Academic Neurosurgery Research Articles

Academic neurosurgery in Nepal: Present status and future directions

IntroductionThe establishment of local neurosurgery training programs in Nepal has proven critical for the expansion of the discipline across the country. This paper aims to describe the evolution, current status, challenges, and future directions of academic neurosurgery in Nepal. Research questionWhat is the current status and international standing of academic neurosurgery in Nepal? Material and methodsInformation related to growth and development in Nepal was obtained from universities and regulatory bodies in Nepal. Variables described are the current number of neurosurgeons, the number of neurosurgical centers and centers with accreditation for training, the description of existing training models, the number of graduates, and the contribution of Nepalese neurosurgeons to world literature. ResultsFormal neurosurgical training started in Nepal in 1999. Of 67 hospitals with neurosurgical facilities, 10 (14.9%) are accredited. Three training models (MCh, NBMS, and FCPS) currently exist. Of 116 neurosurgeons currently practicing in the country, 47 (40.5%) are homegrown. The contribution of the Nepalese neurosurgical community to the world includes the training of the first two Maldivian neurosurgeons and an increasing presence in world neurosurgical literature. ConclusionsAlthough comparable to other countries with similar economies, Nepal still faces some challenges to the sustainability and further developments of Neurosurgery. Continued concerted efforts will help Nepalese neurosurgeons achieve the goal of securing self-reliance in neurosurgical education.

United States Neurosurgery Department Program Directors: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Current and Future Trends and Attributes

While United States (U.S.) neurosurgery residency programs have been subject to many studies, none have focused solely on the program directors (PDs). We aim to analyze the demographic, educational, and academic attributes of this cohort to understand current and future trends of PDs. One hundred sixteen neurosurgeons listed as PDs at U.S. accredited neurosurgical residency training programs as of August 2022 were assessed. Descriptive data including age upon acceptance of role, gender, and h-index were collected from publicly available sources. Most PDs matriculated to their positions before the age of 45 years, were male, and had been hired internally. Approximately 25% of PDs had earned an additional degree. Departments with higher aggregate h-indexes were more likely to hire PDs with higher average publications per year (P < 0.001) and have a higher h-index (P < 0.001). PD subspecialty influenced h-index (P < 0.05) and total average publications per year (P < 0.05) with neuro-oncology subspecialists having higher averages in both. More recently hired PDs had a higher average number of publications per year (P < 0.05) and were more likely to hold an additional degree (odds ratio 1.14, P < 0.05). Female PDs were hired at a younger age (P < 0.05). Neurosurgery PDs typically rise to their position after 10 years of practice and more recent PD hires are more likely to have additional degrees and more publications. As academic neurosurgery becomes more competitive, increased academic productivity and acquisition of additional degrees will become increasingly necessary.

Phanor L. Perot Jr.: South Carolina's father of academic neurosurgery.

Phanor Leonidas Perot Jr., MD, PhD (1928-2011), was a gifted educator and pioneer of academic neurosurgery in South Carolina. As neurosurgical resident and then as a junior faculty member at the Montreal Neurological Institute, he advanced understandings of both epilepsy and spinal cord injury under Wilder Penfield, William Cone, and Theodore Rasmussen. In 1968, he moved to Charleston to lead neurosurgery. From his time spent with master physicians such as Isidor Ravdin and Wilder Penfield, Perot himself became "the ultimate teacher." His research spanned the fields of epilepsy to torticollis to spinal trauma, focusing the most on the basic pathophysiology of spinal cord damage elucidated through somatosensory evoked potentials. His research was distinguished by generous grant funding. By the time he stepped down as chairman in 1997, the division of neurosurgery had become a department and he had served as president of the American Academy of Neurological Surgery and the Society of Neurological Surgeons. Perot taught prolifically at the bedside, and considered the residency program at the Medical University of South Carolina his greatest achievement. Although Dr. Perot never fully retired, he also enjoyed active hobbies of fly-fishing, traveling, and hunting, until his death on February 2, 2011. He influenced many and earned his role in history as the father of academic neurosurgery in South Carolina.

Preoperative Thoracic Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Should Such a Recommendation Be an Absolute Requirement?

