Acceptability Of Program Research Articles

Achieving RoutIne Screening for Emotional health (ARISE) in pediatric subspecialty clinics.

This study aims to describe the experience of implementing a psychosocial distress screening system for children with serious or chronic medical conditions. Achieving RoutIne Screening for Emotional health (ARISE) was developed to systematically evaluate psychosocial distress in children with serious medical or chronic medical illnesses, by integrating patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) into care delivery. ARISE was developed using a user-centered approach with extensive input from patients, families, and healthcare professionals to overcome barriers to routine PROM collection and integration into care as usual. It comprises a system to capture PROMs and then relay results to clinicians for changing care. We sought to implement ARISE at four subspecialty pediatric clinics caring for patients with cystic fibrosis, sickle cell disease, hemophilia, and neurological malignancy. Problems with acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility represented barriers to implementation which were overcome by modifying the intervention using stakeholder input during the planning phase, leading to broad program acceptance. ARISE was implemented in three of the four clinics, in which 79.8% of eligible children and their family completed PROMs. The ARISE program demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating psychosocial screenings into subspecialty pediatric clinics, thereby enhancing the identification and management of psychosocial issues in children with serious and chronic medical illnesses.

Preparedness, Challenges, and Opportunities for Digital Intervention for Chronic Disease Management: A Qualitative Study in Rural Areas of South Korea

ABSTRACT Motivated by the prevalence of an aging population and the associated increase in chronic diseases, coupled with rising medical expenditure, the Korean government initiated a pilot project in Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwon-do, a rural area, to implement a “smart online-to-offline (O2O) digital health care model” aimed at managing and preventing chronic diseases. However, there is limited understanding regarding perspectives and levels of preparedness for digital health among stakeholders at various levels. In-depth focus group interviews were conducted with elderly and non-elderly community members, health care providers, and staff members at Pyeongchang Health and Medical Center. The study found the presence of both positive and negative perceptions and a lack of preparedness across different levels. At the end-user level, it was observed that community members, especially the elderly, have low levels of health and digital literacy, compounded by limited access to social support. At the health care provider level, there was uncertainty about the acceptance of the digital health program. At the area level, the need to bolster health staff members and enhance their capacity was observed. Recommendations include: customizing the design of the online and offline service components by considering end-user factors (such as age, occupation, and household type) that may contribute to disparities in health; establishing a platform for providers to share their experiences to facilitate the effective incorporation of digital health into their practices; and preparing an appropriate provider payment mechanism.

Self-Monitoring With Coping Skills and Lifestyle Education for Hypertension Control in Primary Care.

Self-monitoring with support, lifestyle modifications, and emotion management improves blood pressure (BP). Patients with hypertension need continual support to modify behaviors, but time pressures limit lifestyle education in primary care settings. Using mixed methods, we aimed to study the feasibility and acceptability of an innovative 6-week program that combined self-monitoring with coping skills and lifestyle education for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension interested in lifestyle modifications before intensifying medications were enrolled from primary care clinics. Patients self-monitored emotions, behaviors, and BPs and received education from medical providers and mind-body therapists through shared medical appointments (SMAs) with an option of weekly printed materials. Over 6 months, 31 eligible participants completed the program with higher uptake (21/41) from physician referrals (74.2% women, 41.9% Black, median household income $100 000). Fourteen participants opted for weekly educational materials due to upcoming SMA sessions being fully booked or personal schedules. Pre- to post-intervention paired t-test showed improvement in systolic BP of 11.6mmHg (95% CI, 6.6-16.6, p < 0.0001), and hypertension control rate improved by 36% (11/31) post-intervention. Higher baseline systolic BP was associated with higher BP reduction (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis showed the perceived benefit of self-awareness, education, and peer support, whereas time constraints were perceived as challenges. Self-monitoring with education on coping skills and lifestyle modification is feasible and improved BP and hypertension control across diverse primary care patients interested in lifestyle modifications; however, few low-income patients enrolled. Less burdensome and community-based interventions may improve participation in low-income patients.

