Absolute Psoriasis Area And Severity Index Research Articles

34660 Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, versus placebo and apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Achievement of absolute PASI thresholds in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials

Background: Deucravacitinib is an oral selective inhibitor of TYK2, which mediates signaling of key cytokines in psoriasis immunopathogenesis. The efficacy of deucravacitinib in achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) disease control thresholds in 2 Phase 3 trials was compared versus placebo and apremilast.

Real-world Methotrexate Use in a Prospective Cohort of Paediatric Patients with Plaque Psoriasis: Effectiveness, Adverse Events and Folic Acid Regimen.

In paediatric psoriasis, few studies have evaluated methotrexate effectiveness, adverse events and folic acid regimen. Therefore this study prospectively assessed methotrexate adverse events and effectiveness in paediatric patients with psoriasis in a real-world setting. Furthermore, gastrointestinal adverse events and methotrexate effectiveness were compared between folic acid regimens (5 mg once weekly vs 1 mg 6 times weekly). Data for paediatric patients with psoriasis treated with methotrexate from September 2008 to October 2020 were extracted from Child-CAPTURE, a prospective, daily clinical practice registry. Effectiveness was determined by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Comparison of persistent gastrointestinal adverse events between folic acid regimens were assessed through Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 105 paediatric patients with plaque psoriasis (41.0% male, mean age 14.1 years) were included. At week 24 and 48, an absolute PASI ≤ 2.0 was achieved by approximately one-third of all patients. During follow-up, 46.7% reported ≥ 1 persistent adverse events. After 1 and 2 years, approximately one-quarter of patients achieved a PASI ≤ 2.0 without persistent adverse events. Although non-significant, a possible trend towards lower occurrence of gastrointestinal adverse events was found for folic acid 1 mg 6 times weekly (p = 0.196), with similar effectiveness between folic acid regimens. These findings show that a subgroup of paediatric patients with psoriasis responded well to methotrexate treatment without considerable side-effects during a 2-year follow-up.

Tildrakizumab efficacy and safety in patients with psoriasis and concomitant metabolic syndrome: post hoc analysis of 5‐year data from reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2

BackgroundLimited data are available on long‐term efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with psoriasis and metabolic syndrome (MetS), a common comorbidity.ObjectivesThis analysis updates tildrakizumab efficacy and safety for up to 5 years in patients with and without MetS.MethodsThis was a post hoc analysis of the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 reSURFACE 1 (NCT01722331) and reSURFACE 2 (NCT01729754) trials in adult patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Analyses included data through Week 244 from patients who continuously received tildrakizumab 100 (TIL100) or 200 mg (TIL200) and entered the extension studies, stratified by baseline MetS status. Efficacy was assessed via Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores. Safety was evaluated from exposure‐adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs).ResultsreSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2 analyses included 26 and 44 TIL100‐treated patients with MetS, 98 and 167 TIL100‐treated patients without MetS, 34 and 30 TIL200‐treated patients with MetS, and 111 and 130 TIL200‐treated patients without MetS, respectively. There were no clinically relevant differences in PASI 75/90/100 response rates at Week 244 between patients with vs without MetS. The proportion of patients with vs without MetS achieving absolute PASI score <3 at Week 244 was 53.8% vs 69.4% and 77.3% vs 80.8% in reSURFACE 1 and 2, respectively, for TIL100‐treated patients and 58.8% vs 72.1% and 63.3% vs 72.3%, respectively, for TIL200‐treated patients. In both studies, median reduction from baseline PASI score at all time points in patients with vs without MetS was >83% vs >89% for TIL100 and >85% vs >90% for TIL200. Pooled EAIRs of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest were similar in patients with and without MetS.ConclusionsTildrakizumab maintains efficacy and a favorable safety profile over 5 years in patients with psoriasis regardless of MetS status.

Real-world evidence from the non-interventional, prospective, German multicentre PERSIST study of patients with psoriasis after 1 year of treatment with guselkumab.