ObjectiveCurrent published guidelines recommend advanced imaging, specifically, thoracic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), prior to implantation of epidural paddle spinal cord stimulator (SCS) leads. Preoperative imaging may affect surgical approach to minimize risk of complications. We aimed to assess the impact of preoperative thoracic MRI on surgical planning in a large series of surgical paddle SCS lead placements in a real-world setting. Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained data base of 160 patients treated by SCS with awake thoracic surgical paddle lead placement in a single academic functional neurosurgery center from 2013 to 2021. All patients had a thoracic MRI prior to implantation. Abnormal MRI findings were reviewed to determine their potential impact on the safety of surgical paddle lead placement. A minor impact was defined as anatomical areas to avoid with paddle lead placement. Major impacts included significant deviations from standard approach to electrode placement. ResultsNone of the 160 patients had signs or symptoms referable to thoracic spine pathology prior to lead implant. Sixty-seven had abnormal thoracic MRI findings, and 36 had abnormal MRI findings that impacted surgical planning. Thirty-one patients had MRI findings with minor impact. Five patients (more than 3%) had findings with major impact. ConclusionsThis is the largest case series assessing the impact of preoperative thoracic MRI on surgical planning for patients undergoing paddle SCS placement. Twenty-two percent of patients had MRI findings that impacted surgical planning with 3% requiring additional surgical decompression for safe paddle lead placement. Without advanced imaging to inform surgical planning, unnecessary risk may have been placed on these patients. Although such imaging has been recommended by consensus committees in published guidelines, our study is the first to present a large institutional experience of real-world data that demonstrates its importance.

Trends in Matriculation from Neurological Surgery Training Programs into Academic Versus Private Practice

A career in academic neurosurgery is an arduous endeavor. Specific factors influencing physician practice preferences remain unclear. This study analyzes data from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership identifying the impact of several demographic and educational characteristics influencing neurosurgical career choices centered on academia, private practice, or a combination in the United States. A list of all current neurosurgeons was obtained from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership, and information on physician characteristics was collected via internet searches and institutional databases. The practice type of all neurosurgeons considered in this study were categorized as follows: private practice, academic, or a combination of private practice and academic, termed privademic. These data were subsequently correlated to race, gender, current age, training at a top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded medical school or residency program, and current practice. The median age of private practice and academic neurosurgeons was 58.18 and 53.61 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Age was significantly associated with practicing in an academic setting (odds ratio 0.96), with younger neurosurgeons pursuing careers in academia. Data indicated a positive and statistically significant contribution of female gender (P < 0.001) and training at a top-40 National Institutes of Health-funded institution to practicing in an academic setting (P < 0.01). Neurosurgery as a field has grown significantly over the past century. The authors recommend that future efforts seek to diversify the neurosurgical workforce by considering practice setting, demographic characteristics, and educational background.

Neurosurgery Subspecialty Practice During a Pandemic: A Multicenter Analysis of Operative Practice in 7 U.S. Neurosurgery Departments During Coronavirus Disease 2019

ObjectiveChanges to neurosurgical practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have not been thoroughly analyzed. We report the effects of operative restrictions imposed under variable local COVID-19 infection rates and health care policies using a retrospective multicenter cohort study and highlight shifts in operative volumes and subspecialty practice.MethodsSeven academic neurosurgery departments' neurosurgical case logs were collected; procedures in April 2020 (COVID-19 surge) and April 2019 (historical control) were analyzed overall and by 6 subspecialties. Patient acuity, surgical scheduling policies, and local surge levels were assessed.ResultsOperative volume during the COVID-19 surge decreased 58.5% from the previous year (602 vs. 1449, P = 0.001). COVID-19 infection rates within departments' counties correlated with decreased operative volume (r = 0.695, P = 0.04) and increased patient categorical acuity (P = 0.001). Spine procedure volume decreased by 63.9% (220 vs. 609, P = 0.002), for a significantly smaller proportion of overall practice during the COVID-19 surge (36.5%) versus the control period (42.0%) (P = 0.02). Vascular volume decreased by 39.5% (72 vs. 119, P = 0.01) but increased as a percentage of caseload (8.2% in 2019 vs. 12.0% in 2020, P = 0.04). Neuro-oncology procedure volume decreased by 45.5% (174 vs. 318, P = 0.04) but maintained a consistent proportion of all neurosurgeries (28.9% in 2020 vs. 21.9% in 2019, P = 0.09). Functional neurosurgery volume, which declined by 81.4% (41 vs. 220, P = 0.008), represented only 6.8% of cases during the pandemic versus 15.2% in 2019 (P = 0.02).ConclusionsOperative restrictions during the COVID-19 surge led to distinct shifts in neurosurgical practice, and local infective burden played a significant role in operative volume and patient acuity.

