Absence Of SSB Research Articles

Effect of silencing SSB1 gene on the expression of NBS1 in irradiated rat submandibular gland cells.

The salivary gland (SGS) is a kind of organ vulnerable to ionizing radiation. Radiotherapy is an important treatment for head and neck tumors, but in the process of radiotherapy, tumor cells will be injured by radiation to a certain extent. Infrared-induced DNA double-strand break (IR-DSBs) is one of the most serious DNA damage. DNA repair proteins such as Nymegan rupture syndrome protein 1 (NBS1) play a key role in the identification and repair of DNA damage. but the interaction between SSB1 and NBS1 has not been elucidated. In this study, we irradiated rat submandibular gland (SMG) cells, which were either infected with a rAdE5-SSB1-1p2-shRNA recombinant adenovirus to silence SSB or a control virus, to explore the effect of IR on the expression NBS1 in the absence of SSB. Our results showed that the SSB1 mRNA transcripts and protein expression of SSB1 and NBS1 initially increased and decreased later with increased doses. The relative expression reached the highest levels when the SMG cells were irradiated with 2Gy of IR. Silencing the SSB1 gene suppressed the expression of both SSB1 and NBS1 regardless of irradiation. The expression of NBS1 decreased when the SSB1 gene was silenced. We concluded that IR affected the expression of both SSB1 and NBS1 and there is a synergistic effect on IR-induced NBS1 suppression and DSBs repair in SMG cells. These observations shed light on further investigation and elucidation of IR-caused DNA repair mechanisms.

Yeast Chaperone Hsp70-Ssb Modulates a Variety of Protein-Based Heritable Elements.

Prions are transmissible self-perpetuating protein isoforms associated with diseases and heritable traits. Yeast prions and non-transmissible protein aggregates (mnemons) are frequently based on cross-β ordered fibrous aggregates (amyloids). The formation and propagation of yeast prions are controlled by chaperone machinery. Ribosome-associated chaperone Hsp70-Ssb is known (and confirmed here) to modulate formation and propagation of the prion form of the Sup35 protein [PSI+]. Our new data show that both formation and mitotic transmission of the stress-inducible prion form of the Lsb2 protein ([LSB+]) are also significantly increased in the absence of Ssb. Notably, heat stress leads to a massive accumulation of [LSB+] cells in the absence of Ssb, implicating Ssb as a major downregulator of the [LSB+]-dependent memory of stress. Moreover, the aggregated form of Gγ subunit Ste18, [STE+], behaving as a non-heritable mnemon in the wild-type strain, is generated more efficiently and becomes heritable in the absence of Ssb. Lack of Ssb also facilitates mitotic transmission, while lack of the Ssb cochaperone Hsp40-Zuo1 facilitates both spontaneous formation and mitotic transmission of the Ure2 prion, [URE3]. These results demonstrate that Ssb is a general modulator of cytosolic amyloid aggregation, whose effect is not restricted only to [PSI+].

Atomic force microscopy–based characterization of the interaction of PriA helicase with stalled DNA replication forks

In bacteria, the restart of stalled DNA replication forks requires the DNA helicase PriA. PriA can recognize and remodel abandoned DNA replication forks, unwind DNA in the 3'-to-5' direction, and facilitate the loading of the helicase DnaB onto the DNA to restart replication. Single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) is typically present at the abandoned forks, but it is unclear how SSB and PriA interact, although it has been shown that the two proteins interact both physically and functionally. Here, we used atomic force microscopy to visualize the interaction of PriA with DNA substrates with or without SSB. These experiments were done in the absence of ATP to delineate the substrate recognition pattern of PriA before its ATP-catalyzed DNA-unwinding reaction. These analyses revealed that in the absence of SSB, PriA binds preferentially to a fork substrate with a gap in the leading strand. Such a preference has not been observed for 5'- and 3'-tailed duplexes, suggesting that it is the fork structure that plays an essential role in PriA's selection of DNA substrates. Furthermore, we found that in the absence of SSB, PriA binds exclusively to the fork regions of the DNA substrates. In contrast, fork-bound SSB loads PriA onto the duplex DNA arms of forks, suggesting a remodeling of PriA by SSB. We also demonstrate that the remodeling of PriA requires a functional C-terminal domain of SSB. In summary, our atomic force microscopy analyses reveal key details in the interactions between PriA and stalled DNA replication forks with or without SSB.

