to healthcare access over time, perceived contribution of the intervention to health and well-being, and diffusion of intervention-related information within participants’ social networks. We will conduct deductive thematic analyses of qualitative data.DiscussionLow health literacy among JIA is a foundational challenge requiring tailored intervention strategies. Findings from this trial may inform policies and the structure of service delivery models to build health literacy among JIA in institutional and community settings throughout the United States and elsewhere.Trial registrationThis study is registered with the United States’ ClinicalTrials.gov registry under protocol # 161,903.