Academic Otolaryngology Research Articles

Layperson Perception of Reflux-Related Symptoms.

To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of reflux-related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Cross-sectional survey-based study. Five tertiary, academic otolaryngology practices. Between June 2020 and July 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 20 common descriptors of reflux-related symptoms within four domains (throat-, chest-, stomach-, and sensory-related symptoms) was completed by patients. Attending otolaryngologists at five academic medical centers then completed the same survey. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of reflux-related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. A total of 324 patients and 27 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of six terms compared with 10.5 for otolaryngologists (p < .001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select sensory symptoms (difference: 35.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2%, 52.4%), throat-related symptoms (32.4%; 21.2, 43.6%), and chest-related symptoms (12.4%; 8.8, 15.9). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to consider stomach symptoms as related to reflux (4.0%, -3.7%, 11.7%). No significant differences were identified based on geographic location. There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of reflux. Patients tended to have a narrower interpretation of reflux with symptoms primarily limited to classic stomach-related symptoms, while clinicians tended to have a broader definition of reflux that included extra-esophageal manifestations of disease. This has important counseling implications for the clinician, as patients presenting with reflux symptoms may not comprehend the relationship of those symptoms to reflux disease.

Factors related to wellness and burnout in academic otolaryngology: A pre- and Post-COVID-19 analysis.

Describe demographic and professional factors predictive of burnout in academic otolaryngology before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2018 and 2020, cross-sectional surveys on physician wellness and burnout were distributed to faculty members of a single academic institution's otolaryngology department. Faculty were dichotomized into low and high burnout groups for 2018 (n=8 high burnout, 19%) and 2020 (n=11 high burnout, 37%). To identify protective factors against burnout, three semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty that reported no burnout. Forty-two participants (59%) in 2018 and 30 out of 49 participants (62%) in 2020 completed the survey. In multivariate analysis of 2018 survey data, full and associate professors had significantly lower odds of high burnout (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00-0.53; p=.03). Female gender was associated with increased in odds of high burnout (OR 15.55, 95% CI 1.86-231.74; p=.02). However, academic rank and gender did not remain independent predictors of high burnout in the 2020 survey. We identified significant differences in drivers of burnout brought on by the pandemic, including a shift from a myriad of work-related stressors in 2018 to a focus on patientcare and family obligations in 2020. Interview analysis identified three themes in faculty who reported no burnout: (1) focus on helping others, (2) happiness over compensation as currency, and (3) gratitude for the ability to have an impact. Approximately 20% of faculty reported high burnout before the pandemic, and this proportion nearly doubled during the pandemic. The risk factors and themes identified in this study may help academic otolaryngologists prevent burnout. Factors driving burnout among academic otolaryngologists during the COVID-19 pandemic transitioned away from research, conferences, and work outside business hours toward family and patient responsibilities. Females report higher burnout and full professors report lower burnout. III.

Layperson Perception of Symptoms Caused by the Sinuses.

To assess the perceived symptoms caused by the sinusesas defined by otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Multi-institutional cross-sectional study. Six academic outpatient otolaryngology practices. We performed a multi-institutional, cross-sectional study using a semantics-based questionnaire. Consecutive patients were enrolled at 6 academic otolaryngology centers from June 2020 to May 2021. The primary outcome examined patient and provider definitions for the symptoms caused by the sinuses from a list of 28proposed terms covering 6 general categories. These data were also collected from otolaryngology faculty at the same institutions. Responses were obtained from 451 patients (54% female, mean age 48.3 years) and 29 otolaryngologists (38% female, mean age 37.4 years). Patients selected a median of 12 terms, compared to 8.5 for otolaryngologists. Among patients, the most frequently selected symptom domains were mucus (419, 92.9%), airflow (412, 91.4%), and pain (389, 86.3%). Compared to clinicians, patients more frequently selected symptoms related to the ear (difference, 48.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34.8%-59.3%), throat (difference, 35.7%, 95% CI, 22.0%-47.5%), systemic (difference, 34.4%, 95% CI, 21.2%-46.0%), mucus (difference, 20.5%, 95% CI, 10.2%-30.6%), and airflow domains (difference, 19.0%, 95% CI, 8.4%-29.3%). Multiple domains were selected by 98% of patients and 79% of providers. Semantic differences exist between patients and clinicians regarding the symptoms caused by the sinus with patients having a broader range of perceived symptoms. These differences may provide clues to improve communication between otolaryngologists and their patients.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion in academic American otolaryngology faculty: an elusive dream