Dynamics of the Interaction of RecG Protein with Stalled Replication Forks.

As a guardian of the bacterial genome, the RecG DNA helicase repairs DNA replication and rescues stalled replication. We applied atomic force microscopy (AFM) to directly visualize dynamics of RecG upon the interaction with replication fork substrates in the presence and absence of SSB using high-speed AFM. We directly visualized that RecG moves back and forth over dozens of base pairs in the presence of SSB. There is no RecG translocation in the absence of SSB. Computational modeling was performed to build models of Escherichia coli RecG in a free state and in complex with the fork. The simulations revealed the formation of complexes of RecG with the fork and identified conformational transitions that may be responsible for RecG remodeling that can facilitate RecG translocation along the DNA duplex. Such complexes do not form with the DNA duplex, which is in line with experimental data. Overall, our results provide mechanistic insights into the modes of interaction of RecG with the replication fork, suggesting a novel role of RecG in the repair of stalled DNA replication forks.

The Hsp70 homolog Ssb and the 14-3-3 protein Bmh1 jointly regulate transcription of glucose repressed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Chaperones of the Hsp70 family interact with a multitude of newly synthesized polypeptides and prevent their aggregation. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells lacking the Hsp70 homolog Ssb suffer from pleiotropic defects, among others a defect in glucose-repression. The highly conserved heterotrimeric kinase SNF1/AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) is required for the release from glucose-repression in yeast and is a key regulator of energy balance also in mammalian cells. When glucose is available the phosphatase Glc7 keeps SNF1 in its inactive, dephosphorylated state. Dephosphorylation depends on Reg1, which mediates targeting of Glc7 to its substrate SNF1. Here we show that the defect in glucose-repression in the absence of Ssb is due to the ability of the chaperone to bridge between the SNF1 and Glc7 complexes. Ssb performs this post-translational function in concert with the 14-3-3 protein Bmh, to which Ssb binds via its very C-terminus. Raising the intracellular concentration of Ssb or Bmh enabled Glc7 to dephosphorylate SNF1 even in the absence of Reg1. By that Ssb and Bmh efficiently suppressed transcriptional deregulation of Δreg1 cells. The findings reveal that Ssb and Bmh comprise a new chaperone module, which is involved in the fine tuning of a phosphorylation-dependent switch between respiration and fermentation.

RecG Interaction with the DNA Replication Fork. The Role of E. coli SSB Protein

The RecG DNA helicase is a guardian of the bacterial genome. It binds to a variety of forked DNA structures thereby minimizing pathological DNA replication and facilitating stalled replication fork rescue. It is becomingly increasingly clear that SSB plays a critical role in the function of RecG, but the mechanisms of its interaction with SSB remain unclear. Here we use the atomic force microscope (AFM) to image the structure of RecG with a model fork substrate in the presence or absence of the single strand DNA binding protein (SSB). The DNA substrate has a 3′-end 69nt single stranded DNA (ssDNA) segment inserted between the two DNA duplexes. This design mimics a stalled fork with an ssDNA gap in the leading strand. The SSB proteins bind very specifically to the ssDNA segment with a yield of ∼90%. RecG protein also binds to the fork but the yield was ∼10%. However, the RecG loading on the same substrate increases three-fold in the presence of SSB suggesting that SSB facilitates RecG loading onto the fork. Moreover, in the presence of SSB, RecG becomes capable of translocating along the DNA duplex in an ATP hydrolysis-independent manner. No such mobility of RecG was observed in the absence of SSB. The preferable translocation direction is moving of RecG along parental arm which implies RecG could clear obstacles bound ahead of the fork. This novel activity of SSB requires the SSB C-terminus as a truncated SSB mutant does not substitute for wild type. SSB loading of RecG and subsequent translocation are unaffected by ATP, ADP or the non-hydrolyzable analog ATP-γ-S. Overall the results obtained reveal novel properties of RecG and highlight a new chaperone-type role of SSB in the DNA repair process.