A step toward equal representation? A cross-sectional analysis of the gender composition of neurosurgical editorial boards from 2000 to 2020.

At present, females constitute less than 10% of neurosurgeons in the US, despite representing approximately half of all medical students. Multiple barriers have been described for females entering the neurosurgical field, particularly academic neurosurgery. Understanding the environment that female neurosurgeons face and any potential barriers preventing career advancement is needed to recruit, promote, and retain females in neurosurgery. The gender composition of editorial boards for 5 high-impact neurosurgery journals was analyzed from 2000 to 2020. The names of editorial board members were obtained directly from the journal administration, physical copies of the published journal, or publicly available data through each journal's website. The gender, degrees, academic titles, H-index, and country were determined for each individual and statistical tests were performed to identify significant differences. Of the 466 identified individuals that served on at least one editorial board between 2000 and 2020, there were 36 females (7.7%) and 430 males (92.3%). There were no significant differences between males and females serving on multiple editorial boards. Most females possessed an additional graduate degree (58.3%), while only one-third of males (33.5%) obtained such a degree (p = 0.002). In addition, males had significantly higher average H-indices than females (p = 0.002). These trends were also observed when analyzing only US-based editorial board members. Although females were more likely overall to be identified as associate professors, males were more likely to be appointed as full professors (p = 0.001); this trend did not remain true in the US-based cohort. When analyzing the editorial boards for individual journals, all 5 journals experienced an increase of female representation since 2000 or since their inception after 2000. The highest proportion of females for a single journal was 27.3% in 2020. All other journals ranged from 11.0% to 13.5% in 2020. When entering the field of neurosurgery, females continue to face significant social and academic barriers. While the proportion of females on editorial boards for neurosurgery journals in 2020 is consistent with the proportion of practicing female neurosurgeons, there is a statistically significantly higher likelihood that females possess additional graduate degrees and lower H-indices compared to their male counterparts. The authors encourage neurosurgical journals to continue expanding female representation on editorial boards.

Correlation between social media utilization by academic neurosurgery departments and higher online patient ratings.

Patients increasingly utilize online physician review websites (PRWs) and social media to inform healthcare-related decisions. This provides neurosurgeons with opportunities for increased patient engagement. And despite the growing use of social media among neurosurgeons, the relationship between social media utilization and online reviews remains unknown. The goal of this study was to characterize the relationship between social media utilization and PRW ratings across academic neurosurgery departments. Social media accounts (Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram) of academic neurosurgery departments were identified. Online reviews for individual faculty were obtained from Healthgrades, Vitals, WebMD, and Google. Reviews were aggregated to identify the total number of reviews per department, to generate a composite departmental rating, and to calculate a summed departmental score. US News & World Report (USNWR) and Doximity rankings were recorded for each department. Social media utilization by individual neurosurgeons and associated ratings were investigated within the departments with the highest social media utilization. Seventy-eight percent of academic neurosurgery departments utilized social media. The most prevalent platform was YouTube (49.1%), followed by Twitter (46.5%), Facebook (38.6%), and Instagram (16.7%). Higher patient ratings on PRWs were associated with the utilization of YouTube (p = 0.048) or Twitter (p = 0.02). The number of social media platforms utilized demonstrated a significant, positive correlation with patient ratings (p = 0.006) and summed patient ratings (p = 0.048). Although USNWR (p = 0.02) and Doximity (p = 0.0008) rankings correlated with patient ratings, only the number of social media platforms utilized remained a significant predictor of patient ratings on multivariate analysis (p = 0.0001). Thirty-one percent of academic neurosurgeons from departments with high social media utilization were active on social media. The most prevalent social media platform among individual neurosurgeons was Twitter (27.4%), followed by Instagram (8.4%), Facebook (4.9%), and YouTube (2.2%). Higher summed patient scores were associated with individual neurosurgeon utilization of YouTube (p = 0.04), Facebook (p < 0.0001), and Instagram (p = 0.01). Increased social media utilization among neurosurgeons was correlated with a greater number of patient reviews (p = 0.006) and higher summed patient scores (p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, only Facebook use remained a significant predictor of the number of patient reviews received (p = 0.002) and summed patient satisfaction scores (p < 0.001). An increased social media presence is associated with higher ratings on PRWs. As neurosurgeons continue to expand their online presence, they should be aware of the possible impact of social media on online patient reviews.