ABSTRACT We analyze gender and racial disparities in academic otolaryngology from 2007 to 2018 in the United States (US). A cross-sectional retrospective analysis was done using data from the American Association of Medical Colleges. The distribution of gender and race, academic ranks, tenure tracks, and degrees was reported. The total number of otolaryngologists increased from 1,490 to 2,239, where 53 percent were females. All races experienced an increase; however, Whites and Asians had a greater increase compared to Black and Hispanics. Regarding percentages at different ranks, White were the majority (>50 percent) in every category. As for tenure, the general trend was a decrease in the total number of tenured physicians from 327 in 2007 to 318 in 2018, where Black, Hispanic, and Asian tenured physicians increased, while White tenured physicians decreased. White male otolaryngologists were the majority for every subgroup (>60 percent), whereas Black faculty made up less than 1 percent of tenured category. Female representation gradually increased for all levels of tenure. As for all degrees, Whites were the majority for all levels of education (>60 percent). There were some improvements in the representations for the females in all and Asians on the tenure track. However, progress for the URM remains an elusive dream.

Prevalence of Body Dysmorphic Disorder in an Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinic.

To analyze the prevalence of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in a general otolaryngology population presenting to an outpatient clinic. Prospective prevalence study. Single tertiary academic otolaryngology clinic. New patients over 18 years of age who presented to an academic otolaryngology clinic between August 2018 and May 2021 completed a questionnaire including demographic questions and the validated Body Dysmorphic Disorder Questionnaire (BDDQ). Data collected from the questionnaires were analyzed to assess demographics and prevalence of BDD in an otolaryngology clinic. Of the 242 patients queried, 15 patients screened positive for BDD. The screened prevalence of BDD was determined to be 6.2%. None of the patients had previously been diagnosed with BDD. The prevalence of prior mental health diagnoses was 34.3%. These patients had initially presented for a variety of otolaryngologic concerns and had pre-existing diagnoses of anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive, bipolar and eating disorders. The prevalence of BDD in our population of new patients presenting to an academic otolaryngology practice (6.2%) is higher than that of the general population (1.9%).

Asynchronous learning among otolaryngology residents in the United States

ObjectiveOtolaryngology resident learning has historically relied on didactic lectures, textbook reading, and practical hands-on patient care. However, evidence suggests that an increasing proportion of residents in other specialties are deviating from this paradigm. This work aims to characterize otolaryngology residents' current asynchronous learning practices (i.e., personal learning outside of didactics and patient care). MethodsA thirteen-question survey of otolaryngology residents in the United States was performed from 10/1/2020–12/1/2020 assessing demographics, educational resource utilization, and educational resource preference. ResultsNearly all (99 %) respondents reported engaging with educational materials outside of didactics and case prep. Textbook reading comprised 27 % of residents' total study time, with additional time split between board-review book reading (20 %), searching the web (18 %), watching online videos (15 %), and listening to podcasts (10 %). Residents' highest ranked resources were videos, board-review books, textbooks, podcasts, and recorded lectures. Among electronic and multimedia resources, more than half of residents used the following resources: Iowa Head and Neck Protocols (91 %), Board Vitals (75 %), UpToDate (60 %), YouTube (57 %), Google (56 %), and Headmirror (54 %). ConclusionCurrent otolaryngology resident learning involves substantial use of asynchronous learning, including videos, web-based learning, and podcasts, which currently outpace traditional textbook- and didactic-based education. This underscores the need to consider a paradigm shift within academic otolaryngology education away from textbooks and other tradition media to the generation of high-quality multimedia resources for resident learning.

Otolaryngology residents' experiences of pregnancy and return to work: A multisite qualitative study.

