AbstractThe gas–liquid two‐phase flow pattern, absorption rate and pressure drop of CO2absorbed into the aqueous solution of the task‐specific ionic liquids (1‐aminopropyl‐3‐methylimidazole tetrafluoroborate [Apmim][BF4] and 1‐hydroxyethyl‐3‐methylimidazole tetrafluoroborate [OHemim][BF4]) and halide‐free ionic liquid 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium methylsulfate [Bmim][CH3SO4] were investigated in a microreactor. The absorption mechanism of the three ionic liquids was analyzed employing the13C NMR spectroscopy. The [Apmim][BF4] was found to have the best ability of CO2capture compared with the other two ionic liquids, as chemical absorption occurred between [Apmim][BF4] and CO2, while only physical absorption took place between [OHemim][BF4]/[Bmim][CH3SO4] and CO2. The sequence of CO2absorption rate in three ionic liquids aqueous solutions is: [Apmim][BF4] > [Bmim][CH3SO4] > [OHemim][BF4]. Furthermore, the effects of gas–liquid flow rate and ionic liquids concentration on CO2absorption rate and pressure drop were studied, the pressure drop models based on various flow patterns were proposed.
Read full abstract