Abstract Background A cornerstone of quality adolescent health care is assuring confidential time for adolescent patients. Adolescents are more likely to seek care and disclose sensitive health information if confidentiality is assured. Several national societies endorse the need for confidential care at all health-related encounters with adolescents. Many adolescents have infrequent contact with the medical system other than unscheduled urgent care in pediatric hospitals. Little is known regarding the effectiveness and feasibility of providing confidential care to adolescents in a tertiary pediatric hospital setting. Objectives We hypothesized that significant variation exists in the frequency and quality of confidential care delivery for adolescents. This study sought to characterize clinician comfort with confidentiality provision as well as identification of potential predicators and barriers to providing confidential care for adolescents in a tertiary, pediatric hospital setting. Design/Methods We undertook a cross-sectional survey among Emergency Department (ED), Hospitalist and Resident physicians at an urban, academic pediatric center. Data was collected using a standardized, self-administered electronic questionnaire. Survey participants responded to multiple-choice questions to characterize their comfort and self-identified barriers to providing confidential care to adolescents. Results Response rate was 91% (n=72/79; 26 ED, 14 Hospitalists, 32 Residents). A majority of respondents were female (69%), under the age of 50 (60%) and within their first 10 years of practice (51%). Forty-seven percent of respondents reported being somewhat/very doubtful that confidential care was being consistently provided to adolescents. Eighty-nine percent of respondents identified barriers to the quantity or quality of confidential care provided. Factors most commonly reported to influence physician decision to provide confidential care were diagnosis (75%), time of visit (45%), and patient age (25%). Among attending physicians 60% reported that they usually/always provide confidential care to adolescents, and 83% ensure that their trainees offer confidential care; whereas only 31% of trainees reported usually/always providing confidential care themselves (p=0.01). Limits of confidentiality were more likely to be explained to adolescent patients compared to their parents (83% vs. 33%; p<0.001). The most common reasons identified limiting the provision of confidential care were insufficient time (21%), perceived parental resistance (26%), lack of private space (26%) and the belief that it is not necessary for all adolescent encounters (34%). Forty percent of respondents reported discussing sensitive topics with adolescents in front of family members. Among both attending physicians and trainees, only 45% felt they had received adequate training on how best to deliver confidential care and similarly, 75% in both groups reported a desire for additional training. Conclusion Survey results suggest inadequate provision of confidential care in an academic pediatric hospital, with several potentially modifiable barriers. Confidentiality-specific education likely represents an important intervention to optimize physician comfort and improve the delivery of appropriate confidential care for adolescents.