ObjectivesA paucity of literature exists about childbearing during otolaryngology residency. Pregnancy is a common part of many physician life cycles, but the timing of residency and the rigors of surgical training amplify the challenges. This study was designed to understand the experiences of childbearing otolaryngology residents and support them during this major life event. Unique challenges include long training, shortage of role models, combination surgical and clinical work, and higher rates of infertility.Study DesignQualitative research. IRB exempt.SettingUnited States.MethodsTo capture modern perspectives, 16 current and former otolaryngology residents that experienced pregnancy and childbirth during residency in all four geographic regions of the United States in the past 10 years were recruited to participate in individual structured qualitative interviews.ResultsAlthough there was significant training program and personal anxiety reported by childbearing otolaryngology residents, many surgeons experienced healthy pregnancies and postpartum recoveries with minimal disruption to clinical productivity and minimal disruption to their training programs. Multiple recurring themes were identified among the participants spanning the entire childbearing process: increased incidence of pregnancy complications and preterm labor, pregnancy stigma from leadership and coresidents, scheduling logistics regarding call and parental leave, and challenging transitions back to clinical work while navigating breastfeeding and childcare.ConclusionThere are actional recommendations that programs can address to make childbearing during residency accessible and acceptable. Understanding these challenges is an important step to encouraging childbearing residents to prosper in academic otolaryngology, increasing the diversity at the highest levels of the field.Level of Evidence4.

Financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an academic otolaryngology department.

ObjectiveTo quantify the financial impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID‐19) pandemic on an academic otolaryngology department.MethodsA year‐over‐year comparison was used to compare department revenue from April 2020 and April 2021 as a percentage of baseline April 2019 activity.ResultsAt the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic in April 2020, total department charges decreased by 83.4%, of which outpatient clinic charges were affected to the greatest extent. One year into pandemic recovery, department charges remained down 6.7% from baseline, and outpatient clinic charges remained down 9.9%. The reduction in outpatient clinic charges was mostly driven by a decrease in in‐office procedure charges.ConclusionGiven that precautions to mitigate the risk of viral transmission in the health care setting are likely to be long‐lived, it is important to consider the vulnerabilities of our specialty to mitigate financial losses going forward.

Factors Contributing To Clinic No-Show at a Safety Net Hospital

Appointment no-show refers to patient nonattendance to previously scheduled clinic or surgical appointments without canceling the appointment in advance. No-shows have been an ongoing issue nationally and incur significant strains on the healthcare system, while negatively impacting health outcomes. Furthermore, when no-shows occur in an academic institution, they can lead to fewer educational opportunities for healthcare trainees such as medical students and residents. Prior studies have demonstrated variable no-show rates depending on the location and the type of healthcare setting, with rates range between 15% and 30% in general medicine clinics and urban community centers. In academic otolaryngology clinics, the no-show rate has been estimated to be around 8.3% [5].

Medical scribes improve documentation consistency and efficiency in an otolaryngology clinic

ObjectiveScribes in medical practice enable more efficient documentation requirements but insufficient analyses have occurred to fully evaluate their efficacy in otolaryngology. We analyzed pre/post metrics of scribe implementation that may aid practitioners in determining feasibility for use in their practices. Methods1808 patient charts were analyzed in The Epic Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) (903 pre and 905 post scribe implementation). We measured: clinic volumes, time saved in documentation, chart billing level, and lag days of chart closure. ResultsPatient volumes increased by 3.02% with an 11–17% decrease in time spent in clinic/day and lag days for billing. The distribution of visits for new patients was 17.75% level 2, 51.45% level 3, 29.71% level 4 before the scribe and was 6.83% level 2, 89.21% level 3, 3.96% level 4 after the scribe. For established patients it was 3.97% level 2, 84.92% level 3, 8.93% level 4 before and 0.34% level 2, 91.76% level 3, 7.73% level 4 after. The change in level of documentation for established and new patients pre and post scribe implementation was not statistically significant (p = 0.821, 0.063, respectively). Charts were closed within 0 to 7 days with the implementation of a scribe instead of 7–21 days when awaiting dictations for transcription. ConclusionsThe implementation of a scribe in an academic otolaryngology clinic facilitated more rapid completion of documentation while decreasing provider hours/day in clinic. We feel the analysis can be generalized to otolaryngology practitioners in general and the data structures we implemented are usable for others.

Open Bedside Tracheostomy: Safe and Cost Saving but Underutilized Nationally.

