Abstract Background and Aims Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health concern which continues to increase in prevalence. Early studies have evaluated kidney function by measuring serum creatinine (sCr) and/or the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). To date, there are limited studies that correlate nuclear GFR scans and eGFR by equations that include the Cockroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI) 2021 in Asians, specifically in a Filipino population. This study aims to compare the accuracy of GFR scan results and GFR estimated from the formulas across different levels of kidney functions, age groups, gender, and co-morbidities among a Filipino subset. Method A cross-sectional study was done among 2986 patients who underwent Nuclear GFR scan in a single kidney center. Results obtained were compared to estimated GFR results. Weighted Kappa and Bland-Altman Analyses were used to test for agreement between the measured and estimated GFR results. Results Absolute GFR values derived from the three equations demonstrated moderate reliability with results from nuclear scan when intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated with CKD-EPI 2021 being the highest. When further categorized into GFR levels, there was substantial level of agreement between each equation and GFR scan, with all weighted kappa coefficients being at least 0.700 with CG having the highest result (Table 1). Furthermore, when subgroup analysis was done according to age group, gender, and comorbidities, CG was found to be the most accurate per category (Table 2). Conclusion CKD-EPI 2021 was the most accurate in the actual GFR values however we cannot fully eliminate the utility of CG due to its categorical accuracy and in monitoring the deterioration of renal function.