PERSIST was a prospective, non-interventional, long-term, German multicentre study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving guselkumab, an approved monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin (IL)-23, in a real-world setting. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, and its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who have received 52 weeks of treatment. Patients (≥18 years old) were prescribed guselkumab as per routine clinical practice. End points assessed include Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), target Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Overall, 303 patients were enrolled and treated with guselkumab. Mean disease duration was 21.0 years, and 77.2% and 51.2% of patients had received ≥1 prior conventional systemic or ≥1 prior biologic therapy, respectively. Mean PASI score decreased from 16.4 at baseline to 3.0 by Week (W) 28, and further decreased to 2.4 by W52, while the proportion of patients achieving an absolute PASI score of ≤1 increased from 1.3% at baseline, to 50.8% at W28 and to 58.4% by W52. PASI90 and PASI100 responses also showed marked improvements between W28 and W52, regardless of biologic treatment history. Clearance of psoriatic skin was observed in difficult-to-treat areas, with the percentage of patients achieving a PGA score ≤1 increasing between W28 and W52. Guselkumab improved HRQoL; mean DLQI score decreased from 13.7 at baseline to 2.8 by W28, and further decreased to 2.4 by W52. At W52, 64.6% of patients achieved a DLQI score ≤1. The cumulative probability of drug survival was 92.4% at W52. Guselkumab is efficacious and well tolerated regardless of previous biologic therapies, comorbidities or psoriasis manifestation in difficult-to-treat areas. No new safety signals were observed.

Long‐term, durable, absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and health‐related quality of life improvements with risankizumab treatment: a post hoc integrated analysis of patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis

BackgroundRisankizumab has demonstrated durable, high rates of efficacy in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis as assessed by the achievement of relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1.ObjectivesThe aim of this post hoc analysis is to assess the achievement of absolute PASI thresholds and related improvements in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis treated with (i) risankizumab compared with ustekinumab, and (ii) long‐term (>52 weeks to 172 weeks) risankizumab.MethodsData from patients randomised to 150 mg risankizumab or 45 or 90 mg ustekinumab in replicate randomised controlled trials UltIMMa‐1 and UltIMMa‐2 were analysed for the achievement of absolute PASI thresholds PASI ≤ 3, PASI ≤ 1, and PASI = 0, time to achieve these thresholds, and combined PASI and DLQI endpoints. Data from pat ients initially randomised to risankizumab who continued on risankizumab in the open‐label extension study LIMMitless were analysed for the achievement of absolute PASI levels, mean DLQI scores, and DLQI 0/1.ResultsSignificantly greater proportions of patients treated with risankizumab compared with ustekinumab achieved PASI ≤ 3, PASI ≤ 1, and PASI = 0, as well as combined endpoints for absolute PASI and DLQI [(PASI ≤ 3 and DLQI ≤ 5) or (PASI ≤ 1 and DLQI 0/1)]. The median time to first achieve PASI ≤ 3, PASI ≤ 1, and PASI = 0 was significantly lower for risankizumab‐treated patients compared with ustekinumab‐treated patients. Among patients treated with long‐term risankizumab, more than 90% achieved PASI ≤ 3 though week 172 and more than 80% achieved DLQI 0/1. Low absolute PASI scores corresponded with low mean absolute DLQI scores through week 172 of continuous risankizumab treatment.ConclusionsRisankizumab treatment demonstrated high rates of rapid and durable efficacy as measured by absolute PASI thresholds and improvements in patient HRQoL.

Mean Percentage Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Response and Absolute PASI Through 5 Years of Continuous Treatment With Guselkumab (GUS) in VOYAGE 1

N/A

Application of the Statistical Method to Convert Published PASI 50/75/90/100 into Absolute PASI Response Rate in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Tildrakizumab Based on Data from the Two Pivotal Phase 3 Studies reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2