To evaluate open bedside tracheostomy (OBT) and compare it with open operating room (OR) tracheostomy and bedside percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in complications and cost. To determine the tracheostomy practice patterns of academic otolaryngology programs. Retrospective cohort study and cross-sectional study. Public hospital and tertiary care hospital. Otolaryngology program directors were surveyed to determine their institutions' tracheostomy practice patterns and the factors preventing the implementation of open bedside tracheostomies. A retrospective chart review was done of tracheostomies performed at our institutions from 2009 to 2019 for prolonged mechanical ventilation. Complications, length of intubation, comorbidities, body mass index, demographics, mortality rates, and decannulation rates were recorded. A cost analysis between OBT and PDT was conducted. Data from 802 patients were analyzed for 449 OBTs, 206 PDTs, and 147 open OR tracheostomies. Complication rates were low. PDTs were more likely to have perioperative tracheal bleeding (P = .028) and mucus plugging (P = .006). OBTs were performed on sicker patients with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index than PDT and OR tracheostomies. The cost of OBT was less than that of PDT. The survey response rate of tracheostomy practice patterns was 46%. The otolaryngologists at the responding programs all conducted OR tracheostomies, while 52.7% did OBTs and 30.9% PDTs. OBT can be done safely in patients with multiple comorbidities and has a cost that can be less than PDT. Despite these benefits, only 50% of academic institutions routinely performed OBT.

Patient Satisfaction With Otolaryngology Care: Stratification by Race, Age, Gender, Income, and Language.

To understand how race, gender, income, and language are correlated with patient satisfaction scores. Cross-sectional analysis of patient satisfaction data. An urban/suburban academic otolaryngology practice. Patients presenting for outpatient otolaryngology visits from 2017 to 2020 were surveyed for patient satisfaction following a visit with their otolaryngology provider. Categorical responses and numerical responses were collected regarding overall satisfaction as well as a variety of more specific satisfaction questions. Responses were matched to both provider characteristics and patient demographic data. Differences in satisfaction by demographic data were assessed with descriptive statistics as well as a multivariable mixed-effect model to adjust for repeated responder data and control for confounding factors. In total, 55,469 surveys were included, the majority of which were from white, English-speaking patients. Overall satisfaction levels were very high across all questions. The individual provider was associated highly with satisfaction, but provider gender was not. Race, age, and gender of the patient had a statistically significant impact on patient satisfaction, with higher levels of satisfaction among patients who were older, white, and male; income and language did not. Patient factors including race, age, and gender had a significant impact on ratings on outpatient otolaryngology patient satisfaction surveys, with nonwhite, younger, female patients reporting lower scores.

Risk Factors for Operating Room No-Show in an Academic Otolaryngology Practice.

A no-show to the operating room date negatively impacts a hospital and can lead to increased costs for an institution in terms of time, materials, and manpower. Our objectives are to identify the factors associated with operating room no-shows in order to increase clinical efficiency, reduce hospital costs, and increase patient access to care. Single institution retrospective chart review. A retrospective review was performed of all surgeries within the Otolaryngology department performed at a single tertiary academic center between 2006 and 2019. Demographic and surgical data were collected from the charts. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate statistics were performed on the data. There were a total of 1,752 no-shows and 46,440 patients who did show with an overall no-show rate of 3.63%. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare patients who did not show for surgery to those who did. Analysis found multiple risk factors for not showing to surgery that were statistically significant (P < .05) and included decreasing age, planned outpatient case, head and neck oncology subspecialty, increasing distance from the facility, higher number of clinic no-shows, and not having private insurance. African-American race was more likely to show for surgery as scheduled. Numerous factors may play a role on whether or not a patient attends a scheduled surgical date. Some of these factors may be preventable or modifiable to mitigate increased hospital costs associated with no-show to surgery and increase access to care. 3 Laryngoscope, 132:1738-1742, 2022.

Sex Differences in Faculty Positions Among Top-Ranked US Otolaryngology Departments.