Evaluating the web-based ‘Partner in Balance’ program for informal caregivers of people with Huntington's disease: A pilot study

BackgroundHuntington's disease (HD) poses significant challenges for both affected individuals and their informal caregivers. With the progression of HD, caregivers frequently prioritize caring for the person with HD over their own well-being. ‘Partner in Balance’ (PiB) is an 8-week online self-management program guided by a personal coach, developed to help caregivers of people with HD cope with challenging situations and develop skills to increase resilience and prevent overburdening. AimsThis pilot study evaluates the feasibility and preliminary effects of the PiB-HD program. MethodsThe study employed a pre-post design. Perceived feasibility by HD caregivers was evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative measures. Preliminary effects were based on self-report measures of self-efficacy, mastery, mood, quality of life, and capability to function. Coaches' evaluations were conducted using a questionnaire. ResultsIn total, 18 caregivers completed the intervention. Findings demonstrate positive responses regarding the program's usability, relevance, and acceptability. Participants found the program helpful in addressing challenges, gaining insight into their actions, and feeling better equipped with skills to face future challenges. Descriptive statistics suggest that the PiB-HD program shows potential for reducing stress and anxiety. Additionally, coaches (n = 9) viewed the program positively for its usability, integration potential into their work, flexibility, and time efficiency. ConclusionsThe PiB-HD program proved to be feasible, usable and acceptable for caregivers of people with HD. These results provide directions for further research into the effectiveness of PiB-HD, and can already be utilized to advise on the deployment of eHealth in the provision of HD care.

Acceptability and Fidelity of a Media Literacy Education-Based, Comprehensive Sexual Health Program for College Students: A Multi-Method Student-Centered Evaluation

The present study compares the feasibility and acceptability of two asynchronous, interactive, 2-3-hour, online interventions: Media Aware, which is a comprehensive sex education program, taught from a media literacy perspective and Health Aware, which is a comprehensive sex education program containing identical sexual health content, but no media literacy content. Among n = 649 community college students, both programs were equivalently high in program fidelity (88% completed all lessons) and acceptability (average 90% positive ratings). Qualitative analyses revealed that both programs were informative and usable, with few criticisms besides program length. Results suggest, both programs represent promising approaches to sex education for college students.

Student-Led Mobility Interventions for Hospitalized Adults: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility and Acceptability Study.

Inactivity in hospitalized patients often leads to functional decline. We created an undergraduate course to promote mobilization, provide hands-on learning, and address staff shortages. To assess the feasibility and acceptability of undergraduate students providing mobility-focused interventions for hospitalized adults. This mixed-methods study was conducted at a level 1 trauma academic center. We analyzed program feasibility and acceptability using quantitative data and thematic analysis of interviews and focus groups. In total 47 individuals (n=14 students, n =9 patients, and n =24 clinicians) were included. Students averaged 4.1 mobility sessions per 4-hour shift. All stakeholders agreed the program is acceptable, and 98.6% affirmed the program is feasible. The themes identified included positive impacts on patient care, enhanced student professional development, and practical implementation challenges. Student-led mobility interventions can be an acceptable strategy to mitigate immobility harm in hospitalized patients. The integration of students enhances patient care and provides valuable educational experiences.

Acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the Peer-led Hub-and-Spoke Community Aphasia Group program

ABSTRACT Background Several programs addressing the long-term impacts of aphasia after stroke show promise. However, barriers restrict their implementation at scale. Hub-and-spoke models of care operate in several health contexts to reduce the health care costs associated with health professionals providing all direct services, and to improve the reach of services to communities at distance from the main service. We developed the Peer-led Hub-and-Spoke Community Aphasia Group (Peer-led HS CAG) program to address staff and service availability barriers. The Peer-led HS CAG organises service through a “Hub” of allied and mental health professionals, led by a speech pathologist, who provide consultative and occasional direct services to the aphasia group. The “spokes” are volunteers with and without aphasia, trained and supported by the “Hub” staff to facilitate groups in the community. Aims We aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the Peer-led HS CAG program to address long-term impacts of aphasia. Methods & Procedures In a Phase I, proof of concept, mixed methods design we utilised: (1) a pre-post observational quantitative design; (2) an embedded qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews of group facilitators and participants. Four health professionals from speech pathology, psychology, art therapy, and music therapy formed the Hub. Four volunteers were trained as group facilitators over two, half-day sessions prior to the group programs commencing. The 12-week group programme was delivered twice in a community setting, consisting of weekly 2-hour sessions. Seven people with aphasia attended: four in programme one, three in program two. The group program consisted of four compulsory topic sessions and eight “members choice” sessions. Seven close others attended four of the twelve program sessions: two with their family members with aphasia; two with specific “hub” staff input. During the remaining eight weeks of the program close others chose whether to meet independently. Outcome measures were taken at four time points: 6 weeks pre-program; immediately pre-program; immediately after-program; 6-week follow up. Outcomes & Results Four participants showed clinically meaningful gains in communication-related quality of life and three in functional communication immediately post-program or at 6-week follow up. Qualitative interviews confirmed the feasibility and overall acceptability of the program. Close others requested additional sessions specific to their needs. Conclusions The Peer-led HS CAG program is a feasible and acceptable way to address the current lack of community aphasia groups. Future phase II and III research should explore the efficacy and costs of this model.