Background: Absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a key endpoint in psoriasis management. Petto et al. [Pharm Stat. 2019;18(1):4–21] developed a statistical method to estimate the proportion of patients reaching absolute PASI response given baseline PASI score and proportion of patients achieving relative improvements at predefined time points. Objectives: To test this method on clinical data from two phase 3 tildrakizumab trials (reSURFACE 1/2) comparing estimated absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 responses with reference responses from clinical databases. Methods: Reference PASI responses of ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 were extracted from clinical databases. Estimation of absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 response rates at week (W) 12 and W28 by treatment and trial were performed. Differences between estimated and reference responses were analysed. Bland-Atman limits of agreement and Passing-Bablok regression to assess variations between estimated and reference responses were performed. Results: Differences between estimated and reference absolute PASI ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 responses at W12 and W28 by treatment and trial were of little clinical relevance with an overall mean difference in PASI response proportion of −2.2% (e.g., for the tildrakizumab 100-mg arm, original proportions of patients achieving PASI of ≤1/≤2/≤3/≤5 at W28 were 38.5%/52.2%/63.5%/73.9% and 39.8%/54.8%/63.6%/76.9% [reSURFACE 1 and 2, respectively] vs. estimated proportions of 33.2%/49.8%/62.5%/78.3% and 34.3%/51.6%/64.5%/79.9%). Limits of agreement were −7.1% to 1.4% at W12 and –6.8% to 4.3% at W28. Scatterplots revealed linearity that stood the cusum test in Passing-Bablok regression with slope 1.14 (95% confidence intervals: 1.06 to 1.20). Conclusion: Good estimates of absolute PASI response rates were achieved with the application of the statistical method to tildrakizumab data reported in the phase 3 studies, in particular in the verum study arms. Our data support the method provided by Petto et al. [2019] to estimate proportions of psoriasis patients reaching absolute PASI value thresholds using relative PASI improvements.

Guselkumab Treatment Outcomes and Persistence in a Nationwide Real-world Cohort of Patients with Plaque Psoriasis.

Guselkumab treatment outcomes and persistence were assessed in a real-world cohort of Finnish patients with difficult-to-treat plaque psoriasis over a median follow-up of 1 year. Data on 181 patients who initiated guselkumab at the 15 study centres were collected retrospectively from the patient charts. Prior exposure to biologic therapies was common, with 56% and 35% having used at least 1 and 2 biologics, respectively. Median guselkumab treatment duration was 11 months with 21 patients (12%) discontinuing treatment during follow-up. Of 85 patients with a follow-up duration of at least 1 year, 73 (86%) were still on guselkumab at 1 year. Significant improvements during follow-up were seen in the absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores with 32 patients (80%) having absolute PASI ≤ 2 after a 9-14-month treatment. Guselkumab treatment was effective and treatment persistence was high in the nationwide Finnish real-life setting.

Deucravacitinib in Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in a Phase 2 Trial.

IntroductionDeucravacitinib is an oral, selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor that demonstrated therapeutic benefit in a Phase 2 clinical trial of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This analysis was designed to evaluate the effect of deucravacitinib on additional clinical and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes and assess the relationship between these outcomes in adults with psoriasis.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of a 12-week Phase 2 trial was conducted for the three most efficacious dosage groups (3 mg twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, 12 mg once daily) and placebo. Investigator assessments for efficacy included Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA) involvement, and static Physician's Global Assessment; QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Treatment responses and their associations were evaluated over time.ResultsDeucravacitinib elicited improvement versus placebo as early as Week 4 for most efficacy measures (including changes in absolute PASI and BSA), with efficacy trends observed from Week 2 to Week 12. Improvements in QoL, assessed by achievement of a DLQI overall score of 0/1 (no effect at all on patient’s life), followed a pattern similar to deucravacitinib-related clinical outcomes over 12 weeks. Overall, patients with greater improvements in psoriasis-related clinical signs and symptoms also reported greater improvement in QoL. However, complete skin clearance was not required for achieving DLQI 0/1.ConclusionDeucravacitinib treatment produced early response and similar trends in improvements across multiple efficacy assessments and QoL in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Deucravacitinib has the potential to become a promising new oral therapy for this condition.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT02931838.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00649-y.