ObjectiveThis study aims to characterize the top-ranked departments in otolaryngology to provide an indicator of the state of diversity within otolaryngology and to draw a comparison with other medical and surgical fields.Study DesignThis cross-sectional study examined the 20 highest-ranked otolaryngology programs according to the US News & World Report ranking of best hospitals for ear, nose and throat.SettingAcademic otolaryngology departments in the United States.MethodsFaculty demographic and biographical data were collected from departmental websites. The Web of Science h-index was used as a surrogate for academic productivity. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were used to characterize the cohort and compare otolaryngology with other fields.ResultsOf 562 otolaryngologists on faculty at the 20 highest-ranked programs, 413 (73.5%) were men and 149 (26.5%) were women. Among the faculty in the cohort, 174 (31.0%) were professors, 145 (25.8%) were associate professors, and 183 (32.6%) were assistant professors. Across faculty appointments, the proportion of women grew smaller as academic rank increased. When compared with all faculty across US medical schools, the departments in this study had significantly lower proportions of female professors (P = .0047), associate professors (P = .0009), and assistant professors (P = .0005). Male faculty members had higher h-indices than their female counterparts among professors (P = .004), associate professors (P = .008), assistant professors (P = .0002), and clinical assistant professors (P = .0009).ConclusionWomen are underrepresented across all academic ranks in top-ranked otolaryngology programs. The current state of diversity in otolaryngology yields many opportunities to advance representation for women in the field.

Opioid Use After Elective Otolaryngologic Surgery at a Teaching Institution

Background: Awareness of the opioid epidemic is promoting opioid stewardship in health care. For many commonly performed procedures in general surgery and gynecology, regimented opioid prescribing practices and/or multimodal nonopioid regimens are adequate for optimizing pain management and minimizing opioid dependence. We investigated opioid prescribing patterns for otolaryngology procedures at a tertiary hospital with the aim of characterizing postoperative pain and opioid use.Methods: This cross-sectional study with a patient survey was conducted in a tertiary care academic otolaryngology practice. Patients ≥18 years who underwent 1 of 41 common surgical procedures at an academic hospital between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled. Patients with any diagnosis of malignancy were excluded. Patients were analyzed according to surgery type (rhinoplasty, sinonasal surgery, tonsillectomy, parotidectomy, thyroidectomy, otologic surgery, and laryngoscopy), and those who had surgery in 2017 were surveyed via telephone interview using a standardized questionnaire.Results: A total of 3,152 patients met the study criteria, of whom 95.7% received an opioid prescription. Commonly prescribed opioid agents were hydrocodone-acetaminophen, oxycodone-acetaminophen, and acetaminophen-codeine. A median of 30 pills was prescribed per surgery, with little variation between different surgery types. Reported patient utilization was highest for parotid surgery and tonsillectomy and lowest for laryngoscopic, thyroid, and otologic surgery. Among all patients who received a prescription for opioids, 5.8% required a refill. Among the surveyed patients, 19.6% reported that they did not obtain the prescribed opioid, while 58.4% said they took half, less than half, or none of the prescribed opioid supply. Only 10.8% of surveyed patients disposed of the excess drugs in a recommended fashion.Conclusion: Our findings showed that the quantity of opioid prescriptions does not reflect actual patient analgesic use for elective surgeries in otolaryngology. Differential analgesic requirements for specific surgeries should be considered when prescribing postoperative analgesia.

Analysis of socioeconomic factors in laryngology clinic utilization for treatment of dysphonia.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between patient socioeconomic and demographic factors and tertiary care utilization for dysphonia in a localized metropolitan area of the American Midwest.MethodsMultivariate regression analysis was used to correlate patient demographics and population level data (e.g., age, gender, race, insurance, median income, education level) with tertiary laryngology utilization for dysphonia care at our institution between 2000 and 2019. Initial analyses characterized tertiary laryngology utilization rates for all regional ZIP codes and correlated these data with census information for household income and education. Dysphonia patient demographics were compared among populations cared for in our entire academic Otolaryngology department, our health system, and the regional population.ResultsAmong 1,365,021 patients in our health system, there were 7066 tertiary laryngology visits with a diagnosis of dysphonia. Dysphonia patients as compared to the overall health system were older (62.0 vs. 50.8 years), more likely to be female (63.7 vs. 50.2%) and more likely to have insurance (98.4 vs. 87.5%, all p < .001). Patient and population‐level factors including insurance status, education, and black race showed positive correlation with laryngology utilization while median income did not.Conclusions and RelevanceInsurance status, education level, and race correlated with utilization of tertiary laryngology services for the evaluation of dysphonia in our community, while median income did not. Black patients utilized tertiary laryngology care at higher rates compared to departmental and regional population utilization data. These results underscore important demographic and disease‐specific factors that may affect utilization of subspecialty care in Otolaryngology.Level of EvidenceIV

Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study.