Partial Unwrapping of SSB from SsDNA Facilitates RecA Filament Formation

DNA breaks can be repaired by homologous recombination, a process that maintains genetic stability in an organism. A protein that is essential for this mechanism in E. coli is RecA. During repair, RecA must bind and form nucleoprotein filaments on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in direct competition with single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). Despite extensive studies, the mechanism behind this competitive process remains unclear.Here, we use high-resolution optical tweezers with simultaneous fluorescence microscopy to observe directly the mechanical properties of ssDNA-SSB, ssDNA-RecA, and ssDNA-SSB-RecA complexes under a range of tensions. This single-molecule assay allows us to probe and visualize simultaneously the interactions of RecA and SSB with ssDNA in real time and with nanometer resolution. Using a 70-nucleotide, poly-dT ssDNA construct designed to accommodate a single SSB, we investigated different scenarios of protein-DNA complex formation under a range of tensions between 0-10 pN.Individual SSBs on their own bind and condense ssDNA in discrete steps, the size of which depend on tension. Under low tensions (1-3 pN), an SSB wraps 50-70 nt of ssDNA in a single step. At higher tensions (>4 pN), SSB exhibit transient, partially wrapped states on ssDNA. In the absence of SSB, RecA filaments nucleate rapidly on ssDNA regardless of tension. In contrast, when RecA is added to ssDNA coated with an SSB, filament formation is inhibited at low tensions. At higher tensions, where the SSB can partially unwrap from ssDNA, we observe RecA filaments form after an extended lag time. Our results suggest a mechanism in which SSBs inhibit RecA by sequestering ssDNA. Tension-induced unwrapping of the SSB makes ssDNA available for RecA to bind and nucleate a filament.

Formation and Stability of E.Coli RecA Nucleoprotein Filament Regulated by Single-Stranded DNA Binding Protein

In Escherichia coli, the RecA nucleoprotein filament formed on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is essential for homologous recombinational DNA damage repair. In vivo, formation and stability of the RecA nucleoprotein filament is regulated by the single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). However, current understanding of RecA-ssDNA interaction has been mainly based on experiments in the absence of SSB. In this study, direct knowledge of the influence of SSB on the RecA nucleation, polymerization, and stability is obtained by single ssDNA manipulation method using magnetic tweezers. Our results reveal an SSB, force, and ATP hydrolysis dependent regulation of the RecA nucleoprotein filament formation and stability.

Formation Of RecA Filament During The Mechanical Unzipping Of dsDNA To ssDNA: Competition With SSB Differentially Controls RecA Mediated SOS Response And Replication Repair

RecA and its eukaryotic homologs Rad51 and Dmc1 carry out many DNA transactions: recombinational DNA damage repair, genome integration of incoming DNA, programmed recombination during meiosis, and stalled DNA replication forks processing, all reactions initiated forming a RecA ssDNA nucleoprotein filament. ssDNA/RecA interactions activate the “SOS” response through RecA co-protease activation, raising RecA concentration. RecA/ssDNA binding must be regulated such that it only occurs in specific situations: a feature involved in modulating specificity is competitive binding of SSB and RecA to ssDNA. We studied this competition using a magnetic tweezers assay system in which we follow the formation of RecA filaments, in the presence and absence of SSB, on a single ssDNA molecule obtained by mechanical unzipping of dsDNA. We examined various buffer conditions and the effects of several relevant nucleotides. When RecA and SSB tetramer are equimolar, SSB wins the competition and no stable RecA filament is observed; when RecA is in a 20-fold molar excess, stable RecA filament forms. At intermediate molar ratios mixed situations are observed. These results provide information on the competition dynamics between RecA and SSB at the single DNA molecule level. Our results confirm previous ensemble studies: RecA and SSB affinities for ssDNA provide an intrinsic differential control for RecA mediated DNA repair and recombination functions, independently by a RecA loading machinery. SOS response increases RecA concentration giving a molar ratio of RecA:SSB of ∼30:1 outcompeting SSB without need for loading factors. These studies show that a ssDNA/RecA filament is stable for much longer than any ssDNA/SSB complex examined. This could imply that the free energy for bound RecA is much lower than that for SSB.

Single-strand binding protein enhances invasion of a PNA strand to double-stranded DNA

We show that, in the presence of single-strand binding protein (SSB), one strand of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) efficiently invades double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in sequence-specific manner, as shown in Figure 1. In the absence of SSB, this kind of strand invasion never occurs. This significant enhancement of invasion can be applied to in vivo applications.