Nail Involvement as a Predictor of Differential Treatment Effects of Secukinumab Versus Ustekinumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

IntroductionPatients with plaque psoriasis may experience varying levels of treatment response to different biologics, based on phenotypic characteristics and underlying genetic factors. Nail psoriasis is a common manifestation of psoriasis (approx. 50% of patients) and has been linked to the human leukocyte antigen-C*0602 (HLA-C*0602) allele, which in turn has been associated with differential treatment responses to certain drugs. Here we investigate whether nail involvement in patients with psoriasis can predict differential skin responses to two biologics with different modes of action, namely secukinumab (anti-interleukin-17A) and ustekinumab (anti-interleukin-12/23), to ultimately guide treatment choice.MethodsData were pooled from the CLEAR and CLARITY studies and stratified post hoc by nail involvement status at baseline. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and 90 responses over 52 weeks and absolute PASI ≤ 3, ≤ 1, and 0 values at weeks 16 and 52, were assessed.ResultsBased on the medical history, 30.4% (269/886) of the patients in the secukinumab arm and 29.7% (265/891) of patients in the ustekinumab arm presented with nail involvement. Nail involvement status had little to no impact on the efficacy of secukinumab, as comparable responses were achieved for patients with and without nail involvement in terms of PASI 75/90, ≤ 3, and 0 responses; slightly lower PASI ≤ 1 reponses were achieved in patients with nail involvement. In the ustekinumab arm, patients with nail involvement achieved lower responses across all endpoints.ConclusionsThese findings indicate that nail involvement can serve as an observable prognostic factor for efficacy in skin psoriasis treatment and guide the choice between secukinumab and ustekinumab.Trial RegistrationCLEAR: NCT02074982; CLARITY: NCT02826603.

Absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index as a valuable marker to determine initial treatment response in psoriasis patients treated with guselkumab in routine clinical care.

Guselkumab is an anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody approved as a first-line medication in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis and second-line in active psoriatic arthritis. In the clinic, patients who have shown a lack of previous treatment efficacy and/or tolerability are often prescribed guselkumab. These patients generally have less severe psoriasis compared to clinical trial cohorts, reflected in lower Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). To evaluate treatment response in a real-world setting, we conducted a multicenter-retrospective chart review in three specialized dermatological centers. Seventy-four patients who received guselkumab treatment were included in the study and baseline characteristics were described. The mean PASI at baseline was 13.0 (± 6.7). After 12 weeks of treatment 40 patients could be followed up at the participating centers and efficacy was assessed: 72.5% of these patients achieved an absolute PASI ≤5 (55.0% ≤3; 42.5% ≤2) whereas only 57.5% of patients were able to gain a delta PASI reduction of at least 75%. Using the absolute PASI as a treatment goal rather than response rate revealed that guselkumab was highly effective in this real-world setting. In conclusion, the absolute PASI proved to be a more valuable tool to measure treatment outcome.

IL-23 blockade with guselkumab potentially modifies psoriasis pathogenesis: rationale and study protocol of a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre study in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis (GUIDE)

BackgroundGuselkumab is an interleukin (IL)-23 pathway blocker with proven efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Early intervention with guselkumab may result in changes to the clinical disease course versus...

Long-term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A 9-year real-life experience from a tertiary referral center in Turkey.

There is a paucity of data on long-term (≥5-year) outcomes of ustekinumab therapy for psoriasis in real-life clinical practice. This observational, retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety profile of ustekinumab in 52 adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis who were treated with ustekinumab for at least 28 weeks and a maximum of 105 months in our tertiary referral center in Turkey, between 2010 and 2019. Response to therapy was assessed using Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant associations (p-value <0.05) with response to treatment. The PASI50, PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 response rates were 97.8%, 88.9%, 53.3%, and 35.5%, respectively, at year 1 and 100%, 80.0%, 60.0%, and 40.0%, respectively, at year 5. Non-obesity was independently associated with PASI90 response at year 2 (p=0.043), while biologic-naivety was independently associated with PASI90 responses at year 2 (p=0.047) and year 3 (p=0.021). An absolute PASI score of ≤3 was achieved by 82.2% and 80.0% of the patients at year 1 and year 5, respectively. Nine patients received adjuvant therapy and nine underwent ustekinumab dose escalation. These strategies were effective for recapturing clinical response in most patients. Ustekinumab was generally well-tolerated with no dose-related and cumulative toxicity, or drug interaction over a mean of 33.5 ± 21.1months. The main reasons for discontinuation were secondary failure and loss to follow-up. Our 9-year real-life clinical experience demonstrates that ustekinumab is an efficacious and safe treatment option for long-term therapy of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Network meta-analysis of biologic treatments for psoriasis using absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index values ≤1, 2, 3 or 5 derived from a statistical conversion method.