Financial fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic:Report from a high-volume academic neurosurgery

BackgroundThe global healthcare system has been overwhelmed by the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In order to mitigate the risk of spread of the virus, most elective surgical procedures have been cancelled especially during the lockdown periods. The purpose of this study was to assess the financial impact of the COVID outbreak due to the supposed reduced workload from our neurosurgery department in 2020. MethodsNumber of neurosurgical procedures (NSP) within the Department of Neurosurgery and their associated estimated income were retrospectively reviewed globally and month wise from administrative records of billing in 2020 and 2019 based on the Diagnosis related group (DRG) and severity of illness (4 levels). ResultsOverall, 824 and 818 inpatient surgical procedures were performed in 2019 and 2020 respectively. The total estimate revenue generated from inpatient surgeries was moderately decreased (3%): 9 498 226.41 euros in 2020 versus 9 817 361.65 euros in 2019 without significant difference across DRG (P=0.96) and severity of illness. ConclusionsOur data suggests a moderate negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic had on neurosurgical and financial activity. However, a more in-depth medico-economic analysis need to be performed to assess the real financial impact.

Representation of Women as Neurological Surgery Society Award Recipients

BACKGROUND: Women comprise more than half of medical school matriculants, but only 8.4% of US neurosurgeons. Awards given by neurosurgical societies are instrumental in shaping and advancing careers of women within academic neurosurgery, which can serve to increase the pipeline of women in the field. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the gender diversity of awards given by neurosurgical societies over 54 years. METHODS: Awards given by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons joint sections were classified as research, humanitarian/achievement, or lectureships and analyzed for gender. Composite gender data were obtained from the societies. Percentage differences were calculated using comparison of proportions testing. RESULTS: Ninety six distinct awards granted to 1281 individuals from 1965 to 2019 were analyzed, and 9.4% were awarded to women. Seven percent of neurosurgeon awardees were women (excluding Women in Neurosurgery Section [WINS] awards). 36.1% of awards given at least 5 times were never awarded to women. Female awardees increased from 2000-2009 to 2010-2019 (5.2% difference, P = .018). The Cerebrovascular (2.0%) and Spine (2.3%) sections awarded the fewest awards to women, whereas the WINS (73.3%) and Pediatric section (20.6%) awarded the most. Spine, WINS, Pain, Cerebrovascular, and Tumor sections awarded significantly fewer awards to women than respective society demographic proportions. One-hundred percent (39 of 39) of named awards (excluding 2 from WINS) were named after men. CONCLUSION: Women remain underrepresented in the field of neurosurgery and as award winners. Many subspecialty sections continue to give significantly fewer awards to women than their society demographic proportions.