RecFOR proteins are essential for Pol V-mediated translesion synthesis and mutagenesis

When the replication fork moves through the template DNA containing lesions, daughter-strand gaps are formed opposite lesion sites. These gaps are subsequently filled-in either by translesion synthesis (TLS) or by homologous recombination. RecA filaments formed within these gaps are key intermediates for both of the gap-filling pathways. For instance, Pol V, the major lesion bypass polymerase in Escherichia coli, requires a functional interaction with the tip of the RecA filament. Here, we show that all three recombination mediator proteins RecFOR are needed to build a functionally competent RecA filament that supports efficient Pol V-mediated TLS in the presence of ssDNA-binding protein (SSB). A positive contribution of RecF protein to Pol V lesion bypass is demonstrated. When Pol III and Pol V are both present, Pol III imparts a negative effect on Pol V-mediated lesion bypass that is counteracted by the combined action of RecFOR and SSB. Mutations in recF, recO or recR gene abolish induced mutagenesis in E. coli.

Bipolar DNA Translocation Contributes to Highly Processive DNA Unwinding by RecBCD Enzyme

We recently demonstrated that the RecBCD enzyme is a bipolar DNA helicase that employs two single-stranded DNA motors of opposite polarity to drive translocation and unwinding of duplex DNA. We hypothesized that this organization may explain the exceptionally high rate and processivity of DNA unwinding catalyzed by the RecBCD enzyme. Using a stopped-flow dye displacement assay for unwinding activity, we test this idea by analyzing mutant RecBCD enzymes in which either of the two helicase motors is inactivated by mutagenesis. Like the wild-type RecBCD enzyme, the two mutant proteins maintain the ability to bind tightly to blunt duplex DNA ends in the absence of ATP. However, the rate of forward translocation for the RecB motor-defective enzyme is only approximately 30% of the wild-type rate, whereas for the RecD motor-defective enzyme, it is approximately 50%. More significantly, the processivity of translocation is substantially reduced by approximately 25- and 6-fold for each mutant enzyme, respectively. Despite retaining the capacity to bind blunt dsDNA, the RecB-mutant enzyme has lost the ability to unwind DNA unless the substrate contains a short 5'-terminated single-stranded DNA overhang. The consequences of this observation for the architecture of the single-stranded DNA motors in the initiation complex are discussed.

A DNA Pairing-enhanced Conformation of Bacterial RecA Proteins

The RecA proteins of Escherichia coli (Ec) and Deinococcus radiodurans (Dr) both promote a DNA strand exchange reaction involving two duplex DNAs. The four-strand exchange reaction promoted by the DrRecA protein is similar to that promoted by EcRecA, except that key parts of the reaction are inhibited by Ec single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB). In the absence of SSB, the initiation of strand exchange is greatly enhanced by dsDNA-ssDNA junctions at the ends of DNA gaps. This same trend is seen with the EcRecA protein. The results lead to an expansion of published hypotheses for the pathway for RecA-mediated DNA pairing, in which the slow first order step (observed in several studies) involves a structural transition to a state we designate P. The P state is identical to the state found when RecA is bound to double-stranded (ds) DNA. The structural state present when the RecA protein is bound to single-stranded (ss) DNA is designated A. The DNA pairing model in turn facilitates an articulation of three additional conclusions arising from the present work. 1) When a segment of a RecA filament bound to ssDNA is forced into the P state (as RecA bound to the ssDNA immediately adjacent to dsDNA-ssDNA junction), the segment becomes "pairing enhanced." 2) The unusual DNA pairing properties of the D. radiodurans RecA protein can be explained by postulating this protein has a more stringent requirement to initiate DNA strand exchange from the P state. 3) RecA filaments bound to dsDNA (P state) have directly observable structural changes relative to RecA filaments bound to ssDNA (A state), involving the C-terminal domain.

Lack of interference of DNA single-strand breaks with the measurement of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells using the neutral filter elution assay.