BackgroundIn practice, the goal of treatment for patients with psoriasis is to achieve almost clear or clear skin and maintain disease control, regardless of baseline disease severity. However, identifying absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) values for new treatment goals is challenging, as most clinical trials report relative PASI 50, 75, 90 or 100 improvements but rarely absolute PASI values achieved.ObjectiveOur objective was to illustrate a statistical conversion method that was developed to derive absolute PASI values from available clinical trial data on relative PASI improvements. The results of network meta‐analyses (NMAs) based on these derived data were then compared with those of NMAs based on the corresponding relative PASI improvement data for selected biologics for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis.MethodsThe PASI statistical conversion method was applied to relative PASI improvement data for 11 biologic treatment regimens and placebo at 12 weeks using data from 50 published studies. The respective proportions of patients reaching absolute PASI values ≤1, 2, 3 or 5 were then calculated. Frequentist NMAs (Rücker method) were subsequently used to compare efficacy results across relative and absolute PASI data.ResultsThe ranking of included treatment regimens for patients achieving absolute PASI 0 to 8 was aligned with results for relative PASI scores (from 100 to 60) at end of induction therapy. Across the range of PASI scores considered, the most effective treatment regimens based on both absolute and relative PASI NMAs were brodalumab 210 mg every 2 weeks and ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks, followed by guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks and risankizumab 150 mg every 12 weeks.ConclusionData generated using this mathematical model will be useful to inform ongoing scientific discussions on treatment goals in the absence of primary absolute PASI data for all available treatments for moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis.

Disease response and patient-reported outcomes among initiators of ixekizumab

Objectives There is limited real-world evidence on using ixekizumab in psoriasis patients. Therefore, we characterized patients with psoriasis initiating ixekizumab and report 6-month changes in disease and patient-reported outcomes. Methods Adult patients with psoriasis who initiated ixekizumab and completed a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. Disease characteristics and outcomes were assessed at ixekizumab initiation. Outcomes included the mean 6-month change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and IGA*BSA. Results From baseline to follow-up in all patients (n = 136), means decreased for IGA*BSA (−45.5) and BSA (−12.4), and a higher % achieved an absolute PASI ≤ 5 (84.6%), BSA 0–3 (72.1%), and IGA 0/1 (50.7%). Within stratified groups, means decreased for PASI <12 for IGA*BSA (−21.1) and BSA (−6.3); PASI≥12 for IGA*BSA (−94.8) and BSA (−24.6); weight <100 kg for IGA*BSA (−45.1) and BSA (−12.4); weight ≥100 kg for IGA*BSA (−46.2) and BSA (−12.3); concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (−56.0) and BSA (−15.3); and in no concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (−36.9) and BSA (−10.0). Conclusions We provide real-world evidence on the benefits of ixekizumab for treating psoriasis, regardless of baseline disease severity, weight, or concomitant PsA.

Evaluation of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index as a Proxy for Bio-markers of Systemic Disease under Treatment with Tumour Necrosis Factor-alpha and Interleukin 12/23 Antagonists in Patients with Psoriasis: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 186 Treatment Cycles.

The efficacy of psoriasis treatments is usually evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). However, there is a lack of systematic statistical assessments of PASI as a proxy for systemic disease in individual patients. Therefore, a retrospective study of 186 treatments with adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab for psoriasis (341 patient-years) was performed. While PASI significantly and independently correlated with biomarkers of systemic inflammation (especially neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein), the strengths were only weak-to-moderate and varied considerably inter-individually. A decrease in PASI indicated a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio decrease and a C-reactive protein decrease or stable low margin C-reactive protein in ≥ 80%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of PASI 0 and PASI 2.75 (optimal Youden Index) for low cardiovascular risk C-reactive protein were 24%, 92%, 85%, and 62%, 61%, 76%, respectively. Performance was similar using absolute thresholds and PASI 100 or PASI 75, and overall worse for low cardiovascular risk neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and if psoriasis arthritis was present. In conclusion, PASI allows robust low-order estimates of systemic inflammation, but cannot substitute for laboratory biomarkers for more precise assessments.