Observational Studies in Neurosurgery: Structure, Functioning, and Uses

Although randomized interventional studies are the gold standard of clinical study designs, they are not always feasible or necessary. In such cases, observational studies can bring insights into critical questions while minimizing harm and cost. There are numerous observational study designs, each with strengths and demerits. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for observational study designs to be poorly designed or reported. In this article, the authors discuss similarities and differences between observational study designs, their application, and tenets of good use and proper reporting focusing on neurosurgery. The authors illustrated neurosurgical case scenarios to describe case reports, case series, and cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies. The study design definitions and applications are taken from seminal research methodology readings and updated observational study reporting guidelines. The authors have given a succinct account of the structure, functioning, and uses of common observational study designs in Neurosurgery. Specifically, they discussed the concepts of study direction, temporal sequence, advantages, and disadvantages. Also, they highlighted the differences between case reports and case series; case series and descriptive cohort studies; and cohort and case-control studies. Also, they discussed their impacts on internal validity, external validity, and relevance. This paper disambiguates widely held misconceptions on the different observational study designs. In addition, it uses case-based scenarios to facilitate comprehension and relevance to the academic neurosurgery audience.

Racial and Ethnical Diversity Within the Neurosurgery Resident and Faculty Workforce in the United States.

Promoting workplace diversity leads to a variety of benefits related to a broader range of perspectives and insights. Underrepresented in medicine (URiM), including African Americans, Latinx, and Natives (Americans/Alaskan/Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders), are currently accounting for approximately 40% of the US population. To establish a snapshot of current URiM representation within academic neurosurgery (NS) programs and trends within NS residency. All 115 NS residencies and academic programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in 2020 were included in this study. The National Residency Matching Program database was reviewed from 2011 to 2020 to analyze URiM representation trends over time within the NS resident workforce. The academic rank, academic and clinical title(s), subspecialty, sex, and race of URiM NS faculty (NSF) were obtained from publicly available data. The Black and Latinx NS resident workforce currently accounts for 4.8% and 5.8% of the total workforce, respectively. URiM NSF are present in 71% of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited NS programs and account for 8% (148 of 1776) of the workforce. Black and Latinx women comprise 10% of URiM NSF. Latinx NSFs are the majority within the URiM cohort for both men and women. URiM comprise 5% of all department chairs. All are men. Spine (26%), tumor (26%), and trauma (17%) were the top 3 subspecialties among URiM NSF. NS has evolved, expanded, and diversified in numerous directions, including race and gender representation. Our data show that ample opportunities remain to improve URiM representation within NS.

826 Gender Equality in Neurosurgery and Strategic Goals Towards a More Balanced Workforce

INTRODUCTION: The Women in Neurosurgery (WINS) published a white paper in 2008 setting a goal for women to comprise 20% of neurosurgery residents by 2012 and 20% of practicing neurosurgeons by 2020. There has been notable progress toward these benchmarks, but we ultimately fell short of their achievement. METHODS: A literature review was performed PubMed, Google Scholar, and published data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and other society websites. to perform a thorough progress assessment. The combined expertise and experience of the authors was used to create new specific recommendations. RESULTS: There was an exponential increase in the number of female neurosurgical trainees in the past several decades, the percentage of female neurosurgery residents increased from 12.7% to 19.3%and the percentage of ABNS certified female neurosurgeons increased from 5% to 12% between 2010 and 2020. The total female authorship in Neurosurgery and Journal of Neurosurgery increased from 12 to 16.5% between 2003 and 2018, however there was no increase in senior authorship. Women were more likely to be published as first author with a female senior author than with a male senior author (30.4% v 14.1%). Systemic barriers identified include wage inequity of 10-25%, rampant sexual harassment, and barriers regarding parental leave policies. CONCLUSIONS: We propose the following updated recommendations. Neurosurgical departments and societies should make targeted effort to retain women in academic neurosurgery in order to foster mentorship opportunities. There must be explicit policies regarding sexual harassment, compensation equity, and parental leave. Finally, we propose new benchmarks of women comprising 30% of residents by 2030, and 30% of practicing neurosurgeons by 2040.