In this study, the effect of DNA single strand breaks (ssb) on the neutral (pH 9.6) filter elution of DNA from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO K1) cells containing DNA double strand breaks (dsb) was investigated. Protein associated ssb were induced by the inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I with camptothecin (cpt). Protein associated dsb were introduced by treating cells with the DNA topoisomerase II poison; etoposide (VP-16). Protein associated ssb and dsb were converted to ssb and dsb by proteinase K present in the lysis solution. In some experiments dsb were generated by the restriction endonuclease Pvu II. It was found that elution of DNA in the presence and absence of ssb was similar under neutral conditions. This finding is consistent with the view that the fast component of the bi-phasic repair kinetics observed in irradiated mammalian cells with the neutral filter elution technique is not attributable to the interference of ssb with the measurement of dsb, and thus suggests that the two components of repair observed with the neutral filter elution elution technique may represent two different types of dsb or modes of repair of dsb.

Mechanism of stimulation of T7 DNA polymerase by Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB).

Single-stranded DNA binding protein is a key component in growth of bacteriophage T7. In addition, DNA synthesis by the purified in vitro replication system is markedly stimulated when the DNA template is coated with Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). In an attempt to understand the mechanism for this stimulation, we have studied the effect of E. coli SSB on DNA synthesis by the T7 DNA polymerase using a primed single-stranded M13 DNA template which serves as a model for T7 lagging strand DNA synthesis. Polyacrylamide gel analysis of the DNA product synthesized on this template in the absence of SSB indicated that the T7 DNA polymerase pauses at many specific sites, some stronger than others. By comparing the position of pausing with the DNA sequence of this region and by using a DNA template that contains an extremely stable hairpin structure, it was found that many, but not all, of these pause positions correspond to regions of potential secondary structure. The presence of SSB during synthesis resulted in a large reduction in the frequency of hesitations at many sites that correspond to these secondary structures. However, the facts that a large percentage of the pause sites remain unaffected even at saturating levels of SSB and that SSB stimulates synthesis on a singly primed poly(dA) template suggested that other mechanisms also contribute to the stimulation of DNA synthesis caused by SSB. Using a sucrose gradient analysis, we found that SSB increases the affinity of the polymerase for single-stranded DNA that this increased binding is only noticed when the polymerase concentration is limiting. The effect of this difference in polymerase affinity was clearly observed by a polyacrylamide gel analysis of the product DNA synthesized during a limited DNA synthesis reaction using conditions where only two nucleotides are added to the primer. Under these circumstances, where the presence of hairpin structures should not contribute to the stimulatory effect of SSB, we found that the extension of the primer is stimulated 4-fold if the DNA template is coated with SSB. Furthermore, SSB had no effect on this synthesis at large polymerase to template ratios.

RecA protein promoted DNA strand exchange.

recA protein and circular single-stranded DNA form a stable complex in the presence of single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB), in which one recA protein monomer is bound per two nucleotides of DNA. These complexes are kinetically significant intermediates in the exchange of strands between the single-stranded DNA and an homologous linear duplex. After completion of strand exchange, the recA protein remains tightly associated with the circular duplex product of the reaction and the SSB is bound to the displaced linear single strand. Upon addition of ADP, the recA protein-duplex DNA complex dissociates. RecA protein also interacts with single-stranded DNA in the absence of SSB; however, the amount of recA protein bound is substantially reduced. These findings provide direct physical evidence for the participation of SSB in the formation of the recA protein-single-stranded DNA complexes inferred earlier from kinetic analysis. Moreover, they confirm the ability of recA protein to equilibrate between bound and free forms in the absence of SSB.

On the role of single-stranded DNA binding protein in recA protein-promoted DNA strand exchange.

RecA protein-promoted DNA strand exchange is greatly stimulated by the single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) of Escherichia coli. Stimulation is not a consequence of the binding of SSB to excess single-stranded DNA. It results instead from stabilization of recA protein-single-stranded DNA complexes formed in the presence of ATP and SSB. In the presence of SSB, recA protein does not measurably dissociate from these complexes for up to 90 min. However, in its absence, recA protein moves rapidly between two populations of single-stranded DNA, and complete equilibration occurs with t 1/2 of 17 s. Rapid transfer of recA protein to single-stranded DNA occurs during all stages of DNA strand exchange and does not require ATP. The transfer involves an equilibrium between free and bound recA protein rather than a direct redistribution between single-stranded DNA molecules. Thus, SSB prevents dissociation of recA protein from single-stranded DNA, rendering the binding of the recA protein to single-stranded DNA irreversible. Under these conditions, the pairing phase of the strand exchange reaction is accelerated to the point that it is no longer rate-limiting. These results can explain the relative inefficiency of DNA strand exchange in the absence of SSB.