Clinicians' priorities for exercise programming for people receiving peritoneal dialysis: Qualitative content analysis from an international survey.

Exercise and physical activity have been shown to improve health outcomes among people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD), however, little is known about PD clinicians' perceptions and practices regarding exercise counselling. To inform exercise program design and implementation, we distributed a cross-sectional online questionnaire to PD clinicians between July and December 2021 through professional nephrology societies and networks. As part of this survey, participants were asked, "What are the most important aspects you would like to see incorporated in an exercise program for PD patients?" Six hundred and nine respondents provided 1249 unique perspectives. Responses were coded using summative content analysis and grouped into themes. The overarching theme identified was the need for individualized and accessible programming. Under this umbrella, the four main sub-themes identified were: promotion of specific exercises, overcoming common barriers to exercise, perceived cornerstones of exercise prescriptions, and program design to address patient-relevant outcomes. Overall, PD clinicians believed that PD does not preclude exercise participation and recognized the potential for exercise to improve physical, mental, and social well-being. The involvement of exercise professionals was valued in PD clinical programs. However, additional education for practitioners and patients regarding safety and the benefits of exercise is required to assist in widespread implementation and acceptance of exercise programming in the PD population.

Exploring residents’ willingness-to-pay for benefits provided by Sustainable Drainage Systems

ABSTRACT Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) have increasingly been used in the recent years since they help adapt cities to climate change and make them more sustainable and resilient. Since they are multifunctional, these stormwater control measures provide numerous benefits. However, the question of acceptability by inhabitants remains partially open. This article seeks to assess preferences of the inhabitants living nearby with regards to SuDS implemented on public land. It relies on a discrete choice experiments whose attributes are the different benefits provided by SuDS. The study was conducted in the Eurometropolis of Strasbourg (France). Results show a strong preference for a reduction of urban heat island effects as well as flood prevention and water protection. Based on a latent class model, we also highlight the heterogeneous nature of the preferences. These results are important for the acceptance of environmental programs and a better guarantee of desirable and effective results.

The Impact of a Brief Educational Seminar on Pediatric Pain-focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for School Providers.

Pediatric chronic pain is common and can be detrimental to children's social, emotional, and school functioning. Nonpharmacological approaches to chronic pain, like cognitive- behavioral therapy (CBT), can be effective. Schools could provide children with chronic pain access to these interventions. However, school professionals (ie, nurses and mental health providers) are seldom trained in CBT, creating a barrier to accessing such help. A seminar was created to introduce CBT strategies for chronic pediatric pain to school professionals. Feasibility, acceptability, and self-reported knowledge gained from the seminar were examined. Two introductory seminars (~2.5 h each) were held separately for the Michigan Association of School Nurses and the health department of Northwest Michigan (n = 71 total). The seminar provided an understanding of pain and pain-focused CBT strategies (eg, activity pacing, positive self-statements, and psychoeducation). Fifty-two school nurses, 16 mental health professionals, and 3 participants (unidentified title) rated program acceptability and self-reported knowledge of CBT before and after training (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree). Of the respondents, 89.6% agreed the training was helpful, and 87.5% were interested in additional training. For all questions relating to knowledge of CBT, a mixed-model interaction showed a meaningful, increase of at least 1 point (on a 5-point Likert Scale), F(2, 69.83) = 3.93, P = 0.024. This study underscores the feasibility and acceptability of training school health providers in CBT for pediatric chronic pain. This project also established key partnerships in Michigan to expand future work in this realm with more comprehensive training and assessment of outcomes.