309 Oscillating Between Gratitude and Fear: Lived Experience of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Survivors

INTRODUCTION: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (ASAH) is a devastating stroke that affects young adults at a mean age of 55 and mortality rate of 32%. Those who survive are subjected to short- and long-term consequences and the description of self-accounts of experiences are lacking. METHODS: This qualitative study utilized Husserl’s descriptive phenomenology methodology. Participants were recruited from an academic medical center outpatient neurosurgery clinic. A semi-structured interview guide and biodemographic background questionnaire guided data collection. Verbatim texts were analyzed according to Giorgi five-step method. The City of Hope Health-Related Quality of Life Theoretical Model gave structure to open-ended interviews, literature review, and for synthesis of results. RESULTS: Characteristics of the 16 participants included a median age of 56 years, predominantly female (81%), and six weeks to nine years since aneurysm rupture. Three major qualitative themes were uncovered that explained the structure of the general experience. The salient experiences reported by participants included psychological trauma, difficulty of symptom management, uncertainty, change in social relationships, and being unprepared for life after discharge. Other experiences discovered were difficulty in finding resources, fear of recurrence, social support as critical, and spirituality as a protective factor for wellbeing. CONCLUSION: Dimensions of the City of Hope Health-Related Quality of Life Model surfaced as essential, describing life after ASAH, when compared to the study’s conceptual model. The results highlight the need for multidisciplinary comprehensive post discharge support services, programs acknowledging the salience of all dimensions of health-related quality of life, and matching data-based standardized interventions to core sets of patient-reported short- and long-term outcomes.

Letter to the Editor Regarding “Bibliometric Analysis of Publications from 2011–2020 in 6 Major Neurosurgical Journals (Part 1): Geographic, Demographic, and Article Type Trends”

Women have historically been underrepresented in academic medicine, particularly in surgical subspecialties. This study investigated potential associations between gender and promoting practices in academic neurosurgery.Faculty data, including time from residency, professorship, specialty, and h-index, were obtained from websites of the institutions listed in the American Association of Neurological Surgeons Neurosurgical Residency Training Program Directory. Demographics, training, and appointments were compared between male and female neurosurgeons. Predictors of professorship, chair, directorship, and division leadership were identified using multivariable models.The study examined 1629 faculty members. Women were more likely to be assistant professors (P < 0.0001), while men were more likely to be full professors (P < 0.0001), hold chair positions (P = 0.007), lead subspecialty divisions (P = 0.008), and have a higher Scopus h-index (P < 0.0001). In a multivariable analysis, years from training (P < 0.001), fellowship (P = 0.009), h-index (P < 0.001), and chair/program director/division leadership position (P < 0.001) were significant positive predictors of full professorship. Holding additional advanced degrees (P = 0.010), leading a subspecialty division (P = 0.005), and having a higher h-index (P = 0.002) positively predicted chair position. However, when accounting for all other factors, gender was not a significant predictor of full professorship, division leadership, chair, or program directorship.While significantly more men hold leadership positions in U.S. academic institutions, after controlling for contributing variables, there did not appear to be an association between gender and full professorship, division leadership, chair, or program directorship in academic neurosurgery. While the field still has significant work to do to achieve gender equity, these results may serve as encouragement to women who are looking to advance their careers in academic neurosurgery.

Women in Neuromodulation: Innovative Contributions to Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

Stereotactic neurosurgery emerged in the mid-20th century following the development of a stereotactic frame by Spiegel and Wycis. Historically women were underrepresented in clinical and academic neurosurgery. There is still a significant deficit of female scientists in this field. This article aims to demonstrate the career and scientific work of some of the most important women who contributed to the development of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery. Exceptional women from all over the world, represented in this review, assisted the evolution of modern stereotactic and functional neurosurgery as neurosurgeons, neuropathologists, neurologists, neurophysiologists and occupational therapists. Fortunately, we could conclude that in the last two decades the number of female researchers has increased significantly.

Impact of international research fellows in neurosurgery: results from a single academic center.