BackgroundDespite the ubiquity of social media, the utilization and audience reach of this communication method by otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency programs has not been investigated.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the content posted to a popular social media platform (Twitter) by OHNS residency programs.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we identified Twitter accounts for accredited academic OHNS residency programs. Tweets published over a 6-month period (March to August 2019) were extracted. Tweets were categorized and analyzed for source (original versus retweet) and target audience (medical versus layman). A random sample of 100 tweets was used to identify patterns of content, which were then used to categorize additional tweets. We quantified the total number of likes or retweets by health care professionals.ResultsOf the 121 accredited programs, 35 (28.9%) had Twitter accounts. Of the 2526 tweets in the 6-month period, 1695 (67.10%) were original-content tweets. The majority of tweets (1283/1695, 75.69%) were targeted toward health care workers, most of which did not directly contain medical information (954/1283, 74.36%). These tweets contained information about the department’s trainees and education (349/954, 36.6%), participation at conferences (263/954, 27.6%), and research publications (112/954, 11.7%). Two-thirds of all tweets did not contain medical information. Medical professionals accounted for 1249/1362 (91.70%) of retweets and 5616/6372 (88.14%) of likes on original-content tweets.ConclusionsThe majority of Twitter usage by OHNS residency programs is for intra and interprofessional communication, and only a minority of tweets contain information geared toward the public. Communication and information sharing with patients is not the focus of OHNS departments on Twitter.

Practice Characteristics of Pediatric Otolaryngology Same-Day Appointments.

This study aims to assess characteristics of same-day clinic appointments in a pediatric population at an academic otolaryngology practice. Retrospective chart review of patients aged 18 or younger who had same-day clinic appointments between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at a single academic institution. Demographic data, diagnosis(es), procedures, and operations completed were included in the analysis. There were 363 same-day visits by 322 patients in the 3-year study period. Two hundred sixty-nine (269) of these visits were from new patients. Otitis media and rhinosinusitis were the most frequently coded diagnoses. One hundred forty-four (144) procedures were completed the day of the visit and 169 operations were performed as a result of the same-day visit. If the patient had a procedure or operation performed, they were more likely to have been referred by another provider. Providing same-day appointments can help provide timely and appropriate otolaryngology specialty care to pediatric patients. Further evaluation is needed to determine the effects on patient satisfaction as well as no-show rates.

A 12-Year North American Longitudinal Study of Gender Equity and Equality in Gastroenterology

A 12-Year North American Longitudinal Study of Gender Equity and Equality in Gastroenterology

Otolaryngology resident clinic participation and attending electronic health record efficiency-A user activity logs study.

ObjectivesIn an era of increasing electronic health record (EHR) use monitoring and optimization, this study aims to quantify resident contributions and measure the effect of otolaryngology resident coverage in clinic on attending otolaryngologist EHR usage.MethodsIn one academic otolaryngology department, monthly attending provider efficiency profile metrics, data collected by the EHR vendor (Epic Systems Corporation) between January and June 2019 were accessed. Using weekly resident schedules, resident coverage of attending outpatient clinics was categorized by junior (post‐graduate year [PGY] 1‐3) and senior levels (PGY‐4 through fellows) and correlated with attending EHR metrics using linear mixed effect models.ResultsThirteen attending otolaryngologists on average spent 58.8 minutes per day interacting with the EHR. In modeling, one day of trainee clinic coverage was associated with a 22 minutes reduction (95% CI [−37, −6]) in total daily attending EHR time and a 12 minutes reduction (95% CI [−21, −3]) in per day note time (P < .05). When stratifying by trainee level, senior coverage was associated with significantly reduced total daily time in EHR, per day time in clinical review, notes, and orders, as well as per appointment time in notes and clinical review (P < .05). Junior coverage was only associated with reduced per day note time (P < .05).ConclusionsIncreasing resident clinic coverage was inversely related to attending time spent in the EHR and writing notes. Resident contributions to EHR workflows and hospital system productivity should continue to be studied and considered in EHR use measurement studies.Level of EvidenceLevel 4.