Stepped-Care Web-Based Parent Support Following Congenital Heart Disease: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Early neurodevelopmental risks, compounded with traumatic medical experiences, contribute to emotional and behavioral challenges in as many as 1 in 2 children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Parents report a strong need for supports; yet, there remains a lack of accessible, evidence-based behavioral interventions available for children with CHD and their families. I-InTERACT-North is a web-based stepped-care mental health program designed to support family well-being and reduce behavioral concerns through positive parenting for children with early medical complexity. In previous pilot studies, the program was effective in increasing positive parenting skills and decreasing child behavior problems, with high parent-reported acceptability. This paper presents the protocol for the first randomized study of stepped-care parent support for families of children with CHD. This study will involve a single-site, 2-arm, single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate (1) the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based stepped-care parent support program (I-InTERACT-North) and (2) the effectiveness of the program in enhancing positive parenting skills and reducing behavioral concerns among families of children with CHD. Families will be randomized (1:1) to either receive treatment or continue with care as usual for 12 months. Randomization will be stratified by child's sex assigned at birth and baseline parent-reported child behavior intensity. Primary outcomes include positive parenting skills and child behavior at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include parental mental health, quality of life, service usage, and feasibility including program reach and adherence. A sample size of 244 families will provide >95% power to detect an effect size of d=0.64. Based on attrition data from pilot studies, a target of 382 families will be enrolled. Parent reports of acceptability, adoption, and suggested adaptability of the program will be examined using cross-case thematic analyses. Primary efficacy analysis will be conducted using an intent-to-treat approach. Generalized estimating equations will be used to examine changes in positive parenting. Child behavior, quality of life, and parent mental health will be tested with repeated-measures analyses. Additional sensitivity and replication analyses will also be carried out. Recruitment began in February 2024, and recruitment and follow-up will continue until January 2029. We anticipate results in late 2029. This study aims to test the effectiveness of I-InTERACT-North web-based stepped-care parent support in improving positive parenting skills and reducing child behavior problems in families of children with CHD compared with a care as usual control group. Results will inform future clinical implementation and expansion of this program among families of children with early medical conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06075251; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06075251. DERR1-10.2196/64216.

Reducing mental health stigma in academia: Assessing the acceptability of a first-person narrative program.

Academics are more likely to experience mental health difficulties like depression and anxiety. However, stigma remains a key barrier to help-seeking, and limited data exists on stigma reduction for academics. This study examines the acceptability of a first-person narrative-based antistigma program conducted by Dragonfly Mental Health at a large public university. This intervention used a multitiered approach that leverages education and contact strategies to reduce stigma among graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, staff, and faculty. Personal stories of six local faculty with lived experience of mental health struggles were shown in a short film during three separate departmental retreats, followed by moderated large and small group discussions. This study presents descriptive survey data from academics (N = 149) who attended one of these three programs. A thematic content analysis was conducted on open-ended responses from 86 participants. Overall, the Dragonfly Mental Health program was well-received: 95% of participants found the film beneficial, and over 92% felt the film and discussions reduced stigma. Qualitative analysis highlighted several themes on participants' experiences. Participants appreciated the open, honest disclosures of faculty members in the film but reported that the vague disclosures perpetuated stigma. Participants liked the normalization of mental illness but desired more representation from the mental health spectrum. Participants expressed frustration over an academic work culture that is defined by overwork and burnout. These findings suggest that sharing faculty stories is a powerful mechanism to build connectedness among academics, promote open communication, and foster change in academic culture around mental health. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Building bridges: enhancing cultural understanding and community engagement in the CHAMPS program—experience sought from Gobe Challa Village, Ethiopia

Public health programs’ successful implementation often requires a thorough consideration ⁠ of local cultural contexts and effective community engagement. The complexities and obstacles that public health initiatives may face in culturally ⁠ diverse communities are highlighted by our case study, offering valuable insights. ‍ This article focuses on analyzing a particular incident that occurred in Gobe Challa Village, connected ⁠ to the implementation of the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) program. In Gobe Challa Village, an incident occurred that centered on discord within the community and religious fears, resulting ⁠ from misunderstandings surrounding and a general lack of comprehension about the CHAMPS program. Our resolution process involved engaging the community, and religious leaders in constructive dialogue. Throughout this involvement, we delivered extensive elucidation on the aims and ⁠ protocols of the CHAMPS program, mitigating conflicts within the community. The community successfully achieved acceptance of the CHAMPS program by directly ⁠ and respectfully addressing misconceptions and fears, fostering a common understanding. This study emphasizes the significance of effective communication, community engagement, and ⁠ consideration of cultural customs when implementing public health programs. The experiences derived from this incident can act as a practical ⁠ manual for future public health initiatives encountering analogous cultural and societal dynamics. The main emphasis is on highlighting how a proactive, sensitive, and inclusive approach can ⁠ alleviate potential conflicts while also promoting program acceptance and encouraging community engagement. These discoveries have relevance to various public health initiatives and emphasize the significance ⁠ of a culturally conscious, community-involved approach in executing global health programs. ‍

Acceptability and feasibility of a group-based intervention to improve outcomes for children at risk for developmental delays in Kenya: A piloted randomized trial.

