It is well known that the amplitude of H-max or any level of H-reflex varies with posture, age, long-term training, physical condition, and/or conditioned stimulation. On the other hand, the amplitude of M-max has been suggested to be neurophysiologically constant, regardless of tested muscle length or any other conditions given, such as prepost training. However, there has been recent debate in the literature concerning the change in M-max during prolonged testing (Crone et al., 1999.) PURPOSE To demonstrate if passive changes in muscle length have differential effects on the soleus H-reflex and soleus M-wave between young and elderly subjects in the prone position. METHODS Fifteen (8 males, 7 females) young active subjects (mean age, 24.7 ± 3.5 years) and 15 (6 males, 9 females) elderly independent subjects (mean age, 70.6 ± 5.1 years) participated in the present study. All subjects read and signed an informed consent form, approved by the university. Soleus H-reflexes were elicited by a 1 ms duration square-wave pulse with the cathode, a 0.9 cm diameter stimulating electrode (Ag-AgCl) placed in the popliteal fossa of the left leg. Subjects were positioned on an isokinetic dynamometer examination table in the prone position with the left foot secured to the footplate and attached to the dynamometer with Velcro straps. The left ankle joint was randomly adjusted to 4 different angles: 10 and 20 deg of dorsiflexion, 10 and 20 deg of plantarflexion and neutral position (0 deg) while the limb was relaxed. 2 × 5 (groups × joint angles) ANOVA model was conducted to examine the difference in each mean peak-to-peak EMG amplitude of the H-max and M-max (mV) and H-max/M-max ratio (%) for each of the groups across the different joint angles. RESULTS Young subjects showed differences in both the H-max and M-max across different muscle lengths (p<0.05). In contrast, elderly subjects demonstrated much less modulation due to muscle length, with only significant differences in the amplitude of H-max at 20 deg of DF (p<0.05). Since no postural balance efforts were required in the prone position, these findings reflect segmental changes only. CONCLUSION This study supports previous investigations in which elderly subjects had less ability to modulate the soleus H-reflex during voluntary activation. The current study supports that elderly also produce less modulation, even in the absence of movement. We conclude that segmental mechanisms, perhaps PI to the Ia terminal regulates these differences.