International research fellows have been historically involved in academic neurosurgery in the United States (US). To date, the contribution of international research fellows has been underreported. Herein, the authors aimed to quantify the academic output of international research fellows in the Department of Neurosurgery at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Research fellows with Doctor of Medicine (MD), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), or MD/PhD degrees from a non-US institution who worked in the Hopkins Department of Neurosurgery for at least 6 months over the past decade (2010-2020) were included in this study. Publications produced during fellowship, number of citations, and journal impact factors (IFs) were analyzed using ANOVA. A survey was sent to collect information on personal background, demographics, and academic activities. Sixty-four international research fellows were included, with 42 (65.6%) having MD degrees, 17 (26.6%) having PhD degrees, and 5 (7.8%) having MD/PhD degrees. During an average 27.9 months of fellowship, 460 publications were produced in 136 unique journals, with 8628 citations and a cumulative journal IF of 1665.73. There was no significant difference in total number of publications, first-author publications, and total citations per person among the different degree holders. Persons holding MD/PhDs had a higher number of citations per publication per person (p = 0.027), whereas those with MDs had higher total IFs per person (p = 0.048). Among the 43 (67.2%) survey responders, 34 (79.1%) had nonimmigrant visas at the start of the fellowship, 16 (37.2%) were self-paid or funded by their country of origin, and 35 (81.4%) had mentored at least one US medical student, nonmedical graduate student, or undergraduate student. International research fellows at the authors' institution have contributed significantly to academic neurosurgery. Although they have faced major challenges like maintaining nonimmigrant visas, negotiating cultural/language differences, and managing self-sustainability, their scientific productivity has been substantial. Additionally, the majority of fellows have provided reciprocal mentorship to US students.

Assessment of the incidence and nature of adverse events and their association with human error in neurosurgery. A prospective observation

IntroductionAdverse events in surgery are a relevant cause of costs, disability, or death, and their incidence is a key quality indicator that plays an important role in the future of health care. In neurosurgery, little is known about the frequency of adverse events and the contribution of human error. Research questionTo determine the incidence, nature and severity of adverse events in neurosurgery, and to investigate the contribution of human error. Material and methodsProspective observation of all adverse events occurring at an academic neurosurgery referral center focusing on neuro-oncology, cerebrovascular and spinal surgery. All 4176 inpatients treated between September 2019 and September 2020 were included. Adverse events were recorded daily and their nature, severity and a potential contribution of human error were evaluated weekly by all senior neurosurgeons of the department. Results25.0% of patients had at least one adverse event. In 25.9% of these cases, the major adverse event was associated with human error, mostly with execution (18.3%) or planning (5.6%) deficiencies. 48.8% of cases with adverse events were severe (≥SAVES-v2 grade 3). Patients with multiple adverse events (8.6%) had more severe adverse events (67.6%). Adverse events were more severe in cranial than in spinal neurosurgery (57.6 vs. 39.4%). Discussion and conclusionAdverse events occur frequently in neurosurgery. These data can serve as benchmarks when discussing quality-based accreditation and reimbursement in upcoming health care reforms.The high frequency of human performance deficiencies contributing to adverse events shows that there is potential to further eliminate avoidable patient harm.

Neurosurgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center: 1956-2020.

The history of neurosurgery at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, is reviewed. Kemp Clark, MD, started the academic neurosurgical practice at Parkland Hospital in 1956. Clark developed a robust training program that required the resident to operate early. In 1972, the Dallas Veterans Affairs Hospital was added to the training program. Duke Samson, MD, became chair in 1988. He emphasized technical excellence and honest reporting of surgical outcomes. In 1989, Zale Lipshy University Hospital opened and became a center for neurosurgical care, and Hunt Batjer, MD, became chair in 2012. The program expanded significantly. Along with principles established by his predecessors, Batjer emphasized the need for all neurosurgeons to engage the community and to be active in policy leadership through local and national organizations. During his tenure, the pediatric neurosurgery group at Children's Medical Center Dallas was integrated with the department, and a multidisciplinary spine service was developed. In 2014, the Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute was established, and the William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital opened. For 64 years, UT Southwestern Medical Center has been fertile ground for academic neurosurgery, with a strong emphasis on excellence in patient care.

Wilder Penfield and Academic Neurosurgery in North America: 1934-1945.

Wilder Penfield was appointed as Chair of McGill University's newly created Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery in 1930 and Director of the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) in 1933. The departmental structure allowed Penfield to develop his own research priorities, and the MNI's clinics and laboratories allowed residents to train in neurosurgery and in basic science under one roof. This paper reviews the research performed by neurosurgical residents under Penfield's direction from 1934 to 1945 and argues that their initiation to laboratory research contributed to the emergence of neuroscience following the Second World War.