The Care for Child Development (CCD) program may improve child development outcomes in resource-limited settings, but has not yet been adapted to group-based settings to facilitate sustainable dissemination. In this study, we determined the acceptability and feasibility of a group-based CCD program, with evaluation of program outcomes for child development, home environment, and symptoms of maternal depression as secondary outcomes. We evaluated this adapted program using a 2 × 2 crossover-designed pilot study administered over 10 bi-weekly sessions. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed through focus group discussions using qualitative methods. Child development, home observations, and symptoms of maternal depression were evaluated at baseline, 6months, and 12months and assessed quantitatively. Twenty-six mother-child dyads participated. Overall, they perceived CCD as acceptable and feasible, and especially beneficial within its group-based format. Although there were no measured improvements in child development, improvements in stimulating home environments (mean difference 2.5, 95% C.I. [0.37, 4.72]) were found. Further scale-up of this intervention is needed to determine effectiveness.

Aachen smoking cessation and harm reduction (ASCHR) trial study protocol – scientific evaluation of a psychological-telemedical counseling concept for smoking cessation in patients with vascular diseases

BackgroundSmoking is a major risk factor of cardiovascular diseases, notably peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Despite this link, research on smoking cessation interventions in PAD patients remains scarce and inconclusive regarding the efficacy of such interventions.Therefore, elucidating it is crucial and should address both individuals who smoke that are motivated to quit and individuals who smoke heavily lacking the motivation to quit.Methods/DesignThe Aachen Smoking Cessation and Harm Reduction (ASCHR) trial is a prospective randomized controlled study (RCT) on the benefits of telemedical-psychological support for smoking cessation in patients with PAD, funded by the “Innovation Fund” of the Joint Federal Committee in Germany. This trial aims to scientifically assess the efficacy, feasibility, acceptance, and efficiency of a multi-stage smoking cessation program based on the recommendations of the German guideline for smoking cessation tailored to patients with PAD, compared to a control group receiving no intervention. Central to the program is psychological counseling utilizing motivational interviewing techniques, delivered through telemedicine via video consultations. The primary endpoint of the ASCHR trial is the smoking cessation rate after 8 months of intervention, with a secondary endpoint evaluating sustained abstinence at a further 6 months follow-up. Smoking cessation is defined as a carbon monoxide level in exhaled air of less than 6 ppm. We hypothesize that the group receiving the multi-stage cessation program will yield a cessation rate at least 10 percentage points higher than that of usual care. Anticipating a dropout rate of around 35%, the planned sample size is at least N = 1032 study participants.DiscussionShould the trial demonstrate significant positive outcomes, efforts should be made to integrate the program into routine care in Germany, potentially offering a promising base for future smoking cessation support among PAD patients.

An acceptability and feasibility investigation of a community-based motor program for autistic children with moderate and high support needs

BackgroundGeneral motor impairments are ubiquitous in Autism and are positively correlated with autism symptom severity. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a 13-week community-based motor program for autistic children with moderate and high support needs (MHS). MethodIn this exploratory single arm within-subject study, 10 autistic children with MHS, ages 4–10 years, completed a community-based motor program delivered in a one-on-one format by therapists. Feasibility was determined through recruitment, retention, attendance, enjoyment, engagement and useability of motor, physical activity (PA), and behavioural assessment tools. Thematic analysis evaluated post-intervention semi-structured parent interviews. ResultsHigh program attendance and retention were demonstrated, and therapists reported child engagement and enjoyment were high. Identified themes revealed parents perceived unexpected substantial positive impacts including improvements in social, motor, and behavioural outcomes. They highly valued both the program and the therapeutic relationships fostered within it. Although parents of the children with the higher support needs reported the most substantial improvements, these children were unable to score on motor assessments due to difficulties following instructions and off-task behaviours. Additionally, only four participants wore an accelerometer-based PA monitor. ConclusionsThis community-based motor program was considered feasible and acceptable by the children’s parents, and qualitative findings provided valuable insights into clinical practice for children with MHS. However, recruitment challenges and assessment tools being unfeasible for children with higher support needs led to low participant numbers. Future evaluations should explore alternative assessment measures and study designs, given the challenges associated with studying such a heterogenous and complex group.

A mixed methods evaluation of the music and psychology and social connections (MAPS) pilot - A dyadic intervention for couples affected by young-onset dementia.