Effectiveness and clinical predictors of drug survival in psoriasis patients receiving apremilast: A registry analysis

BackgroundLittle is known about the effectiveness and drug survival associated with apremilast under real-world conditions.ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of patient and disease characteristics on drug survival associated with apremilast and to elucidate clinical effectiveness with regard to the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) reduction.MethodsThis was an observational, retrospective, multicenter analysis from the Austrian Psoriasis Registry.ResultsData from 367 patients were eligible for analysis. The 12-month drug survival rate associated with apremilast (ie, the proportion of patients on the drug) was 57.3% and decreased significantly in patients younger than 40 years (relative hazard ratio = 1.49, P = .007918). Sex; concomitant arthritis; previous biologic therapy; obesity; and palmoplantar, scalp, nail, and intertriginous involvement did not significantly affect drug survival. At 12 months, the response rates in patients receiving apremilast per protocol with a PASI of 50, 75, 90, and 100 were 80.0%, 56.4%, 38.2%, and 22.7%, respectively.LimitationsInclusion of a substantial number of patients with no record of absolute PASI at study entry and lack of PASI reduction follow-up data of 103 patients (28.1%) after starting apremilast treatment.ConclusionApremilast is a robust antipsoriatic drug for which the drug survival is not strongly influenced by most patient- or disease-related factors except age. Drug survival is significantly shorter in patients younger than 40 years.

15921 Absolute PASI response up to 52 weeks with brodalumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

Background: Skin clearance measured by absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) may provide more clinically relevant information on disease severity than relative PASI improvement. Brodalumab is a fully human anti–interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody efficacious for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe psoriasis. In this post hoc analysis, absolute PASI was evaluated through 52 weeks of treatment with brodalumab in a randomized phase 3 trial (AMAGINE-1).

Disease activity and treatment efficacy using patient-level Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores from tildrakizumab phase 3 clinical trials

Background It is unclear whether primary efficacy outcomes in plaque psoriasis clinical trials represent residual disease during treatment. Objectives To evaluate supplementing dichotomous efficacy with residual disease activity. Methods This post hoc analysis used pooled, patient-level data after tildrakizumab 100 mg (N = 616) or placebo (N = 309) treatment from reSURFACE 1/2 (NCT01722331/NCT01729754) phase 3 clinical trials of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Results Median baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 17.9 for patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg. At Week 12, median PASI was 2.9, whereas dichotomous PASI 90 response rate was 36.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 64.0%, 50.8%, and 23.3%, respectively. At Week 28, median PASI was 1.7, whereas PASI 90 response rate was 51.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 75.3%, 62.8%, and 38.0%, respectively. Dermatology Life Quality Index and PASI scores were correlated through Week 28 (r = 0.51, p ≤ .0001). Conclusions Disease activity was more reliably estimated by PASI scores than percentage PASI improvement; this may partially explain efficacy disparities between clinical trials and practice. These results suggest supplementing dichotomous PASI improvement with PASI scores and consideration of patient treatment goals could facilitate clinical decisions.

Absolute and relative psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) treatment goals and their association with health-related quality of life

Background: Relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement, also called ‘PASI response’, is recommended in major guidelines for assessment of treatment response in psoriasis patients. However, under certain circumstances it has some limitations, e.g. when baseline values are missing or during long-term treatment. Improvement of health-related quality of life (HrQoL) can be measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).Objective: To evaluate the association of HrQoL and relative and absolute PASI outcomes during therapy.Material and methods: Data of plaque psoriasis patients of two clinical trials (CLEAR and SCULPTURE) were pooled. The rates of patients achieving DLQI 0/1 at week 16 were compared for different categories of absolute PASI and PASI response values. The correlation of DLQI and absolute or relative PASI goals was assessed over 52 weeks.Results: One thousand and fifty-four patients with available assessments of PASI and DLQI were included. 76% of the patients with an absolute PASI ≤ 2 (N = 548) and patients with a 90% improvement in PASI (N = 559) achieved DLQI 0/1 at week 16. Achievement of DLQI 0/1 was equally reflected by absolute PASI and PASI response.Conclusion: Absolute PASI appeared to be a feasible alternative to PASI response for determining treatment success, reflecting HrQoL improvements in an equal manner.