People living with young-onset dementia and their care-partners are at risk of a range of adverse mental health outcomes and social isolation. There are few interventions aimed at supporting couples affected by young-onset dementia, which poses unique psychosocial challenges for younger people. This pre-post interventional mixed methods pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of an online group program for people with young-onset dementia and their care-partners living at home in Australia. The Music And Psychology and Social connections (MAPS) program aimed to address: (1) the challenges and changes associated with young-onset dementia; and (2) coping and wellbeing. The program involved six weekly two-hour sessions co-facilitated by a psychologist and music therapist, and a private Facebook group. The primary outcomes of feasibility and acceptability were assessed through a post-program focus group, separate individual feedback sessions with each couple, and a program evaluation questionnaire. Thematic analysis was conducted on the focus group transcripts and field notes from couple feedback sessions. We also examined the preliminary utility of MAPS in improving mental health and social connectedness, using quantitative pre-post-measures. Five couples completed the MAPS program. The most common dementia type was Alzheimer's Disease. Participant attendance was 87% across all sessions. Qualitative findings supported acceptability of the program with four emergent themes: being connected to others with shared experiences; reframing thoughts and feelings about dementia; music as a therapeutic tool; and benefits of MAPS. The high retention rate, qualitative findings and positive program evaluation suggest MAPS may be a promising, feasible and acceptable program for couples affected by young-onset dementia.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative screening strategies for the detection of cervical cancer among women in rural areas of Western Kenya.

While the incidence of cervical cancer has dropped in high-income countries due to organized cytology-based screening programs, it remains the leading cause of cancer death among women in Eastern Africa. Therefore, the World Health Organization (WHO) now urges providers to transition from widely prevalent but low-performance visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) screening to primary human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. Due to high HPV prevalence, effective triage tests are needed to identify those lesions likely to progress and so avoid over-treatment. To identify the optimal cost-effective strategy, we compared the VIA screen-and-treat approach to primary HPV DNA testing with p16/Ki67 dual-stain cytology or VIA as triage. We used a Markov model to calculate the budget impact of each strategy with incremental quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) as the main outcome. Deterministic cost-effectiveness analyses show that the screen-and-treat approach is highly cost-effective (ICER 2469 Int$), while screen, triage, and treat with dual staining is the most effective with favorable ICER than triage with VIA (ICER 9943 Int$ compared with 13,177 Int$). One-way sensitivity analyses show that the results are most sensitive to discounting, VIA performance, and test prices. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the triage option using dual stain is the optimal choice above a willingness to pay threshold of 7115 Int$ being cost-effective as per WHO standards. The result of our analysis favors the use of dual staining over VIA as triage in HPV-positive women and portends future opportunities and necessary research to improve the coverage and acceptability of cervical cancer screening programs.

212 - Acceptability of Group-Based Telerehabilitation Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Program in Older Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study

212 - Acceptability of Group-Based Telerehabilitation Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Program in Older Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Qualitative Study

A feasibility study of a couple-based illness perception intervention for couples coping with colorectal cancer

PurposeAs a special psychological variable, illness perception significantly affects the cancer adaptions of colorectal cancer couples. No studies focus on facilitating cancer adaption by targeting the illness perception in colorectal cancer couples. This research attempted to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of an illness perception intervention program designed for couples with colorectal cancer, guided by a self-regulation common sense model. MethodsA single-group pilot study including pre- and post-testing was carried out with Chinese couples having colorectal cancer. Six sessions were delivered consecutively by researchers via in-person or telephone for couples. By calculating the rates of recruitment and retention, the feasibility of the intervention was analyzed. Intervention acceptability was evaluated by analysis of the post-intervention quantitative and qualitative data. Outcomes were described as illness perception, cancer-related communication problems, dyadic coping, quality of life, anxiety and depression, and benefit finding. Effect sizes were computed to assess the preliminary program effects. ResultsThe feasibility was confirmed by the recruitment (67.6%) and retention (82.6%) rates. The acceptability was endorsed by the reported participant satisfaction. Validating the program’s preliminary effectiveness, the intervention program has moderate effect sizes (Cohen’s d: 0.33-0.79) that boost illness perception and major cancer adjustment results for patients and their spousal caregivers. ConclusionsThe research proved that the couple-based illness perception intervention among colorectal couples was feasible, acceptable, and initially effective. To investigate this intervention program more thoroughly and apply it to a wider range of disease backgrounds, an extensive randomized controlled experiment is necessary.